Cornell University Press
Subsidizing Democracy
About this book
Miller considers the impact of state-level public election financing on political campaigns through the eyes of candidates.
Author / Editor information
Michael G. Miller is Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science and the Institute for Legal, Legislative and Policy Studies at the University of Illinois, Springfield.
Reviews
Michael Miller's research, based on surveys and interviews of state legislative candidates, is a welcome addition to the literature and nicely complements existing research by examining how public financing, and in particular the 'clean elections’ regimes in Arizona, Maine, and Connecticut, affect the behavior of candidates and voters.
Costas Panagopoulos, Fordham University. co-author of All Roads Lead to Congress:
In Subsidizing Democracy, Michael G. Miller explores how public financing programs in jurisdictions across the United States affect candidate behavior in elections. This excellent book is timely and useful. Miller leverages original data collected with interviews with candidates to present rare and persuasive empirical evidence. This impressive piece of scholarship advances knowledge about this important topic and contributes meaningfully to the literature.
Richard L. Hasen, Chancellor’s Professor of Law and Political Science, UC Irvine, author of The Voting Wars: From Florida 2000 to the Next Election Meltdown:
Campaign finance reformers are looking for anything that might improve U.S. campaigns in the Citizens United era. Michael G. Miller takes a fair and sober look at public funding to figure out whether—and how—public money can help improve the democratic process. Miller's results should be carefully studied by supporters and opponents of public funding.
Peter L. Francia, East Carolina Universityco, author of The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates:
Subsidizing Democracy is a serious contribution to the literature on public funding of elections. Michael G. Miller effectively combines his quantitative analysis with qualitative information gleaned from interviews with candidates. The end result is a book full of original, comprehensive, important, and convincing findings..
Topics
-
Download PDFPublicly Available
Frontmatter
i -
Download PDFPublicly Available
Contents
vii -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Acknowledgments
ix -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Introduction
1 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
1. Why Public Funding?
12 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
2. Strategic Candidates and Public Funding
29 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
3. Campaign Time
46 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
4. Voting Behavior
64 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
5. Candidate Quality
80 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
6. Ideology and Partisan Participation
108 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
7. Clean Elections at the Supreme Court
124 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Conclusion: Reform in the Future
142 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Appendix 1. Description of Data Sources
155 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Appendix 2. Survey Instrument
159 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Appendix 3. Methods
163 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Notes
181 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Bibliography
185 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Index
195