Home Business & Economics Legitimation strategies in an emerging field: family firm succession consultancy in Germany
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Legitimation strategies in an emerging field: family firm succession consultancy in Germany

  • Regina Lenz EMAIL logo , Claudia Schormüller and Johannes Glückler
Published/Copyright: February 14, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Finding a successor has become a severe challenge for family firms in Germany. As family firms are disproportionately concentrated in rural economies, succession has also become a considerable threat for peripheral regions and their labor markets. It therefore lies in the interest of regional stakeholders to help support family business continuity. One way to do this is by providing consulting services for family entrepreneurs, especially when searching for a family-external successor. Succession consultancy, however is still in its infancy. Applying the framework of the organizational field that centers on the concept of legitimacy, this paper examines the strategies consultants employ in order to get selected by family entrepreneurs in their succession process, as well as consultants’ strategies to match family firms with external successors. Based on expert interviews with succession consultants in the region of Upper Palatinate in Bavaria, we demonstrate the importance of geography and interpersonal linkages in establishing legitimacy in the early stages of field formation, when heterogeneous groups of actors offer their services without set rules or standards. Our content analysis sheds light on the variety of strategies based on trust, networked, and public reputation in order to gain legitimacy as consultants, depending on whether or not they can draw on existing relationships with family firms. We furthermore identify a discrepancy between these legitimation strategies and the actual ways that consultants use to match family firms with external successors. Here, regardless of their previous contact with family firms, geography plays a major role in constraining both consulting and succession: Family firms more readily accept local consultants, and the consultants also preferred to screen succession candidates through their regional networks due to the higher chances of successful succession when finding external successors from within the same region. Conceptually, our analysis contributes to institutional theory by carving out legitimacy-enhancing mechanisms in emerging organizational fields, and by demonstrating the crucial role of geography and interpersonal linkages for succession as well as field formation processes.

Bibliography

Ahrens, J.-P./Calabrò, A./Huybrechts, J./Woywode, M. (2019): The enigma of the family successor – firm performance relationship: A methodological reflection and reconciliation attempt. In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (43)3, 437–474.10.1177/1042258718816290Search in Google Scholar

Armbrüster, T. (2006): The Economics and Sociology of Management Consulting. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511488467Search in Google Scholar

Auschra, C./Schmidt, T./Sydow, J. (2019): Entrepreneurial ecosystems as fields: Integrating meso-level institutional theory. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, (64)2–4, 64–78.10.1515/zfw-2018-0016Search in Google Scholar

Bachmann, R. (2001): Trust, power and control in transorganizational relations. In: Organization Studies, (22)2, 337–365.10.1177/0170840601222007Search in Google Scholar

Barach, J. A./Ganitsky, J. B. (1995): Successful succession in family business. In: Family Business Review, (8)2, 131–155.10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00131.xSearch in Google Scholar

Barbera, F./Hasso, T. (2013): Do we need to use an accountant? The sales growth and survival benefits to family SMEs. In: Family Business Review, (26)3, 271–292.10.1177/0894486513487198Search in Google Scholar

Basco, R./Bartkevičiūtė, I. (2016): Is there any room for family business into European Union 2020 Strategy? Family business and regional public policy. In: Local Economy, (31)6, 709–732.10.1177/0269094216664485Search in Google Scholar

Battisti, M./Williamson, A. J. (2015): The role of intermediaries in the small business transfer process. In: Small Enterprise Research, (22)1, 32–48.10.1080/13215906.2015.1022129Search in Google Scholar

Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik (2018): Regionalisierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung für Bayern bis 2037. Demographisches Profil für den Regierungsbezirk Oberpfalz. Fürth.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, P. L./Luckmann, T. (1969): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie. Frankfurt am Main.Search in Google Scholar

