Home Physical Sciences Syntheses and crystal structures of two new sodium borates [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] and Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4]
Article Publicly Available

Syntheses and crystal structures of two new sodium borates [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] and Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4]

  • Yan-Jing Wang , Ai-Quan Jia , Xing-Shun Chen , Hua-Tian Shi and Qian-Feng Zhang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 11, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Two new sodium borates [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1) and Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2) have been synthesized and their structures have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system space group C2/c with a = 11.118(2), b = 16.442(2), c = 13.572(2) Å, β =112.90(1)°, V = 2285.4(5) Å3, and Z = 4. Compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1̅, with a = 7.4974(9), b = 8.349(2), c = 11.746(2), α = 93.98(1), β = 97.25(1), γ = 101.18(1)°, V = 712.2(2) Å3, and Z = 2. Compound 1 possesses {Na2B5O8(OH)2·3H2O}n chains which form through the connection of the fundamental building blocks (FBBs) [B5O8(OH)2]2– by sharing Na+ ions, while compound 2 has infinite {Na[B7O10(OH)4]}n sheets which form via the connection of the FBBs [B7O10(OH)4]3– by common Na+ ions.

1 Introduction

Borate materials have been a research field with rapid expansion in the past decades, mainly because of their rich structural chemistry and their wide range of applications; in particular, they display remarkable transparency in the ultraviolet (UV) and deep ultraviolet, wide band gaps, excellent thermal stability, and high optical damage thresholds. For some materials, crystals with high optical quality are likely to be good candidates for further deep UV nonlinear optical properties (NLO) materials [1–11]. So far, much interest has been focused on the borate system, especially alkali metal borates, which have produced a large family of compounds with outstanding physical properties, such as LiB3O5 (LBO) [1], CsB3O5 (CBO) [12], KB5O8·4H2O (KB5) [13], and CsLiB6O10 (CLBO) [14]. From a structural chemistry point of view, boron atoms bound by oxygen atoms are found not only in tetrahedral BO4(□) but also in triangular BO3(∆) groups as standard elements, and these basic structures may further link together via common oxygen atoms to create different one-dimensional (1D) chains, 2D sheets, and 3D framework structures [15–17]. Although there are a vast number of different topological arrangements of the polyborate anions, the solid-state and materials chemistry of borates is hard to envisage. Therefore, how to design the alkali metal borate materials with better performance is still the focus of the current research.

During our investigations of such borate materials, we applied hydrothermal methods to synthesize two new sodium borates [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1) and Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2) after optimizing the reaction conditions. Herein, we first describe the syntheses and structural characterizations of these two new sodium borates. Compound 1 possesses the fundamental building blocks (FBBs) [B5O8(OH)2]2–, and compound 2 [B7O10(OH)4]3–. These FBBs are interconnected by Na+ counterions to form chain and sheet structures, respectively. This formation of extended structures of the borate ions by common Na+ ions is not to be confused with the usual way of structurally classifying borates (and silicates) where extended structures result from directly linking the FBBs to form chain, sheet, and 3D structures.

2 Experimental section

2.1 General

All reactants were used as purchased without further purification. IR spectra were measured on a Nicolet FT 1703X spectrophotometer in the 4000–400 cm–1 region using KBr pellets. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a TA-SDT Q600 thermal analyzer under N2 atmosphere with a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. The elemental analysis was carried out on an Elemental Vario EL III CHN elemental analyzer.

2.2 Evaporation synthesis of [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1)

Crystals of [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1) were grown from the aqueous solution of stoichiometric composition by evaporation at nearly 80 °C for 8 h. The raw materials Na2B4O7·10H2O (3.81 g, 10.0 mmol) and H3BO3 (3.09 g, 50.0 mmol) were added to 20 mL distilled water, and the resultant solution was stirred until it became clear. After 3 weeks, large colorless crystals, with smooth faces, were obtained (yield: 60 % based on Na+). – Analysis for B10H16O26Na2: calcd. H 2.75; found H 2.71. – IR (KBr disk, cm–1): ν = 3600–3180 (br), 1750 (m), 1480 (s), 1400 (s), 1206 (s), 1184 (s), 950 (m), 752 (m), 684 (m), 510 (m).

