New adducts of silver(I) halides, AgX (X = Cl, Br), with bidentate phosphine ligands: syntheses and molecular structures of [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6], [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2], {[Et4N][Ag2 (μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n, [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)], and [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2]
Abstract
Interaction of AgCl with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) in THF/MeCN in the presence of K[PF6] or [Et4N]Br afforded typical trinuclear cationic trigonal-bipyramidal complexes [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1) or [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2] (2), respectively. Treatment of AgBr with bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe) in THF/MeCN in the presence of [Et4N]Br gave a polymeric complex {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n (3) with a dinuclear {Ag2(μ-Br)3} core. The reaction of AgCl with dppe or bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp) in THF/MeCN in the presence of [Et4N]Cl resulted in the isolation of a dinuclear anionic complex [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)] (4) with one μ-dppe bridge or a dinuclear neutral complex [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5) with two μ-dppp bridges and a 12-membered ring, respectively. The structures of complexes 1–5 with the bidentate phosphine ligands were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.
1 Introduction
A family of simple complexes of the form MX:EPh3 (1:n) [M = univalent copper or silver, X = simple halide or pseudohalide (Cl, Br, I, CN, SCN) or oxyanion (ClO4, NO3, or simple carboxylate), E = P, As, Sb, n = 1–4] have been well documented [1], [2], [3], [4]. Continuous advances in the structural characterization of adducts of simple salts of the univalent group 11 metals copper and silver, MX, with simple symmetrical bis(diphenyl-pnicogeno)alkane ligands, Ph2E(CH2)xEPh2 (E = P, As; x = 1–3, “dpex”), have been stemming from intriguing structural features [5], [6], [7], [8]. In contrast to a number of copper(I) complexes with monodentate ER3 (E = P, As, Sb) and bidentate Ph2E(CH2)xPPh2 (E = P, As) dpex ligands [8], [9], [10], analogous silver(I) counterparts are relatively rare due to solubility or other less tangible considerations [7], [11]. Recent interesting reports on the bidentate phosphine ligand arrays have been concerned with systems primarily of the form AgX:dpex of (1:1)n [12] and (2:3)n stoichiometeries [10]. It has been noted that the solution and solid-state structures of some 1:2 adducts of Ag(I) salts with 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp) were influenced by different halide/pseudohalide anions [5]. Structural features of trinuclear halogen-capped complexes with bidentate bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and bis(diphenylphosphino)amide [M3(μ3-X)2(μ-dppx)3]X (M = Cu, Ag; X = Cl, Br, I; x = m or a) were found to be related to the properties of metal–phosphorus coordination and metal–metal interactions [13], [14]. For continuous understanding of the reactive properties of silver halides and bidentate phosphine ligands and the structural features of the silver-phosphorus complexes with different AgX:dpex stoichiometeries, this work provides more extensive arrays of silver species with bidentate phosphine ligands. The results of complementary studies, including bidentate Ph2P(CH2)xPPh2 (x = 1–3) ligands and different stoichiometries, are described in this paper.
2 Experimental section
2.1. General
All syntheses and handlings were carried out in air. All reagents, unless otherwise stated, were purchased as analysis grade and were used without further purification. The dppm, bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe), and dppp ligands were purchased from Alfa Ltd. All elemental analyses were carried out using a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN analyzer. Electronic absorption spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu UV-3000 spectrophotometer. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Digilab FTS-40 spectrophotometer with the use of pressed KBr pellets. Positive fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectra were recorded on a Finnigan TSQ 7000 spectrometer. 31P NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker ALX 300 spectrometer operating at 121.5 MHz, and chemical shifts (δ in ppm) were reported with reference to H3PO4.
2.2. Preparation of [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1)
A mixture of AgCl (29 mg, 0.20 mmol), K[PF6] (18.4 mg, 0.10 mmol), and dppm (58 mg, 0.15 mmol) was dissolved in 25 mL THF-MeCN (2:1) and stirred overnight at room temperature. The resulting colorless solution was filtered. Colorless block crystals of [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1) were obtained by layering diethyl ether on the top of the filtrate at room temperature. Yield: 79 mg, 82%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): ν(P–C) 529 (s), 514 (s), 497 (m). – 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=−4.13 (d, 1J(31P-Ag): 422 Hz) ppm. – MS (FAB): m/z=1544 [Ag3(dppm)3Cl2]+, 1510 [Ag3(dppm)3Cl]+, 1476 [Ag3(dppm)3]+, 492 [Ag(dppm)]+. – Anal. for C75H66Cl2 F6P7Ag3: calcd. C 53.22, H 3.93; found C 53.14, H 3.92%.
