Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty

Stanley Rothman; S. Robert Lichter; Neil Nevitte

doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1067

Article

Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty

Stanley Rothman , S. Robert Lichter and Neil Nevitte

Published/Copyright: March 29, 2005

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal The Forum Volume 3 Issue 1

This article first examines the ideological composition of American university faculty and then tests whether ideological homogeneity has become self-reinforcing. A randomly based national survey of 1643 faculty members from 183 four-year colleges and universities finds that liberals and Democrats outnumber conservatives and Republicans by large margins, and the differences are not limited to elite universities or to the social sciences and humanities. A multivariate analysis finds that, even after taking into account the effects of professional accomplishment, along with many other individual characteristics, conservatives and Republicans teach at lower quality schools than do liberals and Democrats. This suggests that complaints of ideologically-based discrimination in academic advancement deserve serious consideration and further study. The analysis finds similar effects based on gender and religiosity, i.e., women and practicing Christians teach at lower quality schools than their professional accomplishments would predict.

Published Online: 2005-3-29

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1067