Home Physical Sciences Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of the praseodymium borate-nitrate Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O
Article Publicly Available

Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of the praseodymium borate-nitrate Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O

  • and EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 7, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The praseodymium borate-nitrate Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O was obtained in a hydrothermal synthesis. It crystallizes monoclinically in the space group P21/n (no. 14) with four formula units (Z=4) and unit cell parameters of a=641.9(3), b=1551.8(7), c=1068.4(5) pm, with β=90.54(2)° yielding V=1.0643(8) nm3. The defect variant constitutes the missing member in the series of isostructural, early rare earth borate-nitrates of the composition RE[B5O8(OH)(H2O)x]NO3·2H2O [RE=La (x=0; 1), Ce (x=1), Nd (x=0.85), Sm (x=0)]. In addition to powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction data, the novel borate-nitrate was characterized through IR and Raman spectroscopy.

1 Introduction

The structural chemistry of borates is exceptionally multi-faceted owing to the ability of the boron cation to form tetrahedral as well as trigonal-planar oxoanionic building blocks [1]. In 2003, our group was able to amplify the known structural possibilities of borate chemistry by reporting the first edge-sharing [BO4]5− tetrahedra in high-pressure rare earth borates [2]. In the indium borate In19B34O74(OH)11, yet another new borate structure motif was found: [BO4]5− groups in a supertetrahedral arrangement [3]. Borates have also proven valuable in every-day usage such as in borate glasses employed in numerous optoelectronic devices [4]. As stable hosts for rare earth cations, borate structures are already applied, e.g. as photo- [5] and thermoluminescent materials [6].

Owing to their unique [Xe]4fn5d16s2 electronic configuration, rare earth elements present a striking structural diversity [7], [8]. Vast scientific research interest, since the first cerium minerals were characterized in the late 18th century [9], has produced countless fascinating crystal structures. Interestingly, already by 1897, rare earth metals were used for lighting, for example as filaments in incandescent gas light bulbs [10]. Today, rare earth compounds are still indispensable in the field of solid-state lighting [11], [12], [13], as laser sources [14], or in electro- [15] or thermoluminescent [6] devices. An excellent overview of numerous rare earth applications was given by, e.g. by Bünzli et al. [16]. For our most recent synthetic investigations, we focused once more on praseodymium, as to date still only very few, ternary praseodymium borates are known. Pr(BO2)3 was reported already in 1969 by Dzhurinskii and coworkers [17], and was studied thoroughly by Schleid et al. in 2002 [18]. Our group was able to report upon the Pr–B–O system, contributing single-crystal structure elucidations of γ-Pr(BO2)3 [19], Pr4B10O21 [20], λ-PrBO3 [21], and Pr2B8O15 [22]. The hydrated praseodymium borates Pr[B8O11(OH)5] [23], Pr[B9O13(OH)4]·H2O [23], Pr4B22O36(OH)6(H2O)13 [24], and Pr[B5O8(OH)2] [25] were all, unlike most deprotonated compounds, obtained without employing high-pressure/high-temperature conditions. The latter borate, Pr[B5O8(OH)2], shows, as the sum formula already suggests, great structural resemblance with the praseodymium borate-nitrate we herein report.

Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O pertains to the family of borate-nitrates. Nitrate anions are very similar to [BO3]3− groups in molecular geometry, however, naturally showing very different chemical and electronic behavior [26], [27]. Borate-nitrates combine borate and nitrate building blocks, paving the way to an even more diverse structural chemistry. To date, six rare earth borate-nitrates are known in the literature, among which the lutetium borate-nitrate Lu2B2O5(NO3)2·2H2O [28] forms a hitherto unprecedented and as yet independent structure type, built up solely from pyroborate units, nitrate, and water molecules. Lu2B2O5(NO3)2·2H2O possesses the highest nitrate content in all borate-nitrates with a ratio of 1:1 for B:N. With Ce[B5O8(OH)(H2O)]NO3·2H2O [23], the first compound of the early rare earth borate-nitrate series RE[B5O8(OH)(H2O)x]NO3·2H2O [RE=La (x=0; 1), Ce (x=1), Nd (x=0.85), Sm (x=0)] was reported in 2003. Two years later, the first isotypic compound La[B5O8(OH)(H2O)]NO3·2H2O [29] was described. In 2013, the analogous, hygroscopic La[B5O8(OH)]NO3·2H2O [30], lacking the coordinating water position in the borate backbone, was synthesized. Nd[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.85]NO3·2H2O and Sm[B5O8(OH)]NO3·2H2O were characterized in 2016 [31], which differ in the coordinating water content.

Adding the missing member to the early rare earth borate-nitrate structures, we present the hydrothermal synthesis and single-crystal structure characterization of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O.

2 Experimental section

2.1 Synthesis

Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O was synthesized hydrothermally in a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (holding approx. 8 mL) from Pr(NO3)3·6H2O [100.0 mg (0.23 mmol); Strem Chemicals, Kehl, Germany, 99.9%] and H3BO3 [71.1 mg (1.15 mmol); Carl Roth GmbH and Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany, ≥99.8%] resulting in a Pr:B atomic ratio of 1:5. The educt mixture was thoroughly ground together, and heated to and kept at 513 K for 3 days. After slowly cooling down to 373 K (2 K h−1), the autoclave was allowed to cool at room temperature. The product mixture was washed with 100 mL of hot, deionized water to remove unreacted educts, whereupon Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O was obtained without any by-products detectable in the powder X-ray analysis.

