Home Philosophy 9. The Moralities of the Odyssey
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

9. The Moralities of the Odyssey

View more publications by Harvard University Press
The Greek Concept of Justice
This chapter is in the book The Greek Concept of Justice
9 The Moralities of the Odyssey In the confrontation between Agamemnon and Achilles, the mythos pits a man of rank and power against a man of dynamic personal energy. The collision is not between virtue and vice, right and wrong, and the resultant feud (the eris, or neikos~) is therefore resolvable. Nor is there any discernible moral difference between Achilles and Hector, even though confrontation in their case is not soluble except by the extinction of one party. The Iliad may intend to suggest that the Achaeans have some moral advantage over the Trojans,1 but the listener has difficulty remembering this as the two sides maneuver, negotiate, or do battle. Moral Polarization The Odyssey in this respect is markedly different. The legalities of the poem, described in the previous chapter, prove ineffective precisely because the party of the first part is upright, and the party of the second part is not, and between two such no procedure of adjustment is possi-ble. The characters grouped round the house of Odysseus (aside from traitors), consisting of wife, son, and servants, political supporters, and finally Odysseus himself, are consistently represented or represent them-selves as protesting against wrongs which are inflicted upon them. Their opponents, the suitors, with equal consistency are represented as the 150

9 The Moralities of the Odyssey In the confrontation between Agamemnon and Achilles, the mythos pits a man of rank and power against a man of dynamic personal energy. The collision is not between virtue and vice, right and wrong, and the resultant feud (the eris, or neikos~) is therefore resolvable. Nor is there any discernible moral difference between Achilles and Hector, even though confrontation in their case is not soluble except by the extinction of one party. The Iliad may intend to suggest that the Achaeans have some moral advantage over the Trojans,1 but the listener has difficulty remembering this as the two sides maneuver, negotiate, or do battle. Moral Polarization The Odyssey in this respect is markedly different. The legalities of the poem, described in the previous chapter, prove ineffective precisely because the party of the first part is upright, and the party of the second part is not, and between two such no procedure of adjustment is possi-ble. The characters grouped round the house of Odysseus (aside from traitors), consisting of wife, son, and servants, political supporters, and finally Odysseus himself, are consistently represented or represent them-selves as protesting against wrongs which are inflicted upon them. Their opponents, the suitors, with equal consistency are represented as the 150
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.4159/harvard.9780674183513.c11/html?srsltid=AfmBOopsJ91lkawqrOI8IJt8q--0Ia_mmFc35T8igiA089dqanTQ20l1
Scroll to top button