Home Synthesis and properties of 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(trimethylstannyl)- 2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborole
Article Publicly Available

Synthesis and properties of 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(trimethylstannyl)- 2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborole

  • Frauke Schödel , Jens M. Breunig , Vasco Thiel , Michael Bolte , Matthias Wagner and Hans-Wolfram Lerner EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 27, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The diazaborole Me3Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 (1; B{N(Dipp)CH}2=N,N′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborolyl) was prepared by the reaction of Me3SnCl with one equivalent of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2]. Single crystals of 1 were obtained from hexane (triclinic space group P1̅). The diazaborole 1 was mono-deprotonated at the heterocycle upon treatment with Li[Me] to give product 2. In contrast to Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] which reacted with P4 to give the tetraphosphenediide Li2[{HC(Dipp)N}2B–P(1)P(2)P(3)P(4)–B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (3; δP=364.5, –29.4; 1JP(2),P(3)=–509.8 Hz, 1JP(1),P(2)=–434.3 Hz, 2JP(1),P(3)=–3.7 Hz, 3JP(1),P(4)=178.9 Hz) and the triphosphenide Li[{HC(Dipp)N}2B–PPP–B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (δP=665.1, 175.4; 1JP,P=500 Hz), the stannyl derivative 1 did not activate white phosphorus. The reaction of 1 with GaCl3 yielded either Me2ClSn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 (4) or MeCl2Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 (5) depending on the molar ratio of the reactants. The monochlorinated diazaborole Me2ClSn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 was also obtained by the reaction of 1 with AsCl3.

1 Introduction

Compounds with negatively charged boron centers have attracted considerable interest in the last decades [1], [2], [3], [4]. The most prominent example of this class of substances is diazaborolyl lithium Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] which was firstly described in 2006 by Nozaki and coauthors [1]. Very recently, Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] has been utilized as a nucleophilic source of the boryl fragment in the synthesis of novel low-valent and low-coordinate main-group compounds (e.g. M[B{N(Dipp)CH}2]2, M=Ga, In, Tl see Fig. 1 and Ref. [5]).

Fig. 1: E[B{N(Dipp)CH}2]2 (E=Ga, In, Tl); see Ref. [5].
Fig. 1:

E[B{N(Dipp)CH}2]2 (E=Ga, In, Tl); see Ref. [5].

Despite its broad usefulness, the availability of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] is more or less unreliable due to its extreme sensitivity towards water and oxygen. In order to prevent unwanted side reactions, in particular oxidative and hydrolytic degradation, we decided to prepare the diazaborole Me3Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 as an alternative, boron-containing building block.

In this context it should be also noticed that the B–Sn bond can be activated by strong nucleophiles. Recently, Kleeberg has reported that the borolidene derivative Me3Sn–B{N(iPr)CH2}2 (1,3-diisopropyl-1,3,2-diazaborolidinyl)trimethylstannane) reacts with K[OtBu] to give K[SnMe3] and tBuO–B{N(iPr)CH2}2 [6]. In considering these facts we asked ourselves: Is it possible to cleave the B–Sn bond by treatment of the diazaborole Me3Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 with strong nucleophiles and if it does, which anion – the B-centered diazaborolyl anion or the stannyl anion [SnMe3] – will be formed?

The purpose of this paper is to describe the synthesis and properties of diazaborole 1. In particular we examined the reactions of 1 with Li[Me], P4, GaCl3, and AsCl3. Finally the solid-state structure of the diazaborole 1 is reported herein.

2 Results and discussion

At first we synthesized the diazaborolyl lithium Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] from Br–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 and lithium by a literature-known procedure [1]. As shown in Scheme 1, the reaction of Me3SnCl with one equivalent of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] at −30°C gave the diazaborole 1 in decent yield. Sublimation of the crude product at 90°C/10−3 mbar yielded the analytically pure diazaborole 1 which could be recrystallized from hexane.

Scheme 1: Synthesis of the stannylated diazaborole 1. (i) +Me3SnCl, –LiCl; thf, –30°C.
Scheme 1:

Synthesis of the stannylated diazaborole 1. (i) +Me3SnCl, –LiCl; thf, –30°C.

