Home Technology The multipurpose thermalhydraulic test facility TOPFLOW: an overview on experimental capabilities, instrumentation and results
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The multipurpose thermalhydraulic test facility TOPFLOW: an overview on experimental capabilities, instrumentation and results

  • H.-M. Prasser , M. Beyer , H. Carl , A. Manera , H. Pietruske , P. Schütz and F.-P. Weiß
Published/Copyright: April 6, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A new multipurpose thermalhydraulic test facility TOPFLOW (TwO Phase FLOW) was built and put into operation at Forschungszentrum Rossendorf in 2002 and 2003. Since then, it has been mainly used for the investigation of generic and applied steady state and transient two phase flow phenomena and the development and validation of models of Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) codes in the frame of the German CFD initiative. The advantage of TOPFLOW consists in the combination of a large scale of the test channels with a wide operational range both of the flow velocities as well as of the system pressures and temperatures plus finally the availability of a special instrumentation that is capable in high spatial and temporal resolving two phase flow phenomena, for example the wire-mesh sensors.

Kurzfassung

Eine neue Mehrzweck-Thermohydraulikversuchsanlage TOPFLOW wurde in den Jahren 2002 und 2003 im Forschungszentrum Rossendorf errichtet und in Betrieb genommen. Seitdem wird sie hauptsächlich zur Untersuchung stationärer und transienter Phänomene in Zweiphasenströmungen und zur Entwicklung und Validierung der in Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) Codes enthaltenen Modellen im Rahmen der deutschen CFD Initiative genutzt. Die großmaßstäblichen Testsektionen, der breite Parameterbereich bei den einstellbaren Strömungsgeschwindigkeiten, Drücken und Temperaturen und schließlich die Verwendung von räumlich und zeitlich hochauflösender Spezialmesstechnik zur Erfassung der Phänomene in Zweiphasenströmungen, beispielsweise Gittersensoren, sind die Vorzüge von TOPFLOW.


Corresponding author: Dr. Helmar Carl, E-Mail:

References

1Hicken, E. F.; Schaffrath, A.; Fethke, M.; Jaegers, H.: Der NOKO-Versuchsstand der Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZR) GmbH – Rückblick auf 7 Jahre experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit von Leichtwasserreaktoren. Atomwirtschaft-Atomtechnik47 (2002) 343348Search in Google Scholar

2Prasser, H.-M.; Beyer, M.; Böttger, A.; Carl, H.; Lucas, D.; Schaffrath, A.; Schütz, P.; Weiss, F.-P.; Zschau, J.: Influence of the pipe diameter on the structure of the gas-liquid interface in a vertical two-phase pipe flow. NURETH-10, Seoul, October 5–9, 2003, paper A00308, extended version published in Nuclear Technology152 (2005) 322Search in Google Scholar

3Prasser, H.-M.; Böttger, A.; Zschau, J.: A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas-liquid flows. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation9 (1998) 11111910.1016/S0955-5986(98)00015-6Search in Google Scholar

4Prasser, H.-M.; Zschau, J.; Peters, D.; Pietzsch, G.; Taubert, W.; Trepte, M.: 2002a, Fast wire-mesh sensors for gas-liquid flows – visualization with up to 10 000 frames per second. ICAPP 2002, Hollywood, Florida, paper #105510.1002/1522-2640(200106)73:6<743::AID-CITE7431111>3.0.CO;2-SSearch in Google Scholar

5Ohnuki, A.; Akimoto, H.: Experimental study on transition of flow pattern and phase distribution in upward air-water two-phase flow along a large vertical pipe. International Journal of Multiphase Flow26 (2000) 367386Search in Google Scholar

6Sato, Y.; Sadatomi, M.; Sekoguchi, K.: Momentum and heat transfer in two-phase bubble flow. International Journal of Multiphase Flow7 (1981) 16717710.1016/0301-9322(81)90003-3Search in Google Scholar

7Manera, A.; Prasser, H.-M.; Lucas, D.: Experimental investigations on bubble turbu-lent diffusion in a vertical large-diameter pipe by means of wire-mesh sensors and cor-relation techniques. NURETH-11, 02–06 Oct. 2005, Avignon, France, paper 091Search in Google Scholar

8Prasser, H.-M.; Krepper, E.; Lucas, D.: Evolution of the two-phase flow in a vertical tube – decomposition of gas fraction profiles according to bubble size classes using wire-mesh sensors. International Journal of Thermal Sciences41 (2002) 1728Search in Google Scholar

9Schaffrath, A.; Hicken, E. F.; Jaegers, H.; Prasser, H.-M.: Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Operation Mode of the Emergency Condenser of the SWR1000. Nuclear Technology126 (1999) 123142Search in Google Scholar

10Krepper, E.; Hicken, E. F.; Jaegers, H.: Investigation of natural convection in large pools on the example of heating up the secondary side of an emergency condenser. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow23 (2002) 359365Search in Google Scholar

11UPTF-FachtagungIV: Versuchsergebnisse, Analysen, Mannheim 25. März 1993, Siemens AG, KWU, KWU R11/93/005, 1993Search in Google Scholar

12Petritsch, G.; Mewes, D.: Experimentelle Untersuchung der Strömungsform in der heißseitigen Hauptkühlmittelleitung eines Druckwasserreaktors. BMBF Forschungsvorhaben 1501004, Abschlussbericht Teil 1, Universität Hannover, Sept. 1997Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2006-3-7
Published Online: 2013-04-06
Published in Print: 2006-08-01

© 2006, Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Downloaded on 11.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/124.100289/html
Scroll to top button