Abstract
The subject of this study is the composition of low-molecular-weight metabolites in downy birch (Betula pubescens) buds and their participation in protection from various kinds of stress. Using the GC-MS, 640 compounds were detected, of which 314 were identified in downy birch buds for the first time. The volatile components detected using the SPME technique mainly consisted (about 70% of the total ionic current of the chromatogram, TIC) of mixtures of sesquiterpenoids. The exudate covering the buds, along with sesquiterpenoids (approximately 60% of TIC), included flavonoids (25% of TIC). The main part of the material extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide from buds comprised sesquiterpenoids and triterpenoids (47 and 28% of TIC, respectively). Via column chromatography, 25 known compounds (mainly flavonoids and triterpenoids) were isolated, most of which were first discovered in the buds of downy birch. Many compounds of these classes have strong biological activity and probably either directly or indirectly perform a protective function in birch buds. An assumption is made about the biological role of a number of secondary metabolites (such as volatile isomeric megastigmatriens and triterpene seco-acids) as well as about these compounds’ possible means of biosynthesis, which were first discovered in the buds of downy birch.
Funding source: Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2016/23/B/NZ7/03360
Funding source: Białystok University of Technology
Award Identifier / Grant number: S/ZWL/1/2017
Acknowledgments
We thanks Anna J. Wołkowycka-Drużba for technical assistance and sample preparation.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This study was funded by National Science Centre (Poland) (grant number 2016/23/B/NZ7/03360) and Białystok University of Technology (grant number S/ZWL/1/2017).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Hynynen, J, Niemist, P, Viher-Aarnio, A, Brunner, A, Hein, S, Velling, P. Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in northern Europe. Forestry 2010;83:103–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpp035.Search in Google Scholar
2. Keinänen, M, Julkunen-Tiitto, R, Rousi, M, Tahvanainen, J. Taxonomic implications of phenolic variation in leaves of birch (Betula L.) species. Biochem Systemat Ecol 1999;27:243–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-1978(98)00086-6.Search in Google Scholar
3. Howland, DE, Oliver, RP, Davy, AJ. Morphological and molecular variation in natural population of Betula. New Phytol 1995;130:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb01821.x.Search in Google Scholar
4. Julkunen-Tiitto, R, Rousi, M, Bryant, J, Sorsa, S, Keinänen, M, Sikanen, H. Chemical diversity of several Betulaceae species: comparison of phenolics and terpenoids in northern birch stems. Trees 1996;11:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004680050053.Search in Google Scholar
5. Isidorov, V, Stocki, M, Vetchinnikova, L. Inheritance of specific secondary volatile metabolites of white birch Betula pendula and Betula pubescens hybrids. Trees 2019;33:1329–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-019-01861-2.Search in Google Scholar
6. Wichtl, M. Herbal drugs and phytopharmaceuticals, 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Medpharm Sci. Publ.; 2004.Search in Google Scholar
7. Birch, RA. In: Govil, JN, Singh, VK, editors. Recent progress in medical plants, drug plants II. Texas: Studium Press; 2010, 28:121–42 pp.Search in Google Scholar
8. Shikov, AN, Pozharitskaya, ON, Makarov, VG, Wagner, H, Verpoorte, R, Heinrich, M. Medicinal plants of the Russian Pharmacopoeia; their history and applications. J Ethnopharmacol 2014;154:481–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.04.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Haukioja, E. Putting the insect into the birch-insect interaction. Oecologia 2003;136:161–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1238-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Haukioja, E. Plant defenses and population fluctuations of forest defoliators: mechanism-based scenarios. Ann Zool Fenn 2005;42:313–25.Search in Google Scholar
11. Howe, GA, Jander, G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2008;59:41–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Trowbridge, AM, Stoy, PC. BVOC-mediated plant-herbivore interactions. In: Niinemets, Ü, Monson, RK, editors. Biology, control and models of tree volatile organic compound emissions. New York: Springer; 2013:21–46 pp.10.1007/978-94-007-6606-8_2Search in Google Scholar
13. Ameye, M, Allmann, S, Verwaeren, J, Smagghe, G, Haesaert, G, Schuurink, RC. Green leaf volatile production by plants: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 2018;220:666–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14671.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Turlings, TCJ, Erb, M. Tritrophic interaction mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. In: Berenbaum, MR, editor. Annual review of entomology. Palo Alto; 2018, vol 63:433–52 pp.10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043507Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Wollenweber, E, Mann, K, Roitman, JN. Flavonoid aglycones from the bud exudates of three Betulaceae. Z Naturforsch 1991;46c:495–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1991-5-621.Search in Google Scholar
