Home The crystal chemistry of Mn3+ in the clino- and orthozoisite structure types, Ca2M33+[OH|O|SiO4|Si2O7]: A structural and spectroscopic study of some natural piemontites and “thulites” and their synthetic equivalents
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The crystal chemistry of Mn3+ in the clino- and orthozoisite structure types, Ca2M33+[OH|O|SiO4|Si2O7]: A structural and spectroscopic study of some natural piemontites and “thulites” and their synthetic equivalents

  • K. Langer , E. Tillmanns , M. Kersten , H. Almen and R. K. Arni
Published/Copyright: September 25, 2009

Abstract

Six new structure refinements and eleven sets of polarised, single-crystal electronic absorption spectra, EX, Y and Z, in the energy range 35000–5000 cm–1 were obtained on natural and synthetic orthozoisite-type “thulites” and clinozoisite-type piemontites: Ca2(Al3–pMp3+) [OH|O|SiO4|Si2O7] where M3+ = Mn3+ or (Mn1–n3+Fen3+) for the synthetic or natural minerals, respectively. Electron microprobe analyses of the single crystals studied revealed substitutional degrees pM3+ = 0.13 or 0.51 in natural and synthetic “thulite”, respectively, and 0.57 ≤ pM3+ ≤ 1.17 or 0.83 ≤ pM3+ ≤ 1.47 in the natural or synthetic piemontites, respectively.

Manganese in “thulite” is trivalent, as it is in piemontite. In both structure types, M3+ fractionates strongly into the axially compressed [M(3)O6] polyhedra, and does not enter the M(2) sites. Mean M(3)—O and M(1)—O distances increase in both structures, compared to the M3+-free Al end members. Such distance changes in piemontite are +0.47% and +0.53% per 0.1xM3+, respectively, (x = site fraction). The bending angle of the Si2O7-group in cis-configuration, ∢Si(1)—O(9)—Si(2), decreases from 164.4° in clinozoisite to 147.4° in the most Mn3+-rich synthetic piemontite with pMn³⁺ = 1.47 (emp) or xMn³⁺(M3) = 0.931 and xMn³⁺(M1) = 0.460 (from structure refinement).

The detailed evaluation of the changes, due to Al→M3+ substitution, of individual bond lengths, as well as the quantitative evaluation of the intensities of the strong spinallowed dd bands of Mn3+ in M(3), prove that in natural piemontite the preference of Mn3+ for M(3) over M(1) is more pronounced than that of Fe3+. This is in accord with the Jahn-Teller effect of 3d4-configurated Mn3+. In addition, evaluation of the individual M(3)–O(i) distances with increasing xMn³⁺(M3) in piemontite indicates that the axial compression of the [M(3)O6] polyhedra increases. This contrasts with the behaviour of Fe3+-bearing epidotes and is again in accord with the Jahn-Teller effect of Mn3+.

The polarisation behaviour of the three strong spin-allowed dd-bands of Mn3+ in M(3), vI at 13000–12000 cm–1 (EY), vII at 19000–18000 cm–1 (EY and Z, Z > Y) and vIII at 24000–22000 cm–1 (EX) is best interpreted by assuming a C2v(C2″) pseudo-symmetry of the M(3) sites, a super-group of their site symmetry Cs. Evaluation of the energies of vI, vII and vIII on the basis of the energy level diagram obtained for Mn3+ with the above pseudo-symmetry yields the crystal field parameter 10 Dq = 13540 cm–1 for xMn³⁺(M3) = 0:931. 10 Dq increases slightly by 30 cm–1 per -0.1xMn³⁺(M3). Such values and the Jahn-Teller splitting of the octahedral crystalfield ground-state of Mn3+, δ = vI, yield a crystal field stabilisation energy of Mn3+(M3) of 14080 cm–1 for xMn³⁺(M3) = 0:931. CFSEMn3+ increases slightly by 28 cm–1 per -0.1xMn³⁺(M3). Such values are appreciably smaller than those typical of Mn3+ substituting for Al in the axially elongated [M(1)O6] octahedra in the andalusite structure type. This different behaviour of Mn3+ in the two structure types is likely due to the smaller deviation of (c=a)oct in piemontite M(3) compared to andalusite M(1) for the same site fractions of Mn3+. In addition, the axial inversion effect — compressed [M(3)O6] in the clinozoisite-type or elongated [M(1)O6] in the andalusite-type, involving the electron hole of 3d4 in dz2 or d(x²-y²), respectively — may play a role.

:
Published Online: 2009-9-25
Published in Print: 2002-11-1

© 2002 Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH

Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1524/zkri.217.11.563.20780/html
Scroll to top button