2.2 Crystal structure analysis

An X-ray powder diffraction pattern was collected in the 2θ range 2.0–45.0° with a step width of 0.01° on a Stadi P powder diffractometer (STOE, Darmstadt, Germany) used in Debye-Scherrer geometry equipped with Ge(111)-monochromatized MoKα1 radiation (λ=70.93 pm) and a Mythen 1K detector (Dectris, Baden-Dättwil, Switzerland). The raw powder data were processed with WinXPOW [32] and refined with the single-crystal structure data using the Rietveld method (program suite Topas 4.2 [33], [34]). Hardware parameters and reflection shape refinements of the Rietveld calculations were carried out with a LaB6 standard.

Single crystals of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O were selected under a polarization contrast microscope. The single-crystal intensity data was collected on a Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer using monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ=71.073 pm). An Incoatec microfocus X-ray tube operating at 50 kV and 1 mA with a multilayer optic was used. The diffracted beam was collected on a Photon 100 detector. Primary data correction for absorption effects was performed with the system-immanent program Sadabs [35]. The centrosymmetric space group P21/n (no. 14) was derived from the systematic extinctions. The structure was subsequently solved with ShelXS-2013 [36] using Direct Methods, and refined with ShelXL-2016 [37] (full-matrix least-squares on F2), both implemented in the used WinGX surface [38]. The Addsym routine of Platon [39] indicated no obvious additional symmetry. For reasons of comparability, the setting transformation to P21/c (no. 14), as suggested by the Structure Tidy [40] routine of Platon, was renounced. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The O–H distances were restrained to 83(2) pm using the DFIX command.

Details of the single-crystal and powder data collections and evaluations are listed in Table 1. Atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters are listed in Table 2, respective anisotropic displacement parameters are given in Table 3. Tables 4 and 5 show selected interatomic distances and angles, data concerning the hydrogen bonds are tabulated in Table 6.

Table 1:

Crystal data and structure refinement of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O.

Empirical formulaPr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O
Molar mass, g·mol−1456.65
Crystal systemMonoclinic
Space groupP21/n (no. 14)
Powder data
Powder diffractometerSTOE Stadi P
Radiation; λ, pmMoKα1; 70.932
2θ range, deg2.00–45.00
Step width, deg0.01
Measurement time per step, s15
a, pm643.372(2)
b, pm1554.93(3)
c, pm1071.72(2)
β, deg90.38(1)
V, nm31.07213(3)
Rexp0.0197
Rwp0.0386
Rp0.0306
Goodness-of-fit1.96
Single-crystal data
Single-crystal diffractometerBruker D8 Quest
Radiation; λ, pmMoKα ; 71.073
a, pm641.9(3)
b, pm1551.8(7)
c, pm1068.4(5)
β, deg90.54(2)
V, nm31.0643(8)
Formula units per cell4
Calculated density, g·cm−32.83
Crystal size, mm30.055×0.02×0.02
Temperature, K278(2)
Absorption coefficient, mm−14.7
F(000), e867
θ range, deg2.314−32.498
Range in hkl−9≤h≤9, −23≤k≤23, −16≤l≤15
Total no. of reflections17 423
Independent reflections/Rint3856/0.0608
Reflections with I>2 σ(I)3044
Refined parameters228
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (Sadabs [35])
Goodness-of-fit on Fi21.064
Final R1/wR2 [I>2 σ(I)]0.0328/0.0515
R1/wR2 (all data)0.053/0.0543
Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−31.01/−1.90
Table 2:

Atomic coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters Ueq2) of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O.

AtomxyzUeq
Pr10.84938(2)0.29839(2)0.64155(2)0.00704(5)
O10.0494(3)0.2198(2)0.8493(2)0.0080(4)
O20.5615(3)0.2008(2)0.7417(2)0.0071(4)
O30.2010(3)0.2344(2)0.7037(2)0.0092(4)
O40.4751(3)0.2844(2)0.5717(2)0.0069(4)
O50.1379(3)0.2970(2)0.4649(2)0.0056(4)
O60.2738(3)0.5503(2)0.4105(2)0.0112(4)
O70.3649(4)0.1333(2)0.5694(3)0.0152(6)
O80.7003(4)0.0299(2)0.5744(3)0.0348(8)
O90.2994(3)0.1756(2)0.9016(2)0.0066(4)
O100.8526(4)0.1517(2)0.5396(3)0.0224(6)
O110.0139(5)0.0484(2)0.6375(4)0.0433(9)
O120.3881(3)0.4114(2)0.4624(2)0.0088(4)
O130.0623(3)0.4316(2)0.3596(2)0.0084(4)
O140.0992(4)0.4129(2)0.7207(3)0.0249(6)
O150.6533(4)0.3657(2)0.8167(3)0.0232(6)
B10.1544(4)0.2084(2)0.8229(3)0.0067(6)
B20.0203(5)0.3379(2)0.3640(3)0.0062(6)
B30.3587(5)0.3169(2)0.4657(3)0.0060(6)
B40.2399(5)0.4626(2)0.4107(3)0.0066(6)
B50.4070(5)0.2212(2)0.6550(4)0.0120(7)
N10.8559(4)0.0767(2)0.5846(3)0.0225(7)
H10.653(8)0.337(3)0.881(3)0.08(2)
H20.691(8)0.415(2)0.836(5)0.07(2)
H30.086(8)0.465(2)0.710(5)0.06(2)
H40.225(3)0.411(3)0.726(5)0.05(2)
H50.384(4)0.557(3)0.447(3)0.03(2)
H60.266(6)0.102(3)0.591(6)0.07(2)
H70.463(6)0.098(3)0.559(5)0.06(2)
  1. Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor (standard deviations in parentheses). All sites comply with the standard Wyckoff position 4e. All sites are fully occupied, with the exception of O7, H6, and H7, with an S.O.F. of 0.87.

