Abstract
This paper examines two research questions. First, we investigate whether specific occupational groups experienced changes in the recognition they received during the Covid-19 crisis. Second, we analyse whether occupational recognition can promote compliance with infection control measures. In addition, we distinguish between a micro-level of job recognition and compliance in the direct working environment on the one hand and a macro-level of recognition of occupational groups and general acceptance of infection control measures on the other. We find that health care occupations and “basic occupations” (essential occupations that do not require formal training) report an increase in recognition received by society during the pandemic, but still perceive the lowest levels of recognition overall. These groups also report lower levels of political recognition and do not feel adequately remunerated. Furthermore, occupational recognition has a positive impact on compliance with infection control measures. We identify institutional trust as the most important mediator. While occupational recognition in the immediate work environment has the greatest impact on micro-level compliance at the workplace, occupational recognition at the macro-level is relevant for accepting closures of public facilities, various restrictions and the intention to get vaccinated.
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Beitrag thematisiert zwei Forschungsfragen. Erstens untersuchen wir, ob bestimmte Berufsgruppen Veränderungen hinsichtlich ihrer Anerkennung während der Covid-Krise erfuhren. Zweitens analysieren wir, ob berufliche Anerkennung die Compliance mit Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen fördern kann. Dabei unterscheiden wir zwischen einer Mikroebene der Job-Anerkennung und Compliance im unmittelbaren Arbeitsumfeld auf der einen Seite und einer Makroebene der Anerkennung der Berufsgruppe und der generellen Akzeptanz von Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen auf der anderen Seite. Beschäftigte in Gesundheits-/Pflegeberufen sowie in „Basisarbeit“ (Tätigkeiten, die keine Qualifizierung erfordern) berichten einen Anerkennungszuwachs seitens der Gesellschaft währende der Pandemie, nehmen insgesamt aber nach wie vor das geringste Ausmaß an Anerkennung wahr. Diese Berufsgruppen empfinden zudem die politische Anerkennung als gering und halten ihren Beruf für unterbezahlt. Zudem zeigt sich, dass berufliche Anerkennung einen positiven Einfluss auf die Compliance mit Infektionsschutzmaßnahmen hat. Institutionenvertrauen erweist sich als wichtigster Mediator dieses Zusammenhangs. Während die unmittelbar erfahrene Anerkennung im direkten Arbeitsumfeld den größten Einfluss auf die Compliance am Arbeitsplatz und damit auf die Mikroebene hat, erweist sich die Anerkennung der Berufsgruppe als relevant für die Akzeptanz von Schließungen öffentlicher Einrichtungen und Einschränkungen sowie die Impfbereitschaft.
References
Adams-Prassl, Abi; Boneva, Teodora; Golin, Marta; Rauh, Christopher (2020): “Work that Can Be Done from Home: Evidence on Variation within and Across Occupations and Industries”, SSRN Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3631584.10.2139/ssrn.3631584Search in Google Scholar
Babst, Axel; Groß, Martin; Lang, Volker (2022a): Konstruktion von Berufsgruppen als Basis für tiefergehende Analysen des Status Quo und der Veränderungen beruflicher Anerkennung im Rahmen der Corona-Pandemie. Download at: https://uni-tuebingen.de/de/197507 [last access: 04/12/2022]Search in Google Scholar
Babst, Axel; Groß, Martin; Lang, Volker (2022b): Konstruktion von Skalen zur quantitativen Messung beruflicher Anerkennung. Download at: https://uni-tuebingen.de/de/197507 [last access: 04/12/2022]Search in Google Scholar
Bauer, Anja; Dengler, Katharina; Matthes, Britta; Jucknewitz, Roland; Schramm, Anja (2021): Berufe und Covid-19-Pandemie: Wie hoch ist das berufsspezifische Ansteckungsrisiko? Edited by IAB-Forum. Download at https://www.iab-forum.de/berufe-und-covid-19-pandemie-wie-hoch-ist-das-berufsspezifische-ansteckungsrisiko/, zuletzt aktualisiert am 21.09.2021, [last access: 14/11/2022].Search in Google Scholar
BMAS (Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales) 2022: Selbstständige Erwerbstätigkeit in Deutschland (Aktualisierung 2022). Forschungsbericht 601. Download at: https://www.bmas.de/DE/Service/Publikationen/Forschungsberichte/fb-601-selbststaendige-erwerbstaetigkeit-in-deutschland.html [last access: 01.08.2022]Search in Google Scholar
Burstedde, Alexander; Seyda, Susanne; Malin, Lydia; Risius, Paula; Jansen, Anika; Flake, Regina; Werner, Dirk (2020): “Versorgungsrelevante” Berufe in der Corona-Krise. Fachkräftesituation und Fachkräftepotentiale in kritischen Infrastrukturen. Edited by Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. Kompetenzzentrum Fachkräftesicherung. Köln.Search in Google Scholar