The diazaborole 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1̅ with two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit (Figs. 2 and 3). Since most structural parameters of both molecules are very similar, only the molecular structure of one molecule is shown in Fig. 2 (selected bond lengths and angles are given in the figure caption).

Fig. 2: Solid-state structure of the diazaborole 1. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å), and bond angles (deg): Sn(1)–C(3) 2.144(6), Sn(1)–C(5) 2.149(5), Sn(1)–C(4) 2.150(7), Sn(1)–B(1) 2.252(5), B(1)–N(1) 1.419(6), B(1)–N(2) 1.430(6), N(1)–C(1) 1.401(5), N(1)–C(11) 1.437(5), N(2)–C(2) 1.395(6), N(2)–C(31) 1.443(6), C(1)–C(2) 1.325(6), C(3)–Sn(1)–C(5) 106.6(2), C(3)–Sn(1)–C(4) 105.5(3), C(5)–Sn(1)–C(4) 106.0(3), C(3)–Sn(1)–B(1) 115.0(2), C(5)–Sn(1)–B(1) 111.9(2), C(4)–Sn(1)–B(1) 111.3(2), N(1)–B(1)–N(2) 104.9(4), N(1)–B(1)–Sn(1) 127.2(3), N(2)–B(1)–Sn(1) 127.7(4), C(1)–N(1)–B(1) 108.2(3), C(1)–N(1)–C(11) 122.9(4), B(1)–N(1)–C(11) 128.8(3), C(2)–N(2)–B(1) 107.9(4), C(2)–N(2)–C(31) 122.9(3), B(1)–N(2)–C(31) 128.9(4), C(2)–C(1)–N(1) 109.3(4), C(1)–C(2)–N(2) 109.7(4).
Fig. 2:

Solid-state structure of the diazaborole 1. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å), and bond angles (deg): Sn(1)–C(3) 2.144(6), Sn(1)–C(5) 2.149(5), Sn(1)–C(4) 2.150(7), Sn(1)–B(1) 2.252(5), B(1)–N(1) 1.419(6), B(1)–N(2) 1.430(6), N(1)–C(1) 1.401(5), N(1)–C(11) 1.437(5), N(2)–C(2) 1.395(6), N(2)–C(31) 1.443(6), C(1)–C(2) 1.325(6), C(3)–Sn(1)–C(5) 106.6(2), C(3)–Sn(1)–C(4) 105.5(3), C(5)–Sn(1)–C(4) 106.0(3), C(3)–Sn(1)–B(1) 115.0(2), C(5)–Sn(1)–B(1) 111.9(2), C(4)–Sn(1)–B(1) 111.3(2), N(1)–B(1)–N(2) 104.9(4), N(1)–B(1)–Sn(1) 127.2(3), N(2)–B(1)–Sn(1) 127.7(4), C(1)–N(1)–B(1) 108.2(3), C(1)–N(1)–C(11) 122.9(4), B(1)–N(1)–C(11) 128.8(3), C(2)–N(2)–B(1) 107.9(4), C(2)–N(2)–C(31) 122.9(3), B(1)–N(2)–C(31) 128.9(4), C(2)–C(1)–N(1) 109.3(4), C(1)–C(2)–N(2) 109.7(4).

Fig. 3: Packing diagram of 1.
Fig. 3:

Packing diagram of 1.

The structure of 1 displays an almost planar BN2C2 heterocycle. The phenyl rings of the Dipp substituents are nearly perpendicular to the plane of this heterocycle (cf. Fig. 3). The conformation of the trimethylstannyl group shows that one of the methyl groups is located in the plane of the heterocycle whereas the remaining two are located above and below this plane. The B–N distances in 1 are quite short (1.419(6) and 1.430(6) Å), suggesting an additional π−interaction between the B and N atoms. All other structural parameters of 1 are within the expected range.