Table 3:

Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2) of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O (SD in parentheses).

U11U22U33U23U13U12
Pr10.00670(7)0.00690(7)0.00749(8)0.00060(8)−0.00204(5)0.00047(6)
O10.0043(8)0.014(2)0.006(2)0.0028(8)−0.0015(8)0.0018(7)
O20.0037(8)0.0111(9)0.007(2)0.0025(9)0.0005(8)−0.0003(8)
O30.0050(8)0.016(2)0.007(2)0.0046(9)0.0001(8)0.0027(8)
O40.0051(8)0.010(2)0.006(2)0.0025(8)−0.0008(8)−0.0011(7)
O50.0028(7)0.0084(9)0.0056(9)0.0000(9)0.0003(7)−0.0013(7)
O60.0103(9)0.007(2)0.017(2)0.0015(9)−0.008(2)−0.0014(8)
O70.013(2)0.015(2)0.018(2)−0.004(2)−0.001(2)−0.001(2)
O80.021(2)0.020(2)0.063(2)−0.007(2)0.006(2)−0.007(2)
O90.0027(8)0.0114(9)0.006(2)0.0022(8)−0.0003(8)0.0023(7)
O100.0258(2)0.013(2)0.029(2)−0.003(2)0.008(2)−0.002(2)
O110.032(2)0.034(2)0.064(3)0.016(2)−0.013(2)−0.001(2)
O120.0065(8)0.0054(9)0.014(2)0.0005(8)−0.0050(8)−0.0016(7)
O130.0078(9)0.0072(9)0.010(2)0.0002(8)−0.0035(8)0.0002(7)
O140.018(2)0.013(2)0.044(2)−0.002(2)−0.013(2)−0.000(2)
O150.039(2)0.014(2)0.017(2)−0.000(2)0.010(2)0.001(2)
B10.006(2)0.008(2)0.006(2)−0.001(2)−0.001(2)−0.001(2)
B20.004(2)0.008(2)0.006(2)−0.001(2)−0.001(2)−0.001(2)
B30.004(2)0.008(2)0.006(2)0.003(2)0.000(2)−0.000(2)
B40.007(2)0.008(2)0.005(2)−0.002(2)−0.000(2)−0.002(2)
B50.005(2)0.019(2)0.012(2)0.007(2)0.003(2)0.003(2)
N10.019(2)0.011(2)0.038(2)−0.005(2)0.011(2)−0.002(2)
Table 4:

Selected interatomic distances (pm) in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O (SD in parentheses).

Pr1–O15249.4(3)B1–O1135.2(3)B2–O2146.5(4)B3–O1149.4(4)
 –O4251.8(2) –O9134.8(4) –O9149.2(3) –O4144.2(4)
 –O10252.5(3) –O3137.2(4) –O5145.5(4) –O5145.1(3)
 –O14253.3(3) Ø135.7 –O13148.0(4) –O12147.9(4)
 –O6253.7(2) Ø147.3 Ø147.0
 –O6254.8(2)
 –O3260.9(2)B4–O6137.8(4)B5–O2138.7(4)N1–O8123.9(4)
 –O9261.2(2) –O12135.4(4) –O3144.0(3) –O10125.8(4)
 –O2262.5(2) –O13134.8(4) –O4139.7(4) –O11123.8(4)
 –O5265.6(2) Ø136.0 –O7166.3(5) Ø124.9
 Ø256.6 Ø147.2
Table 5:

Selected interatomic angles (deg) in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O (SD in parentheses).

O9–B1–O1125.7(3)O13–B4–O12122.9(3)O11–N1–O8119.2(3)
O9–B1–O3122.3(2)O13–B4–O6119.0(3)O8–N1–O10120.9(3)
O1–B1–O3112.0(3)O12–B4–O6118.1(3)O8–N1–O10119.8(3)
Ø120.0Ø120.0Ø120.0
O5–B2–O2112.7(2)O4–B3–O5115.4(2)O2–B5–O4111.1(3)
O5–B2–O13111.0(2)O4–B3–O12107.5(3)O2–B5–O3116.4(3)
O2–B2–O13109.8(2)O5–B3–O12109.6(2)O4–B5–O3115.1(3)
O5–B2–O9103.1(2)O4–B3–O1108.4(2)O2–B5–O7106.9(2)
O2–B2–O9111.3(2)O5–B3–O1107.9(2)O4–B5–O7106(3)
O13–B2–O9108.7(2)O12–B3–O1107.8(2)O3–B5–O799.8(2)
Ø109.4Ø109.4Ø109.4
Table 6:

Hydrogen bonds in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O (SD in parentheses).

Hydrogen bondD–H (pm)H···A (pm)D···A (pm)D–H···A (deg)
O6–H5···O12iii0.81(2)1.82(2)2.618(3)171(4)
O7–H7···O80.84(2)1.86(2)2.685(4)166(6)
O7–H6···O11iv0.84(2)1.89(2)2.716(4)170(6)
O14–H3···O13iii0.83(2)2.00(3)2.760(3)153(5)
O15–H2···O8i0.83(2)2.14(2)2.951(4)168(6)
O15–H1···O5ii0.82(2)2.27(4)2.983(4)146(6)
  1. (i) 1.5−x, 0.5+y, 1.5−z; (ii) 0.5+x, 0.5−y, 0.5+z; (iii) 1−x, 1−y, 1–z; (iv) −1+x, y, z.

