Home Physical Sciences Theoretical Studies of the Spin Hamiltonian Parameters and Local Distortions for Cu2+ in Alkaline Earth Lead Zinc Phosphate Glasses
Article Publicly Available

Theoretical Studies of the Spin Hamiltonian Parameters and Local Distortions for Cu2+ in Alkaline Earth Lead Zinc Phosphate Glasses

  • Bo-Kun Wang , Shao-Yi Wu , Zi-Yi Yuan , Zi-Xuan Liu , Shi-Xin Jiang , Zheng Liu , Zi-Jian Yao , Bao-Hua Teng and Ming-He Wu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 9, 2016

Abstract

The spin Hamiltonian parameters and local structures are theoretically studied for Cu2+-doped alkaline earth lead zinc phosphate (RPPZ, R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba) glasses based on the high-order perturbation calculations for a tetragonally elongated octahedral 3d9 cluster. The relative elongation ratios are found to be ρ≈3.2%, 4.4%, 4.6%, and 3.3% for R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba, respectively, because of the Jahn-Teller effect. The whole decreasing crystal-field strength Dq and orbital reduction factor k from Mg to Sr are ascribed to the weakening electrostatic coulombic interactions and the increasing probability of productivity of nonbridge oxygen (and hence increasing Cu2+–O2− electron cloud admixtures) under PbO addition, respectively, with increasing alkali earth ionic radius. The anomalies (the largest Dq and the next highest k among the systems) for R=Ba are attributed to the cross linkage of this large cation in the network. The overall increasing order (Mg≤Ba<Ca<Sr) of ρ is largely due to the decreasing crystal-field strength Dq and hence the decreasing force constant of the Cu2+–O2− bonds. The present studies would be helpful to understand local structures and the influences on the optical properties of RPPZ glasses containing copper dopants.

1 Introduction

Phosphate glasses are both scientifically and technologically important materials because of unique physical properties superior to conventional silicate and borate glasses, e.g. low glass transition and melting temperatures, high thermal expansion coefficients, good biocompatibility, high refractive indices, and low dispersion [1], [2], [3], [4]. In addition, phosphate glasses have promising applications in fast ion conductors [5], self-cleaning materials for NH3 gas absorption [6], important amorphous biomaterials in tissue engineering [7], [8], neural repair of dental and orthopedic cement [9], controlled release of antimicrobials or drugs [10], optical amplifiers, luminescence fibers, and laser hosts [11]. Importantly, the structural versatility using distinct ion exchanges enables phosphate glasses to modify the glass formulation and broadens the range of application fields [12]. For example, the addition of PbO can remarkably improve chemical durability [13] and shielding performance against high-energy radiations [14]. The addition of widely used dopant ZnO yields zinc phosphate glasses and enhances advantageous applications over original phosphate glasses in LED light sources [15], optical waveguides [16], and photoconducting devices [17]. On the other hand, alkaline earth oxide can act as network modifiers in terms of their field strengths [18] and form alkaline earth lead zinc phosphate (RPPZ, R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba) glasses. In particular, transition-metal dopants (e.g. Cu2+) play a crucial role in the physical properties of the glasses. As a typical system among transition-metal ions and convenient dopants in glasses, Cu2+ (3d9) has a relatively simpler energy level structure with only one ground state and one excited state in ideal octahedra [19] and usually exhibits Jahn-Teller distortions via the vibration interactions [20], [21]. Thus, divalent copper can be taken as an effective probe to demonstrate the local structural properties of the glass systems due to the typical anisotropic (axial) spectroscopic behaviors arising from the significant orbital angular momentum interactions [19]. In general, local structures of impurity Cu2+ (or other transition-metal ions) in glasses can be investigated using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), visible and ultraviolet, infrared, and Raman spectroscopies. Recently, optical and EPR measurements were performed for RPPZ glasses containing copper oxide, and the d-d transition bands and spin Hamiltonian parameters (g factors and hyperfine structure constants) were measured for the impurity Cu2+ [22], with anomalies of d-d transition band and g (i.e. the largest cubic field splitting and the next highest g) for R=Ba. The g factors were calculated from the simple g formulas with various molecular orbital coefficients (α, α′, and β) in the previous work [22]. Nevertheless, the above treatments failed to connect with the local structures of impurity Cu2+, and the hyperfine structure constants have not been theoretically analyzed in a consistent way. In fact, the anomalies of EPR and optical spectra for Cu2+ in RPPZ (particularly R=Ba) glasses would reveal unique mechanisms dissimilar to the conventional phosphate glasses. Moreover, information of the local structures of the copper dopants may be helpful to understand the properties of these systems. Thus, further theoretical studies for the spin Hamiltonian parameters and local structures of the impurity Cu2+ in RPPZ glasses have scientific and practical importance. In this work, the anisotropic g factors and hyperfine structure constants are quantitatively investigated by considering the suitable tetragonal elongation distortions of the octahedral [CuO6]10− clusters because of the Jahn-Teller effect. The whole tendencies of the d-d transition band, the EPR spectra, and their anomalies for R=Ba are discussed in view of the lead addition and cross linkage.

