Abstract
The article starts by observing a parallel between the identification of Christ's humanity and universal human nature, for which Harnack repudiates some church fathers, and David Strauss' claim, in his Life of Jesus, that the subject of the Incarnation must be all humanity. It is argued that this oppositional stance is indicative of fundamental philosophical and theological differences between the Tübingen School and the Ritschl School. Those differences, however, are then explained as emerging from what is ultimately a common project of a radical form of historical theology. This project, it is argued, Ritschl took over from Baur while correcting it in crucial ways. Taken together, the two central theological schools of the 19th century thus illustrate the potential and the limits of christian theology within the historicist paradigm.
© Walter de Gruyter 2011
Artikel in diesem Heft
- An editorial staff change
- „… keinesfalls ,christlich‘ in irgendeinem engeren Sinne schreibend“. Kurt Nowak als Belletrist
- Albrecht Ritschl and the Tübingen School. A neglected link in the history of 19th century theology
- Sinn der Geschichte. Gottfried Salomon-Delatours Gedenkrede über Ernst Troeltsch in Heidelberg am 24. 1.1963
- Paul Tillich im Dialog mit dem Kultur- und Religionsphilosophen Fedor Stepun. Eine Korrespondenz im Zeichen von Bolschewismus und Nationalsozialismus
- Reviews/Rezensionen
Artikel in diesem Heft
- An editorial staff change
- „… keinesfalls ,christlich‘ in irgendeinem engeren Sinne schreibend“. Kurt Nowak als Belletrist
- Albrecht Ritschl and the Tübingen School. A neglected link in the history of 19th century theology
- Sinn der Geschichte. Gottfried Salomon-Delatours Gedenkrede über Ernst Troeltsch in Heidelberg am 24. 1.1963
- Paul Tillich im Dialog mit dem Kultur- und Religionsphilosophen Fedor Stepun. Eine Korrespondenz im Zeichen von Bolschewismus und Nationalsozialismus
- Reviews/Rezensionen