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from FIZ Karlsruhe, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (fax: +49-7247-808-666; e-mail: crysdata@fiz-karlsruhe.de) on quoting the deposition number CSD-433274.

2.3 Vibrational spectroscopy

An FTIR spectrum of a single crystal of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O was measured in the range of 600–4000 cm−1 in transmission mode with a Bruker Vertex 70 FT-IR spectrometer providing a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1. The mid-infrared radiation of a Globar silicon carbide rod with a KBr beam splitter was used to excite the crystal on a BaF2 sample holder. An LN-MCT (liquid nitrogen cooled mercury cadmium telluride) detector attached to a Hyperion 3000 microscope was employed to acquire 320 scans of the sample. A correction for atmospheric influences was performed by using the system-immanent Opus [41] software, the final spectrum was plotted with Origin 2017 [42].

Confocal Raman spectroscopy was performed on a single-crystal of the rare earth borate-nitrate using a Horiba Jobin-Yvon LabRam HR-800 spectrometer with a focal length of 80 cm−1. The scattered light was dispersed by an optical grating with 1800 lines mm−1 and collected with a Peltier-cooled Andor CCD detector (1024×256 pixels). The 632.8 nm emission line of a He-Ne laser with a confocal pinhole of 300 μm and a slit of 100 μm was used. Before the measurement, the spectral position of the Raman mode of a Si standard wafer was measured against the Rayleigh line, resulting in a value of 520.4 cm−1. The spectrum was obtained in multi- window acquisition mode provided by the Labspec [43] software package in the Raman shift range of 200–3700 cm−1 with a spectral resolution of 0.4 cm−1. The spectrum was recorded unpolarized and is presented with a sixth-order, manual background correction (also done with the Labspec package). Final visualization was achieved with Origin 2017 [42].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Hydrothermal synthesis

All borate-nitrates reported to date were obtained through mild hydrothermal syntheses. Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O was readily formed under exactly the same conditions as previously reported by our group for Nd[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.85]NO3·2H2O and Sm[B5O8(OH)]NO3· 2H2O [31]: the praseodymium nitrate hydrate and boric acid in the molar ratio of 1:5 were heated to a maximum temperature of 513 K and held for 3 days. Again, the addition of water, which is common in hydrothermal syntheses of other compounds [44], [45], [46], but was never reported to lead to the desired product in borate-nitrates, consistently led to no observable product formation. A boric acid excess seems crucial in phase formation, as it likely acts as a flux enabling the reaction [47]. A stoichiometric ratio of Pr:B=1:5, however, led to a pure product – no side phases were detectable in the powder diffraction experiments after washing the crude product. Unlike with other defect variants also synthesized in our group [31], a substantial evolution of NOx gases was observed upon opening of the autoclave. Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O forms transparent, colorless, single-crystal columns. The bulk product has a greenish hue as expected for Pr(III), similar to the rare earth nitrate hydrate educt.

3.2 Crystal structure discussion

Firstly, Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O was characterized via X-ray powder diffraction. A Rietveld plot of the pattern obtained at ambient conditions is shown in Fig. 1, with a fit to the reflection positions obtained from single-crystal data, and the respective difference curve. No obvious side phases were detectable, also indicated by the obtained quality values of Rexp=0.0197, Rwp=0.0386, Rp=0.0306, and GOF=1.96 for the refinement of a single powder phase. All reflections were refined with pseudo-Voigt Thompson-Cox-Hasting functions. For the (020) reflection at d=7.77, a preferred orientation was refined, justified with the column-like shape of the crystals formed by Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O. Details on the data collection and Rietveld refinement are given in Table 1.

Fig. 1: Rietveld plot with the experimental powder pattern fitted to the structural model obtained from the single-crystal data.
Fig. 1:

Rietveld plot with the experimental powder pattern fitted to the structural model obtained from the single-crystal data.

The single-crystal structure determination for Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O revealed that the structure variant of RE[B5O8(OH)(H2O)x]NO3·2H2O [RE=La (x=0; 1), Ce (x=1), Nd (x=0.85), Sm (x=0)] is crystallizing monoclinically in the space group P21/n (no. 14) with four formula units (Z=4) per unit cell and the following cell parameters: a=641.9(3), b=1551.8(7), c=1068.4(5) pm, with β=90.54(2)° giving V=1.0643(8) nm3. The phases containing neighboring rare earth cations display comparable unit cell dimensions: the cerium borate-nitrate with a=644.38(12), b=1557.2(3), c=1074.5(2) pm, β=90.395(3)°, and V=1.0782(3) nm3 [48] is quite significantly larger. Interestingly, Nd[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.85]NO3·2H2O, with a=642.85(2), b=1552.58(4), c=1070.52(2) pm, β=90.39(2)°, and V=1.06844(5) nm3 is also slightly larger. Ultimately, Sm[B5O8(OH)]NO3·2H2O with a=644.09(3), b=1541.99(8), c=1050.97(5) pm, β=90.33(1)°, and V=1.04379(9) nm3, and no coordinating water, displays a notably smaller unit cell. The related praseodymium borate Pr[B5O8(OH)2] [25] crystallizes also monoclinically with Z=4, the structure being solved from X-ray powder data in P21/c (no. 14). The unit cell dimensions of a=649(1), b=1041(1), c=1103(1) pm, β=113.35(1)°, and V=0.684(1) nm3 are significantly smaller.

