Home Assembly of C-propyl-pyrogallol[4]arene with bipyridine-based spacers and solvent molecules
Article Publicly Available

Assembly of C-propyl-pyrogallol[4]arene with bipyridine-based spacers and solvent molecules

  • Xiao-Li Liu , Jing-Long Liu , Hong-Mei Yang , Ai-Quan Jia and Qian-Feng Zhang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 2, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Co-crystallization of C-propyl-pyrogallol[4]arene (PgC3) with 4,4′-bipyridine (bpy) in ethanol afforded a multi-component complex (PgC3) · 3(bpy) ·(EtOH) (1) that consists of a one-dimensional brick-wall framework, which was formed by four pyrogallol[4]arene molecules and two juxtaposed bpy molecules, entrapping two other bpy molecules as guests within each cavity. Heating a mixture of PgC3 and trans-1,2-bis-(4-pyridyl)ethylene (bpe) in an ethanol-water mixed solvent allowed the isolation of a multi-component complex (PgC3) ·(bpe) · 2(EtOH) ·(H2O) (2), which has a two-dimensional wave-like polymer structure with the bpe molecules embedded in the wave trough between two PgC3 molecules. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography was utilized to investigate the hydrogen bonding networks of the multi-component complexes 1 and 2.

1 Introduction

The assembly of molecular capsules by the introduction of complementary hydrogen bonds between small molecular components has played a key role in the development of supramolecular chemistry [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Various frameworks based on resorcinol[4]arenes and bifunctional pillar compounds, such as bipyridine and trans-bis(4-pyridyl)-ethylene, have been shown to contain large cavities capable of encapsulating organic or inorganic guests [6], [7], [8]. The pioneering work by MacGillivray and Atwood showed that an assembly of C-methylcalix[4]resorcinarenes, pyridine or 4,4′-bipyridine, and an appropriate guest could effectively produce multi-component host-guest complexes [9]. In particular, multi-component supramolecular systems have attracted great attention in this regard, owing to their potential applications in molecule recognition, ion exchange, small molecule inclusion, catalysis, and the rational design of functional materials [10], [11], [12]. Interactions of resorcinol[4]arene with bipyridine in different solvents led to unique architectures of host structures, including discrete capsules in one-, two-, and three-dimensional arrangements [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]. Co-crystallization of pyrogallol[4]arene and bipyridine building moieties into supramolecular architectures, which may selectively encapsulate guest molecules, was first studied by Atwood and coworkers in 2005 [20]. The Atwood group reported the engineering of supramolecular organic frameworks composed of C-alkylpyrogallol[4]arene (alkyl=methyl, propyl) and 4,4′-bipyridine or 1,2-(4-pyridyl)acetylene spacers in 2015 [21]. Previously, we have reported two host-guest compounds FcH@(PgC4)2·CH3OH·3H2O (PgC4=C-iso-butylpyrogallarene) and FcH@(PgC2)2·3EtOH·2H2O (PgC2=C-ethylpyrogallarene), in which ferrocene molecules are encapsulated by hydrogen-bonded pyrogallarene capsules [22]. Moreover, we have studied the co-crystallization of C-alkyl-calix[4]resorcinarenes, bis-pyridines and ferrocene and found that ferrocene molecules could also be enclosed by the deepened wave-like framework [23]. Following extensive contributions, which have been made to supramolecular chemistry using resorcinarenes and their derivatives, we have turned our attention to the hydrogen-bonded assembly of pyrogallol[4]arene with solvent molecules and bifunctional pillar molecules to form different supramolecular complexes (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1: Synthesis of complexes 1 and 2 (PgC3=C-propyl-pyrogallarene).
Scheme 1:

Synthesis of complexes 1 and 2 (PgC3=C-propyl-pyrogallarene).

2 Experimental

2.1 General

All solvents were commercial products of high purity and used as received. C-propyl-pyrogallarene (PgC3) was prepared according to procedures described in the literature [24]. 4,4′-Bipyridine and trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene were purchased from Alfa Aesar Ltd. (Tianjing, China). 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX-400 instrument (Karlsruhe, Germany) using tetramethylsilane as internal standard. Elemental analyses were carried out using a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN analyzer (Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2 Preparation and crystal growth of (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1)

4,4′-Bipyridine (0.30 mmol, 50 mg) was added to a warm solution of C-propyl-pyrogallarene (0.10 mmol, 72 mg) in ethanol (10 mL) with stirring. The mixture was heated until a clear solution was obtained. The solution was cooled to room temperature and allowed to stand for crystallization at T=5°C. Colorless plate-like crystals were found after 3 weeks and identified as (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1) (yield: 78 mg, 72%). ‒ 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=1.06 (m, 12H, CH3CH2), 1.40 (m, 8H, CH3CH2CH2), 1.91 (m, 8H, CH3CH2CH2), 3.42 (m, 2H, CH3CH2OH), 4.54 (t, J=6.2 Hz, 4H, Ar2CHCH2), 4.61 (s, 1H, CH3CH2OH), 7.00 (s, 4H, ArH), 7.92 (bs, 4H, ArOH), 8.00 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 4H, bpy), 8.62 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 4H, bpy), 8.70 (bs, 8H, ArOH). ‒ Anal. calcd. for (C40H48O12)·3(C10H8N2)·(C2H6O): C 69.00, H 6.54, N 5.19; found C 69.04, H 6.55, N 5.22%.

