Home Spina bifida – a follow-up study of neonates born from 1991 to 2001
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Spina bifida – a follow-up study of neonates born from 1991 to 2001

  • Krzysztof Preis , Malgorzata Swiatkowska-Freund and Iwona Janczewska
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2005

Abstract

Aims. To follow the development of children born with myelomeningocoele.

Methods. We followed 54 infants born with myelomeningocele between 1991 and 2001 in the Obstetrical Department of the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.

Results. The mortality rate for live births was 40.8%. 13.0% of the children were stillborn and 5.5% were lost for observation. Late diagnosis, a high localization of the lesion, the presence of other malformations, and low birth weight increased the risk of death. Diagnosis was most commonly made in the 31–35th week of pregnancy. For 18.5% of the subjects, the diagnosis was postnatal. There was no correlation between the time and mode of delivery and mental development. Only some of the children were able to walk, to use braces, or use a wheelchair. Most of the children had poor bladder and bowel control. We found a correlation between these dysfunctions and the level of myelomeningocele.

Conclusions. Myelomeningocoele is associated with high rates of mortality and severe psychomotoric retardation. The localization of the lesion has an impact on survival rate and sphincter control. Mental development depends on neonatal condition after delivery. Mode of delivery does not influence the child's further development.

:

Corresponding author: Krzysztof Preis, MD Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdansk, Kliniczna 1A, 80-402 Gdansk/Poland,

References

1 Bartecki B: Rehabilitation in children with myelomeningocoele. XVI Symposium of Polish Society of Pediatric Surgery Gorzow 1991, 41Search in Google Scholar

2 Bruner JP, N Tulipan, RL Paschal: Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocoele and the Incidence of Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus. JAMA282 (1999) 1819Search in Google Scholar

3 Chervenak FA, L Duncan, IR Ment: Perinatal management of myelomeningocoele. Obstet Gynecol63 (1984) 376Search in Google Scholar

4 Cochrane D, B Irwin, K Chambers: Clinical outcomes that fetal surgery for myelomeningocoele needs to achieve. Eur J Pediatr Surg11 Suppl I (2001) 1810.1055/s-2001-19738Search in Google Scholar

5 Hunt G: Open spina bifida: The Cambridge cohort in their twenties. Eur J Pediatr Surg2Suppl I (1992) 39Search in Google Scholar

6 Kolble N, TAG Huisman, M Stallmach, M Meuli, FZR Imahorn, R Zimmermann: Prenatal diagnosis of the fetus with lumbal myelocystocoele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol18 (2001) 536Search in Google Scholar

7 Liu SL, DB Shurtleff, RG Ellenbogen JD Loser, R Kropp: 19-year Follow-up of fetal myelomeningocoele brought to term. Eur J Pediatr Surg9Suppl I (1999) 1210.1055/s-2008-1072304Search in Google Scholar

8 Lodzinski K: Dysrrhaphia. In: Poradowska W: Pediatric surgery. PZWL, Warsaw 1992Search in Google Scholar

9 Lodzinski K, Z Dudkiewicz, S Jaworski: Evolution of myelomeningocoele treatment. XVI 9. Symposium of Polish Society of Pediatric Surgery Gorzow (1991) 17Search in Google Scholar

10 Mac Mahon RA: Pediatric Surgery. PZWL, Warsaw 1990Search in Google Scholar

11 Marianowski L, R Debski: Prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations. Ultrasonografia Pediatryczna (1999) 364Search in Google Scholar

12 McLone DG, TP Naidich: Myelomeingocoele: outcome and late complications. Ped Neurosurg: Surgery of the Developing Nervous System. Saunders, Philadephia1989, pp 53Search in Google Scholar

13 Mirzai H, Y Ersahin, S Mutluer, A Kayahan: Outcome of patients with myelomeningocoele. Child's Nerv Syst14 (1998) 120Search in Google Scholar

14 Osemlak J: Morphology and classification of dysrrhaphic malformations of central nervous system. Ped Pol9–10 (1992); Suppl 466Search in Google Scholar

15 Polis L, K Szaflik: In utero treatment of hydrocephaly. Neurologia Dziecieca, 816 (1999) 23Search in Google Scholar

16 Ralis ZA: Traumatizing effect of breech delivery on infants with spina bifida. J Pediatr87 (1975) 61310.1016/S0022-3476(75)80838-9Search in Google Scholar

17 Roszkowski T: Diagnosis of fetal malformations. Klinika5; 1 (1998) 33Search in Google Scholar

18 Roszkowski M, S Barszcz, Z Turkowski: Operative cerebral endoscopy in hydrocephaly treatment. Neur Neurochir Pol31 (1997) 805Search in Google Scholar

19 Roszkowski M, L Skobejko, S Barszcz: Diagnosis and surgical treatment of Tethered spine syndrome. Postepy pediatrii; LXXI2(1996) 135Search in Google Scholar

20 Stark G, M Drummond: Spina bifida as an obstetric problem. Develop Med Child Neurol Suppl22 (1970) 157Search in Google Scholar

21 Steinbok P, B Irvine, D Cohrane, BJ Irvin: Long-term outcome and complications of children born with myelomeningocoele. Child's Nerv Syst8 (1992) 92Search in Google Scholar

22 Sutton LN, NS Adzick, LT Bilaniuk: Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelome-ningocoele. JAMA282 (1999) 1826Search in Google Scholar

23 Szaflik K: Intensive fetal therapy. In: Breborowicz GH: High Risk Pregnancy. PAN, Poznan 2000Search in Google Scholar

24 Wilczynski J, K Szaflik, M Respondek-Liberska, T Stetkierwicz: Malformations of the fetus – management. In: Breborowicz GH: High Risk Pregnancy. PAN, Poznan 2000Search in Google Scholar

25 Wocjan J: Congenital nervous system malformations and genetic disorders. In: Bidzinski J: Neurosurgery. PZWL, Warsaw 1998Search in Google Scholar

26 Wosko IP: Orthopedic and rehabilitation problems in children with myelomeningocoele. Folium, Lublin 1995Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2005-07-01
Published in Print: 2005-07-01

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2005.062/html
Scroll to top button