2.3. Preparation of [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2] (2)
A mixture of AgBr (38 mg, 0.20 mmol), [Et4N]Br (21 mg, 0.10 mmol), and dppm (58 mg, 0.15 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL THF-MeCN (2:1) and stirred overnight at room temperature. The resulting colorless solution was filtered. Colorless block crystals of [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2]·0.5Et2O (2·0.5Et2O) were obtained by layering diethyl ether on the top of the filtrate at room temperature. Yield: 73 mg, 74%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): ν(P–C) 523 (s), 512 (s), 495 (m). – 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=−4.78 (d, 1J(31P-Ag): 436 Hz) ppm. – MS (FAB): m/z=1634 [Ag3(dppm)3Br2]+, 1555 [Ag3(dppm)3Br]+, 1476 [Ag3(dppm)3]+, 492 [Ag(dppm)]+. – Anal. for C75H66P6Br4Ag4·0.5(C4H10O): calcd. C 47.64, H 3.69; found C 47.66, H 3.71%.
2.4. Preparation of {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n (3)
A mixture of AgBr (38 mg, 0.20 mmol), [Et4N]Br (21 mg, 0.10 mmol), and dppe (40 mg, 0.10 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL THF-MeCN (2:1) and stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The resulting colorless solution was filtered. Colorless block crystals of {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]·0.5C6H14}n (3·0.5C6H14) were obtained by layering diethyl ether on the top of the filtrate at room temperature. Yield: 73 mg, 74%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): ν(C–N) 1104 (s), 998 (m), ν(P–C) 522 (s), 514 (s), 499 (m). – 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=2.15 (br) ppm. – MS (FAB): m/z=851 [Ag2(dppe)Br3]+, 772 [Ag2(dppe)Br2]+, 693 [Ag2(dppe)Br]+, 614 [Ag2(dppe)]+. – Anal. for C32H44NP2Br3Ag2·0.5(C6H14): calcd. C 41.90, H 5.12, N 1.40; found C 42.12, H 5.05, N 1.35%.
2.5. Preparation of [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2 (μ-dppe)] (4)
A mixture of AgCl (29 mg, 0.20 mmol), [Et4N]Cl (33 mg, 0.20 mmol), and dppe (40 mg, 0.10 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL THF-MeCN (2:1) and stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The resulting colorless solution was filtered. Colorless block crystals of [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)] (4) were obtained by layering diethyl ether on the top of the filtrate at room temperature. Yield: 81 mg, 79%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): ν(C–N) 1101 (s), 993 (m), ν(P–C) 523 (s), 512 (s), 495 (m). – 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=3.03 (br) ppm. – MS (FAB): m/z=754 [(AgCl2)2(dppe)]+, 719 [Ag2(dppe)Cl3]+, 684 [Ag2(dppe)Cl2]+, 649 [Ag2(dppe)Cl]+, 614 [Ag2(dppe)]+. – Anal. for C42H64N2P2Cl4Ag2: calcd. C 49.63, H 6.34, N 2.76; found C 50.03, H 6.27, N 2.73%.
2.6. Preparation of [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5)
A mixture of AgCl (29 mg, 0.20 mmol), [Et4N]Cl (33 mg, 0.20 mmol), and dppp (82 mg, 0.20 mmol) was dissolved in 30 mL THF-MeCN (2:1) and stirred for 8 h at room temperature. The resulting colorless solution was filtered. Colorless block crystals of [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (4) were obtained by layering diethyl ether on the top of the filtrate at room temperature. Yield: 93 mg, 83%. – IR (KBr, cm−1): ν(P–C) 526 (s), 511 (s), 499 (m). – 31P NMR (121.5 MHz, [D6]DMSO): δ=2.48 (br) ppm. – MS (FAB): m/z=1111 ([(AgCl)2(dppp)2–1]+), 555 [(AgCl)(dppp)]+, 520 [Ag(dppp)]+. – Anal. for C54H52P4Cl2Ag2: calcd. C 58.35, H 4.72; found C 58.31, H 4.69%.
2.7. X-ray crystallographic study
The structures of [Ag3(μ3-Cl)(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1), [Ag3(μ3-Br)(μ-dppm)3]-[AgBr2]·0.5Et2O (2·0.5Et2O), {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n·0.5C6H14 (3·0.5C6H14), [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)] (4), and [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5) were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Diffraction data were collected on a Bruker SMART Apex CCD diffractometer with MoKα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å) at 296 K using an ω scan mode. The collected frames were processed with the software Saint [15]. The data were corrected for absorption using the program Sadabs [16]. The structures were solved by Direct Methods and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 using the Shelxtl software package [17], [18]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The positions of all hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically (Csp3–H=0.96, Csp2–H=0.93 Å) and included in the structure factor calculations with assigned isotropic displacement parameters but were not refined. The diethyl ether solvent in 2·0.5Et2O was isotropically refined with hydrogen atoms. The [Et4N]+ cation in 3·0.5C6H14 was treated with disorder and anisotropically refined with each site occupancy being 0.5. The hexane molecule in 3·0.5C6H14 was isotropically refined without hydrogen atoms due to disorder. The largest peak in the final difference map had a height of 2.17 e Å−3 for 5 and is in the vicinity of the silver atom. Further details of the data determination, crystal data, and structure refinement parameters are summarized in Table 1.