2.3 Solvothermal synthesis of Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2)

A mixture of NaOH (0.040 g, 1.0 mmol), H3BO3 (0.618 g, 10.0 mmol), ethylenediamine (en) (0.20 mL, 3.0 mmol), pyridine (3.0 mL, 37.3 mmol), and H2O (1.0 mL, 55.6 mmol) in a molar ratio of about 1:10:3:37.3:55.6 was sealed in a 23 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor and kept at 200 °C for 7 days and then cooled to room temperature. Colorless block crystals of 2 were recovered by filtration, washed with distilled water, and dried in air (yield: 63 % based on Na+). – Analysis for C2H14N2B7O14Na: calcd. C 6.18, H 3.63, N 7.21; found C 6.15, H 3.60, N 7.25. – IR (KBr disk, cm–1): ν = 3330 (br), 3102 (w), 2640 (w), 2472 (w), 1740 (m), 1500 (s), 1386 (s), 1254 (m), 1206 (s), 1184 (s), 1000 (m), 904 (s), 800 (m), 706 (m), 472 (m).

2.4 Determination of crystal structures

Single crystals of 1 and 2 were carefully selected under an optical microscope and glued to thin glass fibers with epoxy resin. Intensity data were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX 2000 CCD diffractometer using graphite-monochromatized MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) at 293(2) K. The collected frames were processed with the software SAINT [18]. The data were corrected for absorption using the program Sadabs [19]. The structures were solved by Direct Methods and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 using the Shelxtl software package [20, 21]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The crystallographic data and experimental details for structural analyses of 1 and 2 are summarized in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and angles for 1 and 2 are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 1

Crystallographic data and experimental details for [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1) and Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2).

12
Empirical formulaB10H16O26Na2C2H14N2B7O14Na
Formula weight586.21388.81
Crystal systemMonoclinicTriclinic
Space groupC2/cP
a, Å11.118(2)7.4974(9)
b, Å16.442(2)8.349(2)
c, Å13.572(2)11.746(2)
α, deg90.93.983(1)
β, deg112.90(1)97.25(1)
γ, deg90101.18(1)
V, Å32285.4(5)712.16(14)
Z42
Dcalcd., g cm−31.701.81
Temperature, K296(2)296(2)
μ(MoKα), mm−10.200.19
F(000), e1184396
Refl. total/unique/Rint6924/2571/0.01464418/3128/0.0102
R1/wR2 (I > 2.0 σ(I))0.0319/0.08880.0461/0.1220
R1/wR2 (all data)0.0347/0.09160.0514/0.1271
Goodness-of-fit (GoF)1.0501.005
Δρfin (max/min), e Å–30.62/−0.191.21/−0.63
Table 2

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1).

B(1)–O(1)1.472(2)B(1)–O(2)1.469(2)
B(1)–O(3)1.476(2)B(1)–O(4)1.462(2)
B(2)–O(1)1.359(2)B(2)–O(5)1.362(2)
B(2)–O(6)1.375(2)B(3)–O(2)1.353(2)
B(3)–O(6)1.385(2)B(3)–O(7)1.362(2)
B(4)–O(3)1.352(2)B(4)–O(8)1.360(2)
B(4)–O(9)1.396(2)B(5)–O(4)1.348(2)
B(5)–O(9)1.391(2)B(5)–O(10)1.359(2)
Na(1)–O(5)2.268(2)Na(1)–O(1S)2.310(2)
Na(1)–O(6)2.9918(9)Na(2)–O(3S)2.377(2)
Na(2)–O(2S)2.389(2)Na(2)–O(10)2.421(2)
O(4)–B(1)–O(2)110.8(2)O(4)–B(1)–O(1)107.9(1)
O(2)–B(1)–O(1)110.6(1)O(4)–B(1)–O(3)109.8(1)
O(2)–B(1)–O(3)108.3(1)O(1)–B(1)–O(3)109.5(2)
O(1)–B(2)–O(5)122.5(2)O(1)–B(2)–O(6)122.2(2)
O(5)–B(2)–O(6)115.3(2)O(2)–B(3)–O(7)122.1(2)
O(2)–B(3)–O(6)121.0(2)O(7)–B(3)–O(6)117.0(2)
O(3)–B(4)–O(8)122.9(2)O(3)–B(4)–O(9)121.1(2)
O(8)–B(4)–O(9)116.0(2)O(4)–B(5)–O(10)118.3(2)
O(4)–B(5)–O(9)120.6(2)O(10)–B(5)–O(9)121.0(2)
B(2)–O(1)–B(1)122.3(2)B(3)–O(2)–B(1)123.5(2)
B(4)–O(3)–B(1)121.8(1)B(5)–O(4)–B(1)122.6(1)
B(2)–O(6)–B(3)118.6(2)B(5)–O(9)–B(4)118.1(1)
O(5)–Na(1)–O(1S)138.9(1)O(5)–Na(1)–O(6)49.9(1)
O(1S)–Na(1)–O(6)89.2(1)O(3S)–Na(2)–O(2S)89.1(1)
O(3S)–Na(2)–O(10)89.2(1)O(2S)–Na(2)–O(10)84.4(1)
Table 3