16. Laitinen, M-L, Julkunen-Tiitto, R, Rousi, M. Variation of phenolic compounds within a birch (Betula pendula) population. J Chem Ecol 2000;26:1609–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005582611863.10.1023/A:1005582611863Search in Google Scholar
17. Demirci, B, Paper, DH, Demirci, F, Baser, KHC, Franz, K. Essential oil of Betula pendula Roth buds. Evid Base Compl Alternative Med 2004;1:301–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh041.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
18. Peltonen, PA, Julkunen-Tiitto, R, Vapaavuori, E, Holopainen, JK. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and ozone an aphid oviposition preference and birch bud exudate phenolics. Global Change Biol 2006;12:1670–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01226.x.Search in Google Scholar
19. Başer, KHC, Demirci, B. Studies of Betula essential oils. ARKIVOS 2007;7:335–48.10.3998/ark.5550190.0008.730Search in Google Scholar
20. Orav, A, Arak, E, Boikova, T, Raal, A. Essential oil in Betula spp. naturally growing in Estonia. Biochem Systemat Ecol 2011;39:744–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2011.06.013.Search in Google Scholar
21. Vladimorov, MS, Nikolic, VD, Stanojevic, LP, Stanojevic, JS, Nikolic, LB, Danilovic, BR, et al.. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of birch (Betula pendula Roth) buds essential oil. J Essent Oil Bear Plant 2019;22:120–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2019.1602084.Search in Google Scholar
22. Galashkina, NG, Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Flavonoids of Betula pendula Roth buds. Rastit Res 2004;40:62–8 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
23. Vedernikov, DN, Galashkina, NG, Roshchin, VI. Group composition of Betula pendula Roth buds. Rastit Res 2004;40:83–9 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
24. Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Extractive compounds of Betulaceae family birch buds (Betula pendula Roth): I. Composition of fatty acids, hydrocarbons, and esters. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2010;36:894–8. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1068162010070174.Search in Google Scholar
25. Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Extractive compounds of Betulaceae family birch buds (Betula pendula, Roth.): II. Carbonyl compounds, oxides, esters. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2010;36:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1068162010070186.Search in Google Scholar
26. Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Extractive compounds of Betulaceae family birch buds (Betula pendula Roth.): III. Composition of triterpene acids, flavonoids, alcohols and esters. Khim Rastit Syr 2010;4:67–75 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
27. Vedernikov, DN, Shabanova, NY, Roshchin, VI. Change in the chemical composition of the crust and inner bark of the (Betulaceae) with tree height. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2011;37:877–82. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1068162011070259.Search in Google Scholar
28. Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Humulene and its derivatives from Betula pendula buds. Chem Nat Compd 2011;46:886–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10600-011-9775-x.Search in Google Scholar
29. Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Extractive compounds of Betulaceae family birch buds (Betula pendula Roth.): IV. Composition of sesquiterpene diols, triols, and flavonoids. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2012;38:753–61. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1068162012070217.Search in Google Scholar
30. Vedernikov, DN, Roshchin, VI. Extractive compounds of Betulaceae family birch buds (Betula pendula Roth.): V. Composition of triterpene seco-acids. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2012;38:762–8. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1068162012070229.Search in Google Scholar
31. Isidorov, VA, Krajewska, U, Vinogorova, VT, Vetchinnikova, L, Fuksman, IL, Bal, K. Gas chromatographic analysis of essential oil from buds of different birch species with preliminary partition of components. Biochem Systemat Ecol 2004;32:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-1978(03)00175-3.Search in Google Scholar
32. Isidorov, V, Szczepaniak, L, Wróblewska, A, Pirożnikow, E, Vetchinnikova, L. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric examination of chemical composition of two Eurasian birch (Betula L.) bud exudates and its taxonomical implication. Biochem Systemat Ecol 2014;52:41–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2013.12.008.Search in Google Scholar
33. Klika, KD, Demirci, B, Salminen, JP, Ovcharenko, VV, Vuorela, S, Can Başer, KH, et al.. New, sesquiterpenoid-type bicyclic compounds from the buds of Betula pubescens – ring-contracted products of β-caryophyllene? Eur J Org Chem 2004;12:2627–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.200300808.Search in Google Scholar
