Home One-pot desilylation-Sonogashira coupling
Article Publicly Available

One-pot desilylation-Sonogashira coupling

  • Jan Horstmann , Stefanie Reger , Beate Neumann , Hans-Georg Stammler and Norbert W. Mitzel EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Coupling of diethynyldiphenylsilane (1) with aryl halides under Sonogashira conditions affords the symmetrical diarylacetylenes bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)acetylene (2), bis(4-fluorophenyl)acetylene (3) and bis(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)acetylene (4) in 60% to 82% yield. In the case of 2, the by-product bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a) was isolated in 12% yield. The occurring desilylation reaction was investigated by treating bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) under the same conditions. The formation of 1-fluoro-4-(phenylethynyl)benzene (6), 1-trifluoromethyl-4-(phenylethynyl)benzene (7) and (tetrafluoropyridin- 4-yl)ethynylbenzene (8) in 70 to 84% yield and the cleavage of hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane were observed in all cases.

1 Introduction

Since Sonogashira and Hagihara reported Pd- and Cu-catalyzed reactions of aryl halides with terminal acetylenes in 1975, this cross coupling reaction is used extensively for the syntheses of acetylenic compounds [1], [2]. It is the most popular and widely used procedure for alkynylation of aryl halides (simply known as Sonogashira coupling). A wide range of conditions concerning the Pd catalyst, phosphorus ligand, amine solvent and the alkynylation reagent has been used over the years depending on the substrates [3].

Using alkyne protecting groups, the synthesis of internal alkynes is mostly carried out in stepwise procedures of coupling, deprotection and coupling again. Only a few one-pot reaction protocols for diarylacetylenes using palladium nanoparticles [4], alkyne metathesis [5] or by addition of deprotection reagents, e.g. CuCl or DBU and H2O, have been published [6], [7], [8], [9]. Multiple Sonogashira coupling cycles can also be used for the syntheses of oligomers [10] and polymers [11]. In 2005, Kunugi et al. used diethynyldibutylsilane and dibromoarenes to generate copolymers and observed a hydrolytic desilylation in wet triethylamine. Converting 1-bromonaphtalene with diethynyldibutylsilane and thousand equivalents of water provides dinaphthylacetylene [12].

Herein we present an efficient method for the synthesis of diarylacetylenes using diethynyldiphenylsilane as acetylene source, standard substrates and catalysts [ArBr, PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, i-Pr2NH] without any other additions. In a one-pot synthetic procedure, Sonogashira-coupled diethynyldiphenylsilanes undergo a desilylation to terminal alkynes, which are coupled in situ again with hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane being formed after hydrolysis. This was proven by the desilylation-Sonogashira coupling of bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane at 100°C in diisopropylamine. In all cases, both alkynyl units of diethynyldiphenylsilane (1) and bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) can be transferred, as is indicated by the yields (>50%).

2 Results and discussion

During our investigations in the field of host-guest complexes, we synthesized new bidentate Lewis acids and bases [13]. Di- and triethinylsilanes were intended to provide the necessary backbones for corresponding functionalization. The treatment of diethynyldiphenylsilane (1) with 5-bromo-2-methylpyridine under Sonogashira conditions [PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, diisopropylamine] did not afford the desired product bis[(6-methylpyridin- 3-yl)ethynyl]diphenylsilane. After hydrolysis we found bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)acetylene (2), bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a) and hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane to be the major components of the crude product by GC/MS analysis (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1: Syntheses of symmetrical diarylacetylenes 2, 3 and 4via Sonogashira and desilylation reactions of 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) ArBr (2.3–6.0 eq.), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (3.0–4.1 mol%), CuI (3.4–5.9 mol%), i-Pr2NH, reflux, 14–95 h, 60–82%.
Scheme 1:

Syntheses of symmetrical diarylacetylenes 2, 3 and 4via Sonogashira and desilylation reactions of 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) ArBr (2.3–6.0 eq.), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (3.0–4.1 mol%), CuI (3.4–5.9 mol%), i-Pr2NH, reflux, 14–95 h, 60–82%.