2.3 Preparation and crystal growth of (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2)

Trans-1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene (0.10 mmol, 18 mg) was added to a warm solution of C-propyl-pyrogallarene (0.10 mmol, 72 mg) in ethanol-H2O (1: 1, v/v, 10 mL) with stirring. The mixture was heated until a clear solution was obtained. The solution was cooled to room temperature and allowed to stand for crystallization at T=5°C. Colorless plate-like crystals were found after 2 weeks and identified as (PgC3)·(bpe)·2EtOH·H2O (2) (yield: 68 mg, 67%). ‒ 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ=1.03 (m, 12H, CH3CH2), 1.40 (m, 8H, CH3CH2CH2), 1.92 (m, 8H, CH3CH2CH2), 3.40 (m, 4H, CH3CH2OH), 4.54 (t, J=6.2 Hz, 4H, Ar2CHCH2), 4.61 (s, 2H, CH3CH2OH), 7.02 (s, 4H, ArH), 7.95 (bs, 4H, ArOH), 7.30 (2H, d, J=8.0 Hz, CH=CH in bpe), 8.01 (4H, d, J=7.2 Hz, bpe), 8.60 (4H, d, J=7.4 Hz, bpe), 8.73 (bs, 8H, ArOH). ‒ Anal. calcd. for (C40H48O12)·3(C10H8N2)·(C2H6O): C 66.39, H 7.16, N 2.76; found C 66.35, H 7.14, N 2.74%.

2.4 X-ray crystallography

Crystals of the complexes (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1) and (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2) were directly obtained from the parent solution of the reaction mixture (see above). Suitable single crystals were selected and mounted on a Bruker SMART Apex CCD area detector diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) for study using graphite-monochromated Mo (λ=0.71073 Å) radiation at room temperature. Cell parameters were retrieved using the Smart software and refined using Saint on all observed reflections [25]. Data reduction was performed with the Saint software which corrects for Lorentz polarization and decay. Absorption corrections were applied using Sadabs [26]. The structures were solved by Direct Methods using Shelxs-97 and refined by least squares on F2 (Shelxl-97) [27], [28]. The positions of all hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically (Csp3–H=0.96 Å and Csp2–H=0.93 Å) and assigned isotropic displacement parameters. The crystallographic data and experimental details for (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1) and (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2) are summarized in Table 1. The alerts A in CHECKCIF tests (Platon [29]) about the H···H contacts are due to disorder of hydrogen atoms in complexes 1 and 2 measured at room temperature. DFIX commands (five restraints) were applied in the refinement of 2 due to heavy disorder of the co-crystallized water and ethanol solvent molecules which, inter alia, led to a short H···H distance. A total of 37 OMIT commands were used to delete the most disagreeable reflections for complex 2. Not unusual for this class of compounds, the ratio of observed to unique reflections was only 45% for 2.

Table 1:

Crystal data and structure refinement for (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1) and (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2).

Compound12
Empirical formulaC62H70O13N4C56H72O15N2
Formula weight1079.221013.16
Crystal systemTriclinicTriclinic
Space groupPP
a, Å12.4857(3)12.3783(10)
b, Å13.8071(3)13.0489(11)
c, Å19.2742(4)17.4581(14)
α, deg101.604(1)93.729(6)
β, deg90.330(1)102.908(6)
γ, deg115.510(1)103.433(6)
Volume, Å32921.40(11)2653.0(4)
Z22
T, K296(2)296(2)
Density (calcd), g cm−31.231.27
Absorption coefficient, mm−10.10.1
F(000), e11481084
θ range data collection, deg1.82–27.521.62–27.82
Reflections collected53,91148,768
Independent reflections/Rint13326/0.044512293/0.0766
Data/restraints/parameters13326/4/71812293/5/675
Final R1a/wR2b [I>2 σ(I)]0.0738/0.12670.0825/0.2286
Final R1a/wR2b (all data)0.1121/0.16080.1732/0.2885
Goodness of fit on F2c1.0261.048
Final diff. features, e Å−3+0.72/−0.41+0.56/−0.50
  1. aR1=Σ||Fo|−|Fc||/Σ|Fo|; bwR2=[w(F02Fc2/w(F02)2]1/2,w=[σ2(F02)+(AP)2+BP]1, where P=(Max(F02,0)+2Fc2)/3;cGOF=S=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2/(nobsnparam)]1/2.