The 11B{1H} NMR spectrum of 1 is characterized by a broad resonance (δ11B=29.6 ppm). Compound 1 exhibits only one singlet proton resonance for the diazaborolyl 1H nuclei but two doublets for the diastereotopic methyl protons of the isopropyl substituents. Due to the coupling between the tin nuclei and the trimethylstannyl protons (2J1H,119Sn=50 Hz, 2J1H,117Sn=48 Hz), satellites of the signal at δ=–0.17 ppm are present. Therefore this resonance can unambiguously be assigned to the Me3Sn group. The 119Sn{1H} NMR spectrum of 1 displays a quartet at –148.3 ppm (1J119Sn,11B=984 Hz), as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4: 119Sn{1H} NMR spectrum of Me3Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 (1) in C6D6. Chemical shift and coupling constant of 1: δ=–148.3 ppm; 1J119Sn,11B=984 Hz.
Fig. 4:

119Sn{1H} NMR spectrum of Me3Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 (1) in C6D6. Chemical shift and coupling constant of 1: δ=–148.3 ppm; 1J119Sn,11B=984 Hz.

At first we investigated the reaction of diazaborole 1 with Li[Me]. Surprisingly, treatment of 1 with 1 equivalent of Li[Me] in thf afforded the lithiated diazaborole 2, as shown in Scheme 2. In this context it should be noted that treatment of 2 with an excess of water resulted in an immediate reaction and the resonances of the diazaborole 1 were monitored by NMR spectroscopy (Scheme 2). Additionally, we also investigated the behavior of 1 towards the bulky reagent Li[tBu] and the sterically crowded silanide Na[SitBu3] (supersilyl sodium) [7]. Due to steric hindrance, however, no reactions took place. In summary, the chemical behavior of 1 towards bases is in stark contrast to that of Me3Sn–B{N(iPr)CH2}2. As already mentioned, the reaction of Me3Sn–B{N(iPr)CH2}2 with K[OtBu] led to the cleavage of the B–Sn bond.

Scheme 2: Deprotonation of the stannylated diazaborole 1. (i) +Li[Me], –CH4; thf, r.t. (no reaction took place either between 1 and Li[tBu] or 1 and Na[SitBu3]); (ii) +H2O, –LiOH; thf, r.t.
Scheme 2:

Deprotonation of the stannylated diazaborole 1. (i) +Li[Me], –CH4; thf, r.t. (no reaction took place either between 1 and Li[tBu] or 1 and Na[SitBu3]); (ii) +H2O, –LiOH; thf, r.t.

Furthermore we examined the nucleophilic properties of 1. At first the chemical behavior of 1 towards white phosphorus was investigated. In contrast to Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] which reacted with P4 (cf. Scheme 3[1]), no reaction occurred when P4 was treated with the stannylated diazaborole 1 neither at room nor at elevated temperature.

Scheme 3: Reaction of two equivalents of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] with P4.
Scheme 3:

Reaction of two equivalents of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] with P4.

The reaction of 1 with Lewis-acidic GaCl3 was also investigated. As shown in Scheme 4, these reactions yielded either Me2ClSn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 or MeCl2Sn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 depending on the ratio between the diazaborole 1 and GaCl3. The monochlorinated diazaborole Me2ClSn–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 was also obtained by the reaction of 1 with AsCl3.

Scheme 4: Reaction of the stannylated diazaborole 1 with one or two equivalents of GaCl3. (i) +GaCl3, –MeGaCl2; benzene, r. t.; (ii) +2 GaCl3, –2 MeGaCl2; benzene, r. t.
Scheme 4:

Reaction of the stannylated diazaborole 1 with one or two equivalents of GaCl3. (i) +GaCl3, –MeGaCl2; benzene, r. t.; (ii) +2 GaCl3, –2 MeGaCl2; benzene, r. t.

3 Experimental section

The solvents thf, [D8]thf, Et2O, benzene, and C6D6 were stirred over sodium/benzophenone and distilled prior to use. Br–B{N(Dipp)CH}2 [1], Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] [1], and Na[SitBu3] [15] were prepared according to published procedures. All other starting materials were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker AM 250, DPX 250, Avance 300, Avance 400, and Avance 500 spectrometers. NMR chemical shifts are reported in ppm. Abbreviations: s=singlet; d=doublet; t=triplet; sept=septet; m=multiplet; br=broad. Mass spectrometry was performed with a Fisons VG Platform II instrument. Elemental analyses were carried out by the Microanalytical Laboratory of the Goethe University Frankfurt.