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2).

B(1)–O(1)1.491(2)B(1)–O(3)1.513(2)
B(1)–O(6)1.474(2)B(1)–O(8)1.418(2)
B(2)–O(1)1.342(2)B(2)–O(2)1.390(2)
B(2)–O(4)1.362(2)B(3)–O(2)1.392(2)
B(3)–O(3)1.350(2)B(3)–O(5)1.357(2)
B(4)–O(6)1.361(2)B(4)–O(7)1.361(3)
B(4)–O(9)1.372(3)B(5)–O(7)1.478(3)
B(5)–O(8)1.424(2)B(5)–O(10)1.506(2)
B(5)–O(12)1.483(2)B(6)–O(10)1.355(2)
B(6)–O(11)1.381(2)B(6)–O(13)1.369(3)
B(7)–O(11)1.388(3)B(7)–O(12)1.357(3)
B(7)–O(14)1.358(3)
Na(1)–O(5)2.379(2)Na(1)–O(1)2.408(2)
Na(1)–O(4)2.548(2)Na(1)–O(12)2.662(2)
Na(1)–O(13)2.827(2)Na(1)–O(8)2.402(2)
O(8)–B(1)–O(6)114.3(2)O(8)–B(1)–O(1)111.7(2)
O(6)–B(1)–O(1)107.3(2)O(8)–B(1)–O(3)109.2(2)
O(6)–B(1)–O(3)105.8(2)O(1)–B(1)–O(3)108.3(2)
O(1)–B(2)–O(4)119.5(2)O(1)–B(2)–O(2)121.7(2)
O(4)–B(2)–O(2)118.8(2)O(3)–B(3)–O(5)124.4(2)
O(3)–B(3)–O(2)120.4(2)O(5)–B(3)–O(2)115.2(2)
O(7)–B(4)–O(6)122.3(2)O(7)–B(4)–O(9)121.1(2)
O(6)–B(4)–O(9)116.6(2)O(8)–B(5)–O(7)113.5(2)
O(8)–B(5)–O(12)109.7(2)O(7)–B(5)–O(12)108.5(2)
O(8)–B(5)–O(10)110.8(2)O(7)–B(5)–O(10)106.3(2)
O(12)–B(5)–O(10)107.8(2)O(10)–B(6)–O(13)122.0(2)
O(10)–B(6)–O(11)122.1(2)O(13)–B(6)–O(11)116.0(2)
O(12)–B(7)–O(14)117.8(2)O(12)–B(7)–O(11)121.6(2)
O(14)–B(7)–O(11)120.6(2)B(2)–O(1)–B(1)123.4(2)
B(2)–O(2)–B(3)119.3(2)B(3)–O(3)–B(1)124.1(2)
B(4)–O(6)–B(1)121.4(2)B(4)–O(7)–B(5)122.1(2)
B(1)–O(8)–B(5)126.3(2)B(6)–O(10)–B(5)122.0(2)
B(6)–O(11)–B(7)118.0(2)B(7)–O(12)–B(5)121.8(2)
O(1)–Na(1)–O(13)178.0(1)O(8)–Na(1)–O(4)153.6(1)
O(5)–Na(1)–O(12)158.5(1)O(5)–Na(1)–O(8)112.2(1)
O(5)–Na(1)–O(13)82.6(1)O(4)–Na(1)–O(12)104.2(1)

