Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Introduction: Situating the Sharia Debate in Ontario
-
Jennifer A. Selby
and Anna C. Korteweg
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Chapters in this book
- Frontmatter i
- Contents vii
- Acknowledgments xi
-
Introduction: Situating the Sharia Debate
- Foreword: Sharia and the Future of Western Secularism 5
- Introduction: Situating the Sharia Debate in Ontario 12
-
Part One: Practising Religious Divorce among North American Muslims
- 1. Practising an ‘Islamic Imagination’: Islamic Divorce in North America 35
- 2. Faith-Based Arbitration or Religious Divorce: What Was the Issue? 66
-
Part Two: Regulating Faith-Based Arbitration
- 3. Multiculturalism Meets Privatization: The Case of Faith-Based Arbitration 91
- 4. ‘Sharia’ Courts in Canada: A Delayed Opportunity for the Indigenization of Islamic Legal Rulings 123
- 5. Asking Questions about Sharia: Lessons from Ontario 153
- 6. Islamic Law and the Canadian Mosaic: Politics, Jurisprudence, and Multicultural Accommodation 192
-
Part Four: Negotiating the Politics of Sharia-Based Arbitration
- 7. The ‘Good’ Muslim, ‘Bad’ Muslim Puzzle? The Assertion of Muslim Women’s Islamic Identity in the Sharia Debates in Canada 231
- 8. ‘The Muslims Have Ruined Our Party’: A Case Study of Ontario Media Portrayals of Supporters of Faith-Based Arbitration 257
-
Part Five: Analysing Discourses of Race, Gender, and Religion
- 9. Sharia in Canada? Mapping Discourses of Race, Gender, and Religious Difference 279
- 10. Agency and Representations: Voices and Silences in the Ontario Sharia Debate 307
-
Part Six: Managing Religion in the Canadian State
- 11. Managing the Mosaic: The Work of Form in ‘Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion 329
- 12. Construing the Secular: Implications of the Ontario Sharia Debate 351
-
Concluding Thoughts
- Conclusion: Debating Sharia in the West 377
- Contributors 395
Chapters in this book
- Frontmatter i
- Contents vii
- Acknowledgments xi
-
Introduction: Situating the Sharia Debate
- Foreword: Sharia and the Future of Western Secularism 5
- Introduction: Situating the Sharia Debate in Ontario 12
-
Part One: Practising Religious Divorce among North American Muslims
- 1. Practising an ‘Islamic Imagination’: Islamic Divorce in North America 35
- 2. Faith-Based Arbitration or Religious Divorce: What Was the Issue? 66
-
Part Two: Regulating Faith-Based Arbitration
- 3. Multiculturalism Meets Privatization: The Case of Faith-Based Arbitration 91
- 4. ‘Sharia’ Courts in Canada: A Delayed Opportunity for the Indigenization of Islamic Legal Rulings 123
- 5. Asking Questions about Sharia: Lessons from Ontario 153
- 6. Islamic Law and the Canadian Mosaic: Politics, Jurisprudence, and Multicultural Accommodation 192
-
Part Four: Negotiating the Politics of Sharia-Based Arbitration
- 7. The ‘Good’ Muslim, ‘Bad’ Muslim Puzzle? The Assertion of Muslim Women’s Islamic Identity in the Sharia Debates in Canada 231
- 8. ‘The Muslims Have Ruined Our Party’: A Case Study of Ontario Media Portrayals of Supporters of Faith-Based Arbitration 257
-
Part Five: Analysing Discourses of Race, Gender, and Religion
- 9. Sharia in Canada? Mapping Discourses of Race, Gender, and Religious Difference 279
- 10. Agency and Representations: Voices and Silences in the Ontario Sharia Debate 307
-
Part Six: Managing Religion in the Canadian State
- 11. Managing the Mosaic: The Work of Form in ‘Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion 329
- 12. Construing the Secular: Implications of the Ontario Sharia Debate 351
-
Concluding Thoughts
- Conclusion: Debating Sharia in the West 377
- Contributors 395