Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Publius and Proofiness: Is Using Sampling with the Census for Apportioning Representatives Constitutional?
-
Danny M. Adkison
Published/Copyright:
July 13, 2011
This paper examines the desirability and constitutionality of using sampling techniques in conducting the United States census. The census is one of the most controversial political events each decade. Most people would be surprised to learn that the census was a hotly debated topic at the Constitutional Convention. In spite of the fact that a census is typically considered more accurate than a sample, this paper argues that using sampling techniques, for the allocation of legislative seats, would produce a more accurate count of inhabitants in America. Furthermore, the paper addresses the constitutional issues surrounding the use of sampling.
Published Online: 2011-7-13
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Historical Analogies, Military Surges, (and Economic Crises): Who Should be Consulted?
- It's the Financial Crisis, Stupid! How Framing and Competency Signals Altered the Economic Vote in the US and Germany
- Going off the Rails on a Crazy Train: The Causes and Consequences of Congressional Infamy
- Unhyphenated Americans in the 2010 U.S. House Election
- Candidate Obama and the Dilemmas of Political Time
- Obama to Blame? African American Surge Voters and the Ban on Same-Sex Marriage in Florida
- The Behavioral Political Economy of Budget Deficits: How Starve the Beast Policies Feed the Machine
- Publius and Proofiness: Is Using Sampling with the Census for Apportioning Representatives Constitutional?
- Testing Obama's Withdrawal Timeline Hypothesis in Afghanistan
- The Practicing Politics Working Group of the American Political Science Association: Bridging the Policy-Research Divide from the Practitioner's Point of View
- Response to Quirk's "Polarized Populism: Masses, Elites, and Partisan Conflict"
- Review
- A House Dividing: Understanding Polarization
- Review of Treaty Politics and the Rise of Executive Agreements: International Commitments in a System of Shared Powers
Articles in the same Issue
- Article
- Historical Analogies, Military Surges, (and Economic Crises): Who Should be Consulted?
- It's the Financial Crisis, Stupid! How Framing and Competency Signals Altered the Economic Vote in the US and Germany
- Going off the Rails on a Crazy Train: The Causes and Consequences of Congressional Infamy
- Unhyphenated Americans in the 2010 U.S. House Election
- Candidate Obama and the Dilemmas of Political Time
- Obama to Blame? African American Surge Voters and the Ban on Same-Sex Marriage in Florida
- The Behavioral Political Economy of Budget Deficits: How Starve the Beast Policies Feed the Machine
- Publius and Proofiness: Is Using Sampling with the Census for Apportioning Representatives Constitutional?
- Testing Obama's Withdrawal Timeline Hypothesis in Afghanistan
- The Practicing Politics Working Group of the American Political Science Association: Bridging the Policy-Research Divide from the Practitioner's Point of View
- Response to Quirk's "Polarized Populism: Masses, Elites, and Partisan Conflict"
- Review
- A House Dividing: Understanding Polarization
- Review of Treaty Politics and the Rise of Executive Agreements: International Commitments in a System of Shared Powers
