Home Response
Article Open Access

Response

  • Laura A. Harmon
Published/Copyright: June 1, 2014

I appreciate the comments of Reeves and Ladner1 and Wiwanitkit.2 The use of electroencephalography (EEG) has been widely debated throughout the literature. In our investigation,3 which was limited to standard inpatient EEG, 96% of the EEGs performed did not change or contribute to clinical decision making. At this time, there are no national guidelines for EEG use, and EEGs are being employed for a wide spectrum of conditions, including altered mental status, epilepsy, seizure rule-out, syncope, cerebrovascular accident, and traumatic brain injury.

The shortfall of EEG is its low diagnostic sensitivity (25%-56%) and slightly higher specificity (78%-98%).4 Even in the presence of a normal EEG, patients can have a multitude of seizure disorders failing detection,4 while an abnormal EEG can correlate with specific underlying brain pathologies, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease5 or burst suppression patterns.6 Although burst suppression patterns often correlate with poor prognoses, they do not point to any specific disease pathology and can be seen in traumatic brain injury and metabolic encephalopathy alike.6

The utility of EEG has, however, been demonstrated in intraoperative monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.7 Additionally, there have been evidence-based reviews published on its benefit in the evaluation of pediatric neurologic disorders8 and the management of newly diagnosed epilepsy.9

In the 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), put forth by the American College of Critical Care Medicine, EEG was recommended (+1A; high quality, strong recommendation in favor of the intervention) to monitor nonconvulsive ICU patients with known or patients suspected of having seizure disorders or to titrate electrosuppresive medications in patients with elevated intracranial pressures.10 At our institution, in accordance with these guidelines, continuous EEG is used most commonly in patients with traumatic brain injuries, intracerebral hemorrhages, and cerebrovascular accidents to guide treatment.

Our study3 was limited to standard 23-channel, 30-minute recordings and cannot be extrapolated to include the utility of video EEG, 24-hour continuous EEG, or quantitative EEG. Regarding standard 23-channel, 30-minute EEG recordings, my coauthors and I believe that the level of utility is reflected in the appropriateness of ordering. In our study3 there were 8 cases (4%) in which EEG was performed that supported clinical decision making. In each of the EEGs with abnormal findings, indication for ordering EEG was consistent with the clinical practice guideline recommendations10 for use in ICU patients.

Unfortunately, 24% of our population had EEG performed for syncope, whereas previous studies11,12 have clearly shown that EEG was not valuable in treating patients with syncope. Smith et al13 examined appropriate use of EEG in comparison to the United Kingdom national guidelines for the use of EEG and found up to 40% of EEGs had been ordered inappropriately.

In the current political climate, I believe now more than ever, we as physicians are going to be asked to justify our health care expenditures. With a paucity of guidelines for EEG use, the responsibility falls to the physician to determine clinical utility. The goal of our study3 was to bring to light the common indications at our institution for ordering EEGs and the relatively small impact they had on clinical judgment in these cases.

References

1 Reeves RR Ladner ME . Effect of inpatient electroencephalography on clinical decision making: EEG is more valuable than findings suggest [letter]. J Am Osteopath Assoc.2014;114(6):425-426. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2014.091.10.7556/jaoa.2014.091Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2 Wiwanitkit V . Effect of inpatient electroencephalography on clinical decision making: EEG is more valuable than findings suggest [letter]. J Am Osteopath Assoc.2014;114(6):426. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2014.092.10.7556/jaoa.2014.092Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Harmon LA Craddock M Jones EG Spellman CW Loveman DM . Effect of inpatient electroencephalography on clinical decision making. J Am Osteopath Assoc.2013;113(12):891-896. doi:10.7556/jaoa.2013.067.10.7556/jaoa.2013.067Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4 Smith SJM . EEG in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76 (suppl 2):ii2-ii7. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.069245.10.1136/jnnp.2005.069245Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5 Brown P . EEG findings in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. JAMA. 1993;269(24):3168. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03500240112046.10.1001/jama.269.24.3168Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6 van Putten MJ van Putten MH . Uncommon EEG burst-suppression in severe post-anoxic encephalopathy[published online April 2, 2010]. Clin Neurophysiol.2010;121(8):1213-1219. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.162.10.1016/j.clinph.2010.02.162Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Blume WT Furguson GG McNeill DK . Significance of EEG changes at carotid endarterectomy. Stroke. 1986;17(5):891-897.10.1161/01.STR.17.5.891Search in Google Scholar

8 Kwong KL Chak WK So KT . Evaluation of paediatric epilepsy care. HK J Paediatr.2002;7(3):169-172.Search in Google Scholar

9 Ross SD Estok R Chopra S French J . Management of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2001. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No 39. Report No. 01-E038.Search in Google Scholar

10 Barr J Fraser GL Puntillo K et al. ; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med.2013;41(1):263-306. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Davis TL Freemon FR . Electroencephalography should not be routine in the evaluation of syncope in adults. Arch Int Med.1990;150(10):2027-2029. doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390210029008.10.1001/archinte.1990.00390210029008Search in Google Scholar

12 Abubakr A Wambacq I . The diagnostic value of EEGs in patients with syncope. Epilepsy Behav.2005;6(3):433-434.10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.01.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13 Smith D Bartolo R Pickles RM Tedman BM . Requests for electroencephalography in a district general hospital: retrospective and prospective audit. BMJ. 2001;332(7292):954-957.10.1136/bmj.322.7292.954Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Published Online: 2014-06-01
Published in Print: 2014-06-01

© 2014 The American Osteopathic Association

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. In My View
  2. Shorter Training Is No Solution for Building the Primary Care Physician Workforce
  3. A New Model for Educating Our Nation's Primary Care Physicians
  4. Letters
  5. Effect of Inpatient Electroencephalography on Clinical Decision Making: EEG Is More Valuable Than Findings Suggest
  6. Effect of Inpatient Electroencephalography on Clinical Decision Making: EEG Is More Valuable Than Findings Suggest
  7. Response
  8. AOA Communication
  9. Official Call (Reprint)
  10. Proposed Amendments to the AOA Constitution, Bylaws, and Code of Ethics
  11. Original Contribution
  12. Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment on Middle Ear Effusion Following Acute Otitis Media in Young Children: A Pilot Study
  13. Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Inpatients With Pulmonary Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis: Effects on Spirometry Findings and Patient Assessments of Breathing, Anxiety, and Pain
  14. Assessing Palpation Thresholds of Osteopathic Medical Students Using Static Models of the Lumbar Spine
  15. Review
  16. Effectiveness of Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy for Managing Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review
  17. Medical Education
  18. Predictive Relationship of Osteopathic Manual Medicine Grades and COMLEX-USA Level 1 Total Scores and Osteopathic Principles and Practice Subscores
  19. Special Communication
  20. From “Doctor of Osteopathy” to “Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine”: A Title Change in the Push for Equality
  21. Case Report
  22. Osteopathic Approach to Sacroiliac Dysfunction in a Patient With Steroid Myopathy: Case Report and Literature Review
  23. Clinical Images
  24. Hepatic Cystic Echinococcosis
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.7556/jaoa.2014.093/html
Scroll to top button