Home Law 1 Ruling the Pandemic
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

1 Ruling the Pandemic

  • Dave Cowan
View more publications by Bristol University Press
Pandemic Legalities
This chapter is in the book Pandemic Legalities

Abstract

I have spent more time wondering about how to start this chapter on ‘governing’ during the pandemic than actually writing it. Perhaps it could start with the almost daily shock felt in reading headlines and tweets linking Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) contracts and key personnel with the ruling party. Or we might start with the shift in the way of legislating which, on analyses from both the left and the right, has undermined the rule of law and the accountability of the Executive. What was said – rhetorically – about the ‘elected dictatorship’ or the ‘new despotism’ has given way to fresh realizations about its existence; perhaps the question is not, ‘who governs Britain?’, but how is Britain governed? Legislation, and secondary legislation, have combined with other forms of what Robert Megarry termed (in 1944) ‘administrative quasi-legislation’1; or, government by media briefing; or, in 240 characters, by tweet, exemplified by a tweet by Robert Jenrick, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government telling us that he was stopping evictions.

Another way to start this chapter might have been with a recognition of how things have changed over time. Since the invention of the Code of Guidance by the promulgation of the Highway Code, and successive forms of government by guidance, practice, circular, or letter (all of which seem rather quaint now), governments have used these forms as obtaining self-government by consent. As Ganz suggested (1987: 98), it is an empirical question whether government by consent in this way is effective.

Abstract

I have spent more time wondering about how to start this chapter on ‘governing’ during the pandemic than actually writing it. Perhaps it could start with the almost daily shock felt in reading headlines and tweets linking Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) contracts and key personnel with the ruling party. Or we might start with the shift in the way of legislating which, on analyses from both the left and the right, has undermined the rule of law and the accountability of the Executive. What was said – rhetorically – about the ‘elected dictatorship’ or the ‘new despotism’ has given way to fresh realizations about its existence; perhaps the question is not, ‘who governs Britain?’, but how is Britain governed? Legislation, and secondary legislation, have combined with other forms of what Robert Megarry termed (in 1944) ‘administrative quasi-legislation’1; or, government by media briefing; or, in 240 characters, by tweet, exemplified by a tweet by Robert Jenrick, Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government telling us that he was stopping evictions.

Another way to start this chapter might have been with a recognition of how things have changed over time. Since the invention of the Code of Guidance by the promulgation of the Highway Code, and successive forms of government by guidance, practice, circular, or letter (all of which seem rather quaint now), governments have used these forms as obtaining self-government by consent. As Ganz suggested (1987: 98), it is an empirical question whether government by consent in this way is effective.

Downloaded on 23.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781529218947-006/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button