Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Letter: A Reply to Rubin on the Death Penalty
-
John Donohue
Published/Copyright:
April 17, 2006
Contrary to Paul Rubin's recent testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, we believe the fragility of their estimates and the invalidity of their instrumental variables undermine Dezhbakhsh, Rubin, and Shepherd's work as evidence that the death penalty deters murder.
Published Online: 2006-4-17
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Column
- Froth in the Silicon Valley Housing Market?
- China's New Exchange Rate Policy: Will China Follow Japan into a Liquidity Trap?
- The Death Penalty: No Evidence for Deterrence
- Reply to Donohue and Wolfers on the Death Penalty and Deterrence
- Should Governments Provide Catastrophe Insurance?
- Letter
- Letter: A Reply to Rubin on the Death Penalty
Articles in the same Issue
- Column
- Froth in the Silicon Valley Housing Market?
- China's New Exchange Rate Policy: Will China Follow Japan into a Liquidity Trap?
- The Death Penalty: No Evidence for Deterrence
- Reply to Donohue and Wolfers on the Death Penalty and Deterrence
- Should Governments Provide Catastrophe Insurance?
- Letter
- Letter: A Reply to Rubin on the Death Penalty
