The chemical separation of Eka-Hg from CERN W targets in view of recent relativistic calculations

References

1 Marinov, A.; Batty, C. J.; Kilvington, A. I.; Newton, G. W. A.; Robinson, V. J.; Hemingway, J. D.: Evidence for the possible existence of a superheavy element with atomic number 112. Nature229 (1971) 464–467.10.1038/229464a0Search in Google Scholar

2 Marinov, A.; Batty, C. J.; Kilvington, A. I.; Weil, J. L.; Friedman, A. M.; Newton, G. W. A.; Robinson, V. J.; Hemingway, J. D.; Mather, D. S.: Spontaneous fission previously observed in a mercury source. Nature234 (1971) 212–215.10.1038/234212b0Search in Google Scholar

3 Marinov, A.; Eshhar, S.; Weil, J. L.; Kolb, D.: Consistent interpretation of the secondary reaction experiment in W targets and prospects for the production of superheavy elements in ordinary heavy-ion reactions. Phys. Rev. Lett.52 (1984) 2209–2212; 53 (1984) 1120 (E).10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2209Search in Google Scholar

4 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Folger, H.; Kolb, D.; Oelert, W.: Observation of three coincidence events in a superheavy element search via the ⁸⁸Sr + ¹⁸⁴W reaction. 8th Int. Conf. an Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants, AMCO-8, Jerusalem, Israel (1991) L-46. (Unfortunately the AMCO-8 conference was cancelled due to the tension in the Persian Gulf).Search in Google Scholar

5 Marinov, A.: Study of long-lived superheavy elements in W targets via secondary and direct heavy-ion reactions. Proc. Int. Symp. on Structure and Reactions of Unstable Nuclei, Eds. K.Ikeda and Y.Suzuki, Niigata, Japan (1991) 317–324.Search in Google Scholar

6 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Kolb, D.: The evidence for production of the superheavy element with Z – 112 via secondary and direct heavy-ion reactions. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 132, Sixth Int. Conf. an Nuclei Far from Stability and Ninth Int. Conf. on Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants, Bernkastel-Kues, Germany, Eds. R.Neugart and A.Wöhr (1992) 437–442.Search in Google Scholar

7 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Kolb, D.: The evidence for element Z – 112 produced via secondary and direct heavy-ion reactions. Int. School-Seminar on Heavy Ion Physics, Eds. Yu. Ts.Oganessian, Yu. E.Penionzhkevich and R.Kalpakchieva, Dubna, Russia (1993) Vol. 1, 162–171.Search in Google Scholar

8 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Kolb, D.: Discovery of strongly enhanced low energy alpha decay of a long-lived isomeric state obtained in ¹⁶O + ¹⁹⁷Au reaction at 80 MeV. Mod. Phys. Lett. A11 (1996) 861–869.10.1142/S0217732396000862Search in Google Scholar

9 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Kolb, D.: Evidence for long-lived proton decay not far from the β-stability valley produced by the ¹⁶O + ¹⁹⁷Au reaction at 80 MeV. Mod. Phys. Lett. A11 (1996) 949–956.10.1142/S0217732396000965Search in Google Scholar

10 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Kolb, D.: Discovery of long-lived shape isomeric states which decay by strongly retarded high-energy particle radioactivity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E10 (2001) 185–208.10.1142/S0218301301000538Search in Google Scholar

11 Marinov, A.; Gelberg, S.; Kolb, D.; Weil, J. L.: Strongly enhanced low energy α-particle decay in heavy actinide nuclei and long-lived superdeformed and hyperdeformed isomeric states. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E10 (2001) 209–236.10.1142/S0218301301000472Search in Google Scholar

12 Viola, Jr., V. E.; Seaborg, G. T.: Nuclear systematics of the heavy elements-II. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.28 (1966) 741–761.10.1016/0022-1902(66)80412-8Search in Google Scholar

13 Stokstad, R. G.; Eisen, Y.; Kaplanis, S.; Pelte, D.; Smilansky, U.; Tserruya, I.: Fusion of ¹⁶O + ^{148,150,152,154}Sm at sub-barrier energies. Phys. Rev. C21 (1980) 2427–2435.10.1103/PhysRevC.21.2427Search in Google Scholar

14 Iwamoto, A.; Möller, P.: Nuclear deformation and sub-barrier fusion cross sections. Nucl. Phys. A605 (1996) 334–358.10.1016/0375-9474(96)00155-8Search in Google Scholar

15 Pershina, V.; Bastug, T.; Jacob, T.; Fricke, B.; Varga, S.: Intermetallic compounds of the heaviest elements: the electronic structure and bonding of dimers of element 112 and its homolog Hg. Chem. Phys. Lett.365 (2002) 176–183, and references therein.10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01428-8Search in Google Scholar

16 Pitzer, K. S.: Are elements 112, 114 and 118 relatively inert gasesÜ J. Chem. Phys.63 (1975) 1032–1033.10.1063/1.431398Search in Google Scholar

17 Seth, M.; Schwerdtfeger, P.; Dolg, M.: The chemistry of the superheavy elements. I. Pseudopotentials for 111 and 112 and relativistic coupled cluster calculations for (112)H+, (112)F₂, and (112)F₄. J. Chem. Phys.106 (1997) 3623–3632.10.1063/1.473437Search in Google Scholar

18 Marinov, A.; Eshhar, S. and Alspector, B.: Study of Au, TI and Pb sources separated from tungsten targets that were irradiated with 24-GeV protons. Indications for the possible production of superheavy elements. Proc. Int. Sym. on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas, Ed. M. A. K.Lodhi (1978) p. 81–88.Search in Google Scholar

19 Freeman, J. H.; Chivers, D. J.; Gard, G. A.; Temple, W.: Ion beam studies, part VI: The production of heavy ion beams. Nucl. Inst. Meth.145 (1977) 473–505.10.1016/0029-554X(77)90579-1Search in Google Scholar

20 Yakushev, A. B.et al.: Chemical identification and properties of element 112. Radiochimica Acta91 (2003) 433–440.10.1524/ract.91.8.433.20010Search in Google Scholar

21 Sovena, S. for Univ. Bern – PSI – GSI – Univ. Mainz – TUM – LBNL – UCB – IMP – collaboration: Indication for a gaseous element 112. Jahresbericht der Kernchemie, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland2004, p. 3; GSI Scientific Report 2003, Darmstadt, p. 187.Search in Google Scholar

22 Sarpe-Tudoran, C.; Pershina, V.; Fricke, B.; Anton, J.; Sepp, W.-D.: Theoretical predictions of the adsorption energy of element 112 on a gold surface. GSI Scientific Report 2003, Darmstadt, p. 188.Search in Google Scholar

23 Eichler, R.; Soverna, S.for the PSI-University of Bern-GSI-TU-Munich-FLNR-University Mainz-IMP Collaboration: Prospective for the determination of chemical properties of element 112. Phys. At. Nuclei66 (2003) 1146–1151.10.1134/1.1586429Search in Google Scholar