Home Literary Studies “Find me a motive!” Accusatory Rhetoric, Narrative and Values in Emile Zola’s ‘J’accuse’
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Find me a motive!” Accusatory Rhetoric, Narrative and Values in Emile Zola’s ‘J’accuse’

  • Stefan Iversen
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In classical rhetoric, the accusation or kategoria was considered to be tied to an act of telling a story. In accusing someone for a breach of policy or character, the narrative of how that breach came about was key. This vital connection between accusation and narrative, however, has not been developed by contemporary approaches in narrative theory or rhetorical criticism; works on how narratives negotiate meaning and value have not looked at accusations, and the surprisingly sparse work done on accusations has not looked at the roles played by narratives. This article sets out to probe the relationship between accusatory speech acts, the negotiations of values, and the telling of stories. Through a reading of Emile Zola’s ‘J’accuse’.

Abstract

In classical rhetoric, the accusation or kategoria was considered to be tied to an act of telling a story. In accusing someone for a breach of policy or character, the narrative of how that breach came about was key. This vital connection between accusation and narrative, however, has not been developed by contemporary approaches in narrative theory or rhetorical criticism; works on how narratives negotiate meaning and value have not looked at accusations, and the surprisingly sparse work done on accusations has not looked at the roles played by narratives. This article sets out to probe the relationship between accusatory speech acts, the negotiations of values, and the telling of stories. Through a reading of Emile Zola’s ‘J’accuse’.

Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111440804-007/html
Scroll to top button