Home Reactions of Al/P, Ga/P and P–H functionalized frustrated Lewis pairs with azides and a diazomethane – formation of adducts and capture of nitrenes
Article Publicly Available

Reactions of Al/P, Ga/P and P–H functionalized frustrated Lewis pairs with azides and a diazomethane – formation of adducts and capture of nitrenes

  • Werner Uhl EMAIL logo , Jana Backs , Alexander Hepp , Lukas Keweloh , Marcus Layh , Damian Pleschka , Josephine Possart and Agnes Wollschläger
Published/Copyright: October 7, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Al- and Ga-based frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) Mes2P–C(MR2)=CH-R′ (1, M=Al, R=tBu; 2, M=Al, R=CH2tBu; 3, M=Ga, R=tBu) and the unique P–H functionalized FLP Mes(H)P–CH(AlR2)=C(H)-tBu [4, R=CH(SiMe3)2] were treated with a variety of azides R′-N=N=N [R′=tBu, SiMe3, Ph, CH2Ph, C6H4(4-Cl), C6H4(4-CF3), C6H4(4-Me), CH2C6H4(4-Cl), CH2C6H4(4-tBu), C6H4(2-CH=CHPh)] in order to study systematically the influence of the substituents at nitrogen, phosphorus and the metal atoms on the reaction courses and the thermal stability of the products. Azide adducts (5–8) were isolated in which the terminal nitrogen atoms of the azides (Nγγ) were bound to the phosphorus and the respective metal atoms resulting in four-membered PCMN heterocycles as the sole structural motif despite the wide range of substituents and the variation in the metal atoms of the FLPs. Thermal activation of selected azide adducts led to the elimination of N2 and the formation of the nitrene adducts 9–11 in which formally a transient, highly reactive nitrene N–R with an electron sextet nitrogen atom is trapped by the FLPs. For the first time FLPs were treated with a diazomethane, Me3Si–C(H)=N=N. Reactions with 1 and 2 afforded the adducts [Mes2P–C(AlR2)=CH-Ph](μ-N2CH–SiMe3) 12 (R=tBu, CH2tBu) which had structures and spectroscopic properties similar to those of the corresponding azides. These compounds are thermally stable and do not eliminate dinitrogen upon warming or irradiation. Protonation of 12a with HCl in Et2O resulted in cleavage of the Al–N bond and formation of the zwitterionic phosphonium salt Mes2P[NH–N=C(H)–SiMe3]–C(AlCltBu2)=C(H)-Ph 13 with an intramolecular N–H···Cl hydrogen bond.

1 Introduction

Frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) form a class of highly functionalized compounds that have coordinatively unsaturated Lewis-basic and -acidic atoms in single molecules or bimolecular systems [1], [2], [3], [4]. The energetically highly preferred adduct formation with quenching of the conflicting properties is hereby prevented by steric shielding and/or rigid molecular backbones. The specific functionality of FLPs results in a unique chemical reactivity which allows the coordination or activation of various polar and non-polar substrates and the application in numerous highly interesting stoichiometric or catalytic processes [1], [2], [3], [4]. Since the first report on the spectacular transition metal free heterolytical cleavage of dihydrogen by an FLP in 2006 [5] this new class of compounds found enormous interest with a huge number of contributions from many research groups. In most cases B/P-based FLPs with the acidity of the boron atoms enhanced by fluorinated groups have been applied [1], [2], [3], [5], but a variety of systems has been developed recently in which e.g. carbenes, amines or sulfur atoms are the basic components [1], [2], [3]. In recent investigations we have shown that Al/P-based FLPs form a powerful alternative to the B/P-based systems [4]. Aluminium atoms as Lewis acids have the considerable advantage of an inherently high Lewis acidity which does not require an activation by electron withdrawing groups. These Al/P-based FLPs were obtained on a facile route by hydroalumination of sterically shielded alkynylphosphines [6], [7], [8] and have a geminal arrangement of the aluminium and phosphorus atoms (1; Scheme 1). They have been applied in catalytic processes such as the dehydrogenation of amine-borane adducts [9] or in the solubilisation of alkalimetal hydrides and in a phase transfer reaction [10]. Adducts were isolated with various carbonyl compounds [6], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], terminal alkynes [6], [11], [12], chalcogen atoms [21], boron trihalides [22], hydrogen halides [23], transition metal atoms [24], [25], [26] etc. (for further Al/P based systems see Refs. [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]). Their facile generation by hydroalumination allowed the synthesis of a unique P–H functionalized FLP by treatment of Mes(H)P–C≡C-tBu with H-Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2 [32]. This FLP reacted with an azide or isocyanate by coordination via the FLP functionality, transfer of the phosphorus-bound hydrogen atom to the activated substrates and formation of unprecedented structural motifs stabilised by an interaction to the FLP backbone [32]. An unexpected transmetallation reaction was observed upon treatment of FLP 1 with a phenyl Grignard reagent [33]. The aluminium atom was replaced by magnesium and the resulting Grignard analogue allowed the transfer of the basic FLP component to other metal atoms such as gallium or indium [33] and the generation of FLPs with finely tuned acceptor properties based on the different Lewis acidity of the metal atoms.

Scheme 1: FLP 1 and various azide adducts of FLPs.
Scheme 1:

FLP 1 and various azide adducts of FLPs.

The outstanding capability of FLPs to activate or coordinate a large variety of compounds resulted in the isolation of a huge number of remarkable products. Organic azides RN3 with three directly connected nitrogen atoms form a particularly interesting class of substrates in this context, and their treatment with FLPs led to three distinct structural motifs: (i) The terminal nitrogen atom Nγ is bound to the Lewis acidic and basic centres resulting in four- or five-membered heterocyles with exocyclic N=N double bonds (A; Scheme 1) [8], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. (ii) The γ- and β-nitrogen atoms bind to the respective Lewis centres resulting in a heterocycle with an endocyclic N2 group and a single exocyclic nitrogen atom (B) [39]. (iii) The atoms Nα and Nγ interact with the Lewis centres which leads to the formation of a heterocycle with an endocyclic N3 group (C) [40]. All three structural motifs have been experimentally observed although the number of characterised adducts is still comparatively small. Motif A is the most frequently observed structural variant and based on FLPs with one or two carbon atoms between the Lewis basic (P) and Lewis acidic centres (B, Al, Ga, Zr, Sn, Pb). C with a six-membered heterocycle was obtained by the reaction of a geminal P/B-based FLP which has electron withdrawing substituents bound to phosphorus [40], while B was obtained by an irradiation induced rearrangement of the respective terminal adduct (A) [39]. In rare cases thermolysis of A resulted in the elimination of N2 and the formation of stable nitrene adducts of the respective FLPs [8], [37], [39], [40], while C underwent an anomalous Staudinger reaction after irradiation with UV light to yield an NH adduct [40].

This manuscript focuses on the reaction of a variety of alkyl and aryl substituted azides with a number of geminal Al/P- or Ga/P-based FLPs such as Mes2P–C(MR2)=CH-Ph (M=Al, Ga; R=tBu, CH2tBu) or the P–H functionalized compound Mes(H)P–C{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)-tBu and describes the effect of electronic and steric properties of the starting materials on the structures, reactivity and stability of the products. We hoped to find suitable conditions for the predictable formation of a variety of products having different structural motifs. In addition, we investigated for the first time the behaviour of an FLP towards a diazomethane derivative, N2C(H)–SiMe3. In particular we were interested in the release of dinitrogen in these reactions and an access to an adduct of an FLP with an electron sextet carbene moiety which has not been observed previously.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Azide complexes

Treatment of the FLPs Mes2P–C(AlR2)=CH-R′ (1, M=Al, R=tBu [6]; 2, M=Al, R=CH2tBu [7], [8]; 3, M=Ga, R=tBu [33]) or Mes(H)P–C{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)-tBu 4 [32] with various azides R′-N=N=N at room temperature gave in good yields of 62–94% the corresponding adducts 5–7 (Scheme 2) and 8 (Scheme 3). The yellow (5, 6a–c, 7) to colourless (6d, 8) products were difficult to crystallise and only compounds 5, 6d, 7a [33] and 10a were obtained as crystalline, analytically pure products, that were fully characterised including X-ray crystallography. The other compounds yielded yellow-orange oils which contained only minor impurities, but did not crystallise from various solvents and were characterised by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy. All compounds feature four-membered PCMN heterocycles with the terminal Nγ atom of the azide bound to P and Al or Ga, respectively (see crystal structure determination, NMR discussion).

Scheme 2: Reactions of FLPs 1–3 with azides. Syntheses of azametallaphosphetanes 5–7.
Scheme 2:

Reactions of FLPs 1–3 with azides. Syntheses of azametallaphosphetanes 5–7.

Scheme 3: Reactions of the P–H functionalized FLP 4 with azides. Syntheses of compounds 8.
Scheme 3:

Reactions of the P–H functionalized FLP 4 with azides. Syntheses of compounds 8.

The NMR spectra of compounds 5–7 are very similar. They show a significant downfield shift of the 31P NMR resonances from about δ=−15 ppm for the starting FLPs to δ=34.6 (6d) to 45.0 (7b) ppm consistent with an increased coordination number at the phosphorus atoms from three to four. There is also a downfield shift in the 1H NMR spectra for the signals of the vinylic hydrogen atoms from δ<7.40 ppm in the FLPs to δ=7.75–7.98 ppm for the azide adducts and an increase in the 3JPH coupling constants from around 13 Hz to about 42 Hz which is indicative of the larger coordination number on phosphorus and a cis arrangement of phosphorus and vinylic hydrogen atoms across the C=C bonds. The difference arising for Al and Ga derivatives is small (compounds 7 have slightly larger downfield shifts and smaller coupling constants). The corresponding downfield shift in the 31P NMR spectra of compounds 8 in comparison to 4 is slightly larger (from δ=−80.8 to around δ=−12 ppm), the shift in the 1H NMR spectra is similar (from δ=6.69 to about δ=7.20 ppm). The 3JPH coupling constants of the adducts 8 (75 Hz) and the starting material 4 (31.8 Hz) are much larger compared to those of the dimesitylphosphorus compounds as a result of the trans orientation of phosphorus and vinylic hydrogen atoms and are consistent with the Karplus relation for JPH coupling constants [41], [42]. Further evidence for adduct formation are the increased 3JPC coupling constants (ipso-C, C=CPh) from about 13 Hz (1–3) to about 36 Hz (5–7) and increased 1JPC coupling constants (ipso-C, Mes) from around 23 Hz in 1–3 to >68 Hz in the adducts which is again consistent with the increase of the coordination number at phosphorus. Surprisingly there is simultaneously a significant decrease in the 1JPC coupling constants (PC=CH) from 46 (4) and 58 (1–3) Hz in the starting materials to <1 Hz (or not resolved; 8) and around 13 Hz (5 and 6, M=Al) or 30 Hz (7, M=Ga) in the azide adducts. The values of 1–4 may be influenced by an interaction of the lone pair at phosphorus with the vinylic carbon atom and the attached C–M bond (see also the structure discussion below). Compounds 8 additionally show large 1JPH coupling constants close to 470 Hz typical for hydrogen atoms directly bound to four-coordinate phosphorus atoms. Representative 1H,1H-ROESY spectra of 5a–c showed cross peaks between the o-hydrogen atoms of the aromatic azide substituents and both the AltBu groups and the o-Me groups of the mesityl substituents consistent with free rotation of the azide substituent and close contacts to both groups in solution. The presence of four different substituents on phosphorus introduces chirality in compounds 8 and results in highly complicated spectra with distinct signals for the mesityl substituents and the diastereotopic hydrogen and carbon atoms of CH(SiMe3)2 groups.

It is noteworthy that despite the multitude of different azides with a large variety of substituents that range from electron withdrawing [R′=C6H4(4-Cl), C6H4(4-CF3)] to electron donating [R′=C6H4(4-Me), CH2C6H4(4-tBu), tBu] and that differ in steric bulk [e.g. C6H4(4-Cl) versus CH2C6H4(4-Cl) or C6H4(2-CH=CHPh) or tBu] and the application of four different FLPs that differ in electronegativity and steric bulk of Lewis acid [Al, Ga; tBu, CH2tBu, CH(SiMe3)2] and base (Mes, H), exclusively azametallophosphetanes with four-membered heterocycles [structural motif (i)] and the terminal N atom of the azide in the bridging position were formed. The substituents on the metal and phosphorus atoms may be too bulky to favour a larger heterocycle with two or three nitrogen atoms in the ring (interaction of R′ with FLP substituents). The P–H functionalized compounds did not show the shift of the phosphorus-bound H atom to an azide N atom as observed previously for a Me3SiN3 adduct [32].