3.1 Synthesis of 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(trimethylstannyl)- 2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborole (1)

A solution of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (2.50 mmol) in thf (25 mL) was added dropwise to a cooled (–30°C) solution of Me3SnCl (0.50 g, 2.50 mmol) in thf (20 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at –30°C for 1 h and slowly warmed up to room temperature. After removal of all volatile compounds in vacuo, the yellow residue was extracted into hexane. Filtering from LiCl and evaporation of the solvents gave the diazaborole 1 as a yellow solid, which was purified by sublimation (90°C/10−3 mbar). Single crystals of 1 were obtained by recrystallization from hexane (yield: 0.56 g, 41%). – 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ=–0.17 (s, 9H, SnMe3), 1.17 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 1.28 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 3.19 (sept, 4H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 6.37 (s, 2H, N–CH=CH–N); 7.12–7.26 (m, 6H, 7.73–7.71, ph-H). – 13C{H} NMR (126 MHz, C6D6): δ=–10.8 (Sn(CH3)3), 23.9 (CH(CH3)2), 25.9 (CH(CH3)2), 29.1 (CH(CH3)2), 122.5 (N–CH=CH–N), 123.9 (ph-CH), 127.8 (ph-CH), 140.4 (ph-CC), 146.5 (ph-CN). – 11B{1H} NMR (96 MHz, C6D6): δ=29.6 (h1/2=350 Hz). – 119Sn{1H} NMR (112 MHz, C6D6): δ=–148.3 (q, 1J119Sn,11B=984 Hz; cf. Fig. 3). – MS (ESI+): m/z (%)=552 [M]+. – Anal. for C29H45BN2Sn (551.2): calcd. C 63.19, H 8.23, B, N 5.08; found C 63.34, H 8.18, N 4.47.

3.2 Reaction of 1 with Li[Me]

A solution of Li[Me] (0.36 mmol) in 0.2 mL Et2O and 1 mL thf was added to a solution of the diazaborole 1 (0.36 mmol) in 5 mL thf at –78°C. The resulting mixture was slowly warmed up to room temperature. The 1H/13C/11B/119Sn NMR spectra of the reaction solution revealed exclusively the signals of 2 and methane (δH,[D8]thf=0.16). After addition of 0.1 mL H2O to the reaction mixture, signals appeared in the 1H/13C/11B/119Sn NMR spectra of the solution which could be assigned to the diazaborole 1.

2: 1H NMR (500 MHz, [D8]thf): δ=–0.59 (s, 9H, SnMe3), 1.15 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 1.16 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 3.08 (sept, 4H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 5.82 (s, 1H, N–CH=CLi–N); 7.05–7.30 (m, 6H, ph-H). – 13C{1H} NMR (126 MHz, [D8]thf): δ=–11.4 (Sn(CH3)3), 22.7/23.0 (CH(CH3)2), 24.4/24.6 (CH(CH3)2), 27.6/27.7 (CH(CH3)2), 121.5/121.9 (N–CH=CLi–N), 123.9/124.1 (ph-CH), 127.3/128.8 (ph-CH), 142.6 (ph-CN), 145.8/146.0 (ph-CC), 149.1 (ph-CN). – 11B{1H} NMR (160 MHz, [D8]thf): δ=26.9. – 119Sn{1H} NMR (187 MHz, [D8]thf): δ=–143.8 (q, 1J119Sn,11B=1031 Hz).

Note 1: An NMR tube was charged with [D8]thf (0.5 mL) and the diazaborole 1 (0.05 mmol). To this solution 0.1 mL of a 1.8 m solution of Li[Me] (0.18 mmol) in Et2O was added at room temperature. The NMR spectra of the reaction solution revealed the signals of 2, methane, and the diazaborole 1. Additionally, signals of the products of a side reaction between Li[Me] and Et2O appeared in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra which can be assigned to ethene (δH,[D8]thf=5.34) and Li[OEt] (δH,[D8]thf=1.23(t), 3.78(q)).