Crystal data and structure refinement for complexes [Ag3(μ3-Cl)(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1), [Ag3(μ3-Br)(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2]·0.5Et2O (2·0.5Et2O), {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n·0.5C6H14 (3·0.5C6H14), [Et4N]2[(AgCl)2(μ-dppe)] (4), and [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5).
| Complex | 1 | 2·0.5Et2O | 3·0.5C6H14 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formula | C75H66Cl2F6P7Ag3 | C154H142OP12Br8Ag8 | C35H51NP2Br3Ag2 | C42H64N2P2Cl4Ag2 | C54H52P4Cl2Ag2 |
| Formula weight | 1692.58 | 3882.55 | 1003.18 | 1016.43 | 1111.48 |
| Crystal system | Monoclinic | Triclinic | Triclinic | Monoclinic | Triclinic |
| Space group | Cc | P1̅ | P1̅ | P21/n | P1̅ |
| a (Å) | 16.4900(12) | 15.1253(9) | 12.403(5) | 13.77(2) | 10.528(3) |
| b (Å) | 17.0053(13) | 16.5417(10) | 12.504(5) | 9.237(16) | 10.758(3) |
| c (Å) | 27.637(2) | 18.6274(11) | 14.817(6) | 19.09(3) | 12.647(3) |
| α (°) | 90 | 91.930(1) | 65.675(5) | 90 | 65.342(3) |
| β (°) | 94.343(2) | 104.685(1) | 74.843(5) | 97.30(2) | 76.151(4) |
| γ (°) | 90 | 116.740(1) | 85.773(5) | 90 | 71.005(3) |
| V (Å3) | 7727.7(10) | 3966.9(4) | 2019.6(13) | 2409(7) | 1221.9(6) |
| Z | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Dcalcd. (g cm−3) | 1.46 | 1.63 | 1.65 | 1.40 | 1.51 |
| Temperature (K) | 296(2) | 296(2) | 296(2) | 296(2) | 296(2) |
| F(000) (e) | 3400 | 1910 | 994 | 1044 | 564 |
| μ(MoKα ) (mm−1) | 1.0 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| No. of reflections measured | 26057 | 24825 | 12885 | 14177 | 7545 |
| No. of unique reflections | 14221 | 17450 | 9074 | 5479 | 5355 |
| Rint | 0.0198 | 0.0209 | 0.0292 | 0.0814 | 0.0272 |
| No. of observed reflections | 13075 | 10612 | 4053 | 2743 | 3012 |
| No. of parameters | 838 | 824 | 481 | 239 | 280 |
| R1a/wR2b (I>2σ(I)) | 0.0332/0.0925 | 0.0439/0.0827 | 0.0569/0.1023 | 0.0679/0.1117 | 0.0749/0.1522 |
| R1a/wR2b (all data) | 0.0380/0.0965 | 0.0692/0.1217 | 0.0756/0.1417 | 0.0908/0.1763 | 0.0974/0.1854 |
| GoFc | 1.059 | 0.978 | 0.941 | 0.972 | 0.990 |
| Final diff. peaks (max/min) (e Å−3) | +0.64/−0.50 | +0.71/−0.59 | +1.01/−0.50 | +0.67/−0.44 | +2.17/−0.84 |
aR1=Σ||Fo|−|Fc||/Σ|Fo|.
bwR2=[Σw(Fo2−Fc2)2/Σw(Fo2)2]1/2, w=[σ2(Fo2)+(AP)2+BP]−1, where P=(Max(Fo2, 0)+2Fc2)/3.
cGoF=S=[Σw(Fo2−Fc2)2/(nobs−nparam)]1/2.
3 Results and discussion
A summary of the synthetic reactions is presented in Scheme 1. The reaction of AgCl and dppm in a 4:3 ratio in the presence of K[PF6] afforded a typical trinuclear cationic complex [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1). A similar reaction between AgBr and dppm in the presence of [Et4N]Br gave [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2] (2). Both complexes 1 and 2 have a [Ag3(μ3-X)2] (X=Cl, Br) core, which was already observed in the previously known complexes [Ag3(μ3-X)2(μ-dppm)3]X (X=Cl, Br, I) [13], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Treatment of AgBr with dppe in THF-MeCN in the presence of [Et4N]Br gave a novel polymeric complex {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n (3) with a {Ag2(μ-Br)3} core. The reaction of AgCl with dppe or dppp in the presence of [Et4N]Cl resulted in the isolation of a dinuclear anionic complex [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)] (4) with one μ-dppe bridge or a dinuclear neutral complex [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5) with two μ-dppp bridges and a 12-membered ring, respectively. Usually, silver is four-coordinated; the three-coordinated silver atoms in 4 and 5 are relatively rare in silver halide complexes with phosphine ligands [23].