Diethynyldiphenylsilane (1) is a crystalline, air and moisture stable solid that can easily be synthesized and handled [14], [15]. However, when 1 was converted under Sonogashira conditions in diisopropylamine, desilylation took place. First, when the Sonogashira coupling of 1 was conducted in diisopropylamine, only 2.3 equivalents of 5-bromo-2-methylpyridine were introduced (Table 1). Nevertheless, compound 2 could be isolated by sublimation in 63% yield, based on the insufficient amount of aryl bromide. When trimethylsilylacetylene was used instead of 1, no desilylation of the trimethylsilyl group was observed, and 2-methyl-5-(trimethylsilylethynyl)pyridine was formed almost quantitatively. Further reactions of 1 were carried out using an excess of 25% (5 equiv.) or 50% (6 equiv.) of aryl bromides. Fluoro- and trifluoromethyl-substituted aryl bromides were used to verify the formation of the corresponding diarylacetylene in solution via19F NMR spectra before hydrolysis of the reaction mixture.

Table 1:

One-pot syntheses of symmetrical diarylacetylenes from 1 (for Ar see Scheme 1).

CompoundEquiv. ArBraPdCl2(PPh3)2 (mol%)bCuI (mol%)bTime (h)Yield (%)c
22.33.35.91463d
35.04.14.19560
35.04.14.12457
46.03.43.42182
  1. aBased on 1; bbased on ArBr; cisolated yield based on 1; dbased on ArBr.

The crude product of 3 was analyzed by 19F NMR spectroscopy. The spectrum displays only the signals of product 3 [δ=−110.8 ppm (tt)] and of residual 4-fluorobromobenzene [δ=−115.3 ppm (tt)] after 95 h. A reaction time of 95 h does not substantially increase the yield. A reaction time of 24 h affords a slightly lower yield of 57% under the same reaction conditions. Grieco et al. could isolate 3 in 89% yield, using the aryl iodide, trimethylsilylacetylene, double molar catalyst ratio, water and six equivalents of DBU at 60°C after 18 h. Although our yield is lower, it shows the application width of the desilylation-Sonogashira coupling. In case of the trifluoromethyl compound 4 [δ(19F)=−62.9 ppm], a good yield of 82% could be achieved even after a reaction time of only 21 h. 1,2-Bis(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)butadiyne [δ(19F)=−63.0 ppm] was isolated as a second product in 8% yield. In the literature, the synthesis of 4 is usually described by multistep couplings or alkyne metathesis (max. yield 49% overall) [5].

The excess of alkynyl units (only 2.3 equiv. of ArBr) in the reaction mixture of 2 leads to the mentioned second product bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a) in 12% yield. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction experiments of this compound were obtained by slow evaporation of a concentrated solution in benzene (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Molecular structure of bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a) in the crystalline state. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C(1)–C(1′) 1.373(2), C(1)–C(2) 1.202(2), C(2)–C(3) 1.431(1); C(1′)–C(1)–C(2) 179.2(2), C(1)–C(2)–C(3) 177.6(1). Symmetry equivalent atoms are generated by the operation 1−x, 2−y, 1−z.
Fig. 1:

Molecular structure of bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a) in the crystalline state. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C(1)–C(1′) 1.373(2), C(1)–C(2) 1.202(2), C(2)–C(3) 1.431(1); C(1′)–C(1)–C(2) 179.2(2), C(1)–C(2)–C(3) 177.6(1). Symmetry equivalent atoms are generated by the operation 1−x, 2−y, 1−z.

Bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a) crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1̅, with one molecule per unit cell. The C≡C bond lengths are 1.202(2) Å, and the adjacent single bonds to the pyridine are longer [1.431(1) Å] than C(1)–C(1′) between the C≡C bonds [1.373(2) Å], which is typical for bispyridinylbutadyine derivatives [16]. The butadiyne unit of 2a is linear, as indicated by the centroid(pyridine)-center[C(1)–C(1′)]-centroid(pyridine) angle of 180° [13].