Cameron, James E.; Voth, Jennifer; Jaglal, Susan B.; Guilcher, Sara J. T.; Hawker, Gillian; Salbach, Nancy M. (2018): “‘In this together’: Social identification predicts health outcomes (via self-efficacy) in a chronic disease self-management program”, Social Science & Medicine (1982) 208: 172–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.007.10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.007Search in Google Scholar
Caplanova, Anetta; Sivak, Rudolf; Szakadatova, Estera (2021): “Institutional Trust and Compliance with Measures to Fight COVID-19”, Int Adv Econ Res 27(1): 47–60. DOI: 10.1007/s11294-021-09818-3.10.1007/s11294-021-09818-3Search in Google Scholar
Cetrulo, Armanda; Guarascio, Dario; Virgillito, Maria Enrica (2020): “The Privilege of Working From Home at the Time of Social Distancing”, Intereconomics 55: 142–147. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-020-0891-3.10.1007/s10272-020-0891-3Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Cory; Davila, Andrés; Regis, Maxime; Kraus, Sascha (2020): “Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation”, Global Transitions 2: 76–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003.10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003Search in Google Scholar
Droste, Luigi (2019): “Treiben Sorgen und Ängste den ‘populistischen Zeitgeist’? Eine Untersuchung von Erscheinungsformen, Verbreitung und Determinanten populistischer Einstellungen”, in: Christiane Lübke and Jan Delhey (eds.): Diagnose Angstgesellschaft? Was wir wirklich über die Gefühlslage der Menschen wissen. Bielefeld: transcript, 223–253.10.1515/9783839446140-010Search in Google Scholar
Drury, John; Brown, Rupert; González, Roberto; Miranda, Daniel (2016): “Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: Solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake”, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 46(2): 209–223. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2146.10.1002/ejsp.2146Search in Google Scholar
Fessler, Agnes; Holst, Hajo; Niehoff, Steffen (2021): “Corona und die Arbeitswelt der Zukunft: von der gesellschaftlichen (Un-)Sichtbarkeit des Leidens an der Pandemie”, in: Ursula Filipic and Annika Schönauer (eds.): Ein Jahr Corona: Ausblick Zukunft der Arbeit. Wien: ÖGB-Verlag, 8–20.Search in Google Scholar
Fetzer, Thiemo; Hensel, Lukas; Hermle, Johannes; Roth, Christopher (2021): “Coronavirus Perceptions and Economic Anxiety”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 103(5): 968–978. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00946.10.1162/rest_a_00946Search in Google Scholar
Flisi, Sara; Santangelo, Giulia (2022): “Occupations in the European Labour Market During the COVID-19 Pandemic”, Intereconomics 57(2): 120–126. DOI: 10.1007/s10272-022-1040-y.10.1007/s10272-022-1040-ySearch in Google Scholar
Ganzeboom, Harry B.G.; Treiman, Donald J. (2023): “International Stratification and Mobility File: Conversion Tools.” Amsterdam: Department of Social Research Methodology, http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/ismf/index.htm. [last access: 12/05/2023]Search in Google Scholar
Goos, Maarten; Manning, Alan (2003): Lousy and Lovely Jobs: the Rising Polarization of Work in Britain. Download at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/20002/1/Lousy_and_Lovely_Jobs_the_Rising_Polarization_of_Work_in_Britain.pdf l [last access: 14/11/2022].Search in Google Scholar
Green, Mark A.; Semple, Malcolm G. (2021): “Occupational inequalities in the prevalence of COVID-19: A longitudinal observational study of England, August 2020 to January 2021”. Preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.01.21258140.10.1101/2021.06.01.21258140Search in Google Scholar
Groß, Martin (2021): “Sozialer Wandel, soziale Identität und populistische Einstellungen”, in: Birgit Blättel-Mink (ed.): Gesellschaft unter Spannung. Verhandlungen des 40. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie 2020.Search in Google Scholar
Guan, Mengfei; So, Jiyeon (2016): “Influence of Social Identity on Self-Efficacy Beliefs through Perceived Social Support: A Social Identity Theory Perspective”, Communication Studies 67(5): 588–604. DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2016.1239645.10.1080/10510974.2016.1239645Search in Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1992): Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. 1. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Hövermann, Andreas (2020): “Soziale Lebenslagen, soziale Ungleichheit und Corona – Auswirkungen für Erwerbstätige: Eine Auswertung der HBS-Erwerbstätigenbefragung im April 2020”, WSI Policy Brief 44. Download at: https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2020071011444104053350.Search in Google Scholar