The molecular structures of six azide adducts were determined by X-ray crystallography and compounds 5a and 8a are shown as representative examples in Figs. 1 and 2 (Table 1). The azide adducts feature slightly puckered (angle MNP/MCP 5.6–12.6°) four-membered PCMN heterocycles with exocyclic N=N double bonds. The endocyclic angles range from 75° (C–M–N) over close to 90° (N–P–C and P–C–M) to 102° (M–N–P). Compounds 5 and 6d differ from 8a in the orientation of the vinylic H atom relative to phosphorus (cis in case of 5 and 6d, trans in case of 8a) which is in agreement with the observed difference in 3JPH coupling constants discussed above. The N=N double bonds adopt in all compounds a trans configuration but the position of the substituent R′ at Nα differs, it is closer to the metal centre in case of compounds 5 and 6d and closer to the phosphorus atom in case of compound 8a. The reason for the different configurations may be the steric demand of the CH(SiMe3)2 groups and a minimisation of steric repulsion. The N–N bond lengths range from 134.7(2) pm (8a) to 138.1(2) pm (6d; Nβ–Nγ) and 126.4(2) to 124.2(2) pm (Nβ=Nα) and are consistent with partial delocalisation of electron density in the N3 unit as is evident from a comparison with typical N–N single (140 pm) and N=N double bonds (122 pm) [43]. The Al–N and P–N distances of 195 and 166 pm are in the typical range of compounds with four-coordinate Al or P atoms. P–C and M–C bond lengths show the same trends as observed previously in other FLP adducts of 1–4 and are slightly shorter for the P–C bonds in the adducts compared to the free FLPs as a result of the increased oxidation number of the P atoms and longer for the M–C bonds due to the increase in coordination number at the metal atoms (Introduction). The latter effect is particularly significant for the Al–C=C bonds (ca. 207 pm versus 200 pm) and may be attributed to hyperconjugation of a lone pair of electrons from the nitrogen atom with the respective M–C σ* orbital [33].

Fig. 1: Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 5a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H2) and a disordered solvent molecule have been omitted for clarity. Compounds 5b–d and 6d are similar.
Fig. 1:

Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 5a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H2) and a disordered solvent molecule have been omitted for clarity. Compounds 5b–d and 6d are similar.

Fig. 2: Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound (S)-8a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H1 and H2) have been omitted for clarity.
Fig. 2:

Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound (S)-8a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H1 and H2) have been omitted for clarity.

Table 1:

Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for FLP-azide adducts.

5a5b5c5e6d7a [33]8a13
M–C(av)201.6200.0201.5200.8199.1202.6199.4198.9200.4
M–C=C206.6(1)207.8(av)207.2(2)205.6(1)207.0(2)208.6(2)206.1(2)199.2(av)200.0(av)
P–C(av)181.9181.9182.2182.4182.3182.4(2)179.8(2)185.5185.2
P–C=C178.8(1)178.4(av)178.8(1)178.0(1)179.3(2)178.9(2)178.1(2)182.2(av)182.0(av)
P–N166.9(1)166.2(av)165.8(1)166.2(1)165.4(2)166.9(2)167.7(1)
M–N196.1(1)196.4(av)194.6(1)197.5(1)194.6(2)206.8(2)194.4(1)
N1–N2136.2(2)134.8(av)137.2(2)135.5(2)138.1(2)135.4(3)134.7(2)
N2–N3126.0(2)127.5(av)124.7(2)126.4(2)124.2(2)126.9(2)126.4(2)
P–C–M93.55(6)93.9(av)92.93(6)93.85(6)92.40(9)95.6(1)92.92(7)
C–M–N74.35(5)73.8(av)74.65(5)74.63(5)75.11(7)72.42(9)75.66(6)
M–N–P101.41(6)102.2(av)101.93(6)100.74(6)101.56(8)100.14(9)100.62(6)
N–P–C89.47(6)89.5(av)89.97(6)90.42(6)90.52(9)90.3(1)90.56(7)

2.2 Nitrene adducts

Fragments corresponding to the loss of tBu or CH(SiMe3)2 groups and N2 molecules were found as high intensity masses in the mass spectra of all azides indicating that N2 may be released in vacuo without unselective degradation of the compounds. We therefore heated representative azides (5a, 5c, 6a, 6b, 8c) in solution (8c, 80°C, benzene, normal pressure) or in the melt in vacuo to temperatures between 170 and 280°C. All adducts lost selectively N2 to yield the respective nitrene adducts Mes2P–C(MtBu2)=CH-Ph(μ-NR′) (9, M=Al; 10, M=Ga, Scheme 4) and Mes(H)P–C{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=CH-tBu (μ-NCH2Ph) 11 as colourless solids in moderate (10b, 49%; 10a, NMR experiment only) to good yields (9, 11, 73–84%). When 3 was treated with Me3SiN3 at room temperature the direct elimination of nitrogen was observed and the nitrene adduct 10c was identified as the single product by multi-nuclear NMR spectroscopy, but the attempts to crystallise and isolate pure products was unsuccessful. This reaction is remarkable as it is only the second example [8] of a highly reactive nitrene to be formed from an azide at such moderate conditions which may likely be attributed to the unique donating capabilities of the SiMe3 group and its ability to undergo 1,3-shifts. Other azide-FLP complexes (see Introduction and 8, 9, 11) require much higher reaction temperatures. The characteristic NMR spectroscopic parameters are similar to those of the azide adducts. There is a slightly lower downfield shift of the signals in the 31P NMR spectra to about δ=33 ppm (+10 ppm for compound 11), and the 3JPH coupling constants of the vinylic H atoms are with 37 (10), 41 (9) and 51 Hz (11) very similar to the respective values of the azide adducts. The same is true for the 3JPC (36 Hz, ipso-C, C=CPh) and 1JPC (68 Hz, ipso-C, Mes) coupling constants. The 1JPC coupling constants to the vinylic carbon atoms are with about 20 Hz (9) and 42 Hz (10) slightly larger than those of the azide adducts. The loss of nitrogen and the formation of nitrene adducts is evident from the observation of 2/3/4/5JPC, 3/4JPH and 2JPSi (10c) coupling constants between phosphorus and the respective atoms of the substituents R′ directly bound to the nitrogen atom. The 1JPH coupling constant of compound 11 is reduced to 440 Hz.

Scheme 4: Thermolysis of FLP-azide complexes.
Scheme 4:

Thermolysis of FLP-azide complexes.

The molecular structures of the nitrene adducts (compound 9a is shown as a representative example in Fig. 3) feature essentially planar PMCA heterocycles [largest deviation from the plane for P: 1 pm (9a) to 15 pm (11)]. The overall geometry and structural parameters of the molecules (endocyclic angles, M–C and P–C/N distances) are almost identical for all nitrene adducts (Table 2) and very similar to those of the azide complexes. The only exception is the Ga–N bond length of 10b which is with 209.4(7) pm significantly longer than the respective bond lengths of the Al derivatives (196 pm) but similar to the corresponding distance in the parent azide 7a (206.8 pm) [33]. This may reflect the lower Lewis acidity of gallium compared to aluminium. Several nitrene adducts of P/B based FLPs have been reported [39], [40], [44], [45], [46].

Fig. 3: Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 9a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H2) have been omitted for clarity. Compounds 9b, 10b and 11 are similar.
Fig. 3:

Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 9a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H2) have been omitted for clarity. Compounds 9b, 10b and 11 are similar.

Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (pm) and angles (deg) for nitrene and diazomethane adducts of FLPs.

9a9b10b1112a12b13
M–C (av)202.0203.3202.2201.1202.0199.5202.4
M–C=C204.7(1)205.7(1)204.3(7)207.1(2)206.6(2)204.7(2)209.8(2)
P–C182.7(av)183.3(av)183.0(av)181.1(1)182.6(1)182.5182.1
P–C=C179.4(1)179.2(1)178.9(8)177.7(1)179.1(2)179.1(1)180.1(2)
P–N164.5(1)163.2(1)162.8(6)162.6(1)164.3(1)164.8(1)166.0(2)
M–N(Cl)196.0(1)195.2(1)209.4(7)196.2(1)194.9(1)195.9(1)225.27(8)
N1–N2139.6(2)139.3(2)138.8(2)
C=N127.7(2)127.6(2)
P–C–M91.31(5)91.10(6)94.5(3)88.22(6)92.20(7)92.92(6)
C–M–N76.79(5)76.14(5)74.1(3)76.43(5)75.02(6)75.39(5)
M–N–P99.18(5)100.04(6)97.7(3)96.51(6)101.34(7)100.88(6)
N–P–C92.69(6)92.39(6)93.6(3)94.28(6)90.73(7)90.79(6)

2.3 Reactions with trimethylsilyldiazomethane

Diazoalkanes are isoelectronic to azides but as a result of the replacement of a nitrogen by a carbon atom the charge distribution on the atoms of the 1,3-dipole differs [47], [48]. To the best of our knowledge, diazoalkanes have not been reacted with FLPs previously. Solutions of FLPs 1 and 2 were treated at room temperature with Me3Si–C(H)N2 and stirred for several hours (Scheme 5). After recrystallisation of the crude products the adducts 12a and 12b were obtained as colourless solids in yields of about 90%. The results of the NMR spectroscopic investigations are consistent with those of crystal structure determinations that reveal that both compounds adopt structures similar to those of the azide adducts with an intact diazomethane moiety coordinated to the FLP, the terminal nitrogen atom being coordinated to phosphorus and aluminium, a planar four-membered PCAlN heterocycle [largest distance from average plane 6 pm (P, 12a), 1 pm (P, 12b)], a cis arrangement of phosphorus and vinylic hydrogen atoms, a trans conformation at the external C=N double bond (N and SiMe3), and the C(H)SiMe3 group pointing to the aluminium atom rather than to the sterically shielded phosphorus atom (Fig. 4). The chemical shifts of the phosphorus and the vinylic hydrogen atoms in the 31P and 1H NMR spectra are in the same region as those of the azide adducts 5 and 6. Identical 3JPH (PC=CH) and 3JPC (ipso-C, C=CPh) coupling constants of 12 and 5 or 6 are in agreement with the observed cis orientation of phosphorus and vinylic hydrogen atoms, while 1H,1H ROESY spectra (12a) confirm the vicinity of N=C(H) and tBu2Al as well as C=C(H) and o-Me(Mes) groups. The 1JPC (ipso-C, Mes) and 1JPC (PC=CPh) coupling constants show with ca. 67 and 17 Hz the same trends as observed for the azides. The characteristic resonances of the imine hydrogen atoms are found at around δ=8 ppm with geminal 2JSiH coupling constants of 13 and 14.5 Hz. Adduct formation is also evident from the 15N shifts of δ=169 (Nβ) and 386 (Nα) ppm in 12a as compared to δ=342 and 278 ppm in free Me3Si–C(H)N2 consistent with a three-coordinate Nβ atom in 12a [49]. The N1–N2 bond lengths are with >139 pm (Table 2) longer than those of the azide adducts which indicates together with the short C6=N2 bond (127.7 pm) a lower degree of π delocalisation. In an exploratory experiment a solution of 12b in C6D6 was irradiated with polychromatic UV light. This led to the partial isomerisation of 12b at the C=C double bond and the formation of the isomer in which the vinylic hydrogen atom is trans to the phosphorus atom which is recognisable by a new signal in the 31P NMR spectrum at δ=30.6 ppm and the characteristic increase of the 3JPH coupling constant to 72.0 Hz. The reaction was, however, incomplete and after 8 h a 1:1 mixture of the two isomers was obtained which was unaffected by further irradiation or prolonged standing of the sample at room temperature. N2 elimination was not observed and did also not occur upon heating of neat samples to about 150°C.

Scheme 5: Reactions of FLPs 1 and 2 with Me3Si–C(H)N2.
Scheme 5:

Reactions of FLPs 1 and 2 with Me3Si–C(H)N2.

Fig. 4: Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 12a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H6 and H11) have been omitted for clarity. Compound 12b is similar.
Fig. 4:

Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 12a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H6 and H11) have been omitted for clarity. Compound 12b is similar.