To clarify, whether the desilylation took place before or after the first Sonogashira coupling, we synthesized the phenyl substituted diethynyldiphenylsilane 5via salt elimination, in order to avoid the formation of diphenylacetylene when using bromobenzene in a Sonogashira coupling (Scheme 2). Similar to compound 1 bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) is a crystalline air and moisture stable solid. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction experiments were obtained by slow evaporation of a concentrated n-hexane solution (Fig. 2).

Scheme 2: Syntheses of unsymmetrical phenylacetylenes 6, 7 and 8via desilylation reactions of 5. Reagents and conditions: (i) 2.1 eq. phenylacetylene, 2.1 eq. n-BuLi, THF, –78°C to r. t., 90% (ii) 2.8–3.0 eq. ArX [X=Br (6, 7), X=I (8)], PdCl2(PPh3)2 (2.8–4.4 mol%), CuI (4.5–6.1 mol%), i-Pr2NH, reflux, 16–70 h, 70 to 84%.
Scheme 2:

Syntheses of unsymmetrical phenylacetylenes 6, 7 and 8via desilylation reactions of 5. Reagents and conditions: (i) 2.1 eq. phenylacetylene, 2.1 eq. n-BuLi, THF, –78°C to r. t., 90% (ii) 2.8–3.0 eq. ArX [X=Br (6, 7), X=I (8)], PdCl2(PPh3)2 (2.8–4.4 mol%), CuI (4.5–6.1 mol%), i-Pr2NH, reflux, 16–70 h, 70 to 84%.

Fig. 2: Molecular structure of bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) in the crystalline state. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C(1)–Si(1) 1.868(2), C(7)–Si(1) 1.863(2), C(21)–Si(1) 1.829(2), C(13)–Si(1) 1.830(2), C(13)–C(14) 1.206(3), C(14)–C(15) 1.436(3), C(21)–C(22) 1.202(3), C(22)–C(23) 1.438(3); C(1)–Si(1)–C(7) 112.5(1), C(21)–Si(1)–C(13) 107.5(1), Si(1)–C(13)–C(14) 177.8(2), C(13)–C(14)–C(15) 179.0(2), Si(1)–C(21)–C(22) 179.7(2), C(21)–C(22)–C(23) 178.3(2).
Fig. 2:

Molecular structure of bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) in the crystalline state. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C(1)–Si(1) 1.868(2), C(7)–Si(1) 1.863(2), C(21)–Si(1) 1.829(2), C(13)–Si(1) 1.830(2), C(13)–C(14) 1.206(3), C(14)–C(15) 1.436(3), C(21)–C(22) 1.202(3), C(22)–C(23) 1.438(3); C(1)–Si(1)–C(7) 112.5(1), C(21)–Si(1)–C(13) 107.5(1), Si(1)–C(13)–C(14) 177.8(2), C(13)–C(14)–C(15) 179.0(2), Si(1)–C(21)–C(22) 179.7(2), C(21)–C(22)–C(23) 178.3(2).

Bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group Pc, with two molecules per unit cell. The Si(1)–C bonds toward the ethynyl substituents are slightly shorter than the Si(1)–C bonds toward the phenyl substituents [C(21)–Si(1) 1.829(2) Å vs. C(1)–Si(1) 1.868(2) Å]. The C≡C bonds are of normal length [C(13)–C(14) 1.206(3) Å and C(21)–C(22) 1.202(3) Å] [11] and the centroid(phenyl)-center[C(1)–C(1′)]-centroid(phenyl) angle is compressed to 106.1(1)°. In contrast to other diethynyldiphenylsilane derivatives, the angle between the ethynyl units is also shortened to 107.5° [C(21)–Si(1)–C(13)] while C(1)–Si(1)–C(7) [112.5(1)°] is widened [17].