CCDC 1030466 (1) and 1030467 (2) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Synthesis

It seems that the formation of [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1) was greatly influenced by the raw materials and the ratio of Na2B4O7·10H2O to H3BO3. Using NaBO3·4H2O or Na2B4O7·10H2O as only raw materials, the known compound [Na2(H2O)8][B4O5(OH)4] [22] was isolated in our hands. After optimizing the reaction conditions, we found that only when the ratio of Na2B4O7·10H2O to H3BO3 is 1:5, can compound 1 be isolated as the sole product in this reaction system.

In comparison with the preparation process of compound 1, Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2) was successfully obtained by solvothermal methods, the solvent being an essential factor for the formation of this compound. When using water as solvent, the previously reported compound Na6[B4O5(OH)4]3·8H2O [23, 24] was obtained. However, when ethylenediamine (en) acted as structure directing reagent, and pyridine/water were used as co-solvents, compound 2 could be successfully isolated.

3.2 Crystal and molecular structures

3.2.1 The structure of compound 1

The structure of [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1) is built up of Na–O polyhedra and the [B5O8(OH)2]2– polyborate anions. Its asymmetric unit consists of 18 non-hydrogen atoms, including 2 Na, 5 B, and 11 O (see Fig. 1). The [B5O8(OH)2]2– polyborate anion consists of two six-membered rings; each six-membered ring consists of one BO3 triangle (∆), one BO2(OH) triangle (∆), and one common BO4(□) tetrahedron. According to the classification of polyborate anions proposed by Burns, Grice, and Hawthorne [15–17], the shorthand notation for the fundamental building blocks [B5O8(OH)2]2– in [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] is 4∆□:(2∆□)–(2∆□).

Fig. 1: Part of the crystal and molecular structure of compound 1. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40 % probability level.
Fig. 1:

Part of the crystal and molecular structure of compound 1. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40 % probability level.

In 1 there are two kinds of coordinating Na+ ions (see Fig. 2a). Na(1) exhibits a six-fold coordination and coordinates to two oxygen atoms [O(6) and O(6A)] from B–O–B bridges and two oxygen atoms [O(5) and O(5A)] from hydroxyl groups and two oxygen atoms [O(1S) and O(1SA)] from two water molecules, in which the Na–O distances range from 2.3101(12) to 2.9918(9) Å with a mean value of 2.523(1) Å. Na(2) also exhibits a six-fold coordination, with two oxygen atoms [O(10) and O(10A)] from the hydroxyl groups and four oxygen atoms [O(2S), O(2SA), O(3S), and O(3SA)] from water molecules, in which the Na–O distances range from 2.3770(10) to 2.4211(10) Å with a mean value of 2.400(1) Å. The FBBs are connected by sharing Na+ ions forming infinite {Na2B5O8(OH)2·3H2O}n chains (see Fig. 2b). The adjacent chains are further connected with each other through strong O–H···O hydrogen bond interactions, thus leading to a 3D assembly (see Fig. 2c). The parameters of the hydrogen bonds in 1 are given in Table 4.

Fig. 2: (a) The two kinds of coordinated Na+ ions in the crystal structure of compound 1; (b) polyhedral representation of infinite {Na2B5O8(OH)2·3H2O}n chains; (c) polyhedral view down the crystallographic a axis (··· = H bonds).
Fig. 2:

(a) The two kinds of coordinated Na+ ions in the crystal structure of compound 1; (b) polyhedral representation of infinite {Na2B5O8(OH)2·3H2O}n chains; (c) polyhedral view down the crystallographic a axis (··· = H bonds).

