Home An Evidence-based Systemic Review of Glucosamine Conducted by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An Evidence-based Systemic Review of Glucosamine Conducted by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration

  • Catherine Ulbricht , Ethan Basch , Samuel Basch , Renn Crichlow , Edzard Ernst , David Kroll , Mary McGarry , Michael Smith , Nancy Tannous , Ed Tessier , Candy Tsourounis and Mamta Vora
Published/Copyright: January 14, 2005

Review Methodology: Systematic Aggregation, Analysis, and Review of the Literature.Search Strategy: To prepare each Natural Standard monograph, electronic searches are conducted in nine databases, including AMED, CANCERLIT, CINAHL, CISCOM, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, HerbMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Medline, and NAPRALERT. Search terms include the common name(s), scientific name(s), and all listed synonyms for each topic. Hand searches are conducted of 20 additional journals (not indexed in common databases), and of bibliographies from 50 selected secondary references. No restrictions are placed on language or quality of publications. Researchers in the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are consulted for access to additional references or ongoing research.Selection Criteria: All literature is collected pertaining to efficacy in humans (regardless of study design, quality, or language), dosing, precautions, adverse effects, use in regnancy/lactation, interactions, alteration of laboratory says, and mechanism of action (in vitro, animal research, human data). Standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria are utilized for selection.Data Analysis: Data extraction and analysis are performed by health care professionals conducting clinical work and/or research at academic centers, using standardized instruments that pertain to each monograph section defining inclusion/exclusion criteria and analytic techniques, including validated measures of study quality). Data are verified by a second reviewer.Review Process: Blinded review of monographs is conducted by multidisciplinary research-clinical faculty at major academic centers with expertise in epidemiology and biostatistics, pharmacology, toxicology, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) research, and clinical practice. In cases of editorial disagreement, a three-member panel of the Editorial Board addresses conflicts, and consults experts when applicable. Authors of studies are contacted when clarification is required.

Published Online: 2005-1-14

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.2202/1553-3840.1008/html?srsltid=AfmBOoo3yqxlqToOmnfXDHnpOjJ9FINT_HcqvR5V39xdS2adhs7mE5_z
Scroll to top button