Note 2: A solution of 1 (0.05 mmol) and Li[tBu] (0.19 mmol) in 0.5 mL [D8]thf was kept for 3 day at room temperature. The 1H/13C/11B/119Sn NMR spectra revealed exclusively the signals of 1 and Li[tBu].

Note 3: A solution of 1 (0.05 mmol) and Na[SitBu3] [15] (0.1 mmol) in 0.5 mL [D8]thf was kept for 3 day at room temperature. The 1H/13C/11B/29Si/119Sn NMR spectra revealed exclusively the signals of 1 and Na[SitBu3] [15].

3.3 Reaction of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] with P4

A solution of Li[B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (0.03 g, 0.08 mmol) in thf (0.8 mL) was added to a cooled solution (–78°C) of P4 (0.04 mmol) in thf (0.3 mL). After 45 min at –78°C, the solution was allowed to reach room temperature. All volatiles were removed in vacuo and [D8]thf (0.5 mL) was added. According to the 31P NMR spectrum (Fig. 5) the tetraphosphenediide Li2[{HC(Dipp)N}2B–PPPP–B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (3) was formed as the main product (60% P) and the triphosphide Li[{HC(Dipp)N}2B–PPP–B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (δP=665.1, 175.4 ppm; 1JPP=500 Hz) as a side product (10% P) of this reaction (cf. the analogous reaction behavior of M[SitBu3] (M=Li, Na, K) [7] and Na[SiPhtBu2] [8] towards P4; see Table 1 and Refs. [7], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]).

Fig. 5: AA′ part of the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of Li2[{HC(Dipp)N}2B–P(1)P(2)P(3)P(4)–B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (3) in [D8]thf. Chemical shifts and coupling constants of 3: δ=364.5, –29.4 ppm; 1JP(2),P(3)=–509.8, 1JP(1),P(2)=–434.3, 2JP(1),P(3)=–3.7, 3JP(1),P(4)=178.9 Hz [16].
Fig. 5:

AA′ part of the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of Li2[{HC(Dipp)N}2B–P(1)P(2)P(3)P(4)–B{N(Dipp)CH}2] (3) in [D8]thf. Chemical shifts and coupling constants of 3: δ=364.5, –29.4 ppm; 1JP(2),P(3)=–509.8, 1JP(1),P(2)=–434.3, 2JP(1),P(3)=–3.7, 3JP(1),P(4)=178.9 Hz [16].

Table 1:

31P NMR data of the tetraphosphenediides M2[RP1–P2=P3–P4R] (chemical shifts δ in ppm, coupling constants J in Hz).

δP2JP(1),P(3)3JP(1),P(4)
Li2[{HC(Dipp)N}2BPPPPB{N(Dipp)CH}2]364.5, –29.4–3.7178.9
Li2[tBu3SiPPPPSitBu3] [9]394.2, –52.9–29.8198.3
Na2[tBu2PhSiPPPPSiPhtBu2] [10]397.4, –44.3–34.2185.4
Na2[tBu3SiPPPPSitBu3] [11]400.0, –45.2–34.2185.4
[Na(18-crown-6)(thf)2][tBu3SiPPPPSitBu3] [11]390.1, –34.7–28.7126.7
K2[tBu3SiPPPPSitBu3] [12]408.3, –5.1–33.9121.2

Selected data for 3: 1H NMR (250 MHz, [D8]thf): δ=1.12 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.17 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 3.02 (sept, 4H, 3JH,H=7 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 6.27 (s, 2H, (N)HC=CH(N), 7.13–7.26 (6H, m, ph-H). – 31P{1H} NMR (101.25 MHz, [D8]thf) see Fig. 5 and Table 1. – 11B{1H} NMR (80.25 MHz, [D8]thf): δ=22.0.

