Home Medicine Spinal Mobilization Has Peripheral Vasodilation Effects
Article Open Access

Spinal Mobilization Has Peripheral Vasodilation Effects

  • Frances Nanadiego and Michael Seffinger
Published/Copyright: May 1, 2016

Zegarra-Parodi R, Pazdernik V, Roustit M, Park PY, Degenhardt BF. Effects of pressure applied during standardized spinal mobilizations on peripheral skin blood flow: a randomized cross-over study. Man Ther. 2016;220-226. doi:10.1016/j.math.2015.08.008.

Osteopathic physicians who use spinal manipulation claim that it can improve skin blood flow (SBF), but there are few randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over research studies that have evaluated this claim. Researchers at A.T. Still University in Kirksville, Missouri, and at the Grenoble University in France investigated this claim using laser Doppler flowmetry and the inspiratory gap (IG) test to evaluate SBF during and after application of spinal mobilization (SM) and the Novel Pliance-X system pressure monitor to evaluate the influence of pressure on SBF.

Thirty-two participants (mean [SD] age, 25 [5.4] years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 sequences of interventions. Before each session, the participant’s pain pressure threshold (PPT) was determined. The researchers used varied pressures of spinal SM—control (no touch) and SM applied at 5% of PPT (sham), 40% of PPT (low-pressure), or 80% of PPT (high-pressure)—and compared the effects of each intervention on the participant’s SBF. Using a pressure sensor on the thumb, the investigator used the thumb to rhythmically push on the T1 vertebra, over the lamina on the side of the participant’s dominant arm, using a graded translatory pressure toward the base of the participant’s opposite axilla. Measurements were taken at baseline at the end of a 20-minute acclimatization period, during the IG test, 5 minutes after the IG test, during the SM phase (or no manual contact for the control intervention), and 5 minutes after the SM. Thus, 4 interventions were applied on 4 different days, and each 40-minute session comprised 5 phases.

There were equal and significant bilateral vasodilation measurements during application of unilateral sham SM, low-pressure SM, and high-pressure SM. A significant difference in mean SBF was seen across the second half of each low-pressure SM application and control (P=.007). A significant difference in mean SBF was seen between high-pressure SM and control (P=.008) and between sham SM and control (P=.02). Significant vasodilation persisted only after high-pressure SM (P=.02).

This study is the first well-controlled investigation to describe bilateral peripheral SBF changes occurring during and 5 minutes after application of standardized SM. The persistence of post-SM vasodilation after only high-pressure SM suggests possible pressure-dependent mechanisms. However, further research is warranted to clarify these findings. Spinal mobilization should also be compared with other manual procedures to determine if this finding is specific to this particular technique.


Western University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific, Pomona, California

Published Online: 2016-05-01
Published in Print: 2016-05-01

© 2016 American Osteopathic Association

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. BOOK REVIEWS
  2. A View From the Inside: A Collection of Medically Oriented Short Stories
  3. EDITORIAL
  4. ENGAGE Initiative: Showcasing Osteopathic Scholarly Activity
  5. Building Primary Care Research Capacity in a College of Osteopathic Medicine
  6. Correction
  7. Correction
  8. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
  9. Interstate Medical Licensure Compact: Pernicious Myths and Inescapable Facts
  10. AOA COMMUNICATION
  11. Proposed Amendments to the AOA Constitution, Bylaws, and Code of Ethics
  12. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
  13. Effectiveness of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Low-Income Adults in Rural Appalachia
  14. CLINICAL REVIEW
  15. Is Meat Killing Us?
  16. MEDICAL EDUCATION
  17. Premedical Students’ Attitudes Toward Primary Care Medicine
  18. SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
  19. Growing Research Among Osteopathic Residents and Medical Students: A Consortium-Based Research Education Continuum Model
  20. CASE REPORT
  21. Intact Cornual Ectopic Pregnancy and Dermoid Cyst With Intraoperative Rupture
  22. Transient Ischemic Attack After Foam Sclerotherapy in a Woman With a Patent Foramen Ovale
  23. THE SOMATIC CONNECTION
  24. Eye Contact, Appetite, and Vomiting Improved in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder After Visceral Osteopathic Technique
  25. Postural Balance and Gait Improved With an Osteopathic Intervention in a Special Needs Population
  26. Significant Benefit Shown After Lumbar Disk Surgery Rehabilitation by Inclusion of Osteopathic Intervention
  27. Spinal Mobilization Has Peripheral Vasodilation Effects
  28. Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation Improves Outcomes for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
  29. Manual Therapy for Hamstring Hypertonicity Improves Temporomandibular Dysfunction in Athletes
  30. CLINICAL IMAGES
  31. Aseptic Splenic Abscess and Sweet Syndrome
  32. IN YOUR WORDS
  33. The Benefits of Being a Patient
Downloaded on 5.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2016.067/html
Scroll to top button