CCDC 1939877 and 1939878 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

3 Results and discussion

PgC3 was synthesized in fairly high yield by an acid-catalyzed condensation reaction of pyrogallol with butyraldehyde [24]. The result is usually an all-cis configured (r-ccc), bowl-shaped cyclic tetramer. As shown in Scheme 1, the treatment of PgC3 with bpy in a 1:3 ratio in a warm ethanol solution, followed by recrystallization, afforded colorless block-shaped crystals of (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1) in 72% yield. Variation in the PgC3:bpy ratio from 1:3 to 1:6 only afforded crystalline material of the 1:3 product 1. Complex 1 is a brick-wall framework, but unlike the common brick-wall assembly, part of the bpy molecules act as linkers to bridge the PgC3 molecules (Fig. 1A). In 1, each PgC3 molecule adopts a bowl conformation and connects with the neighboring PgC3 molecules through intermolecular O···O hydrogen bonds [O···O separations (Å): O2···O7 3.094(3) and O1···O7 2.682(3) Å] to form a column. The PgC3 columns are further connected by the bpy linker in a monodentate fashion through O−H···N hydrogen bonds [O···N separations (Å): O6···N3 2.685(3)] to form the brick wall, while there are two bpy molecules at other locations without hydrogen bonding to PgC3. This unusual brick-wall framework structure, formed by four pyrogallol[4]arene molecules and two juxtaposed bpy molecules, entraps two other bpy molecules as guests within each cavity (Fig. 1B). The remaining bpy molecule is located in the outside of the cavity, and the ethanol molecules lie on the other side connecting with PgC3 molecules through hydrogen bonding.

Fig. 1: Molecular packing diagram of (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1), showing the hydrogen-bonded network. (a) View of the bpy guests at the base of two PgC3 units; (b) View of two other bpy molecules as guests within each cavity in the molecular packing diagram.
Fig. 1:

Molecular packing diagram of (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1), showing the hydrogen-bonded network. (a) View of the bpy guests at the base of two PgC3 units; (b) View of two other bpy molecules as guests within each cavity in the molecular packing diagram.

In addition to bpy, the longer spacer molecule trans-1,4-bis-(pyridyl)ethylene (bpe) was investigated as a partner for PgC3 in an ethanol-water mixture. A novel crystalline complex of (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2) was obtained in 67% yield. In 2, adjacent bowl-shaped C-propylpyrogallol[4]arenes are connected into a 2D wave-like polymer structure. The wave chain propagates along the crystallographic b axis [O···O separations (Å): O3···O5 3.096(3), O3···O4 2.884(4), O12···O2 2.739(3), O1···O12 3.130(4), O2···O5 2.772(3), O11···O2 3.110(4)] as shown in Fig. 2A, and the parallel chains propagate along the crystallographic a axis [O···O separations (Å): O8−H8···O3 2.838(3)] as shown in Fig. 2B. The pyrogallol[4]arene molecules in one layer are all oriented in the same direction to the opposite layer, and these bis-layers have seven intermolecular hydrogen bonds along their upper rims. The distance from the wave crest to the wave trough is about 11.89 Å, and the adjacent wave crests have a spacing of 10.98 Å. Based on the 2D wave-like arrangement, the bpe molecules are embedded in the wave trough between two PgC3 molecules.

Fig. 2: Molecular packing diagram of (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2), showing the hydrogen-bonded network. Ethanol and water molecules are omitted for clarity. (a) The wave chain propagates along the crystallographic b axis; (b) the parallel chains propagate along the crystallographic a axis.
Fig. 2:

Molecular packing diagram of (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)·(H2O) (2), showing the hydrogen-bonded network. Ethanol and water molecules are omitted for clarity. (a) The wave chain propagates along the crystallographic b axis; (b) the parallel chains propagate along the crystallographic a axis.

In summary, two multi-component complexes, (PgC3)·3(bpy)·(EtOH) (1) and (PgC3)·(bpe)·2(EtOH)· (H2O) (2), based on C-propyl-pyrogallol[4]arene and 4,4′-bipyridine or trans-1,4-bis-(pyridyl)ethylene spacer molecules, have been obtained in good yields. Complex 1 with bpy units is a 1D brick-wall framework, while complex 2 with bpe units is a 2D wave-like polymer, indicating that the length of the spacer molecules may have an influence on the hydrogen bonding pattern and thus the overall architecture of the resultant complexes. Atwood et al. have previously demonstrated that an assembly of C-propyl-pyrogallol[4]arene with bpy in acetone and acetonitrile solvents led to the isolation of a nano-container (PgC3)·4(bpy)·(C3H6O) with acetone molecules as the guests [20] and a 2D wave-like polymer structure (PgC3)·(bpy)·(MeCN) [21], respectively. Based on these results, it seems that both the reaction media and the nature of the spacer are crucial for the assembly of the supramolecular complexes.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (90922008).

