Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Reply: The Death Penalty Once More
-
Paul H. Rubin
Published/Copyright:
April 22, 2006
According to Paul Rubin, John Donohue and Justin Wolfers mischaracterize his analysis of the death penalty.
Published Online: 2006-4-22
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Letter
- Reply: The Death Penalty Once More
- Reply: Transfers vs. Economic Costs in the Iraq War
- Letter: Consider the Consumer Side of the Market for Catastrophe Insurance
- Column
- Grading the President's Tax Reform Panel's Plan
- Are Economists Smarter?
- Taxes on Investment Income Remain Too High and Lead to Multiple Distortions
- The (Legal) Pains of Vioxx: Why Product Liability Can Make Products More Dangerous
- The Economics of Net Neutrality
- Toying with Death and Taxes: Some Lessons from Down Under
Articles in the same Issue
- Letter
- Reply: The Death Penalty Once More
- Reply: Transfers vs. Economic Costs in the Iraq War
- Letter: Consider the Consumer Side of the Market for Catastrophe Insurance
- Column
- Grading the President's Tax Reform Panel's Plan
- Are Economists Smarter?
- Taxes on Investment Income Remain Too High and Lead to Multiple Distortions
- The (Legal) Pains of Vioxx: Why Product Liability Can Make Products More Dangerous
- The Economics of Net Neutrality
- Toying with Death and Taxes: Some Lessons from Down Under