Figure 2 shows the unit cell of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3· 2H2O projected along the a axis. The continuous borate backbone in this rare earth borate-nitrate structure type, as well as in Pr[B5O8(OH)2] [25], is built up from two different, connected Dreierrings [49]: one is formed by two tetrahedral and one trigonal-planar borate groups through shared corners. The other is formed by only one tetrahedral and two trigonal-planar borate blocks also sharing corners. The two rings share one tetrahedron. The resulting fundamental building block (FBB) can be symbolized as 3□3∆: <∆2□>–<□2∆> (after Hawthorne et al. [50]). The double-rings are then again connected through a single, shared oxygen position. In summary, the FBB forms continuous chains <∆2□>–<□2∆><∆2□> –<□2∆>·, visible in Fig. 2 as corrugated layers in the ac plane.

Fig. 2: Unit cell of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O. [BO4]5− tetrahedra are given in blue, [BO3]3− groups are depicted without polyhedra (except for B5 to clarify its deflection from the planar shape). The H2O···[BO3]3− coordination interaction is indicated with dashed grey lines. [NO3]3− groups are highlighted with green triangles.
Fig. 2:

Unit cell of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O. [BO4]5− tetrahedra are given in blue, [BO3]3− groups are depicted without polyhedra (except for B5 to clarify its deflection from the planar shape). The H2O···[BO3]3− coordination interaction is indicated with dashed grey lines. [NO3]3− groups are highlighted with green triangles.

The borate groups’ geometry is in good agreement with the previously presented structure variants and the praseodymium pentaborate Pr[B5O8(OH)2] [25], [30], [31], [48]. B–O distances in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O range from 134.8(4) to 144.0(3) pm (Ø 137.5 pm) in the [BO3]3− groups, and from 144.2(4) to 149.4(4) pm (Ø 147.5 pm) in the [BO4]5− units. The trigonal-pyramidal H2O···[BO3]3− group formed by B5 is, similar as in the hydrated La3+, the Ce3+, and the Nd3+ borate-nitrate variants as well as in Pr[B5O8(OH)2], deflected out of the oxygen plane towards the coordinating water position O7 (cf. Fig. 2). B–O bond lengths in this unit are 138.7(4) (B5–O2), 139.7(4) (B5–O4), 144.0(3) (B5–O3), and 166.3(5) pm (B5···O7). The distance between B5 and the coordinating water molecule is significantly larger than in the La3+ [164.4(4) pm] [29], Ce3+ [163.7(5) pm] [48], or Nd3+ equivalent [162.3(5) pm] [31]. The equivalent position B3 in Pr[B5O8(OH)2] [25] shows a distance of 164.3(2) pm to the equally coordinating position O10. O–B–O bond angles in the trigonal-planar [BO3]3− (Ø 120.0°) and in the [BO4]5− groups including the trigonal-pyramidal H2O···[BO3]3− unit (Ø 109.4°) agree well with commonly reported values for borates [51], [52], along with those obtained, e.g. for the La3+ and Ce3+ structures. Selected interatomic distances and angles are also listed in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.

As mentioned, the praseodymium borate-nitrate is a defect structure, differing from, e.g. the cerium equivalent in its coordinating water content. The crystal structure of the cerium borate-nitrate Ce[B5O8(OH)(H2O)]NO3·2H2O, first discovered by Lin et al. [23], was redetermined by Mi and coworkers in 2012 [48]. The latter group stated one coordinating water molecule in addition to two crystal water molecules, instead of three non-coordinating water positions. In the defect structure we present, the coordinating water position is occupied at 87%, similar to Nd[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.85]NO3·2H2O. Neither for the La3+ nor for the Sm3+ compound, a coordinating water position was found. The positions B5 in these compounds are found in perfect, trigonal-planar coordination by three oxygen anions. Matching all RE[B5O8(OH)(H2O)x]NO3·2H2O [RE=La (x=0; 1), Ce (x=1), Nd (x=0.85), Sm (x=0)] structures, the praseodymium compound contains two crystal water molecules at comparable positions. In Fig. 2, the coordinating as well as crystal water molecules are shown, the B5···O7 interaction is indicated with dashed grey lines.

The third structural component, besides borate groups and water molecules, present in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O, are nitrate groups, indicated with green triangles in Fig. 2. The N–O bond lengths are 123.8(4), 123.9(4), and 125.8(4) pm (Ø 124.5 pm) – comparable values are found in all other known structure variants, e.g. 125.1(5)–125.9(5) pm for the Ce3+ compound. Bond angles in the trigonal-planar [NO3]3− groups (Ø 120.0°) are also in line with those commonly reported for nitrates [27] and the structure analogues, e.g. Ce[B5O8(OH)(H2O)]NO3·2H2O [48]. The interatomic distances and angles, also of the nitrate unit, are listed in Tables 4 and 5.

The hydrogen bonds formed in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O are presented in Table 6. Six different hydrogen bonds are formed in every structure representative, regardless of the coordinating water content. Without the additional water position, the nitrate group is free to act as an acceptor for hydrogen bonds, as reported earlier for the lanthanum [29], [30] and samarium [31] borate-nitrates. The coordinating water molecule present in the Pr3+ compound acts like reported, e.g. for the Nd3+ [31] and Ce3+ [48] equivalents: it reorientates the nitrate group by forming the hydrogen bonds O7–H6···O11 and O7–H7···O8. In this position, all hydrogen bonds formed by the [NO3]3− group are geometrically impossible, instead, another nitrate-water coordination O15–H2···O8 is formed. All values for the hydrogen bonds are in line with those previously reported.

