Abstract
As an generalization of hesitant fuzzy set, interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set and dual hesitant fuzzy set, interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy set has been proposed and applied in multiple attribute decision making. Hamacher t-norm and t-conorm is an generalization of algebraic and Einstein t-norms and t-conorms. In order to combine interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with Hamacher t-norm and t-conorm. We first introduced some new Hamacher operation rules for interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy elements. Then, several interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators are presented, some desirable properties and their special cases are studied. Further, a new multiple attribute decision making method with these operators is given, and an numerical example is provided to demonstrate that the developed approach is both valid and practical.
Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Higher Education of Jiangsu Province (18KJB110024), the High Training Funded for Professional Leaders of Higher Vocational Colleges in Jiangsu Province (2018GRFX038), Science and Technology Research Project of Nantong Shipping College (HYKY/2018A03)
References
[1] Venkata R. Decision making in the manufacturing environment, using graph theory and fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer-Verlag, London, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Hosseinzade Z, Pagsuyoin S A, Ponnambalam K, et al. Decision-making in irrigation networks: Selecting appropriate canal structures using multi-attribute decision analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601–602: 177–185.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.189Search in Google Scholar
[3] Arasteh M A, Shamshirband S, Yee P L. Using multi-attribute decision-making approaches in the selection of a hospital management system. Technology and Health Care, 2017, preprint: 1–17.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Bellman R, Zadeh L A. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 1970, 17(4): B141–B164.10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141Search in Google Scholar
[5] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8: 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-XSearch in Google Scholar
[6] Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Part I, II, III. Information Sciences, 1975, 8: 199–249.10.1007/978-1-4684-2106-4_1Search in Google Scholar
[7] Dubois D, Prade H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1): 87–96.10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3Search in Google Scholar
[9] Atanassov K T, Gargov G. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1989, 31(3): 343–349.10.1016/0165-0114(89)90205-4Search in Google Scholar
[10] Xu Z S. A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic perference relations. Information Sciences, 2004, 166(1–4): 19–30.10.1016/j.ins.2003.10.006Search in Google Scholar
[11] Torra V, Narukawa Y. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. The 18th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Jeju Island, Korea, 2009, 1378–1382.10.1109/FUZZY.2009.5276884Search in Google Scholar
[12] Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010, 25(6): 529–539.10.1002/int.20418Search in Google Scholar
[13] Zhu B, Xu Z S, Xia M M. Dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012, Article ID 879629, 13 pages.10.1155/2012/879629Search in Google Scholar
[14] Su Z, Xu Z S, Liu H F, et al. Distance and similarity measures for dual hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 29: 731–745.10.3233/IFS-141474Search in Google Scholar
[15] Singh P. Distance and similarity measures for multiple-attribute decision making with dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2017, 36(1): 111–126.10.1007/s40314-015-0219-2Search in Google Scholar
[16] Chen J J, Huang X J, Tang J. Distance measures for higher order dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2018, 37(2): 1784–1806.10.1007/s40314-017-0423-3Search in Google Scholar
[17] Wang H J, Zhao X F, Wei G W. Dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 26(5): 2281–2290.10.3233/IFS-130901Search in Google Scholar
[18] Ju Y B, Yang S H, Liu X Y. Some new dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators based on Choquet integral and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 27(6): 2857–2868.10.3233/IFS-141247Search in Google Scholar
[19] Xing J Y, Yu R, Zhang G C. Some new Dual hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operator. 2nd International Workshop on Materials Engineering and Computer Sciences (IWMECS 2015), 2015, 688–694.10.2991/iwmecs-15.2015.137Search in Google Scholar
[20] Ye J. Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38: 659–666,.10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.010Search in Google Scholar
[21] Chen Y, Peng X, Guan G, et al. Approaches to multiple attribute decision making based on the correlation coefficient with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 26(5): 2547–2556.10.3233/IFS-130926Search in Google Scholar
[22] Tyagi S K. Correlation coefficient of dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(22): 7082–7092.10.1016/j.apm.2015.02.046Search in Google Scholar
[23] Pathinathan T, Savarimuthu J. Multi-attribute decision making in a dual hesitant fuzzy set using TOPSIS. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention Research & Development, 2015, II (Issue I): 44–54.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Ren Z, Xu Z, Wang H. Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method. Information Sciences, 2017, 388–389: 1–16.10.1016/j.ins.2017.01.024Search in Google Scholar
[25] Zhao N, Xu Z S. Entropy measures for dual hesitant fuzzy information. 2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, Gwalior, 2015, 1152–1156.10.1109/CSNT.2015.266Search in Google Scholar
[26] Xu Y, Rui D, Wang H. Dual hesitant fuzzy interaction operators and their application to group decision making. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 2015, 32(4): 273–290.10.1080/21681015.2015.1046509Search in Google Scholar
[27] Xu Y P. Model for evaluating the mechanical product design quality with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 30: 1–6.10.3233/IFS-141426Search in Google Scholar
[28] Ju Y B, Liu X Y, Yang S H. Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decison making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 27: 1203–1218.10.3233/IFS-131085Search in Google Scholar
[29] Qu G H, Qu W H, Li C H. Some new interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation operators and their applications. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34(1): 245–266.10.3233/JIFS-171162Search in Google Scholar
[30] Qua G, Zhou H, Qu W, et al. Shapley interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34(3): 1827–1845.10.3233/JIFS-171090Search in Google Scholar
[31] Zang Y, Zhao X, Li S. Interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy Heronian mean aggregation operators and their applications to multi-attribute decison making. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2018, 17(1): 1–26.10.1142/S1469026818500050Search in Google Scholar
[32] Zhang W K, Li X, Ju Y B, Some aggregation operators based on Einstein operations under interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy setting and their application. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, Artical ID: 958927, 12 pages.10.1155/2014/958927Search in Google Scholar
[33] Hamacher H. Uber logische verknunpfungrnn unssharfer Aussagen undderen Zugenhorige Bewertungsfunktione. in: Trappl, Klir, Riccardi (Eds.), Progress in Cybernatics and Systems Research, Hemisphere, Washington DC, 1978, 3: 276–288.Search in Google Scholar
[34] Xia M M, Xu Z S, Zhu B. Some issues on intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 31: 78–88.10.1016/j.knosys.2012.02.004Search in Google Scholar
[35] Xu Z S. On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement marix in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 126: 683–687.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00082-XSearch in Google Scholar
[36] Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calov T. Aggregation functions: A guide for practitioners. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
[37] Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2004, 12: 45–61.Search in Google Scholar
[38] Xu Z S, Da Q L. The ordered weighted geometic averaging operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2002, 17: 709–716.10.1002/int.10045Search in Google Scholar
[39] Xu Z S. Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Meathods and Application. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2004.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Education for Sustainability: Lessons from Living Systems Governance
- Interval-Valued Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators for Multiple Attribute Decision Making
- A Global Seamless Hybrid Constellation Design Approach with Restricted Ground Supporting for Space Information Network
- High-precision Positioning and Deformation Monitoring Analysis of BD/GPS Based on Improved Kalman Filter Fusion
- Optimal Decision-Making of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Incorporating Fairness Concerns
Articles in the same Issue
- Education for Sustainability: Lessons from Living Systems Governance
- Interval-Valued Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators for Multiple Attribute Decision Making
- A Global Seamless Hybrid Constellation Design Approach with Restricted Ground Supporting for Space Information Network
- High-precision Positioning and Deformation Monitoring Analysis of BD/GPS Based on Improved Kalman Filter Fusion
- Optimal Decision-Making of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Incorporating Fairness Concerns