Syntheses of complexes 1–5.
The infrared spectra of all complexes displayed the characteristic ν(P–C) stretching vibration of the dpex ligands at around 500 cm−1. The 31P NMR spectra of 1 and 2 displayed dppm ligand signals at δ −4.13 and −4.78 ppm, respectively, which are comparable to those in similar complexes [Ag3(μ3-X)2(μ-dppm)3]X (X=Cl, Br, I) [13], while the dppe ligands in complexes 3 and 4 exhibited signals at 2.15 and 3.03 ppm, respectively. The dppp ligand in 5 showed a 31P signal at 2.48 ppm. The molecular ions corresponding to [Ag(dppm)]+ and [Ag3(dppm)3]+ with the characteristic isotopic distribution patterns can be observed at m/z=492 and 1476 in the mass spectra of 1 and 2, respectively. Accordingly, the molecular ions corresponding to [Ag2(dppe)]+ and [Ag(dppp)]+ are found at m/z=614 (for 3 and 4) and 520 (for 5) in their mass spectra. The UV/Vis absorption spectra of complexes 2–5 in CH2Cl2 at room temperature are shown in Fig. 1. They are obviously dominated by one intense absorption band at around 265 nm, which may be assigned to a typical metal-to-ligand charge transfer transition [19].

Electronic absorption (UV/Vis) spectra of complexes 2 (red), 3 (green), 4 (blue), and 5 (black) in dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) with 1 cm optical length.
The solid-state structures of complexes 1–5, as shown in Figs. 2–7 , respectively, were determined by X-ray crystallography. Selected bond lengths and angles of the five complexes are listed in Tables 2–6 , respectively. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with space group Cc with Z=4. It consists of an [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3]+ cation and a PF6− anion. The Ag atoms are located in distorted tetrahedral P2Cl2 environments. The average Ag–μ3-Cl and Ag–P bond distances are 2.7179(10) and 2.4450(10) Å, respectively, comparable to those in the complexes [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3]Cl [13] and [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][SbF6] [11]. The Ag···Ag distances range from 3.3489(5) to 3.4490(5) Å, comparable to the sum of the van der Waals radii for silver (3.40 Å) [11]. The Ag–Cl–Ag angles fall in the range of 75.39(3)–78.27(2)°. Complex 2 crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system with space group P1̅ with Z=1. It consists of an [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3]+ cation, an [AgBr2]− anion, and a half diethyl ether solvent molecule. Similar to 1, each Ag atom is coordinated to two bromine atoms and two phosphorus atoms in a distorted tetrahedral geometry in 2. The Ag–μ3-Br distances range from 2.7642(6) to 2.9082(6) Å, obviously longer than the terminal Ag–Br bond in the counteranion [AgBr2]− (2.4217(10) and 2.4409(10) Å). The Ag–P bond distances are in the range 2.4519(13)–2.4645(13) Å, similar to those in 1. The Ag···Ag distances range from 3.1845(7) to 3.5069(5) Å. The Ag–Br–Ag angles fall in the range of 68.22(2)–76.64(2)°, comparable to those in [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3]Br (68.5(1)–74.2(2)°) [24], but slightly acuter than those in 1 (75.39(3)–78.27(2)°) probably due to the halogen effect.
![Fig. 2: A view of the [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3]+ cation in 1.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0193/asset/graphic/j_znb-2016-0193_fig_002.jpg)
A view of the [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3]+ cation in 1.
![Fig. 3: A view of the [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3]+ cation in 2.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0193/asset/graphic/j_znb-2016-0193_fig_003.jpg)
A view of the [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3]+ cation in 2.
![Fig. 4: A view of the [Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]− anion in 3.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0193/asset/graphic/j_znb-2016-0193_fig_004.jpg)
A view of the [Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]− anion in 3.
![Fig. 5: View of a [Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]nn− chain in 3, four units cells long as drawn with Ortep with 40% displacement ellipsoids.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0193/asset/graphic/j_znb-2016-0193_fig_005.jpg)
View of a [Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]nn− chain in 3, four units cells long as drawn with Ortep with 40% displacement ellipsoids.
![Fig. 6: A view of the [(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)]2− anion in 4.](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0193/asset/graphic/j_znb-2016-0193_fig_006.jpg)
A view of the [(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)]2− anion in 4.
![Fig. 7: A perspective view of the structure of [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5).](/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0193/asset/graphic/j_znb-2016-0193_fig_007.jpg)
A perspective view of the structure of [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5).