34. Laitinen, M, Kapari, L, Kentta, J. Newly hatched neonate larvae can glycosylate: the rate of Betula pubescens bud flavonoids in first instar Epirrita autumnata. J Chem Ecol 2006;32:537–46.10.1007/s10886-005-9015-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Isidorov, V, Bagan, R, Szczepaniak, L, Swiecicka, I. Chemical profile and antimicrobial activity of extractable compounds of Betula litwinowii (Betulaceae) buds. Open Chem 2015;13:125–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2015-0019.Search in Google Scholar
36. Adams, RA. Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, 4th ed. Carol Stream, Illinois: Allured Publishing Corporation; 2007.Search in Google Scholar
37. Tkachev, AV. Investigation of plant’s volatile compounds. Novosibirsk: Ofset Publ.; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
38. NIST chemistry webbook. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, MD 20899; 2018. Available from: http://webbook.nist.gov.chemistry.Search in Google Scholar
39. Isidorov, VA. GC-MS of biologically and environmentally significant organic compounds. TMS derivatives. Hoboken: J. Wiley & Sons; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
40. Isidorov, VA, Nazaruk, J. Gas Chromatographic-mass spectrometric determination of glycosides without prior hydrolysis. J Chromatogr A 2017;1521:161–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.033.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Isidorov, VA, Brzozowska, M, Czyżewska, U, Glinka, L. Gas chromatographic investigation of phenylpropenoid glycerides from aspen (Populus tremula L.) buds. J Chromatogr A 2008;1198−1199:196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.038.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
42. Szczepaniak, L, Walejko, P, Isidorov, V. Gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric characterization of trimethylsilyl derivatives of some terpene alcohol phenylpropenoids. Anal Sci 2013;29:643–7. https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.29.643.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
43. Silfver, T, Roininen, H, Oksanen, E, Rousi, M. Genetic and environmental determinants of silver birch growth and herbivore resistance. For Ecol Manag 2009;257:2145–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.020.Search in Google Scholar
44. Isman, MB, Miresmailli, S. Plant essential oils as repellents and deterrents to agricultural pests. In: Paluch, G, Coats, J, editors. Recent developments in invertebrate repellents. ACS symposium series. ACS Symposium Series; 2011, vol 1090:67–77 pp.10.1021/bk-2011-1090.ch005Search in Google Scholar
45. Holopainen, JK. Multiple functions of inducible plant volatiles. Trends Plant Sci 2004;9:529–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
46. Dudareva, N, Pichersky, E, Gershenson, J. Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol 2004;135:1893–902. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.049981.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
47. Dudareva, N, Negre, F, Nagegowa, DA, Orlova, I. Plant volatiles: recent advances and future perspectives. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2006;25:417–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680600899973.Search in Google Scholar
48. Peñuelas, J, Munne-Bosch, S. Isoprenoids: an evolutionary pool for photoprotection. Trends Plant Sci 2005;10:166–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.02.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
49. Rennenberg, H, Loreto, F, Polle, A, Brilli, F, Fares, S, Beniwal, RS, et al.. Physiological responses of forest trees to heat and drought. Plant Biol 2006;8:556–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-924084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
50. Isidorov, VA, Bakier, S, Pirożnikow, E, Zambrzycka, M, Swiecicka, I. Selective behavior of honeybees in acquiring European propolis plant precursors. J Chem Ecol 2016;42:475–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0708-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
51. Isidorov, VA, Buchek, K, Segiet, A, Zambrowski, G, Swiecicka, I. Activity of selected plant extracts against honey bee pathogen Paenibacillus larvae. Apidologie 2018;49:687–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-018-0586-y.Search in Google Scholar
52. Bankova, V, Popova, M, Trusheva, B. Plant sources of propolis: an update from a chemist’s point of view. Nat Prod Commun 2006;1:1023–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x0600101118.Search in Google Scholar
53. Popov, M, Trusheva, B, Khismatullin, R, Gavrilovab, N, Legotkinac, G, Lyapunov, J. The triple botanical origin of Russian propolis from the Perm region, its phenolic content and antimicrobial activity. Nat Prod Commun 2013;8:617–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x1300800519.Search in Google Scholar
54. Simone-Finstrom, M, Spivak, M. Propolis and bee health: the natural history and significance of resin use by honey bee. Apidologie 2010;41:295–311. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2010016.Search in Google Scholar
55. Burdock, GA. Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food Chem Toxicol 1998;36:347–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00145-2.Search in Google Scholar
56. Dreyer, DL, Jones, KC. Feeding deterrency of flavonoids and related phenolics towards Schizaphis grominum and Myzus persica: aphid feeding deterrents. Phytochemistry 1981;20:2489–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(81)83078-6.Search in Google Scholar