2 Calculations

Cu2+ ions (in the form of CuO dopants) of 0.1 mol% introduced into RPPZ glasses can bring forward the 20RO·59.9P2O5·10Pb3O4·10ZnO·0.1CuO (R=Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba) glass systems [22]. Impurity Cu2+ ions prefer to occupy suitable octahedral sites in the glass networks and form the [CuO6]10− clusters. Because Cu2+ (3d9) is a Jahn-Teller ion with the ground orbital doublet 2Eg under ideal octahedral crystal fields, the [CuO6]10− clusters are subject to the Jahn-Teller effect via the vibrational interactions of the copper-oxygen bonds [7], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. For example, the two Cu2+–O2− bonds can be elongated along the fourfold axis by a relative elongation ratio ρ, which leads to the tetragonally elongated octahedral [CuO6]10− clusters (see Fig. 1). As a result, the original twofold orbital degeneracy of cubic ground state 2Eg is removed, and this level is split into two orbital singlets 2B1g and 2A1g, with the former lying lowest and accounting for the measured positive g anisotropies Δg (=gg) [22], [23]. Then, the original cubic excited orbital triplet 2T2g may be separated into an orbital singlet 2B2g and an orbital doublet 2Eg.

Figure 1: Local structure of the [CuO6]10− clusters in the RPPZ glasses.
Figure 1:

Local structure of the [CuO6]10− clusters in the RPPZ glasses.

2.1 Perturbation Formulas of the Spin Hamiltonian Parameters for Tetragonally Elongated Octahedral 3d9 Clusters

As mentioned previously, EPR measurements for Cu2+ in the RPPZ glasses reveal typical tetragonality of the spin Hamiltonian parameters [22]. To overcome the imperfections of the simple g formulas and various adjustable molecular orbital coefficients in the previous studies [7], [22], [24], [25], [26], the high-order perturbation formulas of g factors and hyperfine structure constants for a tetragonally elongated octahedral 3d9 cluster are adopted in the present calculations here. Thus, we have the following equations [28], [29], [30]:

(1)g=gs+8kζ/E1+kζ2/E22+4kζ2/(E1E2)gsζ2[1/E121/(2E22)]+kζ3(4/E11/E2)/E222kζ3[2/(E12E2)1/(E1E22)]+gsζ3[1/(E1E22)1/(2E23)],g=gs+2kζ/E24kζ2/(E1E2)+kζ2(2/E11/E2)/E2+2gsζ2/E12,+kζ3(2/E11/E2)(1/E2+2/E1)/(2E2)gsζ3[1/(2E12E2)1/(2E1E22)+1/(2E23)],A=P[κ4H/7+(ggs)+3Δg/7],A=P[κ+2H/7+11(ggs)/14]. (1)

Here gs (≈2.0023) is the spin-only value. k is the orbital reduction factor, reflecting the covalency (or impurity-ligand orbital admixtures) of the systems. ζ and P are the spin-orbit coupling coefficient and the dipolar hyperfine structure parameter of the 3d9 ion in the glasses, respectively. κ is the core polarization constant, and H is the reduction factor for the anisotropic hyperfine structure constants because of the axial (tetragonal) distortion [31], [32].