INQA (Initiative neue Qualität der Arbeit) (2021): Basisarbeit. Download at: https://inqa.de/DE/wissen/schwerpunkt-covid/basisarbeit/uebersicht.html [last access: 01.08.2022]Search in Google Scholar
Immel, Lea; Neumeier, Florian; Peichl, Andreas (2022): “The Unequal Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Large Representative German Population Survey”, Review of Income and Wealth 68(2): 471–496. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3837091.10.1111/roiw.12571Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Frederik; Bor, Alexander; Petersen, Michael Bang (2021): “Compliance without fear: Individual‐level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic”, British Journal of Health Psychology 26: 679–696.10.1111/bjhp.12519Search in Google Scholar
Kittel, Bernhard; Kalleitner, Fabian; Schiestl, David W. (2021): “Peers for the Fearless: Social norms facilitate preventive behaviour if individuals perceive low COVID-19 health risks”, PloS one 16 (12). DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/q9b23.10.1371/journal.pone.0260171Search in Google Scholar
Konietzka, Dirk; Berger, Peter A. (2001): Die Erwerbsgesellschaft. Neue Ungleichheiten und Unsicherheiten. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey V.; Ratzan, Scott C.; Palayew, Adam; Gostin, Lawrence O.; Larson, Heidi J.; Rabin, Kenneth et al. (2021): “A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine”, Nature Medicine 27(2): 225–228. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9.10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9Search in Google Scholar
Lindholt, Marie Fly; Jørgensen, Frederik; Bor, Alexander; Petersen, Michael Bang (2021): “Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data”, BMJ Open 11(6), e048172. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048172.10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048172Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Roger C.; Davis, James H.; F. David Schoorman (1995): “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”, The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–734.10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335Search in Google Scholar
Mayer-Ahuja, Nicole (2021): Verkannte Leistungsträger. Berichte aus der Klassengesellschaft. Unter Mitarbeit von Oliver Nachtwey. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert (1973): Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft. Aus der Sicht des Sozialbehaviorismus. Edited by Charles W. Morris. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 28).Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, Kristina; Williamson, Harley; Sargeant, Elise; McCarthy, Molly (2020): “Why people comply with COVID-19 social distancing restrictions: Self-interest or duty?”, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 53(4): 477–496. DOI: 10.1177/0004865820954484.10.1177/0004865820954484Search in Google Scholar
Mutambudzi, Miriam; Niedzwiedz, Claire; Macdonald, Ewan Beaton; Leyland, Alastair; Mair, Frances; Anderson, Jana et al. (2021): “Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants”, Occupational and Environmental Medicine 78: 307–314.10.1136/oemed-2020-106731Search in Google Scholar
Nivette, Amy; Ribeaud, Denis; Murray, Aja; Steinhoff, Annekatrin; Bechtiger, Laura; Hepp, Urs (2021): “Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: Insights from a longitudinal cohort study”, Social Science & Medicine 268.10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113370Search in Google Scholar
Pak, Anton; McBryde, Emma; Adegboye, Oyelola A. (2021): “Does High Public Trust Amplify Compliance with Stringent COVID-19 Government Health Guidelines? A Multi-country Analysis Using Data from 102 627 Individuals”, Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 14: 293–302. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S278774.10.2147/RMHP.S278774Search in Google Scholar
Pavela Banai, Irena; Banai, Benjamin; Mikloušić, Igor (2022): “Beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories, compliance with the preventive measures, and trust in government medical officials”, Current Psychology 41(10): 7448–7458. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01898-y.10.1007/s12144-021-01898-ySearch in Google Scholar
