Home A Full Analysis Including Both the Static and Dynamic Factors for the Thermal Shift of 7D0 ⟶ 5F0 Fluorescence Line in SrB4O7:Sm2+Crystal
Article Publicly Available

A Full Analysis Including Both the Static and Dynamic Factors for the Thermal Shift of 7D05F0 Fluorescence Line in SrB4O7:Sm2+Crystal

  • Xiao-Xuan Wu EMAIL logo and Min Cheng
Published/Copyright: December 13, 2018

Abstract

A complete formula consisting of the static factor stemming from lattice thermal expansion and the dynamic factor owing to electron-phonon interaction is employed to investigate the thermal shift at near and higher than room temperature for the 7D05F0 fluorescence line in strontium tetraborate (SrB4O7):Sm2+ crystal. The static factor is gained in terms of the pressure dependence of the fluorescence line. With the aid of an approximate processing, the static parameter A (characterising the static factor) and the electron-phonon coupling parameter α (characterising the dynamic factor) are estimated even if there is no observed thermal shift curve from low temperature (<30 K) to near and higher than room temperature. The static factor and dynamic one in SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal give rise to the thermal blue shift and red shift, respectively, and the total or observed thermal shift is due to the emulation between the two factors. The static factor in shift direction is contrary to and in magnitude is slightly greater than the dynamic one for the 7D05F0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal. Thus, the observed very small thermal blue shift (which is not explained up to now) for the studied line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal is rationally explained.

1 Introduction

Strontium tetraborate (SrB4O7) possesses many good properties, such as great nonlinear optical coefficients and high optical damage threshold and can, therefore, be applied as non-linear optical materials [1], [2]. Furthermore, it, doped with Sm2+ ions is widely used in the areas of phosphor, light conversion agent and optical pressure sensor (in particular, at high pressure and high temperature) [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. These applications are closely connected with the spectroscopic properties of SrB4O7:Sm2+. So, many investigations on the spectral properties (including those under pressure and temperature) for SrB4O7:Sm2+were performed [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. For instance, the pressure and temperature dependences of the fluorescence line 7D05F0 (called E0 line) in SrB4O7:Sm2+ at near or higher than room temperature were measured by several groups [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. It is found that the E0 line position varies approximately linearly with the increase of pressure or temperature [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The pressure leads the E0 line to red shift and the pressure coefficient (or pressure dependence) dE0/dP ≈ −5.3 cm−1/GPa [5], [6], [8], [11], whereas the temperature results in a very small blue shift of E0 line and the temperature dependence (or temperature coefficient) dE0/dT ≈ 0.2 × 10−2 cm−1/K [6], [11], [12]. Compared with the R1-line in ruby, a common optical pressure tensor crystal, one can find that the pressure dependence dE/dP (≈−7.8 cm−1/GPa [14]) of R1-line in sign and in magnitude is similar to that of E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+, but its temperature dependence dE/dT (≈−15.1 × 10−2 cm−1/K) [15] around room temperature in magnitude is much larger than that of E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal. Until now, one cannot find the theoretical interpretation and analysis on the very small thermal shift (or temperature dependence) of E0 line for SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal in literature. In fact, differing from the pressure shift (or pressure dependence) caused mainly by the static factor owing to the lattice compression [16], [17], the thermal shift of a spectral line position originates from both the static and dynamic factors, the former comes from the lattice thermal expansion and the latter stems from electron-phonon interaction [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. In this article, we carry out a theoretical analysis and interpretation for the thermal shift of E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal by dint of a full formula consisting of both the static and dynamic factors. Based on this, the static parameter A (characterising the static factor) and the electron-phonon coupling parameter α′ (characterising the dynamic factor) are estimated with an approximate processing even if there is no the observed thermal shift curve from low temperature (<30 K) to near and higher than room temperature. The outcomes are discussed.

2 Calculation

As both the dynamic and static factors of thermal shift from low temperature (T < 30 K) to near and higher than room temperature for a spectral line of transition metal or rare earth ions in crystals are closely connected with the Debye model, to the full formula of thermal shift ΔE(T) including both the static and dynamic factors is derived as [22]

(1)ΔE(T)=(A+α)(TTD)40TD/Tx3ex1dx

where TD is the Debye temperature. The parameters (A + α′) and TD can be evaluated by fitting the experimental or total thermal shift curve from low temperature to near and higher than room temperature with (1) [22], [23] (noting that in many cases, people often take into account only the dynamic factor and so the static parameter A = 0 in (1). Thus, the estimated parameter α is the apparent electron-phonon coupling parameter [15], [19], [24]. For the E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ crystal under investigation, however, one can find only the observed linear thermal shift at near and higher than room temperature and the thermal shift curve from low temperature to near and higher than room temperature is not reported. So, other way should be considered for estimating the value of (A + α′). Here we evaluate the value of (A + α′) by the aid of an approximate processing.