In a secondary reaction compound 12a was treated with a solution of HCl in Et2O which afforded the hydrazonephosphonium salt 13 by cleavage of the polar Al–N bond in 91% yield as a colourless solid (Scheme 5). The 31P NMR spectrum shows a signal at δ=53.5 ppm (slightly downfield compared to 5–12) and coupling constants in the typical region as discussed above. Characteristic for the formation of 13 is the proton attached to nitrogen which is found in the downfield region of the 1H NMR spectrum at δ=9.99 ppm (2JPH=22.5 Hz). This value is consistent with the presence of a weak intramolecular N–H···Cl hydrogen bond [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55] as observed in the solid state structure (see Fig. 5). The N–H stretching frequency centred at 3356 cm−1 is very broad and shifted to lower wave numbers compared to free N–H bonds which also indicates hydrogen bonding [54], [55], [56], [57]. The 15N chemical shifts of δ=134 and 362 ppm are similar to those of the diazomethane adduct 12a. Compound 13 is zwitterionic in the solid state with four-coordinate phosphorus and aluminium atoms in tetrahedral environments (Fig. 5, Table 2). The vinyl group and the attached phosphorus and aluminium atoms are approximately coplanar with the hydrazine and chlorine substituents on opposite sides of the plane. This allows the formation of an intramolecular N–H···Cl hydrogen bond (H1···Cl1 250.6 pm; N1–H1···Cl1 140.7°) [54], [58] that is comparable to that of the HCl adduct of 1 [23] and consistent with the results of IR and NMR spectroscopy. The P1–N1 (166.0(2) pm), N1–N1 (138.8(2) pm) and N2=C6 (127.1(3) pm) distances are comparable to [Ph3P–N(H)–N=C(H)-Ph]Cl [59], [Ph3P–N(H)–NMe2]Br [60] or IndZrCp2(2-PPh2)·[N2=C(H)–CO2Et] [61] and in agreement with fairly localised P–N, N–N single and N=C double bonds.

Fig. 5: Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 13. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H1, H6, H11) have been omitted for clarity.
Fig. 5:

Molecular structure and numbering scheme of compound 13. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% level. Hydrogen atoms (except H1, H6, H11) have been omitted for clarity.

3 Conclusion

We systematically investigated the reactivity of geminal FLPs towards various azides. The FLPs were based on P atoms as Lewis bases and aluminium or gallium atoms as Lewis acids, which differ considerably with respect to their acid strengths [62]. The FLPs were substituted with alkyl groups of different steric demand at the Al atoms, the P atoms were bound to two bulky mesityl groups, and the phosphanyl groups were functionalized by a P–H bond. Despite these variations only a single structural motif was observed which had the terminal N atom in γ position of the azide coordinated to the phosphorus and metal atoms with the very selective formation of four-membered AlCPN heterocycles. Other structural motifs with N2 or N3 groups embedded in the heterocycles are known from the literature (Introduction) but were not found in the present experiments. Trimethylsilyl azide and the P–H functionalized FLP 4 reacted by adduct formation and hydrogen shift from the P atom to an N atom of the coordinated azide to afford an unprecedented 1-phosphatetrazene fragment stabilised by the FLP backbone [32]. Hydrogen transfer has not been observed in the course of the reactions with the P–H functionalized FLP 4 reported in the present article. The nitrogen atom attached to the trimethylsilyl group may bear a relatively high negative partial charge due to the electronegativity difference between nitrogen and silicon which may favour the shift of a proton to this position, while in other azides with smaller charge separations the driving force for an H shift may be too small.

The new azide adducts eliminate dinitrogen at elevated temperature, and only a trimethylsilyl azide derivative reacted already at room temperature. The latter reaction may be favoured by the facile 1,3-shift of trimethylsilyl groups. The loss of dinitrogen results in the formation of nitrenes which are highly reactive and were captured by the FLPs to afford once more AlCPN heterocycles. For the first time a diazomethane derivative was treated with an FLP. The intact diazomethane molecule was coordinated by the FLP functionality. Release of dinitrogen was not achieved by irradiation or warming.

The azide, nitrene and dizomethane adducts of FLPs are promising starting materials for cycloaddition and insertion reactions, and their chemical properties are systematically investigated in ongoing experiments.

4 Experimental section

All procedures were carried out under an atmosphere of purified argon in dried solvents (n-pentane, n-hexane, cyclopentane with LiAlH4; toluene, benzene with Na/benzophenone; 1,2-difluorobenzene, pentafluorobenzene, 1,1,1-trifluorotoluene with molecular sieves). NMR spectra were recorded in C6D6 at ambient probe temperature using the following Bruker instruments: Avance I (1H, 400.13; 13C, 100.62; 31P, 161.98, 19F 367.4, 29Si 79.5, 15N 40.5 MHz) or Avance III (1H, 400.03; 13C, 100.59; 31P 161.93 MHz) and referenced internally to residual solvent resonances (1H, 13C; chemical shift data in δ). 13C NMR spectra were all proton-decoupled. Elemental analyses were determined by the microanalytic laboratory of the Westfälische Wilhelms Universität Münster. IR spectra were recorded as paraffin mulls between CsI/CsBr plates or as KBr pellets on a Shimadzu Prestige 21 spectrometer, electron impact mass spectra on a Varian mass spectrometer. Mes2P–C(AltBu2)=C(H)-Ph (1) [6], Mes2P–C[Al(CH2tBu)2]=C(H)-Ph (2) [7], [8], Mes2P–C(GatBu2)=C(H)-Ph (3) [33] and Mes(H)P–C{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)-Ph (4) [32] were obtained according to literature procedures. Azides RN3, Me3Si–C(H)N2 and HCl·Et2O are commercially available and were used as purchased without further purification. The assignment of NMR spectra is based on HSQC, HMBC, DEPT135, HN-HMBC and H,H-ROESY data.

4.1 {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3C6H4(4-Cl)} (5a)

N3C6H4(4-Cl) (1.1 mL, 0.55 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue treated with a solution of compound 1 (0.27 g, 0.53 mmol) in toluene (15 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from 1,2-difluorobenzene at −45°C affording yellow crystals of compound 5a. Yield (0.31 g, 81%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 190°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1605 m, 1553 w, 1506 w ν(C=C), Aryl; 1454 vs, 1398 s, 1377 vs (paraffin); 1321 vs, 1290 m, 1273 m, 1240 m δ(CH3); 1148 vs, 1101 s, 1061 vs, 1030 m, 1015 s, 928 w, 889 vw, 849 s, 808 m, 800 m, 750 s δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CCl), ν(CN); 721 vs (paraffin); 691 vw, 673 vw δ(CHPh); 642 m, 619 m, 584 w, 554 w, 517 vw, 496 vw, 473 m, 473 m, 461 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.98 (d, 3JHP=41.7 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.62 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.42 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.16 [m, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.07 [m overlap, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 7.07 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.59 [d, 4JHP=3.5 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.42 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.92 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.43 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=155.8 (PC=CH), 150.3 (d, 1JCP=13.2 Hz, PC=CH), 149.5 [ipso-C(NAr)], 142.3 [d, 4JCP=2.8 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.3 [d, 2JCP=10.2 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.8 [d, 3JCP=36.3 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 133.6 [p-C(NAr)], 132.0 [d, 3JCP=10.8 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.0 [p-C(Ph)], 129.5 [m-C(NAr)], 128.9 [m-C(Ph)], 128.3 [o-C(Ph)], 126.8 [d, 1JCP=68.4 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 123.1 [o-C(NAr)], 32.2 (CMe3), 25.2 (d, 3JCP=3.9 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (p-Me), 17.2 ppm (s br, CMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=40.2 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=417 (N=NAr) ppm. – MS (EI; 25 eV; 443 K): m/z (%)=608 (83) [M–tBu]+, 580 (100) [M–tBu–N2]+, 524 (16) [M–AltBu2]+, 470 (16) [M–H2C=CMe2–N2C6H4Cl]+.–C40H50AlClN3P·0.5C6H4F2 (723.3): calcd. C 71.4, H 7.2, N 5.8; found C 71.1, H 7.1, N 5.4.

4.2 {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3C6H4(4-CF3)} (5b)

N3C6H4(4-CF3) (2.2 mL, 1.11 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in toluene (2 mL) and the solution was added at room temperature to a solution of compound 1 (0.57 g, 1.11 mmol) in toluene (15 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight, the solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue was washed with n-hexane (6 mL) and recrystallised from 1,2-difluorobenzene at −15°C to give yellow crystals of compound 5b. Yield (0.66 g, 85%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 193°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1603 m, 1580 w, 1558 m, 1543 w, 1524 w ν(C=C), Aryl; 1456 vs, 1395 m, 1377 vs (paraffin); 1306 m, 1288 m, 1269 s δ(CH3); 1238 m, 1229 m, 1207 m, 1142 vs, 1098 m, 1086 m, 1063 m, 1030 m, 1015 s, 984 w, 964 w, 926 w, 891 w, 853 m, 835 s, 810 s, 799 m, 760 w sh, 750 vs ν(CC), ν(CF), δ(CH), ν(CN); 721 m (paraffin); 692 m δ(CHPh); 669 vw, 644 s, 623 m, 590 m, 573 w, 556 m, 546 w, 525 m, 496 vw, 471 m, 459 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.90 (d, 3JHP=41.7 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.62 [d, 3JHH=7.6 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.46 (d, 3JHH=8.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.30 [d, 3JHH=8.2 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 7.16 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.07 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.61 [d, 4JHP=3.3 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.42 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.92 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.44 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=156.1 (s, PC=CH), 153.3 [s, ipso-C(NAr)], 149.9 (d, 1JCP=13.0 Hz, PC=CH), 142.5 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.3 [d, 2JCP=10.8 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.7 [d, 3JCP=36.9 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 132.1 [d, 3JCP=10.8 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.1 [p-C(Ph)], 129.3 [q, 2JCF=32.3 Hz, p-C(NAr)], 129.0 [m-C(Ph)], 128.3 [o-C(Ph)], 126.6 [d, 1JCP=68.4 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 126.5 [q, 3JCF=4.0 Hz, m-C(NAr)], 125.0 (q, 1JCF=271.8 Hz, CF3), 122.0 [o-C(NAr)], 32.2 (CMe3), 25.2 (d, 3JCP=3.9 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (p-Me), 17.2 ppm (s br, CMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=40.9 ppm. – 19F NMR (376.4 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−61.9 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 413 K): m/z (%)=642 (100) [M–tBu]+, 614 (64) [M–tBu–N2]+, 558 (18) [M–AltBu2]+, 470 (12) [M–H2C=CMe2–N2C6H4CF3]+.

4.3 {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3CH2C6H4(4-Cl)} (5c)

N3CH2C6H4(4-Cl) (1.3 mL, 0.64 mmol, 0.5 m in CH2Cl2) was added to a solution of compound 1 (0.33 g, 0.64 mmol) in n-hexane (20 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight, the solution concentrated and then stored at −45°C to yield yellow crystals of compound 5c. Yield (0.28 g, 64%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 175°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1601 w, 1553 w, 1506 m ν(C=C), Aryl; 1460 vs, 1402 m, 1375 vs (paraffin); 1304 s, 1288 s, 1273 m, 1246 s δ(CH3); 1211 w, 1153 m, 1121 s, 1090 m, 1076 w, 1065 w, 1030 vw, 982 m, 941 w, 926 w, 903 m, 889 w 851 s, 808 m, 795 vs, 773 m ν(CC), δ(CH), ν(CCl), ν(CN); 721 vs (paraffin); 687 s δ(CHPh); 638 vs, 608 m, 577 m, 556 s, 544 m, 525 m, 500 w, 469 s, 451 m, 420 vw, 399 vw, 355 vw, 338 vw, 309 m, 297 w, 280 vw cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.84 (d, 3JHP=41.5 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.60 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.14 (pseudo-t overlap, 3JHH=7.5 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.07 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 7.04 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.5 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.95 [d, 3JHH=8.5 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 6.61 [d, 4JHP=2.4 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.61 (s, 2 H, NCH2), 2.38 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.94 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.33 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=155.3 (PC=CH), 150.6 (d, 1JCP=13.1 Hz, PC=CH), 142.0 [d, 4JCP=3.0 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.3 [d, 2JCP=9.9 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.8 [d, 3JCP=36.3 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 136.4 [ipso-C(NAr)], 133.1 [p-C(NAr)], 132.0 [d, 3JCP=10.8 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.6 [o-C(NAr)], 129.9 [p-C(Ph)], 128.9 [m-C(Ph)], 128.7 [m-C(NAr)], 128.2 [o-C(Ph)], 127.3 [d, 1JCP=68.6 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 65.4 (NCH2), 32.2 (CMe3), 25.1 (d, 3JCP=3.8 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.0 Hz, p-Me), 17.0 ppm (s br, CMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=38.8 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=479 ppm (N=NCH2). – MS (EI; 20 eV; 413 K): m/z (%)=622 (55) [M–tBu]+, 594 (100) [M–tBu–N2]+, 538 (8) [M–AltBu2]+. – C41H52AlClN3P (680.3): calcd. C 72.4, H 7.7, N 6.2; found C 72.3, H 7.8, N 6.1.

