Excavating Nations

Excavating Nations traces the history of archaeology and museums in the contested German-Danish borderlands from the emergence of antiquarianism in the early nineteenth-century to German-Danish reconciliation after the Second World War.

J. Laurence Hare is an assistant professor in the Department of History at the University of Arkansas.

‘Excavating Nations is a fascinating and deeply relevant study of how political climates, ideological movements, and historical claims affected the archaeological discipline from its inception… It provides a rich context and background for our continued fascination with material remains.’

Eric Kurlander, Department of History, Stetson University:

“Laurence Hare’s fascinating study sheds new light on the uses (and abuses) of archaeology in constructing modern German and Danish national identity. In contrast to much recent scholarship on ‘national indifference’ in the Central European borderlands, Hare shows us that nineteenth-century German-Danish collaborations in excavating and commemorating medieval archaeological sites, such as Schleswig-Holstein's Danevirke, abetted the creation of distinct national(ist) traditions on both sides of the border. Although German and Danish archaeologists genuinely worked to foster a sense of transnational academic community committed to the mutual preservation of Nordic history and culture, their competing research agendas helped produce the racialist conceptions of empire used to justify Nazi expansion in the Second World War.”

George Williamson, Department of History, Florida State University:

“Excavating Nations tells the fascinating story of archaeology in the German-Danish borderlands, the site of some of the most significant archaeological finds of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and the locus of an ongoing rivalry between Germans and Danes over the contested territories of Schleswig and Holstein. Hare shows that even in an era of accelerating nationalisms, archaeology in this region was never merely a national project, it was also grounded in local identities and material realities, shared commitments to academic norms, and often surprising levels of cooperation among scholars across boundaries of language, ethnicity, and politics.”