At near and higher than room temperature, x=ω/kT is very little, then ex1+x and so (1) becomes

(2)ΔE(T)13(A+α)TTD

Equation (2) explains why the observed thermal shifts ΔE(T) of E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ and many other spectral lines in crystals at near and higher than room temperature vary roughly linearly with the increasing temperature. So, (2) can be regarded as suitable. Based on (2), we have the observed temperature dependence of line position:

(3)(dEdT)obs.=A+α3TD,A+α=3TD(dEdT)obs.

Similar to the thermal shift ΔE(T), the observed temperature dependence consists of both the static and dynamic factors, i.e.

(4)(dEdT)obs.=(dEdT)st.+(dEdT)dyn.

where the static factor can be computed by means of the pressure dependence (dEdP) of line position, namely,

(5)(dEdT)st.=(dEdP)(dPdlnV)(dlnVdT)=αthβ(dEdP)

in which αth=(1VdVdT) and β=(1VdVdP) are the thermal expansion coefficient and compressibility of the studied system. In consideration of the Gruneisen relation αth/β=rCν/V [25], the ratio αth/β in an impurity centre of crystal is similar to that in the host crystal. Here we have αth ≈ 2.4 × 10−5/K [26] and β ≈ −5.9 × 10−3/GPa [12] for the host SrB4O7 crystal. Thus, from the observed pressure dependence dE0/dP5.3cm1/GPa [5], [6], [8], [11], we have

(6)(dEdT)st.2.2×102cm1/K

hence, from the observed (dEdT)obs.0.2×102cm1/K [6], [11], [12],

(7)(dEdT)dyn.2.0×102cm1/K

The ratio t = A/α′ means the relative importance of static factor. For the E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+, from (1), it can be given as

(8)t=Aα=(dEdT)st./(dEdT)obs.1.1

The Debye temperature of SrB4O7 is 1180 K [27], so, we find from the above values,

(9)A+α=tα+α=α(t+1)=3TD(dEdT)obs.7.1cm1

Then

(10)α71cm1,A78cm1

3 Discussion

It can be seen from (1) to (3) that the positive signs of parameters A, α′ and the temperature dependence (dEdT)j (j = obs., st., dyn.) mean the thermal shift being blue shift, whereas the negative signs of them imply the thermal red shift. For the E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+ studied, the static factor results in the thermal blue shift because of the positive values of A and (dEdT)st., but the dynamic factor gives rise to the thermal red shift owing to the negative values of α′ and (dEdT)dyn.. This point is in accord with the spectral lines of rare earth ions in crystals [23], [28]. In fact, not only the sign, but also the order of magnitude (∼10 cm−1) of the estimated parameters A and α′ in SrB4O7:Sm2+ is almost the same as those of rare earth ions in crystals obtained by fitting the thermal shift curve from low temperature to near and higher than room temperature [23], [28]. Specially, for the same ion Sm2+ in SrFCl crystal, we have the static parameters A ≈ 57, 60 and 51 cm−1, the electron-phonon coupling parameters α′ ≈ −21, −38 and −19 cm−1 for 5D07F0, 5D07F1 and 5D17F0 spectral lines, respectively [23]. They in sign and in order of magnitude are identical with those of E0 line in SrB4O7:Sm2+. So, our evaluated values of A and α′ for SrB4O7:Sm2+ are proper and the thermal shift parameters A and α′ can be acquired by an approximate processing even if only the thermal shifts at near and higher than room temperature are observed.

The observed thermal shift is due to the emulation between the static factor and the dynamic one. As the static factor (characterised by parameter A) in sign is contrary to and magnitude is slightly larger than the dynamic factor (characterised by parameter α′), the observed very small thermal blue shift for the E0 line of SrB4O7:Sm2+ can be understood and explained.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Prof. W. C. Zheng from the Department of Material Science, Sichuan University for useful discussions and help.