57. Rehman, F, Khan, FA, Badruddin, SMA. Role of phenolics in plant defence against insect herbivory. In: Khemani, LD, Srivastava, MM, Srivastava, S, editors. Chemistry of phytochemicals: health, energy and environmental perspectives. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012:309–13 pp.10.1007/978-3-642-23394-4_65Search in Google Scholar
58. Singh, S, Kaur, I, Kariyat, R. The multifunctional roles of polyphenols in plant-herbivore interactions. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031442.Search in Google Scholar
59. Echeverri, F, Cardona, G, Torres, F, Pelaez, C, Quiñones, W, Renteria, E. Ermanin: an insect deterrent flavonoid from Passiflora foetida resin. Phytochemistry 1991;30:153–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(91)84116-a.Search in Google Scholar
60. Baas, WJ. Naturally occurring seco-ring-A-triterpenoids and their possible biological significance. Phytochemistry 1985;24:1875–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(00)83085-x.Search in Google Scholar
61. Simoneit, BRT, Xu, Y, Neto, RR, Cloutier, J, Jaffe, R. Photochemical alteration of 3-oxygenated triterpenoids: implication for the origin of 3,4-seco-triterpenoids in sediments. Chemosphere 2009;74:543–50. https://doi.org/10.106/j.chemosphere.2008.09.08010.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.080.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.09.080Search in Google Scholar
62. Mäntylä, E, Alessio, GA, Blande, JD, Heijari, J, Holopainen, JK, Laaksonen, et al.. From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory. PLoS One 2008;3:8:e2832. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002832.Search in Google Scholar
63. McCormick, AC, Unsicker, SB, Gershenzon, J. The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci 2012;17:303–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.012.Search in Google Scholar
64. McCormick, AC, Irmisch, S, Boeckler, GA, Gershenzon, J, Kollner, TG. Herbivore-induced volatile emission from old-growth black poplar trees under field conditions. Sci Rep 2019;9:10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43931-y.Search in Google Scholar
65. Casimir, DJ, Kefforr, JF, Whitfield, FB. Technology and flavor chemistry of passion fruit juices and concentrates. In: Chichester, CO, Mrak, EM, Steward, GF, editors. Advances in food research. New York: Academic Press; 1981, vol 27:243–95 pp.10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60300-6Search in Google Scholar
66. Makarenko, OA, Levitsky, AP. Physiological functions of flavonoids in plants. Physiol Biochem Crop Plant 2013;45:100–12.Search in Google Scholar
67. Cuadra, P, Harborne, JB. Changes in epicuticular flavonoids and photosynthetic pigments as plant response to UV-B radiation. Z Naturforsch 1996;51c:671–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1996-9-1012.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ZNC-2021-0036).
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Bioactive compounds from Matricaria chamomilla: structure identification, in vitro antiproliferative, antimigratory, antiangiogenic, and antiadenoviral activities
- Antimicrobial synergism and antibiofilm activities of Pelargonium graveolens, Rosemary officinalis, and Mentha piperita essential oils against extreme drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates
- Chemical composition, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities of two essential oils from Algerian propolis
- Stability of proteins involved in initiation of DNA replication in UV damaged human cells
- Bioguided isolation of antiplasmodial secondary metabolites from Persea americana Mill. (Lauraceae)
- Biological activities of some Salvia species
- Secondary metabolites of downy birch buds (Betula pubescens Erch.)
- (−)-Brunneusine, a new phenolic compound with antibacterial properties in aqueous medium from the leaves of Agelanthus brunneus (Engl.) Tiegh (LORANTHACEAE)
- Novel thiazolyl-hydrazone derivatives including piperazine ring: synthesis, in vitro evaluation, and molecular docking as selective MAO-A inhibitor
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Bioactive compounds from Matricaria chamomilla: structure identification, in vitro antiproliferative, antimigratory, antiangiogenic, and antiadenoviral activities
- Antimicrobial synergism and antibiofilm activities of Pelargonium graveolens, Rosemary officinalis, and Mentha piperita essential oils against extreme drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates
- Chemical composition, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities of two essential oils from Algerian propolis
- Stability of proteins involved in initiation of DNA replication in UV damaged human cells
- Bioguided isolation of antiplasmodial secondary metabolites from Persea americana Mill. (Lauraceae)
- Biological activities of some Salvia species
- Secondary metabolites of downy birch buds (Betula pubescens Erch.)
- (−)-Brunneusine, a new phenolic compound with antibacterial properties in aqueous medium from the leaves of Agelanthus brunneus (Engl.) Tiegh (LORANTHACEAE)
- Novel thiazolyl-hydrazone derivatives including piperazine ring: synthesis, in vitro evaluation, and molecular docking as selective MAO-A inhibitor