Home Thirteen Participation and social policy: transformation, liberation or regulation?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Thirteen Participation and social policy: transformation, liberation or regulation?

  • Peter Beresford
View more publications by Policy Press
Social Policy Review 14
This chapter is in the book Social Policy Review 14

Abstract

This chapter aims to put participation in social policy in an ideological, historical and theoretical context. To do this, the chapter will identify the two dominant modern political discourses, which in the UK and beyond have provided the context for this discussion. It will also outline the development of counter discourses from social care and welfare service users1, and explore the two key competing ideologies that have underpinned different models and understandings of participation, and examine the implications of these different approaches to participation, considering their regressive and liberatory potential. Finally, the chapter will also begin to examine the possibilities and problems now being highlighted for participation in social policy in theory and practice, taking the UK as a case study with wider implications.

One of the ironies of participation, which has so far largely passed without serious comment, is that while its conceptualisation and practice are ostensibly centrally concerned with involving and including people, in its own modern usage, it has generally tended to be abstracted and treated in isolation. There have been some discussions of the socio-economics, politics and ideology of participation, but these have been limited in number and range (for example, Pateman, 1970; Held, 1987). In contrast a much greater interest has developed in the ‘technicalities’ of participation, reflected in the production of a large and rapidly growing body of ‘how to do it’ manuals, courses and consultants (for example, Hanley et al, 2000; VSO, 2001). The emphasis is on techniques for and the findings from participation. There is even a national competition to identify the most ‘successful’ initiatives for public involvement run by The Guardian newspaper and Institute for Public Policy Research (Dean, 2000).

Abstract

This chapter aims to put participation in social policy in an ideological, historical and theoretical context. To do this, the chapter will identify the two dominant modern political discourses, which in the UK and beyond have provided the context for this discussion. It will also outline the development of counter discourses from social care and welfare service users1, and explore the two key competing ideologies that have underpinned different models and understandings of participation, and examine the implications of these different approaches to participation, considering their regressive and liberatory potential. Finally, the chapter will also begin to examine the possibilities and problems now being highlighted for participation in social policy in theory and practice, taking the UK as a case study with wider implications.

One of the ironies of participation, which has so far largely passed without serious comment, is that while its conceptualisation and practice are ostensibly centrally concerned with involving and including people, in its own modern usage, it has generally tended to be abstracted and treated in isolation. There have been some discussions of the socio-economics, politics and ideology of participation, but these have been limited in number and range (for example, Pateman, 1970; Held, 1987). In contrast a much greater interest has developed in the ‘technicalities’ of participation, reflected in the production of a large and rapidly growing body of ‘how to do it’ manuals, courses and consultants (for example, Hanley et al, 2000; VSO, 2001). The emphasis is on techniques for and the findings from participation. There is even a national competition to identify the most ‘successful’ initiatives for public involvement run by The Guardian newspaper and Institute for Public Policy Research (Dean, 2000).

Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781847425522-014/html?srsltid=AfmBOopwu9wMOSGi1QUG_RJrhoaYjgIjP_S73ay4VGPsBIaLZKfg2tFE
Scroll to top button