4.4 {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3CH2C6H4(4-tBu)} (5d)

N3CH2C6H4(4-tBu) (0.11 mL, 0.12 g, 0.63 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 1 (0.32 g, 0.63 mmol) in toluene (20 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight, the solvent removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from pentafluorobenzene (5 mL) at 5°C to yield compound 5d as yellow crystals. Yield (0.37 g, 84%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 155°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1728 vw, 1641 vw, 1603 m, 1564 w, 1553 s, 1531 m, 1512 m ν(C=C), Aryl; 1454 vs, 1400 m, 1377 m (paraffin); 1308 m, 1288 s, 1267 s, δ(CH3); 1238 vs, 1209 s, 1179 s, 1153 s, 1123 vs, 1069 m, 1028 m, 999 w, 982 w, 959 w, 924 m, 889 vw; 851 m, 833 w, 806 s, 797 s, 746 s δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 718 vs (paraffin); 689 s δ(CHPh); 640 vs, 611 s, 571 s, 554 vs, 500 s, 469 vs, 432 m, 409 m, 363 m, 347 w, 322 m, 309 w, 297 vw cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.85 (d, 3JHP=41.8 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.61 [d, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.25 [s, 4 H, o,m-H(NAr)], 7.13 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.04 [t, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.62 [d, 4JHP=3.6 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.84 (s, 2 H, NCH2), 2.42 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.94 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.37 (s, 18 H, AlCMe3), 1.20 ppm (s, 9 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=155.1 (PC=CH), 151.1 (d, 1JCP=13.3 Hz, PC=CH), 149.8 [p-C(NAr)], 141.9 [d, 4JCP=2.8 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.4 [d, 2JCP=10.0 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.9 [d, 3JCP=36.2 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 135.0 [ipso-C(NAr)], 131.9 [d, 3JCP=10.5 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.8 [p-C(Ph)], 128.9 [overlap, m-C(Ph), o-C(NAr)], 128.2 [overlap, o-C(Ph)], 127.5 [d overlap, 1JCP≈64 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 125.5 [m-C(NAr)], 66.2 (NCH2), 34.4 (CMe3), 32.2 (AlCMe3), 31.5 (CMe3), 25.1 (d, 3JCP=3.6 Hz, o-Me), 20.9 (d, 5JCP≈1 Hz, p-Me), 17.1 ppm (s br, AlCMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=38.4 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=477 ppm (N=NCH2). – MS (EI; 20 eV; 413 K): m/z (%)=644 (23) [M–tBu]+, 616 (100) [M–tBu–N2]+, 560 (8) [M–AltBu2]+. – C45H61AlN3P (702.0): calcd. C 77.0, H 8.8, N 6.0; found C 76.3, H 8.5, N 5.9.

4.5 {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3C6H4(2-CH=CHPh)} (5e)

A solution of N3C6H4(2-CH=CHPh) (0.10 g, 0.45 mmol) and compound 1 (0.23 g, 0.45 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) was stirred overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from 1,2-difluorobenzene at 5°C to yield compound 5e as yellow crystals. Yield (0.26 g, 79%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 203°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1601 vw, 1580 vw, 1558 vw, 1541 vw, 1520 vw, 1504 w ν(C=C), Aryl; 1456 vs, 1377 vs (paraffin); 1342 s, 1306 s, 1287 s, 1261 s δ(CH3); 1240 vs, 1207 s, 1186 s, 1136 vs, 1094 m, 1063 m, 1026 w, 1007 s, 982 m, 964 m, 926 w, 889 vw, 849 w, 835 w, 810 w, 797 m, 750 s δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 723 s (paraffin); 691 w, 669 w δ(CHPh); 640 m, 619 m, 581 w, 569 w, 554 m, 519 m, 494 w, 471 w, 397 vw, 366 vw cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=8.50 (d, 3JHH=16.8 Hz, 1 H, CH=CHPh), 7.91 (d, 3JHP=41.6 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.66 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(C=CPh)], 7.61 [d, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.59 [m, 1 H, 3-H(NAr)], 7.44 [m, 1 H, 6-H(NAr)], 7.23 [t, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(C=CPh)], 7.14 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.5 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.06 [m overlap, 1 H, p-H(Ph), 5-H(NAr)], 7.05 [m overlap, 1 H, 4-H(NAr), p-H(C=CPh), C=CHPh], 6.59 [d, 4JHP=3.8 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.42 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.91 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.45 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=155.9 (PC=CH), 149.9 (d, 1JCP=13.1 Hz, PC=CH), 148.7 [ipso-C(NAr)], 142.2 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.5 [d, 2JCP=10.2 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.8 [d, 3JCP=35.9 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 138.2 [ipso-C(C=CPh)], 134.5 [2-C(NAr)], 132.0 [d, 3JCP=11.0 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.6 (C=CPh), 130.0 [5-C(NAr)], 128.9 [m-C(Ph)], 128.8 [m-C(C=CPh)], 128.3 [overlap, o-C(Ph)], 128.1 [4-C(NAr), p-C(C=CPh)], 127.9 [overlap, p-C(Ph)], 127.5 [o-C(C=CPh)], 126.9 [d, 1JCP=68.2 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 126.3 [3-C(NAr)], 125.4 (C=CPh), 118.3 [6-C(NAr)], 32.3 (CMe3), 25.3 (d, 3JCP=3.8 Hz, o-Me), 20.9 (d, 5JCP=1.4 Hz, p-Me), 17.3 ppm (s br, CMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=41.2 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 413 K): m/z (%)=676 (24) [M–tBu]+, 648 (21) [M–tBu–N2]+, 592 (3) [M–AltBu2]+.

4.6 {Mes2PC[Al(CH2tBu)2]=C(H)Ph}{N3C6H4(4-Cl)} (6a)

N3C6H4(4-Cl) (1.3 mL, 0.65 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred to a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue dissolved in n-hexane (10 mL) and the solution combined with a solution of compound 2 (0.35 g, 0.65 mmol) in n-hexane (20 mL). The mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. Compound 6a was unambiguously identified by NMR spectroscopy as the sole product, but attempts to crystallise or further purify the crude product were not successful. 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.87 (d, 3JHP=42.2 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.57 [d, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.44 (d, 3JHH=8.7 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.15 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.06 [m overlap, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 7.06 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.58 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.41 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.93 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.38 (s, 18 H, CMe3), 1.03 and 0.97 ppm (each d, 2JHH=13.7 Hz, 2 H, CH2CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.9 (PC=CH), 153.3 (d, 1JCP=12.3 Hz, PC=CH), 149.5 [ipso-C(NAr)], 142.1 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.1 [d, 2JCP=10.0 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.5 [d, 3JCP=36.8 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 133.4 [p-C(NAr)], 131.8 [d, 3JCP=10.7 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.6 [p-C(Ph)], 129.4 [m-C(NAr)], 128.8 [d, 4JCP=5.1 Hz, o-C(Ph)], 128.3 [m-C(Ph)], 127.9 [overlap, ipso-C(Mes)], 123.1 [o-C(NAr)], 35.5 (CH2CMe3), 33.4 (CH2CMe3), 32.2 (CH2CMe3), 25.0 (d, 3JCP=4.4 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 ppm (d, 5JCP=1.2 Hz, p-Me). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=39.3 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=418 ppm (N=NAr).

4.7 {Mes2PC[(AlCH2tBu)2]=C(H)Ph}{N3CH2C6H4(4-Cl)} (6b)

N3CH2C6H4(4-Cl) (1.1 mL, 0.55 mmol, 0.5 m in CH2Cl2) was added to a solution of compound 2 (0.30 g, 0.56 mmol) in n-hexane (10 mL). The mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. Compound 6b was unambiguously identified by NMR spectroscopy as the sole product, but crystallisation or further purification of the crude product was not successful. – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.82 (d, 3JHP=42.1 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.55 [d, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.13 (pseudo-t overlap, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.08 [d overlap, 3JHH=8.5 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 7.02 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.5 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.92 [d, 3JHH=8.5 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 6.60 [d, 4JHP=4.1 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.63 (s, 2 H, NCH2), 2.38 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.95 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.30 (s, 18 H, CH2CMe3), 0.91 and 0.87 ppm (each d, 2JHH=13.7 Hz, 2 H, CH2CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.5 (PC=CH), 153.8 (d, 1JCP=12.4 Hz, PC=CH), 141.8 [d, 4JCP=2.8 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.1 [d, 2JCP=9.9 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.5 [d, 3JCP=36.8 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 136.5 [ipso-C(NAr)], 133.1 [p-C(NAr)], 131.7 [d, 3JCP=10.7 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.6 [o-C(NAr)], 129.5 [p-C(Ph)], 128.7 [m-C(Ph), o-C(Ph)], 128.6 [m-C(NAr)], 128.1 [d overlap, 1JCP≈60 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 65.2 (NCH2), 35.5 (CH2CMe3), 33.3 (s br., CH2CMe3), 32.1 (CH2CMe3), 24.8 (d, 3JCP=4.3 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 ppm (d, 5JCP=1.1 Hz, p-Me). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=37.7 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=478 ppm (N=NAr).

4.8 {Mes2PC[AlCH2tBu)2]=C(H)Ph}{N3CH2C6H4(4-tBu)} (6c)

N3CH2C6H4(4-tBu) (0.13 mL, 0.14 g, 0.74 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 2 (0.41 g, 0.76 mmol) in n-hexane (20 mL). The mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. Compound 6c was unambiguously identified by NMR spectroscopy as the sole product, but could not be crystallised or further purified. – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.83 (d, 3JHP= 42.0 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.57 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.24 [m, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 7.23 [m, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.14 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.02 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.61 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.85 (s, 2 H, NCH2), 2.43 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.95 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.32 (s, 18 H, CH2CMe3), 1.21 (s, 9 H, CMe3), 0.94 and 0.90 ppm (each d, 2JHH=13.7 Hz, 2 H, CH2CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.3 (s br., PC=CH), 154.2 (PC=CH), 149.8 [p-C(NAr)], 141.6 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.2 [d, 2JCP=10.0 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.6 [d, 3JCP=36.4 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 135.0 [ipso-C(NAr)], 131.7 [d, 3JCP=10.8 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.4 [p-C(Ph)], 129.0 [o-C(NAr)], 128.7 [overlap, o-C(Ph), m-C(Ph)], 128.4 [overlap, ipso-C(Mes)], 125.4 [m-C(NAr)], 66.1 (NCH2), 35.5 (CH2CMe3), 34.4 (CMe3), 33.2 (s br., CH2CMe3), 32.1 (CH2CMe3), 31.5 (CMe3), 24.9 (d, 3JCP=4.3 Hz, o-Me), 20.9 ppm (d, 5JCP≈1 Hz, p-Me). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=37.5 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=476 ppm (N=NCH2).

4.9 {Mes2PC[Al(CH2tBu)2]=C(H)Ph}{N3tBu} (6d)

A solution of N3tBu (0.78 mL, 0.39 mmol, 0.5 m in n-hexane) was added at room temperature to a solution of compound 2 (0.21 g, 0.39 mmol) in n-hexane (10 mL). The mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature, the solution concentrated and stored at −30°C to yield colourless crystals of compound 6d. Yield (0.23 g, 92%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 168°C. – IR (KBr pellet): ν=3061 w, 3024 s, 2951 vs, 2934 vs, 2895 vs, 2841 vs, 2791 m, 2764 m, 2731 w ν(C–H); 1605 vs, 1558 vs, 1501 s ν(C=C), Ar; 1443 vs, 1404 s, 1381 s, 1358 vs, 1290 m, 1277 w, 1250 s δ(CH); 1225 vs, 1105 vs, 1069 vs, 1051 s, 1030 s, 1013 s, 926 s, 849 vs, 793 vs, 750 vs δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 677 vs, 654 vs δ(CHPh); 623 vs, 604 s, 571 m, 554 s, 525 s, 500 w, 469 vs, 457 s, 401 vs cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.81 (d, 3JHP=41.9 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.57 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.14 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.02 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.60 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.42 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.94 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.37 (s, 18 H, CH2CMe3), 1.23 (s, 9 H, NCMe3), 0.94 and 0.89 ppm (each d, 2JHH=14 Hz, 2 H, CH2CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.6 (d, 1JCP=12.4 Hz, PC=CH), 154.0 (PC=CH), 141.5 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.0 [d, 2JCP=9.9 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.7 [d, 3JCP=36.8 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 131.6 [d, 3JCP=10.7 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.3 [p-C(Ph)], 128.7 [m-C(Ph)], 128.6 [o-C(Ph)], 128.6 [d overlap, 1JCP>64 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 63.1 (NCMe3), 35.6 (CH2CMe3), 33.3 (s br., CH2CMe3), 32.5 (CH2CMe3), 28.7 (NCMe3), 24.7 (d, 3JCP=4.4 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 ppm (d, 5JCP=1.4 Hz, p-Me), – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=34.6 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=457 ppm (N=NCMe3). – MS (EI; 20 eV; 323 K): m/z (%)=568 (56) [M–CH2tBu]+, 540 (1) [M–N3tBu]+, 484 (100) [M–CH2tBu–N2–H2C=CMe2]+, 469 (2) [M–N3tBu–CH2tBu]+. – C40H59AlN3P (639.9): calcd. C 75.1, H 9.3, N 6.6; found C 75.1, H 9.5, N 6.3.