The nitrate and borate groups together with the crystal water molecules all coordinate the rare earth cations. Pr3+ centers are ten-fold coordinated at an average distance of 256.6 pm, with effective coordination number (ECoN) [53] contributions of the oxygen anions ranging from 1.155 to 0.778. The average coordination distance is in perfect alignment with those found in the other rare earth compounds: 260.6, 258.4, 255.6, and 253.7 pm for La3+ [30], Ce3+, Nd3+, and Sm3+, respectively. The additional, boron-coordinating water positions present in the hydrated lanthanum, cerium, neodymium, and in the novel praseodymium compounds do not participate in the coordination of the rare earth cations. Regardless of its orientation, the nitrate group participates in the coordination of the central cation also in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O. In Fig. 3, the coordination environment of Pr1 is shown. Interatomic distances in the Pr–O coordination polyhedron are given in Table 4.

Fig. 3: Coordination environment of the praseodymium(III) cation in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O.
Fig. 3:

Coordination environment of the praseodymium(III) cation in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O.

The bond-valence sums for Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O were calculated using the bond-length/bond-strength concept (ΣV) [54], [55]. The charge distribution was derived using the CHARDI concept (Charge distribution in solids, ΣQ) [56], [57], [58]. The calculated formal ionic charges of all atoms are within the limits of the concepts and are listed in Table 7. For the bond-valence sum of B5, the S.O.F. of 0.87 of the coordinating O7 was taken into account.

Table 7:

Charge distribution in Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O, calculated with the bond-length/bond-strength (ΣV) [55] and the CHARDI concept (ΣQ) [57].

Pr1B1B2B3B4B5N1
ΣV+3.15+3.11+3.04+3.07+3.09+3.11+4.97
ΣQ+2.88+2.99+3.14+3.14+3.19+2.87+5.65
O1O2O3O4O5O6O7
ΣV−2.05−2.00–2.15–2.11–1.85–2.19–2.20
ΣQ–1.96–2.05–2.07–2.14–1.84–2.24–2.18
O8O9O10O11O12O13O14O15
ΣV–1.68–2.06–1.60–1.69–1.79–1.81–2.09–2.13
ΣQ–1.72–2.00–1.89–1.73–1.74–1.78–2.32–2.35
H1H2H3H4H5H6H7
ΣV+1.43+1.40+1.39+1.47+1.46+1.36+1.35
ΣQ+0.85+0.85+0.86+0.86+0.89+0.92+0.92

3.3 Vibrational spectroscopy

The FTIR absorption spectrum of a single crystal of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O is given in Fig. 4. Bands at wavenumbers below 800 cm−1 can be attributed to complex lattice vibrations involving Pr3+. Borate group vibrations occur in the regions between 800 and 1100 cm−1 ([BO4]5− tetrahedra) [59], [60], [61], and 1200–1450 cm−1 ([BO3]3− trigonal-planar groups) [59], [62]. Absorptions stemming from ν1 [NO3]3− vibrations around ~1300 cm−1 [63], [64] overlap with borate group absorptions and are better visible in the Raman spectrum. Absorptions at 1498 cm−1 can be attributed to ν4 [NO3]3− vibrations [64]. The absorption at 1556 cm−1 does not pertain to the borate-nitrate and could be assigned to oil residues on the crystal prior used for the single-crystal X-ray structure determination. Bands at 1635 and 1699 cm−1 likely stem from bending vibrations of the water molecules [65], [66]. Absorptions at 3566 and ~3745 cm−1 are assignable to OH group vibrations [67].

Fig. 4: FTIR spectrum of a single crystal of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3· 2H2O.
Fig. 4:

FTIR spectrum of a single crystal of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3· 2H2O.

Figure 5 shows the Raman spectrum of a single crystal of the praseodymium borate-nitrate. Lattice, [BO4]5−, and [BO3]3− vibrations are visible below 800 cm−1, between 800 and 1100 cm−1, and from 1200 to 1400 cm−1, respectively [68], [69]. The most intense bands near 1049 cm−1 stem from the readily polarizable ν1 stretching vibrations of the [NO3] group [70]. Since the local D3h symmetry of the nitrate triangle is lowered due to the coordination to the Pr3+ cation, split peak shapes are observed [63], [71]. The characteristic double bands at 2850 and 2902 cm−1 stem from oil residues on the single crystal’s surface that could unfortunately not be eradicated. Bands at 3453 and 3615 cm−1 originate from OH vibrations [67], [72].

Fig. 5: Raman spectrum of a single crystal of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3· 2H2O.
Fig. 5:

Raman spectrum of a single crystal of Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3· 2H2O.

4 Conclusion

Completing the series of early rare earth borate-nitrates, we reported on the hydrothermally synthesized compound Pr[B5O8(OH)(H2O)0.87]NO3·2H2O. The defect variant of RE[B5O8(OH)(H2O)x]NO3·2H2O (RE=La (x=0; 1), Ce (x=1), Nd (x=0.85), Sm (x=0)) crystallizes monoclinically in the space group P21/n (no. 14) with four formula units (Z=4) per unit cell and a=641.9(3), b=1551.8(7), c=1068.4(5) pm, β=90.54(2)°, and V=1.0643(8) nm3. Single-crystal structure elucidation showed its coordinating water position to be occupied to 87%, equal to the Nd3+ structure analogue.

Acknowledgments

From the Institute for General, Inorganic, and Theoretical Chemistry, Leopold-Franzens-University, Innsbruck, we thank Mag. Daniela Vitzthum for collecting the FTIR spectrum; Lucas Petschnig, MSc. for his patient support with the Rietveld refinement; and Dr. Gunter Heymann for collecting the single-crystal data set. We are also grateful to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Roland Stalder (Institute for Mineralogy and Petrography, Leopold-Franzens-University, Innsbruck) for granting us access to the FTIR microscope, and thank Dr. Bastian Joachim of the same Institute for the Raman data collection.