Table 4

Hydrogen bond parameters for [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] (1).a

D–H···Ad(D–H) (Å)d(H···A) (Å)d(D···A) (Å)∠(DHA) (deg)
O7–H7···O1S #10.821.922.730(2)170.0
O8–H8···O3S #20.821.982.772(2)161.1
O1S–H1S···O2 #30.92(3)1.93(3)2.849(2)172(2)
O1S–H1S···O3 #30.92(3)2.64(2)3.232(2)122.8(19)
O1S–H2S···O2S #40.88(2)1.86(2)2.718(2)165.3(19)
O2S–H3S···O4 #50.85(2)1.94(2)2.772(2)164.4(19)
O2S–H4S···O8 #60.87(3)1.88(3)2.747(2)178(2)
O3S–H5S···O7 #70.81(2)2.04(2)2.855(2)177(2)
O3S–H6S···O3 #80.88(2)1.90(2)2.776(2)176.8(19)

aSymmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 x − ½, –y+1/2, z − ½; #2 x+½, y+½, z; #3 –x+3/2, –y+½, –z+1; #4 –x+1, –y, –z+1; #5 –x+1, y, –z+½; #6 –x+1, –y, –z; #7 x, –y, z–½; #8 –x+3/2, y − ½, –z+½.

3.2.2 The structure of compound 2

The crystal structure of Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2) consists of an isolated [B7O10(OH)4]3– polyborate anion, a sodium (Na+) ion, and a [NH3CH2CH2NH3]2+ ion (see Fig. 3). The [B7O10(OH)4]3– heptaborate group consists of three six-membered rings in which four trigonal BO2(OH) units, one trigonal BO3 unit, and two tetrahedral BO4 units are linked by vertical oxygen atoms. In other words, BO2(OH) triangles, the BO3 triangle, and the BO4 tetrahedra are linked by oxygen atoms, and the three six-membered rings are linked through their vertices [B(1) and B(5)] to form the heptaborate anion [B7O10(OH)4]3–. In the BO2(OH) triangles, the B–O bond lengths lie from 1.342(2) to 1.390(2) Å, with an average one being 1.367(2) Å; in the BO3 triangle, the B–O bond distances lie from 1.350(2) to 1.392(2) Å, with an average one being 1.369(2) Å; while in those tetrahedral boron atoms, the B–O bond lengths range from 1.418(2) to 1.506(2) Å, and the average bond length is 1.474(2) Å. These compare very well with the corresponding mean bond lengths observed in many hydrated or anhydrous borate compounds [8, 10, 11]. The FBBs’ shorthand notation for [B7O10(OH)4]3– is 7:5∆+2□. The polyborate anion with seven boron atoms is also found in [Cu(en)2][B7O13H3] [25], Cs2B7O9(OH)5 [26], and Rb2B7O9(OH)5 [27].

Fig. 3: Part of the crystal and molecular structure of compound 2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30 % probability level.
Fig. 3:

Part of the crystal and molecular structure of compound 2. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30 % probability level.

In 2, Na+ and [enH2]2+ cations compensate the negative charge of the heptaborate. All sodium ions are octahedrally coordinated, Na exhibits a six-fold coordination and coordinates to three oxygen atoms from B–O–B bridges and three oxygen atoms from hydroxyl, in which the Na–O distances range from 2.379(2) to 2.827(2) Å with a mean value of 2.538(2) Å. It is known that extensive hydrogen bond interactions play an important role in the formation and stability of low-dimensional structures. As is shown in Fig. 4a, The FBBs are connected by sharing Na+ ions forming an infinite {Na[B7O10(OH)4 ]}n sheet-like structure. The [enH2]2+ cations lie in the vacant space of the infinite {Na[B7O10(OH)4]}n sheets and form N–H···O hydrogen bonds with the [B7O10(OH)4]3– groups, thus leading again to a 3D assembly (see Fig. 4b). The parameters of the hydrogen bonds in 2 are presented in Table 5.

Fig. 4: (a) Polyhedral view along the crystallographic c axis; (b) polyhedral view along the a axis (··· = H bonds).
Fig. 4:

(a) Polyhedral view along the crystallographic c axis; (b) polyhedral view along the a axis (··· = H bonds).