References

[1] L. R. MacGillivray, J. L. Atwood, Nature1997, 389, 469.10.1038/38985Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. L. Atwood, L. J. Barbour, A. Jerga, Chem. Commun.2001, 2376.10.1039/b106250fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] T. Adachi, M. D. Ward, Acc. Chem. Res.2016, 49, 2669.10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00360Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] S. N. Journey, K. L. Teppang, C. A. Garcia, S. A. Brim, D. Onofrei, J. B. Addison, G. P. Holland, B. W. Purse, Chem. Sci.2017, 8, 7737.10.1039/C7SC03821FSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] A. Katiyar, J. C. F. Sovierzoski, P. B. Calio, A. A. Vartia, W. H. Thompson, Chem. Commun.2019, 55, 6591.10.1039/C9CC03151KSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] R. S. Patil, C. Zhang, C. L. Barnes, J. L. Atwood, Cryst. Growth Des.2017, 17, 7.10.1021/acs.cgd.6b01464Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. Q. Ma, P. Coppens, Chem. Commun.2003, 504.10.1039/b212548jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] A. Nakamura, T. Sato, R. Kuroda, CrystEngComm2003, 5, 318.10.1039/b307471dSearch in Google Scholar

[9] L. R. MacGillivray, J. L. Atwood, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1997, 119, 6931.10.1021/ja970758rSearch in Google Scholar

[10] R. S. Patil, C. Zhang, K. Sikligar, G. A. Baker, J. L. Atwood, Chem. Eur. J.2018, 24, 3299.10.1002/chem.201705609Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] X. Feng, X. Ding, D. Jiang, Chem. Soc. Rev.2012, 41, 6010.10.1039/c2cs35157aSearch in Google Scholar

[12] L.-L. Tan, H. Li, Y. Tao, S. X.-A. Zhang, B. Wang, Y.-W. Yang, Adv. Mater.2014, 26, 7027.10.1002/adma.201401672Search in Google Scholar

[13] L. R. MacGillivray, P. R. Diamente, J. L. Reid, J. A. Ripmeester, Chem. Commun.2000, 359.10.1039/a909339gSearch in Google Scholar

[14] B. Q. Ma, Y. G. Zhang, P. Coppens, Cryst. Growth Des.2002, 2, 7.10.1021/cg0155595Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. O. Brown, G. D. Enright, J. A. Ripmeester, J. Supramol. Chem.2002, 2, 497.10.1016/S1472-7862(03)00066-2Search in Google Scholar

[16] B. Q. Ma, P. Coppens, Chem. Commun.2003, 412.10.1039/b209989fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] L. R. MacGillivray, J. L. Reid, J. A. Ripmeester, Chem. Commun.2001, 1034.10.1039/b102856cSearch in Google Scholar

[18] B. Q. Ma, Y. G. Zhang, P. Coppens, Cryst. Growth Des.2001, 1, 271.10.1021/cg015516oSearch in Google Scholar

[19] B. Q. Ma, Y. G. Zhang, P. Coppens, CrystEngComm2001, 3, 78.10.1039/b103190mSearch in Google Scholar

[20] G. W. V. Cave, M. C. Ferrarelli, J. L. Atwood, Chem. Commun.2005, 2787.Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. S. Patil, H. Kumari, C. L. Barnes, J. L. Atwood, Chem. Commun.2015, 51, 2304.10.1039/C4CC08388ASearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] B. Wang, A.-Q. Jia, H.-M. Yang, J.-L. Liu, Q.-F. Zhang, Z. Naturforsch.2018, 73b, 597.10.1515/znb-2018-0083Search in Google Scholar

[23] Y.-J. Wang, J.-L. Liu, H.-M. Yang, A.-Q. Jia, Q.-F. Zhang, J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem.2016, 85, 105.10.1007/s10847-016-0609-0Search in Google Scholar

[24] D. J. Cram, S. Karbach, H. E. Kim, C. B. Knobler, E. F. Maverick, J. L. Ericson, R. C. Helgeson, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1988, 110, 2229.10.1021/ja00215a037Search in Google Scholar

[25] Smart and Saint+ for Windows NT (version 6.02a), Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA) 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[26] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[27] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.1990, A46, 467.10.1107/S0108767390000277Search in Google Scholar

[28] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3.Search in Google Scholar

[29] A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr.2009, D65, 148.10.1107/S090744490804362XSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-10-31
Accepted: 2020-01-20
Published Online: 2020-03-02
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0194/html
Scroll to top button