References

[1] R. S. Bubnova, S. K. Filatov, Z. Kristallogr.2013, 228, 395.10.1524/zkri.2013.1646Search in Google Scholar

[2] H. Emme, H. Huppertz, Chem. Eur. J.2003, 9, 3623.10.1002/chem.200204696Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] D. Vitzthum, K. Wurst, J. Prock, P. Brüggeller, H. Huppertz, Inorg. Chem.2016, 55, 11473.10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] D. Kothandan, R. J. Kumar, Int. J. ChemTech Res.2015, 8, 310.Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Lin, D. Yang, G. Liu, T. Ma, B. Zhai, Q. An, J. Yu, X. Wang, X. Liu, E. Yue-Bun Pun, J. Lumin.2005, 113, 121.10.1016/j.jlumin.2004.09.115Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Bahl, A. Pandey, S. P. Lochab, V. E. Aleynikov, A. G. Molokanov, P. Kumar, J. Lumin.2013, 134, 691.10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[7] B. G. Wybourne, Spectroscopic Properties of Rare Earths, Interscience, New York, 1965.10.1063/1.3047727Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. J. Freeman, R. E. Watson, Phys. Rev.1962, 127, 2058.10.1103/PhysRev.127.2058Search in Google Scholar

[9] L. M. Dennis, W. H. Magee, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1894, 16, 649.10.1021/ja02108a001Search in Google Scholar

[10] O. Knöfler, Gas-Incandescent, US 593, 106, 1897.Search in Google Scholar

[11] J. M. Ramírez, A. Ruiz-Caridad, J. Wojcik, A. M. Gutierrez, S. Estradé, F. Peiró, P. Sanchís, P. Mascher, B. Garrido, Br. J. Appl. Phys.2016, 119, 113108.10.1063/1.4944433Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. Müller-Mach, G. Müller, M. R. Krames, H. A. Höppe, F. Stadler, W. Schnick, T. Juestel, P. Schmidt, Phys. Status Solidi A2005, 202, 1727.10.1002/pssa.200520045Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Pust, V. Weiler, C. Hecht, A. Tücks, A. S. Wochnik, A.-K. Henß, D. Wiechert, C. Scheu, P. J. Schmidt, W. Schnick, Nat. Mater.2014, 13, 891.10.1038/nmat4012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] B.-S. Lu, J. Wang, H.-F. Pan, M.-H. Jiang, E.-Q. Liu, X.-Y. Hou, J. Appl. Phys.1989, 66, 6052.10.1063/1.343583Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. J. Steckl, J. C. Heikenfeld, D.-S. Lee, M. J. Garter, C. C. Baker, Y. Wang, R. Jones, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron.2002, 8, 749.10.1109/JSTQE.2002.801690Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. V. Eliseeva, J.-C. G. Bünzli, New J. Chem.2011, 35, 1165.10.1039/c0nj00969eSearch in Google Scholar

[17] V. I. Pakhomov, G. B. Silnitskaya, A. V. Medvedev, B. F. Dzhurinskii, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater.1969, 5, 1661.Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. Sieke, T. Nikelski, Th. Schleid, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2002, 628, 819.10.1002/1521-3749(200205)628:4<819::AID-ZAAC819>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar

[19] H. Emme, C. Despotopoulou, H. Huppertz, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2004, 630, 2450.10.1002/zaac.200400202Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Haberer, G. Heymann, H. Huppertz, J. Solid State Chem.2007, 180, 1595.10.1016/j.jssc.2007.02.021Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Haberer, R. Kaindl, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2010, 65b, 1206.10.1515/znb-2010-1005Search in Google Scholar

[22] M. Glätzle, G. J. Hoerder, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2016, 71b, 535.10.1515/znb-2016-0027Search in Google Scholar

[23] L. Li, X. Jin, G. Li, Y. Wang, F. Liao, G. Yao, J. Lin, Chem. Mater.2003, 15, 2253.10.1021/cm030004dSearch in Google Scholar

[24] T. G. Parker, A. L. Chown, A. Beehler, D. Pubbi, J. N. Cross, T. E. Albrecht-Schmitt, Inorg. Chem.2015, 54, 570.10.1021/ic502461dSearch in Google Scholar

[25] L.-Y. Li, F.-H. Liao, G.-B. Li, J.-H. Lin, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem.2005, 21, 949.Search in Google Scholar

[26] D. Jarosch, J. Zemann, Monatsh. Chem.1983, 114, 267.10.1007/BF00798948Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. Leclaire, J. Solid State Chem.1979, 28, 235.10.1016/0022-4596(79)90075-6Search in Google Scholar

[28] T. S. Ortner, K. Wurst, C. Hejny, H. Huppertz, J. Solid State Chem.2016, 233, 329.10.1016/j.jssc.2015.11.005Search in Google Scholar

[29] L. Y. Li, G.-B. Li, F.-H. Liao, J. H. Lin, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin.2005, 21, 769.10.3866/PKU.WHXB20050714Search in Google Scholar

[30] B.-C. Zhao, W. Sun, W.-J. Ren, Y.-X. Huang, Z. Li, Y. Pan, J.-X. Mi, J. Solid State Chem.2013, 206, 91.10.1016/j.jssc.2013.07.032Search in Google Scholar

[31] T. S. Ortner, K. Wurst, B. Joachim, H. Huppertz, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2016, 3659.10.1002/ejic.201600480Search in Google Scholar

[32] Stoe Win Xpow, STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt (Germany), 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. Parsons, H. D. Flack, T. Wagner, Acta Crystallogr.2013, B69, 249.10.1107/S2052519213010014Search in Google Scholar