References

[1] Y. S. Oseledchik, A. L. Prosvirnin, A. I. Pisarevskiy, V. V. Starshenko, V. V. Osadchuk, et al., Opt. Mater. 4, 669 (1995).10.1016/0925-3467(95)00027-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. Petrov, F. Noach, D. Shen, F. Pan, G. Shen, et al., Opt. Lett. 29, 373 (2004).10.1364/OL.29.000373Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. Kulshreshtha, S. H. Cho, Y. S. Jung, and K. S. Sohn, J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, J86 (2007).10.1149/1.2429039Search in Google Scholar

[4] J. Y. Sun, J. C. Zhu, X. T. Liu, and H. Y. Du, J. Rare Earths 30, 1084 (2012).10.1016/S1002-0721(12)60183-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] F. Datchi, R. Letoullec, and P. Loubeyre, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 5333 (1997).10.1063/1.365025Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Lacam and C. Chateau, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 366 (1989).10.1063/1.343884Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. F. Goncharov, J. M. Zaug, J. C. Crowhurst, and E. Gregoryanz, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 094917 (2005).10.1063/1.1895467Search in Google Scholar

[8] F. Datchi, A. Dewaele, P. Loubeyre, R. Letoullec, Y. LeGodec, et al., High Press. Res. 27, 447 (2007).10.1080/08957950701659593Search in Google Scholar

[9] Q. Jing, Q. Wu, L. Liu, J. A. Xu, Y. Bi, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 113, 023507 (2013).10.1063/1.4774113Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. Zhao, H. Li, Y. Wang, J. Jiang, and Y. He, High Press. Res. 37, 18 (2017).10.1080/08957959.2016.1269899Search in Google Scholar

[11] Q. Jing, Q. Wu, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, et al., High Press. Res. 33, 725 (2013).10.1080/08957959.2013.845665Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. M. Leger, C. Chateau, and A. Lacam, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2351 (1990).10.1063/1.346543Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Solarz, M. Karbowiak, M. Glowacki, M. Berkowski, R. Diduszko, et al., J. Alloys Compd 661, 419 (2016).10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.155Search in Google Scholar

[14] P. R. Wamsley and K. L. Bray, J. Lumin. 59, 11 (1994).10.1016/0022-2313(94)90016-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. P. Vink and A. Meijerink, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 61, 1717 (2000).10.1016/S0022-3697(00)00047-0Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. A. Hernandez-Rodriguez, J. E. Munoz-Santiuste, V. Lavin, A. D. Lozano-Gorrin, P. Rodriguez-Hernandez, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 148, 044201 (2018).10.1063/1.5010150Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] W. C. Zheng, Y. Mei, and H. G. Liu, Physica B 407, 4635 (2012).10.1016/j.physb.2012.09.021Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. A. Kaminskii, Laser Crystals: Their Physics and Properties, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1981.10.1007/978-3-540-34838-2Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Kuznetsov, A. Laisaar, and J. Kikas, Opt. Mater. 32, 1671 (2010).10.1016/j.optmat.2010.04.022Search in Google Scholar

[20] W. C. Zheng, P. Su, and H. G. Liu, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 066103 (2011).10.1063/1.3561488Search in Google Scholar

[21] W. C. Zheng, P. Su, H. G. Liu, and G. Y. Feng, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45, 345305 (2012).10.1088/0022-3727/45/34/345305Search in Google Scholar

[22] W. C. Zheng, B. X. Li, G. Y. Feng, and H. G. Liu, J. Lumin. 138, 214 (2013).10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[23] Y. Mei, H. G. Liu, and W. C. Zheng, Z. Naturforsch. A 73, 657 (2018).10.1515/zna-2018-0134Search in Google Scholar

[24] X. Chen and B. Di Bartolo, J. Lumin. 54, 309 (1993).10.1016/0022-2313(93)90090-ASearch in Google Scholar

[25] M. Kachhava, Solid State Physics, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. K. Filatov, M. G. Krzhizhanovskaya, R. S. Bubnova, A. P. Shablinskii, O. L. Belousova, et al., Struct. Chem. 27, 1663 (2016).10.1007/s11224-016-0810-1Search in Google Scholar

[27] N. V. Moiseev, P. A. Popov, V. D. Solomennik, A. I. Zaitsev, and A. V. Cherepakhin, Inorg. Mater. 48, 504 (2012).10.1134/S0020168512050123Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. X. Li, S. Xian, and D. J. Feng. Optik 165, 50 (2018).10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.03.115Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-09-18
Accepted: 2018-11-25
Published Online: 2018-12-13
Published in Print: 2019-02-25

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2018-0425/html
Scroll to top button