Compound 5 was converted with aryl halides under the Sonogahira conditions mentioned above. Compound 5 first undergoes a desilylation reaction toward the phenylacetylene unit, which is directly substituted in a Sonogashira coupling with the aryl substrate (Scheme 2).

We converted 5 with three different fluorine substituted aryl halides (Table 2). Using 4-fluorobromobenzene, 1-fluoro-4-phenylethynylbenzene (6) could be isolated in 76% yield. This proves that 5 is a transfer reagents for two equivalents of phenylacetylene under Sonogashira coupling conditions. Although phenylacetylene could be used instead of 5 under these conditions, this desilylation opens new possibilities in the synthesis of unsymmetrically arylphenylacetylenes. The formation of tetrafluoropyridinyl-4-ethynylbenzene (8) indicates that a reaction time of 16 h might be sufficient (6 and 7 were refluxed over the weekend). 1-Bromo-4-trifluoromethylbenzene can be converted in a good yield of 70% into 7 without formation of other products than hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane, which can be easily separated by column chromatography. Single crystals of compound 7 suitable for X-ray diffraction experiments were obtained by slow evaporation of a concentrated solution in DCM (Fig. 3).

Table 2:

Syntheses of unsymmetrical aryl-phenylacetylenes 6, 7 and 8 from 5 (for Ar see Scheme 2).

CompoundEquiv. ArXaPdCl2(PPh3)2 (mol%)bCuI (mol%)bTime (h)Yield (%)c
63.04.45.06576
72.84.24.57070
82.62.86.11684
  1. a[X=Br (6, 7), X=I (8)], based on 5; bbased on ArBr; cisolated yield based on 5.

Fig. 3: Molecular structure of 1-trifluoromethyl-4-phenylethynylbenzene (7) (above) and its packing in the crystalline state (below). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C(15)–F(1) 1.337(2), C(15)–F(2) 1.345(2), C(15)–F(3) 1.338(2), C(9)–C(8) 1.437(2), C(8)–C(7) 1.198(2), C(7)–C(1) 1.434(2); F(1)–C(15)–F(2) 105.8(1), F(1)–C(15)–F(3) 106.6(1), F(2)–C(15)–F(3) 106.3(1), C(9)–C(8)–C(7) 177.4(2), C(8)–C(7)–C(1) 178.2(2).
Fig. 3:

Molecular structure of 1-trifluoromethyl-4-phenylethynylbenzene (7) (above) and its packing in the crystalline state (below). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): C(15)–F(1) 1.337(2), C(15)–F(2) 1.345(2), C(15)–F(3) 1.338(2), C(9)–C(8) 1.437(2), C(8)–C(7) 1.198(2), C(7)–C(1) 1.434(2); F(1)–C(15)–F(2) 105.8(1), F(1)–C(15)–F(3) 106.6(1), F(2)–C(15)–F(3) 106.3(1), C(9)–C(8)–C(7) 177.4(2), C(8)–C(7)–C(1) 178.2(2).

1-Trifluoromethyl-4-(phenylethynyl)benzene (7) crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbcn, with eight molecules per unit cell. All C–F bonds are of the same length within experimental error. The observed compressed F–C(15)–F angles [F(1)–C(15)–F(2) 105.8(1)°, F(1)–C(15)–F(3) 106.6(1)° and F(2)–C(15)–F(3) 106.3(1)°] agree well with predictions of the VSEPR model. The C≡C bond is 1.198(2) Å long and the centroid(phenyl)-center[C(1)–C(1′)]-centroid(phenyl) angle is close to linearity [178.9(1)°].