[34] Topas, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe (Germany), 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Sadabs, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA), 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[36] ShelXS, Crystal Structure Solution, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany), 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[37] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3.Search in Google Scholar

[38] L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1999, 32, 837.10.1107/S0021889899006020Search in Google Scholar

[39] A. L. Spek, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2003, 36, 7.10.1107/S0021889802022112Search in Google Scholar

[40] L. M. Gelato, E. Parthe, J. Appl. Crystallogr.1987, 20, 139.10.1107/S0021889887086965Search in Google Scholar

[41] Opus, Bruker Optik GmbH, Ettlingen (Germany), 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[42] OriginPro 2017G, OriginLab Corporation, Northhampton (USA), 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[43] LabSpec, Horiba Jobin Yvon GmbH, Bensheim, Germany, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[44] G. T. Kohman, N. J. Summit, Growing of quartz crystals, US 2,895,812, 1959.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Z. Y. Wu, P. Brandao, Z. Lin, Inorg. Chem.2012, 51, 3088.10.1021/ic202516zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] N. Stock, T. Bein, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2004, 43, 749.10.1002/anie.200351718Search in Google Scholar

[47] L. Li, P. Lu, Y. Wang, X. Jin, G. Li, Y. Wang, L. You, J. Lin, Chem. Mater.2002, 14, 4963.10.1021/cm0203870Search in Google Scholar

[48] W. Sun, T.-T. Zhu, B.-C. Zhao, Y.-X. Huang, J.-X. Mi, Acta Crystallogr.2012, E68, i33.10.1107/S1600536812002875Search in Google Scholar

[49] F. Liebau, Structural Chemistry of Silicates, Springer, Berlin, 1985.10.1007/978-3-642-50076-3Search in Google Scholar

[50] P. C. Burns, J. D. Grice, F. C. Hawthorne, Can. Mineral.1995, 33, 1131.Search in Google Scholar

[51] E. Zobetz, Z. Kristallogr.1982, 160, 81.10.1524/zkri.1982.160.1-2.81Search in Google Scholar

[52] E. Zobetz, Z. Kristallogr.1990, 191, 45.10.1524/zkri.1990.191.1-2.45Search in Google Scholar

[53] R. Hübenthal, M. Serafin, R. Hoppe, Maple (version 4.0), Program for the Calculation of Distances, Angles, Effective Coordination Numbers, Coordination Spheres, and Lattice Energies, University of Gießen, Gießen (Germany), 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[54] I. D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr.1985, B41, 244.10.1107/S0108768185002063Search in Google Scholar

[55] N. E. Brese, M. O’Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr.1991, B47, 192.10.1107/S0108768190011041Search in Google Scholar

[56] R. Hoppe, Z. Kristallogr.1979, 150, 23.10.1524/zkri.1979.150.1-4.23Search in Google Scholar

[57] R. Hoppe, S. Voigt, H. Glaum, J. Kissel, H. P. Müller, K. Bernet, J. Less-Common Met.1989, 156, 105.10.1016/0022-5088(89)90411-6Search in Google Scholar

[58] M. Nespolo, B. Guillot, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2016, 49, 317.10.1107/S1600576715024814Search in Google Scholar

[59] M. Ren, J. H. Lin, Y. Dong, L. Q. Yang, M. Z. Su, L. P. You, Chem. Mater.1999, 11, 1576.10.1021/cm990022oSearch in Google Scholar

[60] C. E. Weir, R. A. Schroeder, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand.1964, 68A, 465.10.6028/jres.068A.045Search in Google Scholar

[61] J. P. Laperches, P. Tarte, Spectrochim. Acta1966, 22, 1201.10.1016/0371-1951(66)80023-1Search in Google Scholar

[62] W. C. Steele, J. C. Decius, J. Chem. Phys.1956, 25, 1184.10.1063/1.1743175Search in Google Scholar

[63] J. R. Ferraro, J. Mol. Spectrosc.1960, 4, 99.10.1016/0022-2852(60)90071-0Search in Google Scholar

[64] A. Walker, J. R. Ferraro, J. Chem. Phys.1965, 43, 2689.10.1063/1.1697196Search in Google Scholar

[65] H.-Y. Sun, W. Sun, Y.-X. Huang, J.-X. Mi, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2010, 636, 977.10.1002/zaac.201000066Search in Google Scholar

[66] N. A. Yamnova, Y. K. Egorov-Tismenko, N. V. Zubkova, O. V. Dimitrova, A. P. Kantor, Crystallogr. Rep.2005, 50, 766.10.1134/1.2049393Search in Google Scholar

[67] K. Nakamoto, M. Margoshes, R. E. Rundle, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1955, 77, 6480.10.1021/ja01629a013Search in Google Scholar

[68] W. Bues, G. Förster, R. Schmitt, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1966, 344, 148.10.1002/zaac.19663440305Search in Google Scholar

[69] G. D. Chryssikos, J. Raman Spectrosc.1991, 22, 645.10.1002/jrs.1250221109Search in Google Scholar

[70] T. Furukawa, S. A. Brawer, W. B. White, J. Chem. Phys.1978, 69, 2639.10.1063/1.436912Search in Google Scholar

[71] J.-C. G. Bünzli, E. Moret, J.-R. Yersin, Helv. Chim. Acta1978, 61, 762.10.1002/hlca.19780610224Search in Google Scholar

[72] W. Baur, Acta Crystallogr.1972, B28, 1456.10.1107/S0567740872004455Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-6-28
Accepted: 2017-7-20
Published Online: 2017-9-7
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0121/html
Scroll to top button