The denominators E1 and E2 denote the energy differences between the ground state 2B1g and the excited states 2B2g and 2Eg, respectively, which can be calculated from the energy matrices for a 3d9 ion under tetragonal symmetry [28], [29], [30]:

(2)E110Dq,E210Dq3Ds+5Dt. (2)

Here Dq is the cubic field parameter, and Ds and Dt are the tetragonal field parameters.

2.2 Tetragonal Field Parameters based on the Superposition Model

Making use of the local geometrical relationship of the tetragonally elongated octahedral [CuO6]10− clusters, the impurity-ligand bonds parallel and perpendicular to the C4 axis can be expressed by the reference distance R and the relative elongation ratio ρ (see Fig. 1):

(3)R=R(1+2ρ),R=R(1ρ). (3)

Using the superposition model [33], [34], [35], [36], the tetragonal field parameters can be determined as follows:

(4)Ds=4A¯2[(1+2ρ)t2(1ρ)t2]/7,Dt=16A¯4[(1+2ρ)t4(1ρ)t4]/21. (4)

Here t2≈3 and t4≈5 are the power law exponents [33]. The relationships A̅4≈(3/4) Dq and A̅2≈12A̅4 [37], [38], [39], [40] have been verified suitable in many systems for 3dn ions in octahedral environments, which are also used here. Thus, the local structures in the vicinity of impurity Cu2+ are quantitatively correlated to the tetragonal field parameters and hence to the spin Hamiltonian parameters (especially the anisotropy Δg) of the systems.

2.3 Calculations of the Spin Hamiltonian Parameters and Local Structures based on the High-Order Perturbation Formulas

In the calculations of the spin Hamiltonian parameters, the cubic field parameters Dq (≈1224.0, 1210.7, 1189.1, and 1236.1 cm−1 [22]) and the orbital reduction factors k (≈0.9115, 0.8967, 0.8864, and 0.9034) are obtained from the optical spectral measurements for Cu2+ in the studied systems and similar oxides [22], [41]. The spin-orbit coupling coefficient ζ and the dipolar hyperfine structure parameter P can be calculated from the free-ion values ζ0 (≈829 cm−1 [42]) and P0 (≈402×10−4 cm−1 [43]) for Cu2+ by multiplying k. From the study of Abragam and Pryce [44], the core polarization constant κ is within the range of 0.26–0.3 for Cu2+ in Tutton’s salts. In view that the magnitude (or average) of hyperfine structure constants exhibits slightly increasing tendency (Mg<Ca<Sr<Ba [22]), similar increasing κ relevant to the isotropic parts of A factors may be expected. Thus, one can reasonably adopt κ≈0.264, 0.265, 0.271, and 0.272 for R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba, respectively. In the light of the tetragonal elongation distortions for Cu2+ in RPPZ glass systems, the reduction factor H can be slightly lower than the ideal value unity for a regular octahedron [31], [32]. From the increasing magnitude (Mg<Ca<Sr<Ba) [22]) of the anisotropy ΔA (=AA) for hyperfine structure constants, one can suitably take H≈0.895, 0.912, 0.915, and 0.935 for R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba, respectively. Thus, there is only one unknown quantity (i.e. the relative elongation ratio ρ) in the formulas of the spin Hamiltonian parameters. Inserting the relevant values into (1) and matching the calculated anisotropies Δg to the experimental data, the optimal relative elongation ratios,

(5)ρ3.2%,4.4%,4.6%, and 3.3%, (5)

are obtained for R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba, respectively. The corresponding spin Hamiltonian parameters (Calc.c) are listed in Table 1.

Table 1:

The g factors and hyperfine structure constants (in 10−4 cm−1) for Cu2+ in the RPPZ glasses.

RggAA
Mg
 Calc.a2.3892.112
 Calc.b2.3922.092
 Calc.c2.4642.100–100.425.2
 Expt. [22]2.4642.095–100.525.2
Ca
 Calc.a2.3662.105
 Calc.b2.3552.092
 Calc.c2.4492.093–108.124.0
 Expt. [22]2.4492.093–108.224.0
Sr
 Calc.a2.3552.104
 Calc.b2.3382.092
 Calc.c2.4472.092–110.821.5
 Expt. [22]2.4472.092–110.022.0
Ba
 Calc.a2.3712.111
 Calc.b2.3682.093
 Calc.c2.4482.097–116.325.2
 Expt. [22]2.4482.097–116.025.0

aCalculations of g factors based on the simple g formulas and the molecular orbital coefficients α, α′, and β of Ref. [22].

bCalculations of g factors based on the simple g formulas and the molecular orbital coefficients α, β, and β1 of Ramadevudu et al. [45].

cCalculations of the spin Hamiltonian parameters in present work based on the high-order perturbation formulas in (1) and the optimal tetragonal elongation ratios ρ in (5).