Table 5

Hydrogen bond parameters for Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4] (2).a

D–H···Ad(D–H) (Å)d(H···A) (Å)d(D···A) (Å)∠(DHA) (deg)
N1–H1A···O6 #10.892.373.247(3)167.9
N1–H1B···O100.892.583.416(2)156.2
N1–H1C···O14 #20.891.872.739(2)165.4
N2–H2A···O13 #30.891.992.873(2)171.9
N2–H2B···O6 #40.892.052.865(2)151.7
N2–H2C···O14 #50.891.902.778(2)170.5
N2–H2C···O12 #50.892.523.105(2)123.8

aSymmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1 x – 1, y, z; #2 x, y+1, z; #3 –x, –y, –z+1; #4 –x+1, –y+1, –z+1; #5 –x+1, –y, –z+1.

3.3 FT-IR spectroscopy

The FT-IR spectra of compounds 1 and 2 exhibit the following absorption bands. The band at 3600–3200 cm−1 is due to the stretching modes of O–H. The strong bands at around 1500–1200 cm−1 might be the asymmetric and symmetric stretching modes of B–O in BO3. The bands at 850–700 cm−1 are assigned as the asymmetric and symmetric stretching of B–O in BO4. The band at 700–400 cm−1 is a combination of the out-of-plane bending mode of B–O in BO3 and the bending mode of B–O in BO4 [28]. In addition, for compound 2 the stretching vibrations of the N–H and C–H bands are observed at 3102 and 2640 cm−1, respectively.

3.4 TGA analysis

The thermal behaviors of 1 and 2 are displayed in Figs. 5 and 6, respectively. TGA shows that 1 has a one-step weight loss at about 140–470 °C, corresponding to the removal of water (found: 23.55 %; calcd.: 24.57 %). For 2, there is a one-step weight loss of 31.93 % between 100 and 550 °C, which corresponds to the loss of water due to the condensation of hydroxyl groups and [enH2]2+ and can be compared with a calculated value of 25.24 %.

Fig. 5: TG curve of compound 1.
Fig. 5:

TG curve of compound 1.

Fig. 6: TG curve of compound 2.
Fig. 6:

TG curve of compound 2.


Corresponding author: Qian-Feng Zhang, Institute of Molecular Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan, Anhui 243002, P.R. China, Fax: +86-555-2311059, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (90922008).

References

[1] Y. C. Wu, T. Sasaki, A. Yokotani, H. G. Tang, C. T. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett.1993, 62, 2614.10.1063/1.109262Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. L. Pan, Y. C. Wu, P. Z. Fu, G. C. Zhang, Z. H. Li, C. X. Du, C. T Chen, Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 2218.10.1021/cm020878kSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Y. J. Wang, S. L. Pan, X. L. Tian, Z. X. Zhou, G. Liu, J. D. Wang, D. Z. Jia, Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 7800.10.1021/ic900700uSearch in Google Scholar

[4] X. Y. Fan, S. L Pan, X. L. Tian, Z. X. Zhou, G. Liu, J. D. Wang, Inorg. Chem.2009, 48, 4806.Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. D. McMillen, J. W. Kolis, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 6809.Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. C. Wang, N. Ye, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2011, 133, 11458.10.1021/ja204179gSearch in Google Scholar

[7] T. Sasaki, Y. Mori, M. Yoshimura, Opt. Mater. 2004, 26, 421.Search in Google Scholar

[8] X. Yan, S. Y. Luo, Z. S. Lin, J. Y. Yao, R. He, Y. C. Yue, C. T. Chen, Inorg. Chem.2014, 53, 1952.10.1021/ic4029436Search in Google Scholar

[9] F. Li, X. L. Hou, S. L. Pan, X. A. Wang, Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2846.10.1021/cm900560xSearch in Google Scholar

[10] H. T. Zhou, X. L. He, W. N. Zhou, G. H. Zhang, C. L. Zhang, D. H. Huo, J. H. Wang, S. H. Qin, Y. B. Zuo, F. U. Lu, L. J. Liu, X. Y. Wang, C. Y. Liu, D. P. Li, H. X. Zhang, Y. X. Chen, J. Cryst. Growth2011, 318, 613.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.08.036Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. McMillen, C. Heyward, H. Giesber, J. Kolis, J. Solid State Chem.2011, 184, 2966.Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. T. Chen, Y. C. Wu, A. D. Jiang, B. C. Wu, G. M. You, R. K. Li, S. J. Lin, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1989, 6, 616.10.1364/JOSAB.6.000616Search in Google Scholar