3 Conclusion

With diethynyldiphenylsilane (1), we present a stable and easily accessible reagent for the synthesis of symmetrical diarylacetylenes in yields up to 82% under standard Sonogashira conditions [ArX, PdCl2(PPh3)2, CuI, i-Pr2NH, reflux] without any further additives. In a one-pot protocol, two Sonogashira coupling reactions and a desilylation of the primarily coupled bis(arylethynyl)diphenylsilane take place. This sequence could be clarified by using bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5) to generate phenyl-substituted diarylacetylenes in up to 84% yields. In all cases, both alkynyl units could be transferred, and hexaphenylcyclotrisiloxane was identified as a second product after hydrolysis.

4 Crystal structure determinations

Suitable crystals of compounds 5 and 7 were obtained by cooling saturated n-hexane solutions to −30°C, 2a from saturated benzene solution. The crystals were coated with paratone-N oil, selected, mounted on a glass fiber and transferred onto the goniometer into the cryostream of the diffractometer. Data collections were performed at 100.0(2) K on a SuperNova diffractometer, using monochromated Cu-Kα radiation.

Using Olex2, the structures were solved by Direct Methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares cycles (program Shelx-97) [18], [19]. Crystal and refinement details as well as CCDC numbers are provided in Table 3.

Table 3:

Crystallographic data for 2a, 5 and 7.

2a57
Empirical formulaC16H12N2C28H20SiC15H9F3
Mr232.28384.53246.22
F(000), e1224041008
Crystal systemTriclinicMonoclinicOrthorhombic
Space groupPPcPbcn
a, Å6.1877(6)10.16959(14)14.5263(5)
b, Å6.5036(5)9.31545(9)5.85100(19)
c, Å7.6239(8)12.29851(14)27.2283(10)
α, deg87.694(7)9090
β, deg77.641(9)108.9004(13)90
γ, deg89.608(7)9090
V, Å3299.45(5)1102.272314.22(14)
Z128
ρcalcd., g cm−31.291.161.41
μ, mm−10.61.01.0
θmax, deg144.6144.5152.3
Index ranges−7≤h≤7−11≤h≤12−18≤h≤14
h, k, l−8≤k≤8−11≤k≤11−7≤k≤5
−9≤l≤8−15≤l≤15−33≤l≤31
Reflexes collected4269180486221
Independent reflexes117641552367
Rint0.01940.02620.0342
Observed refl. (I>2 σ(I))96341071950
Ref. parameters83282199
R1 (I>2σ(I))0.04110.02730.0429
wR2 (I>2σ(I))0.11730.07080.1148
R1 (all data)0.04790.02760.0524
wR2 (all data)0.12450.07120.1251
Flack parameter x−0.001(8)
GoF1.0881.0721.042
Δρmax/ρmin, e Å−30.18/−0.220.20/−0.140.27/−0.31
CCDC152875615287571528758
Remarksa
  1. aDisorder of C(8), C(9) and C(10) over two sites (58:42); disorder of C(26), C(27) and C(28) over two sites (77:23).

CCDC 1528756–1528758 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre viawww.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

5 Experimental section

5.1 Materials and methods

The syntheses and structures of diethynyldiphenylsilane (1) [14], [15] and bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)acetylene (2) [13] have been described elsewhere. All reactions were performed under an anhydrous, inert atmosphere of nitrogen or argon by using Schlenk or glovebox techniques and freshly dried and distilled solvents (benzene dried with Na/K alloy, THF dried with K, pentane, n-hexane and Et2O dried with LiAlH4). Diisopropylamine (99%) was purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt). Bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (from Fluorochem), CuI (from Merck), phenylacetylene (from Aldrich), 4-fluorobromobenzene (from Merck), 5-bromo-2-methylpyridine (from fluorochem) and 4-trifluoromethylbromobenzene (from Lancaster) were used as purchased. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX 500 and a Bruker Avance III 500 HD instrument. The chemical shifts (δ) were measured in ppm with respect to the solvent (CDCl3: 1H NMR, δ=7.26 ppm, 13C NMR, δ=77.16 ppm) or referenced externally (29Si: SiMe4, 19F: CFCl3). EI mass spectra were recorded using an Autospec X magnetic sector mass spectrometer with EBE geometry (Vacuum Generators, Manchester, UK) equipped with a standard EI source. Samples were introduced by push rod in aluminum crucibles. Ions were accelerated by 8 kV. Elemental analyses were performed with CHNS elemental analyzer HEKAtech EURO EA.