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for [Ag3(μ3-Cl)(μ-dppm)3][PF6] (1).
| Ag(1)–P(1) | 2.4496(11) | Ag(2)–P(2) | 2.4424(11) |
| Ag(2)–P(3) | 2.4336(9) | Ag(3)–P(4) | 2.4554(11) |
| Ag(3)–P(5) | 2.4447(10) | Ag(1)–P(6) | 2.4441(10) |
| Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 2.7795(10) | Ag(1)–Cl(2) | 2.6636(9) |
| Ag(2)–Cl(1) | 2.7076(9) | Ag(2)–Cl(2) | 2.7815(11) |
| Ag(3)–Cl(1) | 2.6965(10) | Ag(3)–Cl(2) | 2.6786(10) |
| Ag(1)–Ag(3) | 3.3489(5) | ||
| P(6)–Ag(1)–P(1) | 129.46(4) | P(6)–Ag(1)–Cl(2) | 110.43(4) |
| P(1)–Ag(1)–Cl(2) | 109.94(3) | P(6)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 108.84(3) |
| P(1)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 102.03(3) | Cl(2)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 87.49(3) |
| P(6)–Ag(1)–Ag(3) | 87.69(3) | P(1)–Ag(1)–Ag(3) | 142.12(3) |
| Cl(2)–Ag(1)–Ag(3) | 51.38(2) | Cl(1)–Ag(1)–Ag(3) | 51.18(2) |
| P(3)–Ag(2)–P(2) | 127.61(4) | P(3)–Ag(2)–Cl(1) | 117.32(3) |
| P(2)–Ag(2)–Cl(1) | 90.24(3) | P(3)–Ag(2)–Cl(2) | 102.70(3) |
| P(2)–Ag(2)–Cl(2) | 123.86(3) | Cl(1)–Ag(2)–Cl(2) | 86.59(3) |
| P(5)–Ag(3)–P(4) | 129.36(4) | P(5)–Ag(3)–Cl(2) | 112.35(3) |
| P(4)–Ag(3)–Cl(2) | 100.83(3) | P(5)–Ag(3)–Cl(1) | 106.50(3) |
| P(4)–Ag(3)–Cl(1) | 111.43(4) | Cl(2)–Ag(3)–Cl(1) | 88.91(3) |
| P(5)–Ag(3)–Ag(1) | 87.07(3) | P(4)–Ag(3)–Ag(1) | 142.90(3) |
| Cl(2)–Ag(3)–Ag(1) | 50.98(2) | Cl(1)–Ag(3)–Ag(1) | 53.43(2) |
| Ag(3)–Cl(1)–Ag(2) | 78.27(2) | Ag(3)–Cl(1)–Ag(1) | 75.39(3) |
| Ag(2)–Cl(1)–Ag(1) | 77.34(2) | Ag(1)–Cl(2)–Ag(3) | 77.64(3) |
| Ag(1)–Cl(2)–Ag(2) | 78.03(3) | Ag(3)–Cl(2)–Ag(2) | 77.30(3) |
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2]·0.5Et2O (2).
| Ag(1)–P(1) | 2.4639(13) | Ag(1)–P(3) | 2.4645(13) |
| Ag(2)–P(4) | 2.4621(13) | Ag(2)–P(5) | 2.4583(13) |
| Ag(3)–P(2) | 2.4522(12) | Ag(3)–P(6) | 2.4519(12) |
| Ag(1)–Br(1) | 2.9082(6) | Ag(1)–Br(2) | 2.8192(6) |
| Ag(2)–Br(1) | 2.8052(6) | Ag(2)–Br(2) | 2.8366(7) |
| Ag(2)–Ag(3) | 3.1845(6) | Ag(3)–Br(1) | 2.7642(6) |
| Ag(3)–Br(2) | 2.8422(6) | Ag(4)–Br(4) | 2.4217(10) |
| Ag(4)–Br(3) | 2.4409(10) | ||
| P(1)–Ag(1)–P(3) | 132.04(4) | P(1)–Ag(1)–Br(2) | 104.47(3) |
| P(3)–Ag(1)–Br(2) | 106.79(3) | P(1)–Ag(1)–Br(1) | 110.04(3) |
| P(3)–Ag(1)–Br(1) | 104.59(3) | Br(2)–Ag(1)–Br(1) | 91.429(18) |
| P(5)–Ag(2)–P(4) | 124.48(4) | P(5)–Ag(2)–Br(1) | 107.89(4) |
| P(4)–Ag(2)–Br(1) | 108.02(3) | P(5)–Ag(2)–Br(2) | 116.75(4) |
| P(4)–Ag(2)–Br(2) | 101.87(3) | Br(1)–Ag(2)–Br(2) | 93.236(18) |
| P(6)–Ag(3)–P(2) | 122.85(4) | P(6)–Ag(3)–Br(1) | 106.72(3) |
| P(2)–Ag(3)–Br(1) | 107.69(3) | P(6)–Ag(3)–Br(2) | 115.64(3) |
| P(2)–Ag(3)–Br(2) | 105.86(3) | Br(1)–Ag(3)–Br(2) | 93.997(19) |
| Br(4)–Ag(4)–Br(3) | 179.20(4) | Ag(3)–Br(1)–Ag(2) | 69.746(16) |
| Ag(3)–Br(1)–Ag(1) | 74.346(16) | Ag(2)–Br(1)–Ag(1) | 75.705(16) |
| Ag(1)–Br(2)–Ag(2) | 76.639(16) | Ag(1)–Br(2)–Ag(3) | 74.562(16) |
| Ag(2)–Br(2)–Ag(3) | 68.218(16) |
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for {[Et4N][Ag2(μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n·0.5C6H14 (3).
