Home Law Conclusion
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Conclusion

  • Thibault Moulin
View more publications by Manchester University Press
Cyber-espionage in international law
This chapter is in the book Cyber-espionage in international law

Abstract

The conclusion explains that, for a long time, espionage was only indirectly constrained by international law – and States were satisfied with this. This regime was however destabilised by the digitalisation of espionage. Hence, cyber-espionage is neither authorised nor prohibited: it is not unlawful, but States do not want to create a right to spy. As a matter of fact – and for the time being – regulation of cyber-espionage is mainly achieved through domestic laws. The conclusion also focuses on the managerialist approach to international law, and explains how a need to fill a so-called legal vacuum emerged in doctrine.

Abstract

The conclusion explains that, for a long time, espionage was only indirectly constrained by international law – and States were satisfied with this. This regime was however destabilised by the digitalisation of espionage. Hence, cyber-espionage is neither authorised nor prohibited: it is not unlawful, but States do not want to create a right to spy. As a matter of fact – and for the time being – regulation of cyber-espionage is mainly achieved through domestic laws. The conclusion also focuses on the managerialist approach to international law, and explains how a need to fill a so-called legal vacuum emerged in doctrine.

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7765/9781526168047.00025/html
Scroll to top button