Bethge, I. (2013): Basel III: Die Folgen für den Mittelstand. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Cesaroni, F. M./Sentuti, A. (2017): Family business succession and external advisors: The relevance of ‘soft’ issues. In: Small Enterprise Research, (24)2, 167–188.10.1080/13215906.2017.1338193Search in Google Scholar

Chua, J. H./Chrisman, J. J./Sharma, P. (2003): Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationship with nonfamily managers. In: Family Business Review, (16)2, 89–107.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00089.xSearch in Google Scholar

Colyvas, J. A./Powell, W. W. (2006): Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaaries between public and private science. In: Research in Organizational Behavior, (27), 305–353.10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4Search in Google Scholar

Coraiola, D. M./Suddaby, R. (2018): Organizational fields as mnemonic communities. In: Glückler, J./Suddaby, R./Lenz, R. (Eds.): Knowledge and Institutions. Cham, 45–68.10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_3Search in Google Scholar

Cucculelli, M./Micucci, G. (2008): Family succession and firm performance: Evidence from Italian family firms. In: Journal of Corporate Finance, (14)1, 17–31.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Das, T. K./Teng, B. S. (2001): Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. In: Organization Studies, (22)2, 251–283.10.1177/0170840601222004Search in Google Scholar

David, R. J./Sine, W. D./Haveman, H. A. (2013): Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. In: Organization Science, (24)2, 356–377.10.1287/orsc.1120.0745Search in Google Scholar

De Massis, A./Chua, J. H./Chrisman, J. J. (2008): Factors preventing intra-family succession. In: Family Business Review, (21)2, 183–199.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.xSearch in Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J./Powell, W. W. (1983): The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: American Sociological Review, (48)2, 147–160.10.2307/j.ctv1f886rp.7Search in Google Scholar

Farrell, H. (2018): The shared challenges of institutional theories: Rational choice, historical institutionalism, and sociological institutionalism. In: Glückler, J./Suddaby, R./Lenz, R. (Eds.): Knowledge and Institutions. Cham, 23–44.10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A./Corley, K. G./Hamilton, A. (2012): Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. In: Organizational Research Methods, (16)1, 15–31.10.1177/1094428112452151Search in Google Scholar

Glückler, J. (2004): Reputationsnetze: Zur Internationalisierung von Unternehmensberatern. Eine relationale Theorie. Bielefeld.10.1515/9783839402658-009Search in Google Scholar

Glückler, J. (2005): Making embeddedness work: Social practice institutions in foreign consulting markets. In: Environment and Planning A, (37)10, 1727–1750.10.1068/a3727Search in Google Scholar

Glückler, J. (2006): A relational assessment of international market entry in management consulting. In: Journal of Economic Geography, (6), 369–393.10.1093/jeg/lbi016Search in Google Scholar

Glückler, J. (2017): Services and innovation. In: Bathelt, H., Cohendet, P./Henn, S./Simon, L. (Eds.): The Elgar Companion to Innovation and Knowledge Creation. A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cheltenham, 258–274.10.4337/9781782548522.00025Search in Google Scholar

Glückler, J./Suddaby, R./Lenz, R. (2018): On the spatiality of institutions and knowledge. In: Glückler, J./Suddaby, R./Lenz, R. (Eds.): Knowledge and Institutions. Cham, 1–19.10.1007/978-3-319-75328-7_1Search in Google Scholar

Glückler, J./Armbrüster, T. (2003): Bridging uncertainty in management consulting: The mechanisms of trust and networked reputation. In: Organization Studies, (24)2, 269–297.10.1177/0170840603242004Search in Google Scholar

Gottschalk, S./Egeln, J./Kinne, J./Hauer, A./Keese, D./Oehme, M. (2017): Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. München.Search in Google Scholar

Greenwood, R./Suddaby, R./Hinings, C. R. (2002): Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. In: The Academy of Management Journal, (45)1, 58–80.10.2307/3069285Search in Google Scholar

Greenwood, R./Suddaby, R. (2006): Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. In: Academy of Management Journal, (49)1, 27–48.10.5465/amj.2006.20785498Search in Google Scholar