4.10 {Mes2PC(GatBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3C6H4(4-CF3)} (7b)

N3C6H4(4-CF3) (0.80 mL, 0.40 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in toluene (5 mL), and the solution was added at room temperature to a solution of compound 3 (0.22 g, 0.40 mmol) in toluene (5 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield an orange solid which was analytically pure according to NMR spectroscopy. Attempts to crystallise compound 7b from a variety of solvents were not successful. Yield (0.28 g, 94%); m.p. of the crude material (dec., argon, sealed capillary): 124°C. – IR (KBr pellet): ν=3056 w, 3024 m, 2952 vs, 2929 vs, 2867 vs, 2827 vs, 2759 w, 2698 w ν(CH); 2635 vw, 2275 vw, 2100 w; 1945 vw, 1911 vw, 1764 vw, 1735 vw, 1671 vw, 1606 vs, 1558 s, 1509 w ν(C=C), Aryl; 1492 w, 1465 vs, 1436 vs, 1399 vs, 1359 m, 1322 vs δ(CH3); 1288 s, 1241 vs, 1145 vs, 1124 vs, 1102 vs, 1062 vs, 1029 s, 1008 vs, 923 m, 848 vs, 805 vs, 746 vs, 717 w δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 692 s, 665 s δ(CHPh); 640 vs, 603 s, 572 s, 553 m, 518 m, 491 m, 470 vs, 445 m cm−1ν(PC), ν(GaC), ν(GaN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.93 (d, 3JHP=37.9 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.52 [d, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.46 [d, 3JHH=8.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.33 [d, 3JHH=8.4 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 7.12 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.06 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.62 [d, 4JHP=3.8 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.44 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.93 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.48 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.1 [ipso-C(NAr)], 153.6 (d, 2JCP=2.8 Hz, PC=CH), 153.0 (d, 1JCP=30.9 Hz, PC=CH), 142.2 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.3 [d, 2JCP=10.0 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.8 [d, 3JCP=34.9 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 132.0 [d, 3JCP=10.9 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.8 [p-C(Ph)], 129.0 [m-C(Ph)], 128.4 (q overlap, 2JCF=32.0 Hz, p-C(NAr)], 128.0 [o-C(Ph)], 127.1 [d, 1JCP=68.3 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 126.4 [q, 3JCF=3.8 Hz, m-C(NAr)], 125.1 (q overlap, 1JCF=272.0 Hz, CF3), 121.9 [o-C(NAr)], 32.3 (CMe3), 25.3 (d, 3JCP=3.8 Hz, o-Me), 25.2 (GaCMe3), 20.8 ppm (d, 5JCP=1.3 Hz, p-Me). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=45.0 ppm. – 19F NMR (376.4 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−61.8 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 373 K): m/z (%)=684 (12) [M–tBu]+, 656 (11) [M–tBu–N2]+, 497 (29) [M–tBu–N3C6H4CF3]+.

4.11 {Mes2PC(GatBu2)=C(H)Ph}{N3C6H4(4-Me)} (7c)

N3C6H4(4-Me) (0.80 mL, 0.40 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in toluene (5 mL) and the solution was added at room temperature to a solution of compound 3 (0.22 g, 0.40 mmol) in toluene (5 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield an orange solid. Attempts to crystallise compound 7c from a variety of solvents were not successful, but the crude material was NMR spectroscopically characterised, and 7c was identified as the major product. – 1H NMR (400.0 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.93 (d, 3JHP=37.7 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.65 [d, 3JHH=8.2 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.55 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.14 [pseudo-t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.06 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 7.00 [d, 3JHH=8.2 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.61 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.49 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 2.08 [s, 3 H, Me(NAr)], 1.93 [s, 6 H, p-Me(Mes)], 1.51 ppm (s, 18 H, GaCMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.1 (d, 1JCP=31.2 Hz, PC=CH), 152.9 (d, 2JCP=2.7 Hz, PC=CH), 149.6 [ipso-C(NAr)], 141.8 [d, 4JCP=2.6 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.3 [d, 2JCP=9.7 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 141.0 [d, 3JCP=34.8 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 137.0 [p-C(NAr)], 131.9 [d, 3JCP=10.9 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.9 [m-C(NAr)], 129.6 [p-C(Ph)], 128.9 [m-C(Ph)], 128.0 [o-C(Ph)], 127.7 [d overlap, 1JCP=68.0 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 121.9 [o-C(NAr)], 32.4 (GaCMe3), 25.3 (d, 3JCP=3.7 Hz, o-Me), 25.1 (d, 3JCP=4.3 Hz, GaCMe3), 21.1 [Me(NAr)], 20.9 ppm [d, 5JCP=2.0 Hz, p-Me(Mes)]. – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=43.3 ppm.

4.12 {Mes(H)PC{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)tBu}{N3C6H4(4-Cl)} (8a)

N3C6H4(4-Cl) (0.82 mL, 0.41 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue dissolved in n-pentane (5 mL). The solution was added at −78°C to a solution of compound 4 (0.24 g, 0.42 mmol) in n-pentane (20 mL). The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from 1,2-difluorobenzene at −30°C affording colourless crystals of compound 8a. Yield (0.19 g, 62 %); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 86°C. – IR (KBr, paraffin): ν=1605 ν(C=C), Aryl; 1483 w, 1460 s, 1433 m, 1377 m (paraffin); 1364 w, 1296 vw, 1242 m δ(CH3); 1148 s, 1088 w, 1074 vw; 1007 m ν(CHSi2); 988 w, 974 w, 930 w, 914 w, 843 vs, 779 m, 750 m ρ(SiCH3), δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 725 w (paraffin); 706 vw, 669 m ν(SiC), δ(CHPh); 611 vw, 557 vw, 527 m, 505 w, 459 vw, 442 vw, 419 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=8.68 (d, 1JHP=472. 9Hz, 1 H, PH), 7.30 [d, 3JHH=8.7 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.21 (d, 3JHP=75.7 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 6.96 [d, 3JHH=8.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.55 [d, 4JHP=4.2 Hz, 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 6.39 [d, 4JHP=2.0 Hz, 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.61 and 2.53 (each s, 3 H, o-Me), 1.85 (s, 3 H, p-Me), 0.81 (s, 9 H, CMe3), 0.51, 0.49, 0.40 and 0.39 (each s, 9 H, SiMe3), −0.55 and −0.60 ppm (each s, 1 H, AlCH). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=171.7 (d, 2JCP=6.8 Hz, PC=CH), 148.1 [ipso-C(NAr)], 143.6 [d, 4JCP=2.5 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 142.6 [d, 2JCP=12.0 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 141.9 [d, 2JCP=9.1 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 133.7 [p-C(NAr)], 131.1 [d, 3JCP=11.7 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.7 [d, 3JCP=10.0 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.5 (s br. overlap, PC=CH), 129.5 [m-C(NAr)], 122.5 [o-C(NAr)], 121.1 [d, 1JCP=70.1 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 38.0 (d, 3JCP=14.2 Hz, CMe3), 28.4 (CMe3), 24.5 (d, 3JCP=6.5 Hz, o-Me), 21.8 (d, 3JCP=9.1 Hz, o-Me), 21.0 (p-Me), 6.1 (s br., CHSi2) 5.3 and 5.2 (SiMe3), 5.1 (s br. overlap, CHSi2), 5.0 and 4.7 ppm (SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−11.5 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−1.9, −1.7, −1.3 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=406 (N=NAr), 187 ppm (PN). – MS (EI; 20 eV; 373 K): m/z (%)=688 (3) [M–CH3–N2]+, 572 (6) [M–CH(SiMe3)2]+, 544 (100) [M–CH(SiMe3)2–N2]+. – C35H64AlClN3PSi4 (732.7): calcd. C 57.4, H 8.8, N 5.7; found C 56.9, H 8.6, N 5.5.

4.13 {Mes(H)PC{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)tBu}{N3Ph)} (8b)

N3Ph (0.98 mL, 0.49 mmol, 0.5 m in t-butyl methyl ether) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue dissolved in n-hexane (10 mL). This solution was added at −30°C to a solution of compound 4 (0.28 g, 0.48 mmol) in n-hexane (20 mL). The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. Compound 8b was unambiguously identified by NMR spectroscopy as the sole product, but could not be crystallised or further purified. – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=8.72 (d, 1JHP=472.9 Hz, 1 H, PH), 7.57 [m, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 7.21 (d, 3JHP=75.1 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.06 [pseudo-t, 3JHH=7.8 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.91 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-C(Ph)], 6.56 [d, 4JHP=4.4 Hz, 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 6.40 [d, 4JHP=2.0 Hz, 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.63 and 2.60 (each s, 3 H, o-Me), 1.84 (s, 3 H, p-Me), 0.82 (s, 9 H, CMe3), 0.51, 0.50, 0.42 and 0.41 (each s, 9 H, SiMe3), −0.54 and −0.59 ppm (each s, 1 H, AlCH). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=171.4 (d, 2JCP=6.7 Hz, PC=CH), 149.7 [ipso-C(NAr)], 143.4 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 142.6 [d, 2JCP=11.9 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 141.9 [d, 2JCP=9.0 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 131.0 [d, 3JCP=11.5 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.7 (s br. overlap, PC=CH), 130.6 [d, 3JCP=9.8 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.3 [m-C(NAr)], 128.3 [p-C(NAr)], 121.4 [o-C(NAr)], 121.3 [d, 1JCP=70.4 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 38.7 (d, 3JCP=14.5 Hz, CMe3), 28.4 (CMe3), 24.4 (d, 3JCP=6.6 Hz, o-Me), 21.8 (d, 3JCP=8.9 Hz, o-Me), 21.0 (d, 5JCP=1.3 Hz, p-Me), 6.0, (s br., CHSi2), 5.3 (SiMe3), 5.2 (s br. overlap, CHSi2), 5.2, 5.0, 4.7 ppm (SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−11.8 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−2.0, −1.9, −1.4 ppm.

4.14 {Mes(H)PC{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)tBu}{N3CH2Ph)} (8c)

N3CH2Ph (0.82 mL, 0.41 mmol, 0.5 m in CH2Cl2) was transferred into a Schlenk flask. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue dissolved in n-hexane (10 mL). This solution was added at −30°C to a solution of compound 4 (0.24 g, 0.42 mmol) in n-hexane (20 mL). The mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. Compound 8c was unambiguously identified by NMR spectroscopy as the sole product, but could not be crystallised or further purified. – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=8.45 (d, 1JHP=472.1 Hz, 1 H, PH), 7.15 (d, 3JHP=74.6 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.00 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.99 [m overlap, 1 H, p-H(NAr)], 6.79 [m, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 6.41 [d, 4JHP=2.0 Hz, 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 6.34 [d, 4JHP=4.0 Hz, 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.66 and 4.55 (each d, 2JHH=13.9 Hz, 1 H, CH2) 2.63 and 2.21 (each s, 3 H, o-Me), 1.88 (s, 3 H, p-Me), 0.78 (s, 9 H, CMe3), 0.51, 0.50, 0.44 and 0.41 (each s, 9 H, SiMe3), −0.57 and −0.63 ppm (s, 1 H, AlCH). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=170.8 (d, 2JCP=7.0 Hz, PC=CH), 142.9 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 142.4 [d, 2JCP=5.1 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 142.3 [d, 2JCP=7.7 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 137.6 [ipso-C(NAr)], 131.1 (s br. overlap, PC=CH), 130.8 [d, 3JCP=10.7 Hz, m-C(NMes)], 128.6 [o-C(NAr)], 128.4 [m-C(NAr)], 127.0 [p-C(Ph)], 121.0 [d, 1JCP=71.0 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 64.9 (NCH2), 38.6 (d, 3JCP=14.4 Hz, CMe3), 28.4 (d, 4JCP=1.0 Hz, CMe3), 24.4 (d, 3JCP=6.6 Hz, o-Me), 21.4 (d, 3JCP=8.7 Hz, o-Me), 21.0 (5JCP=1.3 Hz, p-Me), 5.9 (s br., CHSi2) 5.3, 5.2 and 5.0 (SiMe3), 5.0 (s br. overlap, CHSi2), 4.8 ppm (SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−11.6 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−2.1, −2.0, −1.9, −1.4 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=478 ppm (N=NAr).