[13] C. F. Dewey, W. R. Cook, R. T. Hodgson, J. J. Wynne, Appl. Phys. Lett.1975, 26, 714.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y. Mori, I. Kuroda, S. Nakajima, T. Sasaki, S. Nakai, Appl. Phys. 1995, 34, 296.10.1143/JJAP.34.L296Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. C. Burns, J. D. Grice, F. C. Hawthorne, Can. Mineral.1995, 33, 1131.Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. D. Grice, P. C. Burns, F. C. Hawthorne, Can. Mineral.1999, 37, 731.Search in Google Scholar

[17] E. Cannillo, A. D. Negro, L. Ungaretti, Am. Mineral.1973, 5, 110.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Smart and Saint+ for Windows NT (version 6.02a), Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[20] G. M. Sheldrick, Shelxtl (version 5.1), Software Reference Manual, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[21] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar

[22] H. A. Levy, G. C. Lisenky, Acta Crystallogr. 1978, B34, 3502.10.1107/S0567740878011504Search in Google Scholar

[23] C.Giacovazzo, S. Menchetti, F. Scordari, Am. Mineral.1973, 58, 523.Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. L. Luck, G. Wang, Am. Mineral.2002, 87, 350.10.1016/S0022-3913(02)70071-1Search in Google Scholar

[25] H. Y. Sung, M. M. Wu, I. D. Williams, Inorg. Chem. Common. 2000, 3, 401.10.1016/S1387-7003(00)00086-1Search in Google Scholar

[26] Z. H. Liu, L. Q. Li, W. J. Zhang, Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 1430.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Z. H. Liu, L. Q. Li, Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 1247.10.1021/cg0503200Search in Google Scholar

[28] J. Li, S. P. Xia, S. Y. Gao, Spectrochim. Acta1995, 51A, 519.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-4-16
Accepted: 2015-6-17
Published Online: 2015-12-11
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this Issue
  3. Gas electron diffraction of increased performance through optimization of nozzle, system design and digital control
  4. Syntheses and crystal structures of two new sodium borates [Na2(H2O)3][B5O8(OH)2] and Na[enH2][B7O10(OH)4]
  5. Three new prenylflavonol glycosides from heat-processed Epimediumkoreanum
  6. Nano-SiO2: a heterogeneous and reusable catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of symmetrical and unsymmetrical 3,3-di(aryl)indolin-2-ones under solvent-free conditions
  7. Heterocycles [h]-fused to 4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid. Part XI: Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 4-fluoro-6-oxoimidazo[4,5-h]quinoline-7-carboxylic acids
  8. Synthesis, structure and magnetic properties of a binuclear copper(II) complex constructed by a new coordination mode of the tetrachlorophthalate ligand
  9. Structural and IR-spectroscopic characterization of magnesium acesulfamate
  10. Magnetic properties of RE10TCd3 (RE = Ho, Er, Tm, Lu; T = Fe, Co, Ni, Ru) and 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopic data of Y10FeCd3
  11. Synthesis and characterization of the novel rare earth orthophosphates Y0.5Er0.5PO4 and Y0.5Yb0.5PO4
  12. Glutamyl-glutamate – a tailor-made chelating ligand for the [Be4O]6+ core in basic beryllium complexes and implications on investigations on the origins of chronic beryllium disease
  13. Notes
  14. Improved synthesis and crystal structure of the parent 1,3,5-trisilacyclohexane
  15. 1,3,5-Tris[(trimethylstannyl)ethynyl]- 1,3,5-trimethyl-1,3,5-trisilacyclohexane
  16. Corrigendum
  17. Corrigendum to: Ionic binuclear ferrocenyl compounds containing 1,1,3,3-tetracyanopropenide anions – synthesis, structural characterization and catalytic effects on thermal decomposition of main components of solid propellants
Downloaded on 6.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2015-0072/html
Scroll to top button