Note: A solution of the diazaborole 1 (0.10 mmol) in 0.5 mL [D8]thf was added to a solution of P4 (0.04 mmol) in thf (0.3 mL). After 1 d at room temperature the 1H/13C/11B/31P/119Sn NMR spectra of the solution revealed the signals of 1 and P4.

3.4 Synthesis of 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(chlorodimethylstannyl)- 2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborole (4)

GaCl3 (0.10 g, 0.60 mmol) was added to a solution of 1 (0.31 g, 0.57 mmol) in benzene (10 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at room temperature. After removal of all volatile compounds in vacuo, 4 was obtained by sublimation (100°C/10−3 mbar) as a colorless solid (yield: 0.19 g, 60%). – 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ=0.10 (s, 6H, 2J119Sn,H=49 Hz, SnClMe2), 1.17 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 1.29 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 3.18 (sept, 4H, 3JH,H=6.8 Hz, CHMe2), 6.35 (s, 2H, 4J119Sn,H=13.5 Hz, N–CH=CH–N), 7.11–7.26 (m, 6H, ph-H). – 11B{1H} NMR (96 MHz, C6D6): δ=28.9 (1JSnB=1095 Hz, h1/2=220 Hz). – 119Sn{1H} NMR (112 MHz, C6D6): δ=84.7 (q, 1J119Sn,11B=1095 Hz). – Anal. for C28H42BClN2Sn (571.6): calcd. C 58.83, H 7.41, N 4.90; found C 58.64, H 7.58, N 4.72.

Note: AsCl3 (0.22 g, 1.19 mmol) was added to a solution of 1 (0.01 g, 0.01 mmol) in C6D6 (0.5 mL). After 1 d at room temperature the 1H/13C/11B/119Sn NMR spectra of the solution revealed the signals of 4.

3.5 Synthesis of 1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-2-(dichloromethylstannyl)- 2,3-dihydro-1H-1,3,2-diazaborole (5)

GaCl3 (0.12 g, 0.68 mmol) was added to a solution of 1 (0.18 g, 0.32 mmol) in benzene (10 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at room temperature. After removal of all volatile compounds in vacuo, 5 was obtained by sublimation (100°C/10−3 mbar) as a colorless solid (yield: 0.09 g, 45%). – 1H NMR (300 MHz, C6D6): δ=0.41 (s, 3H, 2J119Sn,H=53 Hz, SnCl2Me), 1.10 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 1.31 (d, 12H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 3.06 (sept, 4H, 3JH,H=6.9 Hz, CHMe2), 6.27 (s, 2H, 4J119Sn,H=20 Hz, N–CH=CH–N), 7.07–7.20 (m, 6H, ph-H). – 11B{1H} NMR (96 MHz, C6D6): δ=27.2 (1J119Sn,11B=1380 Hz, h1/2=160 Hz). – 119Sn{1H} NMR (112 MHz, C6D6): δ=106.3 (q, 1J119Sn,11B=1380 Hz). – Anal. for C27H39BCl2N2Sn (592.0): calcd. C 54.77, H 6.64, N 4.73; found C 53.94, H 6.38, N 4.67.

3.6 Crystal structure determinations

Data for 1 (Table 2) were collected on a STOE IPDS II two-circle diffractometer with graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å) [17] and corrected for absorption using the program Platon [18]. The structure was solved by Direct Methods using the program shelxs [17] and refined against F2 with full-matrix least-squares techniques using the program shelxl [19].

Three isopropyl groups are disordered over two positions with site occupation factors of 0.61(1), 0.54(3) and 0.58(3) for the major occupied site. Bond lengths and angles in the disordered groups were restrained to have the same values as in a non-disordered group. All disordered atoms were isotropically refined.

CCDC 1530547 (1) contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Table 2:

Crystal data and structure refinement of 1.