4.15 Nitrene adduct {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{NC6H4(4-Cl)} (9a)

Compound 5a (0.13 g, 0.20 mmol) was heated in vacuo for 15 min to 170°C. The solid melted, and a vigorous gas evolution was visible. The melt was cooled to room temperature and the solid dissolved in a small amount of pentafluorobenzene. The solution was stored at room temperature to yield colourless crystals of compound 8a. Yield (0.10 g, 78%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 216°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1603 w, 1580 w, 1557 w ν(C=C), Aryl; 1454 vs, 1375 vs (paraffin); 1308 m, 1271 vs, 1242 vs δ(CH3); 1155 s, 1096 w, 1061 w, 1026 w, 999 w, 974 m, 922 w, 887 vw, 854 w, 837 w, 799 w, 772 m, 745 m δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 721 vs (paraffin); 689 m δ(CHPh); 637 m, 602 vw, 573 w, 554 m, 529 w, 517 w, 469 vw, 465 m, 428 w, 420 vw, 397 w, 357 vw, 327 vw, 303 vs cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.78 (d, 3JHP=41.4 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.57 [d, 3JHH=7.2 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.15 [pseudo-t overlap, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.05 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.99 [dd, 3JHH=8.9 Hz, 4JHP=1.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 6.93 [d, 3JHH=8.9 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.57 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.23 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.96 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.31 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=153.6 (d, 1JCP=20 Hz, PC=CH), 153.0 (PC=CH), 145.4 [d, 2JCP=5.5 Hz, ipso-C(NAr)], 141.5 [d, 4JCP=2.8 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.1 [d, 3JCP=36.8 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 140.9 [d, 2JCP=10.1 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 131.8 [d, 3JCP=10.5 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.7 [d, 1JCP=66.7 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 129.5 [p-C(Ph)], 128.8 [m-C(Ph), m-C(NAr)], 128.6 [d, 5JCP=2.5 Hz, p-C(NAr)], 128.3 [o-C(Ph)], 127.4 [d, 3JCP=8.4 Hz, o-C(NAr)], 32.8 (CMe3), 25.1 (d, 3JCP=3.8 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.4 Hz, p-Me), 18.1 ppm (s br, CMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=32.9 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 353 K): m/z (%)=580 (100) [M–tBu]+. – C40H50AlClNP (638.3): calcd. C 75.3, H 7.9, N 2.2; found C 75.1, H 8.0, N 2.1.

4.16 Nitrene adduct {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}{NCH2C6H4(4-Cl)} (9b)

Compound 5c (0.15 g, 0.22 mmol) was heated in vacuo for 15 min to 175°C. The solid melted, and a vigorous gas evolution was visible. The melt was cooled to room temperature, the solid dissolved in a small amount of pentafluorobenzene and the solution stored at room temperature to give colourless crystals of compound 9b. Yield (0.12 g, 84%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 185°C. – IR (CsI, paraffin): ν=1601 w, 1555 m, 1491 s ν(C=C), Aryl; 1458 vs, 1406 m, 1377 vs (paraffin); 1352 m, 1341 m, 1310 w, 1287 w δ(CH3); 1244 m, 1211 w, 1173 vw, 1136 s, 1101 w, 1086 w, 1063 w, 1051 w, 1026 m, 1016 m, 988 m, 959 vw, 924 m, 889 vw, 853 s, 824 m, 802 vs, 746 vs δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 721 m (paraffin); 714 m, 689 m δ(CHPh); 667 w, 633 vs, 623 s, 584 s, 554 vs, 513 w, 500 m, 480 s, 463 vs, 440 w, 409 m, 384 vw, 355 w, 332 w, 303 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.64 (d overlap, 3JHP=43.2 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.59 [d overlap, 3JHH=6.8 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.12 [pseudo-t, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.06 [d, 3JHH=8.4 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NCH2Ar)], 7.02 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.95 [d, 3JHH=8.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NCH2Ar)], 6.62 [d, 4JHP=3.3 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.22 (d, 3JHP=14.5 Hz, 2 H, NCH2), 2.35 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 2.00 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.22 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=154.1 (d, 1JCP=13.7 Hz, PC=CH), 152.4 (d, 2JCP=2.0 Hz, PC=CH), 141.0 [d, 3JCP=36.9 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 141.0 [d, 4JCP=2.7 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 140.2 [d, 2JCP=9.4 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 139.0 [d, 3JCP=11.9 Hz, ipso-C(NCH2Ar)], 133.4 [p-C(NCH2Ar)], 131.8 [d, 3JCP=10.0 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 131.6 [o-C(NCH2Ar)], 129.9 [d, 1JCP=66.2 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 129.3 [p-C(Ph)], 128.6 [d, 5JCP=0.9 Hz, m-C(Ph)], 128.5 [m-C(NCH2Ar)], 128.4 [d, 4JCP=1.2 Hz, o-C(Ph)], 50.4 (d, 2JCP=4.2 Hz, NCH2), 32.7 (CMe3), 24.6 (d, 3JCP=4.0 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.4 Hz, p-Me), 17.8 ppm (s br, CMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=37.8 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 313 K): m/z (%)=594 (100) [M–tBu]+. – C41H52AlClNP (652.3): calcd. C 75.5, H 8.0, N 2.1; found C 75.3, H 8.0, N 2.1.

4.17 Nitrene adduct {Mes2PC(GatBu2)=C(H)Ph}{NC6H4(4-Cl)} (10a)

In an NMR experiment a small quantity of solid compound 7a was heated to 200°C in vacuo. After the gas evolution had stopped, the brown solid was dissolved in C6D6 and characterised by NMR spectroscopy which showed compound 10a as the major product in solution. – 1H NMR (400.1 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.79 (d, 3JHP=37.4 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.47 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.13 [m overlap, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.02 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.94 [d overlap, 4 H, o-H(NAr), m-H(NAr)], 6.60 [d, 4JHP=3.3 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.28 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.97 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.34 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=157.2 (d, 1JCP=42.3 Hz, PC=CH), 149.9 (d, 2JCP=1.3 Hz, PC=CH), 147.4 [d, 2JCP=4.9 Hz, ipso-C(NAr)], 141.3 [d, 4JCP=3.0 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.1 [d overlap, 3JCP=35.0 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 141.0 [d, 2JCP=10.1 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 131.8 [d, 3JCP=10.4 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 131.4 [d overlap, 1JCP=68.0 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 129.2 [p-C(Ph)], 128.9 [m-C(Ph)] 128.8 [m-C(NAr)], 128.0 [o-C(Ph)], 127.1 [d, 5JCP=2.0 Hz, p-C(NAr)], 126.6 [d, 3JCP=9.8 Hz, o-C(NAr)], 32.8 (CMe3), 26.0 (d, 3JCP=3.3 Hz, CMe3), 25.1 (d, 3JCP=4.0 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 ppm (d, 5JCP=1.2 Hz, p-Me). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=32.5 ppm.

4.18 Nitrene adduct {Mes2PC(GatBu2)=C(H)Ph}{NC6H4-(4-CF3)} (10b)

Solid compound 7b (0.30 g, 0.40 mmol) was melted at 280°C in vacuo until the gas evolution subsided. The obtained residue was recrystallised from cyclopentane at −15°C to afford yellow crystals of compound 10b. Yield (0.14 g, 49%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 192°C. – IR (CsBr, paraffin): ν=1607 s, 1580 m, 1555 m ν(C=C), Aryl; 1445 vs, 1433 vs, 1371 vs (paraffin); 1321 vs 1296 vs, 1276 vs, 1246 vs δ(CH3); 1184 s, 1157 vs, 1116 vs, 1070 vs, 1028 s, 1008 s, 979 vs, 935 s, 918 s, 885 vs, 827 m, 806 s, 785 vs, 771 m, 748 vs δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN); 725 vs (paraffin); 690 m, 657 s δ(CHPh); 635 vs, 600 m, 570 m, 556 m, 544 m, 528 m, 517 m, 494 w, 475 m, 461 s, 444 m cm−1ν(PC), ν(GaC), ν(GaN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.78 (d, 3JHP=37.4 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.45 [d, 3JHH=7.2 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.21 (d, 3JHH=8.4 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 7.13 [pseudo-t, 3JHH=7.2 Hz, 2 H, m-H(NPh)], 7.04 [t overlap, 3JHH=7.2 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 7.03 [d overlap, 3JHH=8.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 6.61 [d, 4JHP=3.8 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.25 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.98 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.31 ppm (s, 18 H, CMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=156.0 [d, 1JCP=42.2 Hz, PC=CH), 152.7 (d, 2JCP=4.3 Hz, ipso-C(NAr)], 149.9 (PC=CH), 141.6 [d, 4JCP=2.8 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.4 [d, 2JCP=10.2 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 141.0 [d, 3JCP=35.2 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 131.9 [d, 3JCP=10.2 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 130.8 [d, 1JCP=68.3 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 129.3 [p-C(Ph)], 128.9 [m-C(Ph)], 128.0 [o-C(Ph)], 126.1 [q, 3JCF=3.6 Hz, m-C(NAr)], 125.5 (q overlap, 1JCF=272.0 Hz, CF3), 124.3 [d, 3JCP=11.0 Hz, o-C(NAr)], 123.0 [q, 2JCF=32.8 Hz, p-C(NAr)], 32.8 (CMe3), 26.2 (d, 3JCP=3.7 Hz, GaCMe3), 25.3 (d, 3JCP=4.2 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 ppm (p-Me). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=32.5 ppm. – 19F NMR (376.4 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−61.0 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 403 K): m/z (%)=656 (100) [M–tBu]+. – C41H50F3 GaNP·(C5H10)0.5 (749.6): calcd. C 69.7, H 7.4, N 1.9; found C 70.3, H 7.4, N 1.9.

4.19 Nitrene adduct {Mes2PC(GatBu2)=C(H)Ph}(NSiMe3) (10c)

A solution of N3SiMe3 (0.05 mL, 0.042 g, 0.36 mmol) in toluene (5 mL) was added at room temperature to a solution of compound 3 (0.20 g, 0.36 mmol) in toluene (5 mL). The mixture was stirred overnight and the solvent removed in vacuo to yield a brown solid. Attempts to crystallise compound 10c from a variety of solvents were unsuccessful, but the crude material was NMR spectroscopically characterised, and 10c was identified as the major product. – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.55 (d, 3JHP=40.1 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.49 [d, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.11 [pseudo-t, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.02 [t, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.63 [d, 4JHP=3.8 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.42 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 2.00 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.42 (s, 18 H, CMe3), 0.23 ppm (s, 9 H, SiMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=160.8 (d, 1JCP=34.2 Hz, PC=CH), 148.3 (PC=CH), 140.9 [d, 3JCP=35.0 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 140.6 [d, 2JCP=9.8 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 140.4 [d, 4JCP=2.8 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 132.4 [d, 1JCP=72.7 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 131.8 [d, 3JCP=10.1 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 128.9 [p-C(Ph)], 128.6 [m-C(Ph)], 128.3 [o-C(Ph)], 33.2 (CMe3), 25.9 (d, 3JCP=2.1 Hz, CMe3), 25.4 (d, 3JCP=4.4 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.3 Hz, p-Me), 5.2 ppm (d, 3JCP=3.6 Hz, SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=33.5 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=−3.5 ppm (d, 2JPSi=1.0 Hz). – 15N NMR (40.1 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=59.0 ppm.

4.20 Nitrene adduct {Mes(H)PC{Al[CH(SiMe3)2]2}=C(H)tBu}{NCH2Ph)} (11)

A solution of compound 8c (0.29 g, 0.42 mmol) in benzene (20 mL) was heated for 8 h at 80°C. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from cyclopentane at −30°C to yield colourless crystals of compound 11. Yield (0.21 g, 73%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 120°C. – IR (KBr, paraffin): ν=1607 vw, 1558 vw ν(C=C), Aryl; 1456 vs, 1377 vs (paraffin); 1364 w δ(CH3); 1148 w, 1078 vw; 1000 w ν(CHSi2); 936 w, 841 s, 774 w δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CN), ρ(SiCH3); 700 w, 669 w ν(SiC), δ(CHPh); 451 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(Al–C). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=7.97 (d, 1JHP=440.3 Hz, 1 H, PH), 7.11 [m, 2 H, o-H(NAr)], 6.81 [m, 1 H, p-H(NAr)], 6.80 [m, 2 H, m-H(NAr)], 6.49 (d, 3JHP=51.3 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 6.48 [s br., 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 6.26 [s br., 1 H, m-H(Mes)], 4.43 (dd, 3JHP=16.6 Hz, 2JHH=13.9 Hz, 1 H, CH2), 4.29 (dd, 3JHP=19.4 Hz, 2JHH=13.9 Hz, 1 H, CH2), 2.53 (s, 3 H, o-Me), 1.88 (s, 3 H, p-Me), 1.76 (s, 3 H, o-Me), 1.09 (s, 9 H, CMe3), 0.53 and 0.49 (each s, 18 H, SiMe3), −0.54 ppm (s, 2 H, AlCH). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=166.4 (d, 2JCP=4.1 Hz, PC=CH), 143.8 [br., o-C(Mes)], 143.3 [o-C(Mes)], 142.9 [d, 4JCP=2.7 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 140.5 (PC=CH), 139.3 [d, 3JCP=8.1 Hz, ipso-C(NAr)], 130.6 [d overlap, m-C(Mes)], 130.5 [d overlap, m-C(Mes)], 129.7 [o-C(Ph)], 128.3 [m-C(Ph)], 127.6 [p-C(Ph)], 120.5 [d, 1JCP=67.1 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 51.3 (d, 2JCP=5.8 Hz, NCH2), 37.4 (d, 3JCP=32.0 Hz, CMe3), 28.8 (d, 4JCP=1.7 Hz, CMe3), 23.2 (d, 3JCP=5.7 Hz, o-Me), 21.6 (d, 3JCP=8.5 Hz, o-Me), 20.9 (5JCP=1.0 Hz, p-Me), 6.3, 6.1, 5.8 and 5.5 (SiMe3), 5.5 and 4.4 ppm (s br. overlap, CHSi2). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=10.0 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=−2.7, −2.6, −2.4, −2.0 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 333 K): m/z (%)=668 (3) [M–Me]+, 525 (100) [M+H–CH(SiMe3)2]+. – C36H67AlNPSi4 (684.2): the carbon value was always found 1% below the calculated value; C 63.2, H 9.9, N 2.1; found C 62.2, H 9.8, N 1.9.

