Home Forging CLIL Teacher Identities in Kazakhstan: Developmental Pathways of Two University Teachers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Forging CLIL Teacher Identities in Kazakhstan: Developmental Pathways of Two University Teachers

  • D. Philip Montgomery

    D. Philip Montgomery is an assistant professor of Multilingual Education at Nazarbayev University in Kazakhstan. His research interests include language teacher education, language policy, and language ideology.

    , Peter I. De Costa

    Peter I. De Costa is a professor in the Department of Linguistics and Languages and the Department of Teacher Education at Michigan State University. His research areas include emotions, identity, ideology and ethics in educational linguistics.

    and Yuliya Novitskaya

    Yuliya Novitskaya is Head of the Foreign Language Department at Kazakh American Free University (KAFU). She has been a lecturer, advisor, and manager of partnerships with universities, businesses, and foundations in Kazakhstan, Russia, Great Britain, Singapore, and the U.S.

Published/Copyright: February 28, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

As universities in Kazakhstan continue to address the challenges that come with developing English-medium instruction (EMI) programs, university Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) teachers need to develop capacities to teach in English, while their English teacher counterparts need to develop content-specific pedagogical knowledge. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) pedagogies, defined as the integration of both language and content curricular goals, have emerged as a vehicle to facilitate this development for both types of teachers. However, what it means to be a CLIL teacher may vary considerably as teachers leverage their professional knowledge and personal experiences. We, therefore, explore teachers’ conceptions of CLIL and how their disciplinary, linguistic, and pedagogical backgrounds enable or burden them to forge a “CLIL teacher” identity. This qualitative study illustrates the salient points of the journeys taken by two university teachers, one a specialist in oil and gas, the other an English teacher and teacher educator. Drawing on extended one-on-one interviews, we present two teachers’ experiences through a series of CLIL-informed workshops. Using a multidisciplinary analytical framework, we map the ways in which the two teacher participants negotiate their identities in relation to CLIL. The findings highlight the importance of understanding teacher experiences, particularly their language learning backgrounds, attitudes toward supporting student learning, and relationships with their colleagues as they work to adapt to teaching English and STEM subjects in university EMI contexts.

About the authors

D. Philip Montgomery

D. Philip Montgomery is an assistant professor of Multilingual Education at Nazarbayev University in Kazakhstan. His research interests include language teacher education, language policy, and language ideology.

Peter I. De Costa

Peter I. De Costa is a professor in the Department of Linguistics and Languages and the Department of Teacher Education at Michigan State University. His research areas include emotions, identity, ideology and ethics in educational linguistics.

Yuliya Novitskaya

Yuliya Novitskaya is Head of the Foreign Language Department at Kazakh American Free University (KAFU). She has been a lecturer, advisor, and manager of partnerships with universities, businesses, and foundations in Kazakhstan, Russia, Great Britain, Singapore, and the U.S.

References

Aguilar, M. (2017). Engineering lecturers’ views on CLIL and EMI. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(6), 722-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.107366410.1080/13670050.2015.1073664Search in Google Scholar

Aitzhanova, K. (2020). Perceptions and attitudes of students towards multilingual practices in an EMI STEM classroom at two Kazakhstani universities. Unpublished thesis, Nazarbayev University.Search in Google Scholar

Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Banegas, D. L. (2019). Teacher professional development in language-driven CLIL: A case study. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 12(2), 242-264. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.310.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.3Search in Google Scholar

Banegas, D. L., Montgomery, D. P., & Raud, N. (2025). Student-teachers’ understanding of language teaching through the CLIL language triptych. Learning and Instruction, 95(102044). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.10204410.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102044Search in Google Scholar

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480300190310.1017/S0261444803001903Search in Google Scholar

Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96, 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.xSearch in Google Scholar

Codó, E., & Patiño-Santos, A. (2018). CLIL, unequal working conditions and neoliberal subjectivities in a state secondary school. Language Policy, 17(4), 479-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-017-9451-510.1007/s10993-017-9451-5Search in Google Scholar

Comer, J. P., Joyner, E. T., & Ben-Avie, M. (Eds.). (2004). Six pathways to healthy child development and academic success: The field guide to Comer schools in action. Thousand Oaks.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108914505Search in Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Flook, L., Gardner, M., & Melnick, H. (2019). With the whole child in mind: Insights from the Comer School Development Program. ACSD.Search in Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.10.54300/122.311Search in Google Scholar

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35, 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400019110.1017/S0267190514000191Search in Google Scholar

Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching, 56(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482100005710.1017/S0261444821000057Search in Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2012a). How to carry out case study research. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 95-116). Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444347340.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2012b). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In A. Mackey & S.M. Gass (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 410-426). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2019). Social dimensions and processes in second language acquisition: Multilingual socialization in transnational contexts. Modern Language Journal, 103, 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.1253410.1111/modl.12534Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, B., & Kambatyrova, A. (2022). Both necessary and irrelevant: Political economy and linguistic injustice of English in higher education in Kazakhstan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 277, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-007410.1515/ijsl-2021-0074Search in Google Scholar

Hajar, A., & Mhamed, A. A. S. (2021). Exploring postgraduate students’ challenges and strategy use while writing a master’s thesis in an English-medium university in Kazakhstan. Tertiary Education and Management, 27(3), 187-207.10.1007/s11233-021-09072-6Search in Google Scholar

Hemmi, C., & Banegas, D. L. (2021). International perspectives on CLIL. Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-70095-9Search in Google Scholar

Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Shashken, A. (2021). Exploring the potential of CLIL in Kazakhstan: A qualitative study. Revista Complutense de Educación, 32(2), 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rced.6834510.5209/rced.68345Search in Google Scholar

Karabassova, L. (2020). Understanding trilingual education reform in Kazakhstan: Why is it stalled? In D. Egéa (Ed.), Education in Central Asia (pp. 37-51). Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-50127-3_3Search in Google Scholar

Karabassova, L. (2022a). Is top-down CLIL justified? A grounded theory exploration of secondary school science teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1530-1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.177578110.1080/13670050.2020.1775781Search in Google Scholar

Karabassova, L. (2022b). Teachers’ conceptualization of content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Evidence from a trilingual context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(3), 787-799. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.155004810.1080/13670050.2018.1550048Search in Google Scholar

Karimsakova, A. S., Yermenova, K. K., & Kuzembayeva, G. A. (2018). CLIL implementation in West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University: Challenges and experience. West Kazakhstan Medical Journal, 1(57), 63-67.Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Y. Y. (2019). Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: Does professional development help? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(7), 818-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.131882110.1080/13670050.2017.1318821Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Y. Y. (2020). Professional development of CLIL teachers. Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-2425-7Search in Google Scholar

McDougald, J. S. (2020). What is next for CLIL professional development? Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 12(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.110.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.1Search in Google Scholar

Montgomery, D. P., & De Costa, P. I. (2024). Leveraging relational agency: CLIL teacher collaboration in one Kazakhstani university. RELC Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688224123475610.1177/00336882241234756Search in Google Scholar

Morton, T. (2016). Being a language teacher in the content classroom: Teacher identity and content and language integrated learning (CLIL). In Preece, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp. 382-395). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Norton, B., & De Costa, P. I. (2018). Research tasks on identity and language education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481700032510.1017/S0261444817000325Search in Google Scholar

Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: Tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 593-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.128629210.1080/13670050.2017.1286292Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2016). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: In-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 266-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.98077810.1080/13670050.2014.980778Search in Google Scholar

Relaño Pastor, A. M. (2019). Language socialization and teachers’ agency in Castilla-La Mancha bilingual programs: Appropriations and transformations. Foro de Educación, 17(27), 65-89. https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.70210.14516/fde.702Search in Google Scholar

San Isidro, X. (2018). Innovations and Challenges in CLIL Implementation in Europe. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.148403810.1080/00405841.2018.1484038Search in Google Scholar

Selvi, A. F. (2020). Qualitative content analysis. In J. McKinley, & H. Rose (Eds.), Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 440-452). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471-3710.4324/9780367824471-37Search in Google Scholar

Simons, H. (2014). Case study research: In-depth understanding in context. In P. Leavy (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 455-470). Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.005Search in Google Scholar

Tan, M. (2011). Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15, 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216881140115310.1177/1362168811401153Search in Google Scholar

Acknowledgments

This project was conducted with funding from the U. S. -Kazakhstan University Partnerships program funded by the U. S. Mission to Kazakhstan and administered by American Councils [Award number SKZ100-19-CA-0149]. The authors thank American Councils for their support in advancing Kazakh-American academic partnerships, and colleagues at Kazakh-American Free University for their logistical and technical support throughout the project.

Published Online: 2025-02-28
Published in Print: 2025-02-25

© 2025 BFSU, FLTRP, Walter de Gruyter, Cultural and Education Section British Embassy

Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CJAL-2025-0103/html
Scroll to top button