Home Law 7 COVID-19 PPE Extremely Urgent Procurement in England: A Cautionary Tale for an Overheating Public Governance
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

7 COVID-19 PPE Extremely Urgent Procurement in England: A Cautionary Tale for an Overheating Public Governance

  • Albert Sanchez-Graells
View more publications by Bristol University Press
Pandemic Legalities
This chapter is in the book Pandemic Legalities

Abstract

One of the notorious failings of the UK government in its reaction to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was its inability to ensure that the health and social care frontline had proper and undisrupted access to essential personal protective equipment (PPE), such as masks, gowns and gloves. The story of the failings leading to the PPE fiasco runs largely in parallel to the also failed attempt at boosting the availability of ventilators through the ‘Ventilator Challenge’, and the not more successful subsequent ‘Test and Trace’ programme, including its doubling down in ‘Operation Moonshot’ – which, at the time of writing, has been assessed to be having a marginal impact on the prevention and management of the second wave.

These stories offer a cautionary tale for the future management of extremely urgent public procurement, which will become ever more important given the serious risks of social and ecological breakdown derived from climate change. These stories show the very significant problems that result from having a public sector with insufficient procurement capability, an inadequate procurement strategy and (perhaps more importantly) a very weak procurement governance system largely incapable of ensuring the accountability for outsourced tasks in the public interest (Boeger and Sanchez-Graells, 2019). Perhaps even worse, these stories are not news at all, and the underlying problems not only concern extremely urgent procurement, but also complex procurement projects, as the second phase of the Grenfell Tower Disaster Inquiry is further evidencing.

Abstract

One of the notorious failings of the UK government in its reaction to the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was its inability to ensure that the health and social care frontline had proper and undisrupted access to essential personal protective equipment (PPE), such as masks, gowns and gloves. The story of the failings leading to the PPE fiasco runs largely in parallel to the also failed attempt at boosting the availability of ventilators through the ‘Ventilator Challenge’, and the not more successful subsequent ‘Test and Trace’ programme, including its doubling down in ‘Operation Moonshot’ – which, at the time of writing, has been assessed to be having a marginal impact on the prevention and management of the second wave.

These stories offer a cautionary tale for the future management of extremely urgent public procurement, which will become ever more important given the serious risks of social and ecological breakdown derived from climate change. These stories show the very significant problems that result from having a public sector with insufficient procurement capability, an inadequate procurement strategy and (perhaps more importantly) a very weak procurement governance system largely incapable of ensuring the accountability for outsourced tasks in the public interest (Boeger and Sanchez-Graells, 2019). Perhaps even worse, these stories are not news at all, and the underlying problems not only concern extremely urgent procurement, but also complex procurement projects, as the second phase of the Grenfell Tower Disaster Inquiry is further evidencing.

Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781529218947-012/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button