Home A Conceptual Modelling of the Tetragonality of L10 (AuCu-I type) Intermetallics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Conceptual Modelling of the Tetragonality of L10 (AuCu-I type) Intermetallics

  • Subramanian Raju and Eledath Mohandas
Published/Copyright: January 3, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The systematics of tetragonality in L10 (AuCu-I) type intermetallics is analysed by means of a structural mapping procedure. It is found that the Miedema parameters (metallic electronegativity and electron density at the Wigner-Seitz cell surface) order the tetragonality systematics into two broad classes, exhibited respectively by transition metal compounds and by transition – nontransition type mixed compounds. In the former category, the axial ratio (c/a) revealed a decrease with an increase in electronegativity difference, while the reverse trend is observed for the mixed type intermetallics. The effect of ternary addition and its preferential occupation of one of the sublattices of L10 structure have been found to influence strongly the tetragonality. The observed systematics has been explained in terms of a synthesis of crystal physical and chemical viewpoints on structure and bonding in intermetallics. In particular, it is hypothesised that an antiferromagnetic like coupling between interplanar and intraplanar interactions is responsible for the relative stability of L10 over B2 (CsCl) crystal structure. It is argued that a dominantly attractive (stabilising) interlayer interaction serves to compress the lattice along the [001] axis, which is promoted by a charge transfer taking place between the constituent elements segregating to individual sublattices. On the other hand, the presence of a net repulsive interaction in the {002} planes is what is responsible for increasing the tetragonality of the lattice and pushing the structure away from a B2 packing.


This paper is dedicated to the fiftieth anniversary of Indian independence.



S. Raju, E. Mohandas Physical Metallurgy Section Metallurgy Division Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research Kalpakkam-603102, India

Literature

1 Raju, S.; Mohandas, E.; Terrance, A.L.E.; Raghunathan, V.S.: Mater. Lett. 12 (1991) 931.10.1016/0167-577X(91)90116-NSearch in Google Scholar

2 Villars, P.; Calvert, L.D.: Pearson’s Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases, Vol. 1–4, American Society for Metals, Materials Park, Ohio (1991).Search in Google Scholar

3 Massalski, T.B.; Subramanian, P.R.; Okamoto, H.; Kacprazak, L.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, Second edition, Vol. 1–3, ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio (1990).Search in Google Scholar

4 Schubert, K.: Kristallstrukturen zweikomponentiger Phasen, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1964).10.1007/978-3-642-94904-3Search in Google Scholar

5 Neumann, J.P.; Ipser, H.; Chang, Y.A.: J. Less Common Metals 57 (1978) 29.10.1016/0022-5088(78)90171-6Search in Google Scholar

6 Ker-Chang-Hseih; Chang, Y.A: Scripta Metall. 22 (1988) 1267.10.1016/S0036-9748(88)80144-3Search in Google Scholar

7 Wijn, H.P.J.: in: R. Poerschke (ed.), Magnetic Properties of Metals: d-elements, Alloys and Compounds, Series on Data in Science & Technology Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1991).10.1007/978-3-642-58218-9Search in Google Scholar

8 Pearson, W.B.: The Crystal Chemistry and Physics of Metals and 18. Alloys, Wiley, New York (1972). The structure type HgIn (tp2, P4/mmm; tetragonally elongated B2) is a typical example for alloying induced distortion of a cubic lattice giving rise to a structure which is closely related to that of true L10. In MnPt compound, both AuCu and HgIn structure types are listed as possible candidates [2]; this is in fact readily reconciled with in our present scheme of things; In HgIn type MnPt, Mn occupies (0,0,0) positions, while Pt takes the (1/2, 1/2, 1/2) positions, which in the absence of any distortion should give rise to a B2 (CsCl type) ordering; but the presence of Mn confined to one particular layer yields on the other hand a distorted version of B2, of which the L10 is only a special class. At fairly high temperatures, the crystal field effect due to Mn atoms are lifted and one gets a simple B2 lattice. There are a host of other examples like MnRh, PuIn, (Pu is similar to Mn in its effect) etc. which conform to this hypothesis.Search in Google Scholar

9 de Boer, F.R.; Boom, R.; Mattens, W.C.M.; Miedema, A.R., Niessen, A.K: Cohesion in Metals: Transition Metal Alloys, in : F.R. de Boer; D.G. Pettifor: (eds.), Cohesion and Structure, Vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988).Search in Google Scholar

10 Pettifor, D.G.: Solid State Phys. 40 (1987) 43.10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60690-6Search in Google Scholar

11 Miedema, A.R.: Physica B182 (1992) 1.Search in Google Scholar

12 Rajasekharan, T.; Girgis, K: Phys. Rev. B27 (1983) 910.10.1103/PhysRevB.27.910Search in Google Scholar

13 Raju, S.; Mohandas, E.; Raghunathan, V.S.: Mater. Lett. 15 (1992) 56.10.1016/0167-577X(92)90013-ASearch in Google Scholar

14 Villars, P.: Factors Governing Crystal Structures, in: J.H. West brook; R.L. Fleischer: (eds.), Intermetallic Compounds, Vol. 1, John-Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1995).Search in Google Scholar

15 Raju, S.; Mohandas, E.; Raghunathan, V.S.: Mater. Trans. JIM 35 (1996) 195.10.2320/matertrans1989.37.195Search in Google Scholar

16 Raju, S.; Mohandas, E.; Raghunathan, V.S.: Mater. Lett. 16 (1993) 123.10.1016/0167-577X(93)90035-VSearch in Google Scholar

17 Vujic, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.H.: Metall. Trans. A 19A (1988) 2445; see also, Mohandas, E.; Beaven, P.A.: Scripta Metall. 25 (1991) 2023.10.1016/0956-716X(91)90268-6Search in Google Scholar

18 Lu, Z.W.; Zunger, A.; Fox, A.G.: Acta Metall. Mater. 42 (1994) 3929.10.1016/0956-7151(94)90171-6Search in Google Scholar

19 Krompholz, K; Weiss, A.: J. Less Common Metals. 50 (1976) 213.10.1016/0022-5088(76)90161-2Search in Google Scholar

20 Kogachi, M.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 28 (1982) 102.10.2320/matertrans1960.28.102Search in Google Scholar

21 Kogachi, M.: Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 26 (1985) 153.10.2320/matertrans1960.26.153Search in Google Scholar

22 Nakahigashi, K.; Kogachi, M.; Katada, K.: Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 21 (1982) L650.10.1143/JJAP.21.L650Search in Google Scholar

23 Nakahigashi, K.; Shinoya, Y.: Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 22 (1983) 1790.10.1143/JJAP.22.1790Search in Google Scholar

Received: 1998-02-11
Published Online: 2022-01-03

© 1998 Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/ijmr-1998-0114/html
Scroll to top button