5.2 Bis(2-methylpyridin-5-yl)butadiyne (2a)

Diethynyldiphenylsilane (1.0 g, 4.3 mmol) and 5-bromo-2-methylpyridine (1.6 g, 10 mmol) were dissolved in diisopropylamine (30 mL), and the solution was degassed two times. PdCl2(PPh3)2 (230 mg, 0.33 mmol) and CuI (110 mg, 0.59 mmol) were added, and the yellow solution was refluxed for 14 h. The reaction was quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (30 mL) and extracted with DCM (40 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Sublimation (100°C, 10−2 mbar) provided 2a as a colorless solid. Yield 140 mg (0.60 mmol, 12%). − 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): δ=8.71 (s, 2H, 2-H), 7.31 (d, J=7.9, 2H, 4-H), 6.36 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H, 5-H), 2.25 (s, 6H, CH3) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, C6D6): δ=159.2, 153.0, 139.2, 122.5, 115.9, 80.1, 76.9, 24.5 ppm. – EI-MS (70 eV): m/z=232.2, 208.2, 180.1.

5.3 Bis(4-fluorophenyl)acetylene (3)

Diethynyldiphenylsilane (100 mg, 0.44 mmol) and 1-bromo-4-fluorobenzene (0.24 mL, 2.2 mmol) were dissolved in diisopropylamine (15 mL). The solution was degassed two times and CuI (17 mg, 0.09 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (62 mg, 0.09 mmol) were added. The yellow solution was heated to 100°C for 95 h, then quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (15 mL) and extracted with DCM (40 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Sublimation (50°C, 6×10−2 mbar) gave bis(4-fluorophenyl)acetylene as a colorless solid. Yield: 110 mg (0.53 mmol, 60%). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.50 (m, 4H, o-PhH), 7.05 (m, 4H, m-PhH) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ=162.7 (d, J=249.7 Hz), 133.6 (d, J=8.4 Hz), 119.3 (d, J=3.5 Hz), 115.8 (d, J=22.1 Hz), 88.1 ppm. – 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ=−110.8 (tt, J=8.6, 5.4 Hz) ppm.

5.4 Bis(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)acetylene (4)

Diethynyldiphenylsilane (0.12 mg, 0.52 mmol) and 1-bromo-4-trifluoromethylbenzene (0.46 mL, 3.2 mmol) were dissolved in diisopropylamine (15 mL). The solution was degassed two times, and CuI (21 mg, 0.11 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (68 mg, 0.10 mmol) were added. The solution was heated to 100°C for 21 h then quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (15 mL) and extracted with DCM (40 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Column chromatography (pentane) afforded 1,2-bis(4-trifluoromethylphenyl)acetylene as a colorless solid. Yield: 0.27 g (0.85 mmol, 82%). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.64 (m, ArH) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ=133.0, 132.1, 130.7 (q, J=33.2 Hz), 125.5 (q, J=3.9 Hz), 124.0 (q, J=272.1 Hz), 90.3 ppm. – 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ=−62.9 ppm.