4.21 {Mes2PC(AltBu2)=C(H)Ph}(NN=C(H)SiMe3) (12a)

A solution of 1 (0.18 g, 0.35 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was treated with N2C(H)–SiMe3 (0.18 mL, 0.35 mmol, 2.0 m in n-hexane) at room temperature. The mixture was stirred for 21 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was recrystallised from 1,1,1-trifluorotoluene (2 mL) at −32°C to yield colourless crystals of compound 12a. Yield (0.19 g, 87%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 105°C. – IR (KBr, paraffin): ν=1603 vs, 1555 vs, 1535 s, 1516 s ν(C=C), Aryl, ν(C=N); 1466 vs, 1454 vs, 1435 vs, 1406 vs, 1373 vs (paraffin); 1337 s, 1323 vs, 1314 vs sh, 1290 vs, 1246 vs δ(CH3); 1211 s, 1171 vs, 1157 vs, 1132 vs, 1094 vs, 1071 vs, 1028 vs, 1001 s, 963 s, 943 vs, 910 s, 887 s, 851 vs, 808 vs, 793 s, 770 s, 743 vs δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CC), ρ(SiCH3); 723 vs (paraffin); 692 s, 640 vs ν(SiC), δ(CHPh); 627 m, 602 vs, 579 s, 556 m, 529 s, 500 s, 469 vs, 430 m, 407 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=8.03 (d, 4JHP=1.3Hz, 2JHSi=13.0 Hz, 1 H, CHSi), 7.82 (d, 3JHP=40.3 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.60 [d, 3JHH=7.6 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.14 [pseudo-t overlap, 3JHH=7.6 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.05 [t, 3JHH=7.3 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.63 [d, 4JHP=3.5 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.47 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.93 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.38 (s, 18 H, CMe3), 0.15 ppm (s, 2JHSi=6.7 Hz, 9 H, SiMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=158.1 (d, 3JCP=26.4 Hz, C=N), 154.5 (PC=CH), 149.8 (d, 1JCP=16.7 Hz, PC=CH), 141.5 [d, 4JCP=2.9 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 141.4 [d, 2JCP=9.8 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 141.1 [d, 3JCP=35.2 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 131.7 [d, 3JCP=10.7 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.6 [p-C(Ph)], 128.8 [m-C(Ph)], 128.2 [overlap, o-CPh)], 128.2 [d overlap, 1JCP=67.3 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 32.4 (CMe3), 25.0 (d, 3JCP=3.4 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.2 Hz, p-Me), 17.4 (s br. CMe3), −2.0 ppm (SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=39.5 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=−7.7 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.1 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=386 (N=CH), 169 ppm (3JNH=9.5 Hz, PN). – MS (EI; 25 eV; 298 K): m/z (%)=569 (89) [M–tBu]+, 470 (20) [M–NCHSiMe3–H2C=CMe2]+. – C38H56AlN2PSi (626.92): calcd. C 72.8, H 9.0; found C 72.5, H 9.0.

4.22 {Mes2PC[Al(CH2tBu)2]=C(H)Ph}(NN=C(H)SiMe3) (12b)

A solution of 2 (0.24 g, 0.44 mmol) in n-pentane (10 mL) was treated with N2C(H)–SiMe3 (0.22 mL, 0.44 mmol, 2.0 m in n-hexane). The mixture was stirred for 12 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue recrystallised from 1,1,1-trifluorotoluene (2 mL) at 0°C to afford colourless crystals of compound 12b. Yield (0.26 g, 90%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 132°C. – IR (KBr, paraffin): ν=1603 w, 1650 vw, 1531 vw ν(C=C), Aryl, ν(C=N); 1462 vs, 1402 vw, 1377 s (paraffin); 1358 m, 1306 vw, 1288 vw, 1246 w δ(CH3); 1223 w, 1121 w, 1092 m, 1061 w, 1028 w, 959 vw, 945 w, 928 vw, 907 w, 851 m, 841 m, 795 w, 743 w δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CC), ρ(SiCH3); 723 m (paraffin); 694 w, 638 w ν(SiC), δ(CHPh); 629 w, 602 vw, 563 w, 552 vw, 500 vw, 461 w, 401 w cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=8.07 (d, 4JHP=1.5Hz, 2JHSi=14.5 Hz, 1 H, CHSi), 7.81 (d, 3JHP=40.5 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.55 [d, 3JHH=7.2 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.16 [pseudo-t overlap, 3JHH=7.6 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.04 [t, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.62 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.47 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.94 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.30 (s, 18 H, CH2CMe3), 0.93 (s, 4 H, CH2CMe3) 0.14 ppm (s, 2JHSi=7.0 Hz, 9 H, SiMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=158.4 (d, 3JCP=25.9 Hz, C=N), 153.4 (PC=CH), 153.0 (d, 1JCP=17.0 Hz, PC=CH), 141.2 [d, 4JCP=3.0 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 141.1 [d, 2JCP=9.6 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 141.0 [d, 3JCP=35.2 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 131.4 [d, 3JCP=10.6 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.2 [p-C(Ph)], 129.2 [d, 1JCP=67.7 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 128.7 [m-C(Ph)], 128.6 [o-C(Ph)], 35.4 (CH2CMe3), 34.0 (s br., CH2CMe3), 32.0 (CH2CMe3), 24.7 (d, 3JCP=3.9 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.4 Hz, p-Me), −1.9 ppm (1JCSi=53.0 Hz, SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=37.6 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=−7.9 ppm. – MS (EI; 20 eV; 298 K): m/z (%)=583 (50) [M–CH2tBu]+. – C40H60AlN2PSi (655.0): calcd. C 73.3, H 9.2, N 4.3; found C 73.1, H 9.1, N 3.9.

4.23 {Mes2PC[Al(Cl)tBu2]=C(H)Ph}{NHN=C(H)SiMe3} (13)

A solution of 12a (0.27 g, 0.43 mmol) in toluene (10 mL) was treated with HCl·Et2O (0.43 mL, 0.43 mmol, 1.0 m in Et2O). The mixture was stirred for 15 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo, the residue dissolved in n-pentane (1 mL), the solvent again removed in vacuo, and the residue recrystallised from pentafluorobenzene (2 mL) at −45°C to afford colourless crystals of compound 13. Yield (0.26 g, 91%); m.p. (dec., sealed capillary): 153°C. – IR (KBr, paraffin): ν=3356 vw br. (NH); 3142 vw, 2951 vs, 2920 vs, 2851 vs, 2752 s sh, 2725 s, 2687 s (paraffin); 1599 vs, 1578 vs, 1555 vs, 1541 vs, 1505 s ν(C=C), Aryl, ν(C=N); 1456 vs, 1402 vs, 1375 vs (paraffin); 1341 vs, 1306 vs, 1290 vs, 1248 vs δ(CH3); 1207 s, 1171 s, 1157 s, 1045 vs, 936 m, 905 m, 849 s, 812 s, 787 s, 748 s δ(CH), ν(CC), ν(CC), ρ(SiCH3); 721 vs (paraffin); 694 s, 648 m ν(SiC), δ(CHPh); 611 w, 590 w, 561 m, 513 w, 496 w, 471 m, 417 s cm−1ν(PC), ν(AlC), ν(AlN), δ(CC). – 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=9.99 (d, 2JHP=22.5 Hz, 1 H, NH), 8.00 (d, 3JHP=48.8 Hz, 1 H, PC=CH), 7.61 [d, 3JHH=7.4 Hz, 2 H, o-H(Ph)], 7.48 (s, 1 H, N=CH), 7.22 [pseudo-t, 3JHH=7.7 Hz, 2 H, m-H(Ph)], 7.09 [t, 3JHH=7.5 Hz, 1 H, p-H(Ph)], 6.66 [d, 4JHP=3.7 Hz, 4 H, m-H(Mes)], 2.33 (s, 12 H, o-Me), 1.95 (s, 6 H, p-Me), 1.28 (s, 18 H, CMe3), −0.15 ppm (s, 9 H, SiMe3). – 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=160.2 (d, 2JCP=2.3 Hz, PC=CH), 157.2 (d, 3JCP=13.6 Hz, N=CH), 144.2 (d, 2JCP=10.3 Hz, o-C(Mes)], 143.7 [d, 4JCP=2.6 Hz, p-C(Mes)], 140.1 [d, 3JCP=37.3 Hz, ipso-C(Ph)], 138.5 (s br., PC=CH), 132.5 [d, 3JCP=11.5 Hz, m-C(Mes)], 129.6 [p-C(Ph)], 129.1 [m-C(Ph)], 128.8 [d, 4JCP=1.5 Hz, o-C(Ph)], 122.1 [d, 1JCP=83.5 Hz, ipso-C(Mes)], 32.7 (CMe3), 25.3 (d, 3JCP=3.8 Hz, o-Me), 20.8 (d, 5JCP=1.5 Hz, p-Me), 18.1 (s br. CMe3), −2.5 ppm (SiMe3). – 31P NMR (161.9 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ=53.5 ppm. – 29Si NMR (79.5 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=−6.7 ppm. – 15N NMR (40.1 MHz, 300 K, C6D6): δ=362 (N=CH), 134 ppm (PN). – MS (EI; 25 eV; 298 K): m/z (%)=605 (1) [M–tBu]+, 569 (19) [M–tBu–HCl]+, 547 (6) [M–NHN=C(H)SiMe3)]+. – C38H57AlClN2PSi (663.4): calcd. C 68.8, H 8.7, N 4.2; found C 69.0, H 8.4, N 3.9.

4.24 Crystal structure determinations

Crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained by crystallisation from a 1,2-difluorobenzene (5a, 5b, 5e, 8a, 13), pentafluorobenzene (9), CH2Cl2 (5c), cyclopentane (10b, 11), 1,1,1-trifluorotoluene (12) and n-hexane (6d). Intensity data was collected on Bruker D8 Venture (5a–c, 5e, 6d, 8a, 9b, 10b, 11–13) or Quazar (9a) diffractometers with multilayer optics and MoKα radiation. The collection method involved ω scans. Data reduction was carried out using the programme Saint+ [63], [64]. The crystal structures were solved by Direct Methods using Shelxtl [65], [66], [67]. Non-hydrogen atoms were first refined isotropically followed by anisotropic refinement by full-matrix least-squares calculations based on F2 using Shelxtl. Hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their respective parent atoms. Compounds 5a and 5e cocrystallised with one molecule of 1,2-difluorobenzene which was disordered (5a, three positions 0.434: 0.311: 0.254; 5e, F2 and F6 refined on split positions 0.87: 0.13). Compound 11 cocrystallised with two molecules of cyclopentane which were disordered and refined in two positions (0.47: 0.53; 0.50: 0.50). Compounds 8a and 11 also incorporated solvent molecules, but these were heavily disordered and treated as diffuse contribution to the overall scattering without specific atom positions by using the routine SQUEEZE in Platon [68] (8a, 5.5 molecules 1,2-difluorobenzene, 12a, three molecules of 1,1,1-trifluorotoluene). The CF3 groups of compounds 5b and 10b, one neopentyl and the SiMe3 group of compound 12b were disordered and refined in split positions (5b has two independent molecules, 0.90: 0.10 and 0.72: 0.28; 10b, 0.83: 0.17; 12b, C60 0.69: 0.31, SiMe3 0.48: 0.52).

CCDC 1557572 (5a), 1557573 (5b), 1557574 (5c), 1557575 (5d), 1557576 (5e), 1557577 (8a), 1557578 (9a), 1557579 (9b), 1557580 (10b), 1557581 (11), 1557582 (12a), 1557583 (12b) and 1557584 (13) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. This data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.


Dedicated to: Professor Dietrich Gudat on the occasion of his 60th birthday.


Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IRTG 2027) for generous financial support.