| Ag(1)–P(1) | 2.374(2) | Ag(2)–P(2) | 2.399(2) |
| Ag(1)–Br(1) | 2.7888(13) | Ag(1)–Br(2) | 3.0105(14) |
| Ag(1)–Br(3) | 2.5859(14) | Ag(2)–Br(1) | 2.7959(14) |
| Ag(2)–Br(2) | 2.7012(13) | Ag(2)–Br(3) | 2.8920(15) |
| Ag(1)–Ag(2) | 2.9039(14) | ||
| P(1)–Ag(1)–Br(3) | 138.02(6) | P(1)–Ag(1)–Br(1) | 117.77(6) |
| Br(3)–Ag(1)–Br(1) | 99.62(4) | P(1)–Ag(1)–Br(2) | 100.86(6) |
| Br(3)–Ag(1)–Br(2) | 97.18(4) | Br(1)–Ag(1)–Br(2) | 90.20(4) |
| P(2)–Ag(2)–Br(1) | 123.49(5) | P(2)–Ag(2)–Br(2) | 124.07(5) |
| P(2)–Ag(2)–Br(3) | 115.55(6) | Br(2)–Ag(2)–Br(1) | 96.79(3) |
| Br(1)–Ag(2)–Br(3) | 92.46(4) | Br(2)–Ag(2)–Br(3) | 97.49(4) |
| Ag(1)–Br(1)–Ag(2) | 62.66(3) | Ag(2)–Br(2)–Ag(1) | 60.83(3) |
| Ag(1)–Br(3)–Ag(2) | 63.74(3) |
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)] (4).a
| Ag(1)–P(1) | 2.388(5) | Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 2.551(4) |
| Ag(1)–Cl(2) | 2.438(4) | ||
| P(1)–Ag(1)–Cl(2) | 134.02(11) | P(1)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 114.05(10) |
| Cl(2)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 111.67(15) | C(1)–P(1)–Ag(1) | 113.4(3) |
| C(11)–P(1)–Ag(1) | 115.9(3) | C(21)–P(1)–Ag(1) | 112.3(3) |
aSymmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 −x+2, −y+1, −z.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (deg) for [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] (5).
| Ag(1)–P(1) | 2.4511(19) | Ag(1)–P(2) | 2.4338(19) |
| Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 2.6381(17) | ||
| P(2)–Ag(1)–P(1) | 143.46(6) | P(2)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 112.00(6) |
| P(1)–Ag(1)–Cl(1) | 103.77(6) | C(21)–P(1)–Ag(1) | 115.1(3) |
| C(11)–P(1)–Ag(1) | 121.9(2) | C(1)–P(1)–Ag(1) | 106.3(2) |
| C(41)–P(2)–Ag(1) | 116.9(2) | C(31)–P(2)–Ag(1) | 115.1(2) |
| C(3)–P(2)–Ag(1) | 110.4(2) |
As depicted in Figs. 4 and 5, complex 3 has a polymeric anionic structure with a dinuclear {Ag2(μ-Br)3} core, which is quite novel to the best of our knowledge except for the similar structure of [Ag2(μ-I)3I2]3− [25]. Complex 3 crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system with space group P1̅ with Z=2. Each Ag atom is coordinated to three bridging bromine atoms and one phosphorus atom from dppe in a distorted tetrahedral geometry. The bridging Ag–μ-Br lengths in 3 range from 2.5859(14) to 3.0105(14) Å, which are obviously longer than the terminal Ag–Br bond lengths in 2 (2.4217(10) and 2.4409(10) Å). The Ag–P bond lengths in 3 are 2.374(2) and 2.399(2) Å, slightly shorter than those in 2 (2.4519(13)–2.4645(13) Å). The Ag···Ag distance of 2.9039(14) Å is shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii for silver (3.40 Å) [11], indicating a weak Ag···Ag interaction [26]. The Ag–Br–Ag angles in the {Ag2(μ-Br)3} core fall in the range of 60.83(3)–63.74(3)°, obviously acuter than those in 2 bearing a {Ag3(μ3-Br)2} core (68.22(2)–76.640(2)°).