FormulaC29H45BN2Sn
Mr551.17
Crystal size, mm30.18×0.13×0.03
Crystal systemtriclinic
Space groupP
a, Å9.4425(5)
b, Å12.6891(7)
c, Å25.5833(14)
α, deg88.522(4)
β, deg82.969(4)
γ, deg84.437(4)
V, Å33027.6(3)
Z4
Dcalcd., g cm−31.21
μ(MoKα ), mm−10.9
F(000), e1152
hkl range±11, ±15, ±30
((sinθ)/λ)max, Å−10.595
Refl. measured33 908
Refl. unique/Rint10 667/0.0976
Param. refined593
R1 (F)/wR2 (F2 )a,b (all refls.)0.0936/0.0791
GoF (F2)c0.798
Δρfin (max/min), e Å−30.43/–0.44

aR1=Σ||Fo|–|Fc||/Σ|Fo|; bwR2=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2w(Fo2)2]1/2, w=[σ2(Fo2)+(aP)2+bP]−1, where P=(Max(Fo2, 0)+2Fc2)/3; cGoF=S=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2/(nobsnparam)]1/2.

References

[1] Y. Segawa, M. Yamashita, K. Nozaki, Science2006, 314, 113.10.1126/science.1131914Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Y. Segawa, Y. Suzuki, M. Yamashita, K. Nozaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2008, 130, 16069.10.1021/ja8057919Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] T. Kajiwara, T. Terabayashi, M. Yamashita, K. Nozaki, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2008, 47, 6606.10.1002/anie.200801728Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] M. Yamashita, Y. Suzuki, Y. Segawa, K. Nozaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2007, 129, 9570.10.1021/ja073037tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] A. V. Protchenko, D. Dange, J. R. Harmer, C. Y. Tang, A. D. Schwartz, M. J. Kelly, N. Phillips, R. Tirfoin, K. H. Birjkumar, C. Jones, N. Kaltsoyannis, P. Mountford, S. Aldridge, Nat. Chem.2014, 6, 315.10.1038/nchem.1870Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] C. Kleeberg, J. Grunenberg, X. Xie, Inorg. Chem.2014, 53, 4400.10.1021/ic500065sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] H.-W. Lerner, Coord. Chem. Rev.2005, 249, 781.10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.020Search in Google Scholar

[8] H.-W. Lerner, S. Scholz, M. Bolte, M. Wagner, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2004, 630, 443.10.1002/zaac.200300347Search in Google Scholar

[9] H.-W. Lerner, M. Wagner, M. Bolte, Chem. Commun.2003, 990.10.1039/b210984kSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] A. Lorbach, S. Breitung, I. Sänger, F. Schödel, M. Bolte, M. Wagner, H.-W. Lerner, Inorg. Chim. Acta2011, 378, 1.10.1016/j.ica.2011.07.050Search in Google Scholar

[11] A. Lorbach, A. Nadj, S. Tüllmann, F. Dornhaus, F. Schödel, I. Sänger, G. Margraf, J. W. Bats, M. Bolte, M. C. Holthausen, M. Wagner, H.-W. Lerner, Inorg. Chem.2009, 48, 1005.10.1021/ic8016003Search in Google Scholar

[12] H.-W. Lerner, M. Bolte, K. Karaghiosoff, M. Wagner, Organometallics2004, 23, 6073.10.1021/om049348jSearch in Google Scholar

[13] N. Wiberg, A. Wörner, K. Karaghiosoff, D. Fenske, Chem. Ber.1997, 130, 135.10.1002/cber.19971300123Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. Asami, M. Okamoto, K. Suzuki, M. Yamashita, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2016, 55, 12827.10.1002/anie.201607995Search in Google Scholar

[15] N. Wiberg, K. Amelunxen, H.-W. Lerner, H. Schuster, H. Nöth, I. Krossing, M. Schmidt-Amelunxen, T. Seifert, J. Organomet. Chem.1997, 542, 1.10.1016/S0022-328X(97)00306-9Search in Google Scholar

[16] Iterative optimization of the simulated spectrum with the software spinworks 2.5.5 (K. Marat, Spinworks, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, 2006) yields the shown coupling constants.Search in Google Scholar

[17] X-Area, Diffractometer control program system, STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt (Germany) 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. L. Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2003, 36, 7.10.1107/S0021889802022112Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-7-20
Accepted: 2017-8-9
Published Online: 2017-9-27
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0122/html
Scroll to top button