References

[1] D. W. Stephan, G. Erker, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 46.10.1002/anie.200903708Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] D. W. Stephan, G. Erker, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6498.10.1002/ange.201409800Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Erker, D. W. Stephan (ed.), Frustrated Lewis Pairs, Vol. I and II, Topics in Current Chemistry, Springer, Heidelberg, 2013.10.1007/978-3-642-37759-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] W. Uhl, E.-U. Würthwein, in Frustrated Lewis Pairs, Vol. I and II, Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 334, (Eds.: G. Erker, D. W. Stephan), Springer, Heidelberg, 2013, p. 101.10.1007/128_2012_374Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] G. C. Welch, R. R. S. Juan, J. D. Masuda, D. W. Stephan, Science2006, 314, 1124.10.1126/science.1134230Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] C. Appelt, H. Westenberg, F. Bertini, A. W. Ehlers, J. C. Slootweg, K. Lammertsma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2011, 50, 3925.10.1002/anie.201006901Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] W. Uhl, C. Appelt, J. Backs, H. Westenberg, A. Wollschläger, J. Tannert, Organometallics2014, 33, 1212.10.1021/om4012246Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Pleschka, M. Layh, F. Rogel, W. Uhl, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A.2017, 375, 20170011.10.1098/rsta.2017.0011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] C. Appelt, J. C. Slootweg, K. Lammertsma, W. Uhl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2013, 52, 4256.10.1002/anie.201208746Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] C. Appelt, J. C. Slootweg, K. Lammertsma, W. Uhl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2012, 51, 5911.10.1002/anie.201201855Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] M. A. Dureen, D. W. Stephan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2009, 131, 8396.10.1021/ja903650wSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] M. A. Dureen, C. C. Brown, D. W. Stephan, Organometallics2010, 29, 6594.10.1021/om1009044Search in Google Scholar

[13] G. Ménard, D. W. Stephan, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 1796.10.1021/ja9104792Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] G. Ménard, D. W. Stephan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2010, 50, 8396.10.1002/anie.201103600Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] F. Bertini, F. Hoffmann, C. Appelt, W. Uhl, A. W. Ehlers, J. C. Slootweg, K. Lammertsma, Organometallics2013, 32, 6764.10.1021/om3011382Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Boudreau, M. A. Courtemanche, F. G. Fontaine, Chem. Commun.2011, 47, 11131.10.1039/c1cc14641fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] W. Uhl, P. Wegener, M. Layh, A. Hepp, E.-U. Würthwein, Z. Naturforsch.2016, 71b, 1043.10.1515/znb-2016-0118Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. Uhl, C. Appelt, Organometallics2013, 32, 5008.10.1021/om400620hSearch in Google Scholar

[19] W. Uhl, P. Wegener, E.-U. Würthwein, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2015, 641, 2102.10.1002/zaac.201500519Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. Roters, C. Appelt, H. Westenberg, A. Hepp, J. C. Slootweg, K. Lammertsma, W. Uhl, Dalton Trans.2012, 41, 9033.10.1039/c2dt30080jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] W. Uhl, P. Wegener, M. Layh, A. Hepp, Organometallics2015, 34, 2455.10.1021/om501206pSearch in Google Scholar

[22] W. Uhl, C. Appelt, A. Wollschläger, A. Hepp, E.-U. Würthwein, Inorg. Chem.2014, 53, 8991.10.1021/ic5009126Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] W. Uhl, C. Appelt, M. Lange, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2015, 641, 311.10.1002/zaac.201400527Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. Devillard, E. Nicolas, C. Appelt, J. Backs, S. Mallet-Ladeira, G. Bouhadir, J. C. Slootweg, W. Uhl, D. Bourissou, Chem. Commun.2014, 50, 14805.10.1039/C4CC06992GSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] M. Devillard, E. Nicolas, A. W. Ehlers, J. Backs, S. Mallet-Ladeira, G. Bouhadir, J. C. Slootweg, W. Uhl, D. Bourissou, Chem. Eur. J.2015, 21, 74.10.1002/chem.201405610Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] M. Devillard, R. Declercq, E. Nicolas, A. W. Ehlers, J. Backs, N. Saffon-Merceron, G. Bouhadir, J. C. Slootweg, W. Uhl, D. Bourissou, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2016, 138, 4917.10.1021/jacs.6b01320Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] S. Styra, M. Radius, E. Moos, A. Bihlmeier, F. Breher, Chem. Eur. J.2016, 22, 9508.10.1002/chem.201602192Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] T. E. Stennett, J. Pahl, H. S. Zijlstra, F. W. Seidel, S. Harder, Organometallics2016, 35, 207.10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00927Search in Google Scholar

[29] H. S. Zijlstra, J. Pahl, J. Penafiel, S. Harder, Dalton Trans.2017, 46, 3601.10.1039/C7DT00318HSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] M. G. M. Knaus, M. M. Giuman, A. Pöthig, B. Rieger, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2016, 138, 7776.10.1021/jacs.6b04129Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Y. Zhang, G. M. Miyake, M. G. John, L. Falivene, L. Caporaso, L. Cavallo, X. Y. Chen, Dalton Trans.2012, 41, 9119.10.1039/c2dt30427aSearch in Google Scholar

[32] L. Keweloh, H. Klöcker, E.-U. Würthwein, W. Uhl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2016, 55, 3212.10.1002/anie.201511048Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. Backs, M. Lange, J. Possart, A. Wollschläger, C. Mück-Lichtenfeld, W. Uhl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2017, 56, 3094.10.1002/anie.201612485Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Stute, L. Heletta, R. Fröhlich, C. G. Daniliuc, G. Kehr, G. Erker, Chem. Commun.2012, 48, 11739.10.1039/c2cc36782cSearch in Google Scholar

[35] C. M. Mömming, G. Kehr, B. Wibbeling, R. Fröhlich, G. Erker, Dalton Trans.2010, 39, 7556.10.1039/c0dt00015aSearch in Google Scholar

[36] X. Xu, G. Kehr, C. G. Daniliuc, G. Erker, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2013, 135, 6465.10.1021/ja3110076Search in Google Scholar

[37] V. Cadierno, M. Zablocka, B. Donnadieu, A. Igau, J.-P. Majoral, A. Skowronska, Chem. Eur. J.2000, 6, 345.10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(20000117)6:2<345::AID-CHEM345>3.0.CO;2-QSearch in Google Scholar

[38] J. Schneider, K. M. Krebs, S. Freitag, K. Eichele, H. Schubert, L. Wesemann, Chem. Eur. J.2016, 22, 9812.10.1002/chem.201601224Search in Google Scholar

[39] M. W. P. Bebbington, S. Bontemps, G. Bouhadir, D. Bourissou, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 3333.10.1002/anie.200605078Search in Google Scholar

[40] A. Stute, G. Kehr, R. Fröhlich, G. Erker, Chem. Commun.2011, 47, 4288.10.1039/c1cc10241aSearch in Google Scholar

[41] S. Berger, S. Braun, H.-O. Kalinowski, NMR Spektroskopie von Nichtmetallen, Vol. 3: 31P NMR Spektroskopie, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[42] O. Kühl, Phosphorus-31 NMR Spectroscopy, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2008.10.1007/978-3-540-79118-8Search in Google Scholar

[43] F. H. Allen, O. Kennard, D. G. Watson, L. Brammer, A. G. Orpen, R. Taylor, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. II1987, S1–S19.10.1039/p298700000s1Search in Google Scholar

[44] N. Kano, K. Yanaizumi, X. Meng, T. Kawashima, Heteroatom Chem.2012, 23, 429.10.1002/hc.21033Search in Google Scholar

[45] L. E. Longobardi, V. Wolter, D. W. Stephan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2015, 54, 809.10.1002/anie.201409969Search in Google Scholar

[46] C. Jiang, D. W. Stephan, Dalton Trans.2013, 42, 3318.10.1039/c2dt32677aSearch in Google Scholar

[47] B. Dinda, Essentials of Pericyclic and Photochemical Reactions, Springer, Berlin, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-45934-9Search in Google Scholar

[48] K. N. Houk, J. Sims, R. E. Duke, Jr., R. W. Strozier, J. K. George, J. Am. Chem. Soc.1973, 95, 7287.10.1021/ja00803a017Search in Google Scholar

[49] S. Berger, S. Braun, H.-O. Kalinowski, NMR Spektroskopie von Nichtmetallen, Vol. 2: 15N-NMR-Spektroskopie, Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[50] E. Arunan, G. R. Desiraju, R. A. Klein, J. Sadlej, S. Schreiner, I. Akorta, D. C. Clary, R. H. Crabtree, J. J. Dannenberg, P. Hobza, H. G. Kjaergaard, A. C. Legon, B. Mennucci, D. J. Nsebitt, Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 1637.10.1351/PAC-REC-10-01-02Search in Google Scholar

[51] E. D. Becker, High Resolution NMR Spectroscopy, Theory and Applications, 3rd edition, Academic Press, San Diego, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[52] R. K. Harris, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (A Physicochemical View), Longman Scientific & Technical, copublished with John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[53] H. Günther, NMR Spectroscopy, 3rd edition, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[54] T. Steiner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2002, 41, 48.10.1002/1521-3773(20020104)41:1<48::AID-ANIE48>3.0.CO;2-USearch in Google Scholar

[55] G. R. Desiraju, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2011, 50, 52.10.1002/anie.201002960Search in Google Scholar

[56] R. J. C. Brown, J. Mol. Struct.1995, 345, 77.10.1016/0022-2860(94)08381-QSearch in Google Scholar

[57] B. Chenon, C. Sandorfy, Can. J. Chem.1958, 36, 1181.10.1139/v58-173Search in Google Scholar

[58] S. M. M. Sony, M. N. Ponnuswamy, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.2006, 79, 1766.10.1246/bcsj.79.1766Search in Google Scholar

[59] A. S. Batsanov, J. A. K. Howard, D. D. Snowden, Acta Cryst.2001, C57, 195.10.1107/S0108270100016590Search in Google Scholar

[60] A. R. Cowley, J. R. Dilworth, A. K. Naim, A. J. Robbie, Dalton Trans.2005, 680.10.1039/b417068gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[61] V. Cadierno, M. Zablocka, B. Donnadieu, A. Igau, J.-P. Majoral, New. J. Chem.2003, 27, 675.10.1039/b210773mSearch in Google Scholar

[62] M. Xu, J. Possart, A. E. Waked, J. Roy, W. Uhl, D. W. Stephan, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 2017, 375, 20170014.10.1098/rsta.2017.0014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[63] Saint+ (version 6.02), includes Xprep and Sadabs, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA), 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[64] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany), 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[65] Shelxtl-Plus (rel. 4.1); Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin (USA), 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[66] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxl-97, Program for the Refinement of Structures, Universität Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany), 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[67] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[68] A. L. Spek, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 9.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-6-26
Accepted: 2017-7-20
Published Online: 2017-10-7
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this Issue
  3. Preface
  4. Congratulations to Dietrich Gudat
  5. On the dimorphism of Pr6Mo10O39
  6. Rhodium-rich silicides RERh6Si4 (RE=La, Nd, Tb, Dy, Er, Yb)
  7. Coordination of the ambiphilic phosphinoborane tBu2PCH2BPh2 to Cu(I)Cl
  8. N-Heterocyclic germylenes and stannylenes of the type [Fe{(η5-C5H4)NR}2E] with bulky alkyl substituents
  9. Die Europium(II)-Oxidhalogenide Eu2OBr2 und Eu2OI2
  10. Structure and spectroscopic properties of porphyrinato group 14 derivatives: Part I – Phenylacetylido ligands
  11. Synthesis, solid-state structures and reduction reactions of heteroleptic Ge(II) and Sn(II) β-ketoiminate complexes
  12. Reactions of Al/P, Ga/P and P–H functionalized frustrated Lewis pairs with azides and a diazomethane – formation of adducts and capture of nitrenes
  13. Metal carbonyl complexes of potentially ambidentate 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole and 2,1,3-benzoselenadiazole acceptors
  14. Lithium alkaline earth tetrelides of the type Li2AeTt (Ae=Ca, Ba, Tt=Si, Ge, Sn, Pb): synthesis, crystal structures and physical properties
  15. Magnetic properties of the germanides RE3Pt4Ge6 (RE=Y, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd–Dy)
  16. Overcrowded aminophospanitrenes: a case study
  17. PCl bond length depression upon coordination of a diazaphosphasiletidine to a group 13 element Lewis acid or a transition metal carbonyl fragment – Synthesis and structural characterization of diazaphosphasiletidine adducts with P-coordination
  18. Iminopyridine ligand complexes of group 14 dihalides and ditriflates – neutral chelates and ion pair formation
  19. On the structure of the P-iodo-, bromo- and chloro-bis(imino)phosphoranes: A DFT study
  20. (Dicyclohexyl(2-(dimesitylboryl)phenyl)phosphine: en route to stable frustrated Lewis pairs-hydrogen adducts in water
  21. Insertion of phenyl isocyanate into mono- and diaminosilanes
Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0099/html
Scroll to top button