Home Technology The Influence of Sample Preparation on SEM Measurements of Anodic Oxide Layers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Influence of Sample Preparation on SEM Measurements of Anodic Oxide Layers

  • Joanna Korzekwa received her PhD in Materials Engineering in 2007 at the University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. She is now professor assistant in the Department of Technology of Surface Science at the University of Silesia. Her research interests are related with aluminum oxide layers on aluminum alloys.

    ,

    Aneta Gądek-Moszczak received her PhD in 2005 at the Cracow University of Technology, Poland. She is now professor assistant at the Institute of Applied Informatics at Cracow University of Technology. Her research interests included application of computer image analysis and stereology in material science, biology and medicine.

    and
Published/Copyright: February 16, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Coatings with high wear, corrosion resistance and sliding properties are desirable in tribological applications, especially for oil-free nodes. In order to obtain such coatings on aluminium alloy the anodizing process is one of the methods which is commonly used. In the present research two kinds of anodic oxide layer were prepared. One series of samples comprised amorphous oxide layer Al2O3 obtained on aluminium alloy EN AW 5251. The second one was the composite oxide layer Al2O3 with inorganic fullerene-like tungsten disulfide (IF-WS2). The addition of IF-WS2 to an acid bath is used to reduce the friction coefficient of the oil free friction pair. The aim of the study is the analysis of the surface and fresh cross section of the samples depending on the kind of conductive metal used for SEM examination. Gold and carbon were used in order to prevent the charging of a specimen with an electron beam in the conventional SEM mode. Significant differences in the interpretation of results were found.

Kurzfassung

Tribologische Anwendungen, insbesondere trockene Reibpaarungen, erfordern Beschichtungen mit hoher Verschleißfestigkeit, hoher Korrosionsbeständigkeit und guten Gleiteigenschaften. Eines der gängigen Beschichtungsverfahren für Aluminiumlegierungen ist das Anodisieren (anodische Oxidation). Für die vorliegende Untersuchung wurden zwei verschiedene Arten anodischer Oxidschichten erzeugt. Für eine Probenserie wurden auf einer Aluminiumlegierung EN AW 5251 amorphe Oxidschichten (Al2O3) erzeugt. Für eine zweite Probenserie wurde ein Verbund aus Al2O3-Oxidschicht und anorganischem fullerenartigem Wolframdisulfid (IF-WS2) aufgebracht. Die Beimengung von IF-WS2 zu einem Säurebad dient der Reduzierung des Reibungskoeffizienten der trockenen Reibpaarung. Ziel dieser Untersuchung ist die Analyse der Oberfläche und des unbehandelten Querschnitts der Proben in Abhängigkeit des für die REM-Untersuchung verwendeten leitfähigen Metalls. Um im konventionellen REM-Modus die Aufladung einer Probe durch einen Elektronenstrahl zu verhindern, wurde mit Gold und Kohlenstoff gearbeitet. Bei der Interpretation der Untersuchungsergebnisse ergaben sich wesentliche Unterschiede.


Übersetzung: E. Engert


About the authors

J. Korzekwa

Joanna Korzekwa received her PhD in Materials Engineering in 2007 at the University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. She is now professor assistant in the Department of Technology of Surface Science at the University of Silesia. Her research interests are related with aluminum oxide layers on aluminum alloys.

A. Gądek-Moszczak

Aneta Gądek-Moszczak received her PhD in 2005 at the Cracow University of Technology, Poland. She is now professor assistant at the Institute of Applied Informatics at Cracow University of Technology. Her research interests included application of computer image analysis and stereology in material science, biology and medicine.

References / Literatur

[1] Escobar, J.; Arurault, L.; Turq, V.: Appl Surf Sci 258 (2012), 8199–8208 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.02210.1016/j.apsusc.2012.05.022Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kogovsek, J.; Kalin, M.: Tribol Lett 53 (2014), 585–597 DOI: 10.1007/s11249-014-0296-110.1007/s11249-014-0296-1Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kmita, T.: Maintenance and Reliability 1 (2010), 77–82Search in Google Scholar

[4] Kmita, T.: Chemical and Process Engineering 33 (2012) 3, 479–48610.2478/v10176-012-0040-zSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Bara, M.; Skoneczny, W.; Kaptacz, S.: Maintenance and Reliability 4 (2008), 66–70Search in Google Scholar

[6] Korzekwa, J., Skoneczny, W.: Tanger Ltd, NANOCON 2012, 4th International conference (2012), 826–831Search in Google Scholar

[7] Goldstein, J. I.; Newbury, D. E.; Echlin, P.; Joy, D. C.; Lyman, C. E.; Lifshin E.; Sawyer, L.; Michael J. R.; Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, Third Edition 2003Search in Google Scholar

[8] Wesley-Smith, J.; Sample preparation strategies for characterisation of materials, National Centre for NanoStructured Materials, CSIRSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Abdullaha, S. Z.; Bérubéa, P. R.; Horneb, D. J.: Journal of Membrane Science, 463 (2014), 113–125 DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.04810.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.048Search in Google Scholar

[10] Korzekwa, J.; Tenne, R.; Skoneczny, W.; Dercz, G.: Phys. Status Solidi A 210 (2013) 11, 2292–2297 DOI: 10.1002/pssa.20132932010.1002/pssa.201329320Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gądek, A.; Wojnar, L.: Inżynieria Materiałowa 3 (2003) 134, 111–116Search in Google Scholar

[12] Wojnar, L.; Kurzydłowski, K.J.; Szala, J.; Praktyka analizy obrazu, PTST, Kraków, Polska, 2002Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gawdzińska, K.; Nagolska, D.; Wojnar, L.: Solid State Phenomena, 197 (2013), 180–185 10.4028/ www.scientific.net/SSP.197.18010.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.197.180Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-08-18
Accepted: 2015-11-11
Published Online: 2022-02-16

© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Germany

Downloaded on 1.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/147.110367/html
Scroll to top button