Hargadon, A.B./Douglas, Y. (2001): When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, (46)3, 476–501.10.2307/3094872Search in Google Scholar

Jansson, J. (2014): Temporary events and spaces in the Swedish primary art market. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, (58)4, 202–215.10.1515/zfw.2014.0014Search in Google Scholar

Jung, H. (2015): Überblick über die Formen der Unternehmensnachfolge. In: Wegmann, J./Wiesehahn, A. (Eds.): Unternehmensnachfolge. Praxishandbuch für Familienunternehmen. Wiesbaden, 53–63.10.1007/978-3-658-07820-1_4Search in Google Scholar

Kay, R./Suprinovič, O. (2013): Unternehmensnachfolgen in Deutschland 2014 bis 2018. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Kay, R./Suprinovič, O./Schlömer-Laufen, N. (2018): Unternehmensnachfolgen in Deutschland 2018–2022. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Kempert, W./Baum, S. B./Miels, M./Heinzel, C./Sievers, H. (2016): Standards ordnungsgemäßer Nachfolgeberatung. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

King, S. (2003): Organizational performance and conceptual capability: The relationship between organizational performance and successors’ capability in a family-owned firm. In: Family Business Review, (16)3, 173–182.10.1177/08944865030160030301Search in Google Scholar

Lange, B./Power, D./Suwala, L. (2014): Geographies of field-configuring events. In: Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, (58)4, 187–201.10.1515/zfw.2014.0013Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B./Dover, G. (2015): Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, (60)3, 371–410.10.1177/0001839215589813Search in Google Scholar

Maguire, S./Hardy, C./Lawrence, T. B. (2004): Instituional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. In: Academy of Management Journal, (47)5, 657–679.10.2307/20159610Search in Google Scholar

Mandl, I. (2008): Overview of Family Business Relevant Issues. Final report. Vienna.Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P./Fenzl, T. (2019): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In: Baur, N./Blasius, J. (Eds.): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden, 633–648.10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_42Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, J. W./Rowan, B. (1977): Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology, (83)2, 340–363.10.2307/j.ctv1f886rp.6Search in Google Scholar

Mickelson, R. E./Worley, C. (2003): Acquiring a family firm: A case study. In: Family Business Review, (16)4, 251–268.10.1177/08944865030160040401Search in Google Scholar

Miller, D./Steier, L./Le Breton-Miller, I. (2003): Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. In: Journal of Business Venturing, (18)4, 513–531.10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2Search in Google Scholar

Minichilli, A./Nordqvist, M./Corbetta, G./Amore, M. D. (2014): CEO succession mechanisms, organizational context, and performance: A socio‐emotional wealth perspective on family‐controlled firms. In: Journal of Management Studies, (51)7, 1153–1179.10.1111/joms.12095Search in Google Scholar

Molly, V./Laveren, E./Deloof, M. (2010): Family business succession and its impact on financial structure and performance. In: Family Business Review, (23)2, 131–147.10.1177/089448651002300203Search in Google Scholar

Mumford, M. D./Marks, M./Connelly, M. S./Zaccaro, S. J./Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000): Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. In: The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 87–114.10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00044-2Search in Google Scholar

Murmann, J. (2018): Facts & Figues zum Beratermarkt 2018. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Murmann, J. (2019): Facts & Figues zum Beratermarkt 2019. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar

Murray, B. (2003): The succession transition process: A longitudinal perspective. In: Family Business Review, (16)1, 17–33.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar

Naldi, L./Chirico, F./Kellermanns, F. W./Campopiano, G. (2015): All in the family? An exploratory study of family member advisors and firm performance. In: Family Business Review, (28)3, 227–242.10.1177/0894486515581951Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, C. (1991): Strategic Responses to institutional processes. In: Academy of Management Review, (16)1, 145–179.10.2307/258610Search in Google Scholar