5.5 Bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (5)

Phenylacetylene (0.88 mL, 8.0 mmol) was dissolved in THF (15 mL), and n-BuLi (5.0 mL, 1.6 m in n-hexane, 8.0 mmol) was added dropwise at −78°C. The clear solution was warmed to ambient temperature, dichlorodiphenylsilane (0.80 mL, 3.8 mmol) was added and the yellow solution was stirred for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (5 mL) and extracted with Et2O (20 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Column chromatography (pentane-DCM 1:1) provided bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane as a crystalline solid. Yield: 1.3 g (3.4 mmol, 90%). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): δ=7.89 (m, 4H, o-PhH), 7.60 (m, 4H, o-PhH), 7.45 (m, 6H, m/p-PhH), 7.35 (m, 6H, m/p-PhH) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, C6D6): δ=135.1, 133.2, 132.5, 130.4, 129.4, 128.4, 128.2, 122.6, 108.9, 87.8 ppm. – 29Si{1H} NMR (99 MHz, C6D6): δ=−48.1 ppm. – EI-MS (70 eV): m/z=384.0, 307.1, 205.0, 129.0, 105.0, 77.0. – Elemental analysis calcd. (%) for C28H20Si (M=384.54): C 87.45, H 5.24; found C 87.50, H 5.45.

5.6 1-Fluoro-4-phenylethynylbenzene (6)

Bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (200 mg, 0.53 mmol) and 1-bromo-4-fluorobenzene (0.17 mL, 1.6 mmol) were dissolved in diisopropylamine (15 mL). The solution was degassed twice, and CuI (15 mg, 0.08 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (48 mg, 0.07 mmol) were added. The yellow solution was heated to 100°C for 65 h then quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (10 mL) and extracted with DCM (40 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Sublimation (2×10−2 mbar, 40°C) gave 1-fluoro-4-phenylethynylbenzene as a colorless solid. Yield: 160 mg (0.80 mmol, 76%). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.52 (m, 4H, o-PhH, 3-H/5-H), 7.35 (m, 3H, m/p-PhH), 7.05 (m, 2H, 2-H/6-H) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ=162.5 (d, J=249.6 Hz), 133.6 (d, J=8.3 Hz), 131.8, 128.5, 128.5, 123.4, 119.5 (d, J=3.7 Hz), 115.8 (d, J=22.1 Hz), 89.5, 88.4 ppm. – 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ=−111.0 (tt, J=8.6, 5.4 Hz) ppm.

5.7 1-Trifluoromethyl-4-phenylethynylbenzene (7)

Bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (200 mg, 0.53 mmol) and 1-bromo-4-trifluoromethylbenzene (0.21 mL, 1.5 mmol) were dissolved in diiospropylamine (15 mL). The solution was degassed two times, and CuI (13 mg, 0.07 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (44 mg, 0.06 mmol) were added. The yellow solution was heated to 100°C for 70 h, then quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (10 mL) and extracted with DCM (40 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Column chromatography (pentane) gave 1-trifluoromethyl-4-phenylethynylbenzene as a colorless solid. Yield: 180 mg (0.74 mmol, 70%). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.62 (m, 4H, 2-H/3-H/5-H/6-H), 7.56 (m, 2H, o-PhH), 7.38 (m, 3H, m/p-H) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ=132.7, 132.0, 131.9, 130.1 (q, J=32.7 Hz), 129.0, 128.6, 125.4 (q, J=3.8 Hz), 124.1 (q, J=272.1 Hz), 122.7, 91.9, 88.1 ppm. – 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ=−62.8 ppm.

5.8 (Tetrafluoropyridin-4-ylethynyl)benzene (8)

Bis(phenylethynyl)diphenylsilane (166 mg, 0.43 mmol) and 4-iodotetrafluoropyridine (300 mg, 1.1 mmol) were dissolved in diisopropylamine (20 mL). CuI (15 mg, 0.08 mmol) and PdCl2(PPh3)2 (25 mg, 0.04 mmol) were added, and the yellow solution was heated to 100°C for 16 h then quenched with sat. aqueous NH4Cl solution (10 mL) and extracted with DCM (20 mL). The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, and all volatile compounds were removed in vacuum. Column chromatography (pentane) afforded (tetrafluoropyridin-4-yl)ethynylbenzene as a colorless crystalline solid. Yield: 180 mg (0.72 mmol, 84%). – 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.63 (m, 2H, o-PhH), 7.48 (m, 1H, p-PhH), 7.43 (m, 2H, m-PhH) ppm. – 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ=143.9, 141.8, 132.5, 130.8, 129.4, 128.8, 120.7, 117.5, 106.8 ppm. – 19F NMR (470 MHz, CDCl3): δ=−90.5 (3-F/5-F), –138.3 (2-F/6-F) ppm.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dipl.-Ing. Klaus-Peter Mester for recording NMR spectra, Brigitte Michel for performing CHN analyses, Heinz-Werner Patruck for measuring mass spectra as well as Dr. Jan-Hendrik Lamm for helpful comments on the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG.

