Home Law 5 Scotland, Devolution and Independence: A Union at its Limits?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

5 Scotland, Devolution and Independence: A Union at its Limits?

  • Coree Brown Swan
View more publications by Bristol University Press
Diverse Voices in Public Law
This chapter is in the book Diverse Voices in Public Law

Abstract

Devolution, endorsed by the Scottish electorate and delivered by the Labour government in 1999, was, in the words of George Robertson, the former Labour Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland, designed “to kill nationalism stone dead” (https://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/scottish-parliament-20-why-devolution-failed-kill-nationalism-stone-dead-1418095; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-31129382). However, at the time of writing, more than two decades after the first elections to the Scottish Parliament, Scottish nationalism remains a potent force, and broader questions about the UK’s constitutional arrangements and the future of the Union remain salient. At a fundamental level, these debates speak to the understanding of power in the UK’s constitutional arrangements. Is power to be fiercely guarded at Westminster or is it to be dispersed throughout the UK? Does sovereignty sit with Parliament or with the people? These questions underpin the debates over devolution and independence, and it is not wholly clear whether the UK can accommodate these differing understandings, raising the question of whether the its famed flexibility has, at last, reached its limits.

Abstract

Devolution, endorsed by the Scottish electorate and delivered by the Labour government in 1999, was, in the words of George Robertson, the former Labour Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland, designed “to kill nationalism stone dead” (https://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/scottish-parliament-20-why-devolution-failed-kill-nationalism-stone-dead-1418095; https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-31129382). However, at the time of writing, more than two decades after the first elections to the Scottish Parliament, Scottish nationalism remains a potent force, and broader questions about the UK’s constitutional arrangements and the future of the Union remain salient. At a fundamental level, these debates speak to the understanding of power in the UK’s constitutional arrangements. Is power to be fiercely guarded at Westminster or is it to be dispersed throughout the UK? Does sovereignty sit with Parliament or with the people? These questions underpin the debates over devolution and independence, and it is not wholly clear whether the UK can accommodate these differing understandings, raising the question of whether the its famed flexibility has, at last, reached its limits.

Downloaded on 3.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781529220766-009/html
Scroll to top button