Preminger, B./Drori, G. S. (2016): How institutions get materialized in space: “Spatialized logics” along Jerusalem’s western wall. In: Gehman, J./Lounsbury, M./Greenwood, R. (Eds.): How Institutions Matter. Bingley, 101–136.10.1108/S0733-558X201600048A004Search in Google Scholar

Rädiker, S./Kuckartz, U. (2019): Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA. Wiesbaden.10.1007/978-3-658-22095-2Search in Google Scholar

Reay, T./Pearson, A. W./Dyer, W. G. (2013): Advising family enterprise: Examining the role of family firm advisors. In: Family Business Review, (26)3, 209–214.10.1177/0894486513494277Search in Google Scholar

Reddrop, A./Mapunda, G. (2015): Family businesses: Seekers of advice. In: Journal of Family Business Management, (5)1, 90–115.10.1108/JFBM-08-2014-0018Search in Google Scholar

Royer, S./Simons, R./Boyd, B./Rafferty, A. (2008): Promoting family: A contingency model of family business succession. In: Family Business Review, (21)1, 15–30.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007.00108.xSearch in Google Scholar

Salvato, C./Corbetta, G. (2013): Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. In: Family Business Review, (26)3, 235–255.10.1177/0894486513490796Search in Google Scholar

Scholes, L./Westhead, P./Burrows, A. (2008): Family firm succession: The management buy‐out and buy‐in routes. In: Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, (15)1, 8–30.10.1108/14626000810850829Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, P./Chrisman, J. J./Chua, J. H. (2003): Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. In: Family Business Review, (16)1, 1–15.10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00001.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sharma, P./Irving, P. G. (2005): Four Bases of Family Business Successor Commitment: Antecedents and Consequences. In: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (29)1, 13–33.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00067.xSearch in Google Scholar

Steier, L. P./Miller, D. (2010): Pre- and post-succession governance philosophies in entrepreneurial family firms. In: Journal of Family Business Strategy, (1)3, 145–154.10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Strang, D./Sine, W. D. (2002): Interorganizational institutions. In: Baum, J. A. C. (Eds.): The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford, 467–519.10.1002/9781405164061.ch21Search in Google Scholar

Strike, V. M. (2012): Advising the family firm: Reviewing the past to build the future. In: Family Business Review, (20)10, 1–22.10.1177/0894486511431257Search in Google Scholar

Sturdy, A. (1997): The consultancy process: An insecure business? In: Journal of Management Studies, (34)3, 389–413.10.1111/1467-6486.00056Search in Google Scholar

Suchman, M. C. (1995): Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. In: Academy of Management Review, (20)3, 571–610.10.2307/258788Search in Google Scholar

Suddaby, R./Bitektine, A./Haack, P. (2016): Legitimacy. In: Academy of Management Annals, (11)1, 451–478.10.5465/annals.2015.0101Search in Google Scholar

Sund, L.-G./Melin, L./Haag, K. (2015): Intergenerational ownership succession: Shifting the focus from outcome measurements to preparatory requirements. In: Journal of Family Business Strategy, (6)3, 166–177.10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.07.001Search in Google Scholar

Wallau, F./Boerger, S. (2019): Erhebung und Analyse zur Unternehmensnachfolge in Bayern. Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, G. (2011): Family business succession: Managing the all-important family component. Ottawa.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, D. H./Shen, W. (2016): Why do some outside successions fare better than others? The role of outside CEOs’ prior experience with board diversity. In: Strategic Management Journal, (37)3, 2695–2708.10.1002/smj.2471Search in Google Scholar

Zietsma, C/Groenewegen, P./Logue, D. M./Hinings, C. R. (2017): Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. In: Academy of Management Annals, (11)1, 391–450.10.5465/annals.2014.0052Search in Google Scholar

Zietsma, C/Lawrence, T.B. (2010): Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, (55)2, 189–221.10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-08-26
Accepted: 2020-01-26
Published Online: 2020-02-14
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 10.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfw-2019-0019/html
Scroll to top button