The solid-state structures of complexes 4 and 5 are shown in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively. Complex 4 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system with space group P21/n with Z=2, while complex 5 crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system with space group P1̅ with Z=1. Complex 4 has a dinuclear anionic structure with one μ-dppe bridge, while 5 is a dinuclear neutral complex with two μ-dppp bridges and a 12-membered ring. Usually, silver is four-coordinated, while in 4 and 5 both the silver atoms adopt three coordination modes: one coordinated to two chlorides and one phosphorus atom from dppe; the other one coordinated to one chloride and two phosphorus atoms from two bridging dppp ligands [27], [28]. The average Ag–Cl bond length of 2.494(4) Å in 4 is shorter than the Ag–Cl bond length in 5 (2.638(2) Å). The Ag–P bond length in 4 is 2.388(5) Å, shorter than the average Ag–P bond length in 5 (av. 2.442(2) Å).
In summary, five silver(I) complexes have been synthesized by the reaction of AgX (X=Cl, Br) with the bidentate phosphine ligands Ph2P(CH2)xPPh2 (x=1–3) by varying the stoichiometry and the reaction conditions. All presented complexes have been structurally characterized along with spectroscopic properties and microanalyses. In the presence of a chloride or a bromide source, the mononuclear and binuclear Ag-dppm species are converted into typical dichloro- or dibromo-bridged trinuclear complexes. The interaction of silver(I) chloride with dppe or dppp in the presence of a chloride source afforded a dinuclear anionic complex [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)] with one μ-dppe bridge or a dinuclear neutral complex [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2] with two μ-dppp bridges and a 12-membered ring, respectively, where the terminal Ag–Cl bonds are kept in both complexes. Further investigations are required to gain insights into the nature of the intermediate species of silver(I) complexes with high nuclearity.
CCDC 1491924–1491928 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (21372007) and Anhui University of Technology (QZ201419).
References
[1] J.-L. Chen, P. Song, J. Liao, H.-R. Wen, R. Hong, Z.-N. Chen, Y. Chi, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2010, 13, 1057.10.1016/j.inoche.2010.06.010Search in Google Scholar
[2] G. A. Bowmaker, Effendy, J. V. Hanna, P. C. Healy, B. W. Skelton, A. H. White, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.1993, 1387.10.1039/DT9930001387Search in Google Scholar
[3] G. A. Bowmaker, Effendy, R. D. Hart, J. D. Kildea, A. H. White, Aust. J. Chem.1997, 50, 653.10.1071/C96039Search in Google Scholar
[4] L. M. Engelhardt, C. Pakawatchai, A. H. White, P. C. Healy, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.1985, 125.10.1039/DT9850000125Search in Google Scholar
[5] D. Affandi, S. J. Berners-Price, Effendy, P. J. Harvey, P. C. Healy, B. E. Ruch, A. H. White, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.1997, 1411.10.1039/a607692kSearch in Google Scholar
[6] C. Michon, F. Medina, F. Capet, P. Roussel, F. Agbossou-Niedercorn, Adv. Synth. Catal.2010, 352, 3293.10.1002/adsc.201000536Search in Google Scholar
[7] P. Teo, L. L. Koh, T. S. Andy Hor, Chem. Commun.2007, 4221.10.1039/b707218jSearch in Google Scholar
[8] P. Comba, C. Katsichtis, B. Nuber, H. Pritzkow, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.1999, 777.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0682(199905)1999:5<777::AID-EJIC777>3.0.CO;2-ASearch in Google Scholar
[9] L. M. Engelhardt, C. Pakawatchai, A. H. White, P. C. Healy, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.1985, 125.10.1039/DT9850000125Search in Google Scholar
[10] Effendy, C. Di Nicola, C. Pettinari, A. Pizzabiocca, B. W. Skelton, N. Somers, A. H. White, Inorg. Chim. Acta2006, 359, 64.10.1016/j.ica.2005.06.012Search in Google Scholar
[11] M.-M. Wu, Y.-H. Qin, Acta Crystallgr.2004, E60, m1185.10.1107/S1600536804018112Search in Google Scholar
[12] Effendy, C. Di Nicola, M. Fianchini, C. Pettinari, B. W. Skelton, N. Somers, A. H. White, Inorg. Chim. Acta2005, 358, 763.10.1016/j.ica.2004.09.047Search in Google Scholar
[13] C. Di Nicola, Effendy, F. Fazaroh, C. Pettinari, B. W. Skelton, N. Somers, A. H. White, Inorg. Chim. Acta2005, 358, 720.10.1016/j.ica.2004.08.007Search in Google Scholar
[14] H.-T. Shi, T. Duan, C. Xu, Q.-F. Zhang, Z. Naturforsch. 2009, 64b, 204.10.1515/znb-2009-0210Search in Google Scholar
[15] Smart and Saint+ for Windows NT (version 6.02a), Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
[16] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1996.Search in Google Scholar
