TWO A History of Accountability in Criminal Courts
-
Judith Townend
Abstract
Chapter Two provides historical context on the way in which open justice and accountability have developed in England and Wales. It considers modes of accountability in the criminal process, public participation in the criminal courts, and its development in recent decades.
It looks at the place of open justice in a wider tradition of justice system accountability, sitting alongside and underpinning other important tools. As part of this exercise, the authors detail the main methods for contemporary observation of physical criminal court hearings and access to different information types, drawing attention to the main obstacles and gatekeepers.
They also explore the main theoretical rationales for the contemporary approach to open justice which, it is suggested, can be categorised as punitive (shaming), deterring, educational, scrutable (ensuring fairness and proper conduct). The chapter then critiques these various arguments, proposing that understandings of justice system accountability need to recognise their weaknesses and strengths.
The authors introduce one of their core arguments, that policy and law makers should prioritise informational transparency as a means of scrutiny and education, rather than as a means of an individual’s punishment and deterrence.
Abstract
Chapter Two provides historical context on the way in which open justice and accountability have developed in England and Wales. It considers modes of accountability in the criminal process, public participation in the criminal courts, and its development in recent decades.
It looks at the place of open justice in a wider tradition of justice system accountability, sitting alongside and underpinning other important tools. As part of this exercise, the authors detail the main methods for contemporary observation of physical criminal court hearings and access to different information types, drawing attention to the main obstacles and gatekeepers.
They also explore the main theoretical rationales for the contemporary approach to open justice which, it is suggested, can be categorised as punitive (shaming), deterring, educational, scrutable (ensuring fairness and proper conduct). The chapter then critiques these various arguments, proposing that understandings of justice system accountability need to recognise their weaknesses and strengths.
The authors introduce one of their core arguments, that policy and law makers should prioritise informational transparency as a means of scrutiny and education, rather than as a means of an individual’s punishment and deterrence.
Chapters in this book
- Front Matter i
- Contents v
- Series Editor’s Preface vii
- About the Authors viii
- Acknowledgements ix
- Introduction: Why We Need to Rethink Approaches to Open Justice in the Criminal Courts 1
- A History of Accountability in Criminal Courts 12
- Justice System Modernisation, Digitalisation and Data 40
- The Role of the Public and Media in Observing Justice 65
- The Human Impact of Justice System Transparency 93
- Conclusion: Towards a New Framework for Justice System Accountability 120
- References 133
- Index 158
Chapters in this book
- Front Matter i
- Contents v
- Series Editor’s Preface vii
- About the Authors viii
- Acknowledgements ix
- Introduction: Why We Need to Rethink Approaches to Open Justice in the Criminal Courts 1
- A History of Accountability in Criminal Courts 12
- Justice System Modernisation, Digitalisation and Data 40
- The Role of the Public and Media in Observing Justice 65
- The Human Impact of Justice System Transparency 93
- Conclusion: Towards a New Framework for Justice System Accountability 120
- References 133
- Index 158