References

[1] K. Sonogashira, Y. Tohda, N. Hagihara, Tetrahedron Lett.1975, 16, 4467.10.1016/S0040-4039(00)91094-3Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. Sonogashira, J. Organomet. Chem.2002, 653, 46.10.1016/S0022-328X(02)01158-0Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. Chinchilla, C. Najera, Chem. Rev.2007, 107, 874, and the references cited therein.10.1021/cr050992xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] P. K. Mandali, D. K. Chand, Catal. Commun.2014, 47, 40.10.1016/j.catcom.2013.12.029Search in Google Scholar

[5] N. G. Pschirer, U. H. Bunz, Tetrahedron Lett.1999, 40, 2481.10.1016/S0040-4039(99)00282-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Nishihara, E. Inoue, D. Ogawa, Y. Okada, S. Noyori, K. Takagi, Tetrahedron Lett.2009, 50, 4643.10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.05.112Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. J. Mio, L. C. Kopel, J. B. Braun, T. L. Gadzikwa, K. L. Hull, R. G. Brisbois, C. J. Markworth, P. A. Grieco, Org. Lett.2002, 4, 3199.10.1021/ol026266nSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] M.-J. Wu, L.-M. Wei, C.-F. Lin, S.-P. Leou, L.-L. Wei, Tetrahedron2001, 57, 7839.10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00758-XSearch in Google Scholar

[9] S. E. Denmark, S. A. Tymonko, J. Org. Chem.2003, 68, 9151.10.1021/jo0351771Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] L. Fenenko, G. Shao, A. Orita, M. Yahiro, J. Otera, S. Svechnikov, C. Adachi, Chem. Comm.2007, 2278.10.1039/b700466dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] H. Sasabe, N. Inomoto, N. Kihara, Y. Suzuki, A. Ogawa, T. Takata, J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem.2007, 45, 4154.10.1002/pola.22204Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Ohshita, D. Nada, Y. Tada, Y. Kimura, H. Yoshida, A. Kunai, Y. Kunugi, J. Organomet. Chem.2005, 690, 3951.10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.05.029Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Horstmann, M. Hyseni, A. Mix, B. Neumann, H.-G. Stammler, N. W. Mitzel, Angew. Chem.2017, accepted; DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701303.10.1002/anie.201701303Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] U. Krüerke, J. Organomet. Chem.1970, 21, 83.10.1016/S0022-328X(00)90596-5Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Horstmann, M. Niemann, K. Berthold, A. Mix, B. Neumann, H.-G. Stammler, N. W. Mitzel, Dalton Trans.2017, 46, 1898.10.1039/C6DT04608HSearch in Google Scholar

[16] A. Crihfield, J. Hartwell, D. Phelps, R. B. Walsh, J. L. Harris, J. F. Payne, W. T. Pennington, T. W. Hanks, Cryst. Growth Des. 2003, 3, 313.10.1021/cg0340042Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. Wang, D. Wang, H. Lu, H. Wang, L. Xue, S. Feng, Appl. Organomet. Chem.2013, 27, 529.10.1002/aoc.3025Search in Google Scholar

[18] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A2008, 64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard, H. Puschmann, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2009, 42, 339.10.1107/S0021889808042726Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-2-7
Accepted: 2017-3-31
Published Online: 2017-5-16
Published in Print: 2017-6-27

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2017-0027/html
Scroll to top button