Pfattheicher, Stefan; Nockur, Laila; Böhm, Robert; Sassenrath, Claudia; Petersen, Michael Bang (2020): “The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic”, Psychological Science 31(11): 1363–1373.10.1177/0956797620964422Search in Google Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas (2019): Das Ende der Illusion. Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur in der Spätmoderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Schmelz, Katrin (2021): “Enforcement may crowd out voluntary support for COVID-19 policies, especially where trust in government is weak and in a liberal society”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(1). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016385118.10.1073/pnas.2016385118Search in Google Scholar
Scholz, Urte; Freund, Alexandra M. (2021): “Determinants of protective behaviours during a nationwide lockdown in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic”, British Journal of Health Psychology 26(3): 935–957. DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12513.10.1111/bjhp.12513Search in Google Scholar
Schumpe, Birga M.; van Lissa, Caspar J.; Bélanger, Jocelyn J.; Ruggeri, Kai; Mierau, Jochen; Nisa, Claudia F. et al. (2022): “Predictors of adherence to public health behaviors for fighting COVID-19 derived from longitudinal data”, Scientific Reports 12(1): 3824. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04703-9.10.1038/s41598-021-04703-9Search in Google Scholar
Seyd, Ben; Bu, Feifei (2022): “Perceived risk crowds out trust? Trust and public compliance with coronavirus restrictions over the course of the pandemic”, Eur. Pol. Sci. Rev. 14(2): 155–170. DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000078.10.1017/S1755773922000078Search in Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri; Turner, John C. (1979): “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict”, Organizational Identity: A reader 56(65): 33–47.10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Tanis, Martin; Postmes, Tom (2005): “A social identity approach to trust: interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behaviour”, Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 35(3): 413–424. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.256.10.1002/ejsp.256Search in Google Scholar
Treiman, D. J. (1976). “A Standard Occupational Prestige Scale for Use with Historical Data”, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 7(2): 283–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/20273710.2307/202737Search in Google Scholar
van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (2011). “mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R”, Journal of Statistical Software 45(3): 1–67.10.18637/jss.v045.i03Search in Google Scholar
van Vu, Thanh (2021): “Public Trust in Government and Compliance with Policy during COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam”, Public Organiz Rev 21(4): 779–796. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-021-00566-w.10.1007/s11115-021-00566-wSearch in Google Scholar
Wright, Austin L.; Sonin, Konstantin; Driscoll, Jesse; Wilson, Jarnickae (2020): “Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 180: 544–554. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.008.10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.008Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Occupational health in a post-pandemic world of work. Introduction to this special issue
- Social partners and OSH: a multilevel and cross-country exploration in the hospital and social services sectors
- Occupational health in slaughterhouses in Germany: translating political claims into Legal Language during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Mental stress and resources in the sectors of IT services and social services – The potential of company occupational safety and health policy for developing health-promoting organisations
- Occupational recognition during the Covid-19 pandemic: differences between occupational groups and the association with compliance with infection control measures
- Occupational safety and infection control for risk groups in the Covid-19 pandemic and the participation of employee representative bodies
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Occupational health in a post-pandemic world of work. Introduction to this special issue
- Social partners and OSH: a multilevel and cross-country exploration in the hospital and social services sectors
- Occupational health in slaughterhouses in Germany: translating political claims into Legal Language during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Mental stress and resources in the sectors of IT services and social services – The potential of company occupational safety and health policy for developing health-promoting organisations
- Occupational recognition during the Covid-19 pandemic: differences between occupational groups and the association with compliance with infection control measures
- Occupational safety and infection control for risk groups in the Covid-19 pandemic and the participation of employee representative bodies