[17] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxtl, Software Reference Manual (version 5.1), Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
[18] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A2008, 64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[19] W.-B. Zhou, Z.-C. Dong, J.-L. Song, H.-Y. Zeng, R. Cao, G.-C. Guo, J.-S. Huang, J. Li, J. Cluster Sci.2002, 13, 119.10.1023/A:1015195130685Search in Google Scholar
[20] A. A. M. Aly, D. Neugebauer, O. Orama, U. Schubert, H. Schmidbaur, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.1978, 17, 125.10.1002/anie.197801251Search in Google Scholar
[21] P. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. Yang, Q. Zhang, Xiamen Daxue Xuebao Ziran Kexue (Chin.) (J. Xiamen Univ., Nat. Sci.)1990, 29, 549.Search in Google Scholar
[22] A. Zavras, G. N. Khairallah, T. U. Connell, J. M. White, A. J. Edwards, P. S. Donnelly, R. A. O’Hair, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2013, 52, 8391.10.1002/anie.201302436Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[23] D. Fernandez-Anca, M. I. Garcia-Seijo, A. Castineiras, M. E. Garcia-Fernandez, Inorg. Chem.2008, 47, 5685.10.1021/ic702419rSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] U. Schubert, D. Neugebauer, A. A. M. Aly, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.1980, 464, 217.10.1002/zaac.19804640121Search in Google Scholar
[25] S. Mishra, E. Jeanneau, S. Daniele, G. Ledoux, Dalton Trans.2008, 6296.10.1039/b809964bSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[26] H. Schmidbaur, A. Schier, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2015, 54, 746.10.1002/anie.201405936Search in Google Scholar
[27] P. A. Perez-Lourido, J. A. Garcia-Vazquez, J. Romero, M. S. Louro, A. Sousa, Q. Chen, Y. Chang, J. Zubieta, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans.1996, 2047.10.1039/DT9960002047Search in Google Scholar
[28] M. C. Blanco, E. J. Fernandez, M. E. Olmos, O. Crespo, A. Laguna, P. G. Jones, Organometallics2002, 21, 2426.10.1021/om020142xSearch in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Regio- and stereoselective 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of C-aryl (or hetaryl)-N-phenylnitrones to monosubstituted ylidene malononitriles and 4-benzylidene-2-phenyloxazol-5(4H)-one
- New adducts of silver(I) halides, AgX (X = Cl, Br), with bidentate phosphine ligands: syntheses and molecular structures of [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6], [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2], {[Et4N][Ag2 (μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n, [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)], and [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2]
- Structural study of the coordination behavior of a tetradentate NO3-donor amino alcohol ligand toward a CdII:HgII mixture
- Preparation of magnesium oxide and magnesium silicate replicas retaining the hierarchical structure of pine wood
- New bioactive compounds from the marine-derived actinomycete Nocardiopsis lucentensis sp. ASMR2
- DMAP as a new efficient catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of condensed phthalazines
- Fused thia-heterocycles via isothiocyanates. Part I. Facile synthesis of some new 1-benzothiopyran- 4-one derivatives
- Ring opening of cyclobutane in 1,3-dimethyl-5-methylenebarbituric acid dimer by various nucleophiles
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- In this Issue
- Regio- and stereoselective 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions of C-aryl (or hetaryl)-N-phenylnitrones to monosubstituted ylidene malononitriles and 4-benzylidene-2-phenyloxazol-5(4H)-one
- New adducts of silver(I) halides, AgX (X = Cl, Br), with bidentate phosphine ligands: syntheses and molecular structures of [Ag3(μ3-Cl)2(μ-dppm)3][PF6], [Ag3(μ3-Br)2(μ-dppm)3][AgBr2], {[Et4N][Ag2 (μ-Br)3(μ-dppe)]}n, [Et4N]2[(AgCl2)2(μ-dppe)], and [(AgCl)2(μ-dppp)2]
- Structural study of the coordination behavior of a tetradentate NO3-donor amino alcohol ligand toward a CdII:HgII mixture
- Preparation of magnesium oxide and magnesium silicate replicas retaining the hierarchical structure of pine wood
- New bioactive compounds from the marine-derived actinomycete Nocardiopsis lucentensis sp. ASMR2
- DMAP as a new efficient catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of condensed phthalazines
- Fused thia-heterocycles via isothiocyanates. Part I. Facile synthesis of some new 1-benzothiopyran- 4-one derivatives
- Ring opening of cyclobutane in 1,3-dimethyl-5-methylenebarbituric acid dimer by various nucleophiles