2.4 Analysis of g Factors based on the Previous Simple g Formulas with Various Molecular Orbital Coefficients

As mentioned before, the treatments of g factors were performed based on the simple g formulas with various molecular orbital coefficients (α, α′, and β) in the previous work [22], with the corresponding theoretical g factors (Calc.a) shown in Table 1. To further examine the covalency of the studied [CuO6]10− clusters in the RPPZ glasses, theoretical analysis is used here on the basis of the more conventional molecular orbital coefficients (α, β, and β1) of Ramadevudu et al. [45]. Here α indicates the in-plane σ-bonding with the dx2y2 orbitals, β describes the out-of-plane π-bonding with the dxz and dyz orbitals, and β1 demonstrates the in-plane π-bonding with the dxy orbitals, respectively; Γσ and Γπ reflect the normalized covalency coefficients of Cu2+–O2− bonds in σ and π planes, respectively [45]. The detailed expressions of these quantities can be expanded in terms of the measured spin Hamiltonian parameters (g, g, and A) as follows [45]:

(6)α2=AP0+(gg)+37(ggs)+0.04,β2=(g/gs1)(ΔExz,yz)ζ0α2,β12=(g/gs1)(ΔExy)4ζ0α2,Γπ=200(1β12)(%),Γσ=200(1S)(1α2)12S(%), (6)

where ΔExz,yz can be calculated as follows [45]:

(7)ΔExz,yz=2K2ζ0/(ggs). (7)

Here S (≈0.076 [45]) is the overlap integral between the copper 3d orbitals and the normalized ligand orbitals, and K (≈0.77 [45]) denotes the covalency factor. For consistency, the free-ion values ζ0 (≈829 cm−1 [42]) and P0 (≈402×10−4 cm−1 [43]) for the calculations of the spin Hamiltonian parameters in Section 2.3, which are slightly different from those (≈828 cm−1 and 360×10−4 cm−1) of the previous works [22], [45], are applied in the analysis of g factors based on the simple g formulas and the molecular orbital coefficients here. Inputting the related experimental data of g, g, A and E1 (=ΔExy) [22], the molecular orbital coefficients and the normalized covalency coefficients as well as the averages χ=(α+β+β1)/3 and Γ=(Γσπ)/2 are obtained and shown in Table 2. The corresponding theoretical g factors (Calc.b) are also collected in Table 1 for comparison.

Table 2:

The molecular orbital coefficients α, β, and β1, the normalized covalency coefficients Γπ and Γσ. and the averages χ (=(α+β+β1)/3) and Γ (=(Γπσ)/2) based on the formulas of Ramadevudu et al. [45] for Cu2+ in the RPPZ glasses.

Rαββ1χΓπ (%)Γσ (%)Γ (%)
Mg0.8920.8240.9560.890214433
Ca0.8930.8220.9130.876374340
Sr0.8950.8200.8900.868444444
Ba0.9050.8170.9180.880353937

3 Discussion

From Table 1, one can find that the theoretical spin Hamiltonian parameters (Calc.c) for Cu2+ in the RPPZ glasses based on the high-order perturbation formulas in (1) and the relative elongation ratios in (5) show good agreement with the measured results. However, the calculated g factors (Calc.a or Calc.b) based on the simple g formulas and the adjusted molecular orbital coefficients (α, α′, and β or α, β, and β1) based on the formulas of Sreehari Sastry and Rupa Venkateswara Rao [22] or Ramadevudu et al. [45] are not so well. Moreover, the local distortions around impurity Cu2+ in the glass systems are also quantitatively obtained. There are several points that may be discussed here.

  1. Except the anomalous increases for R=Ba, both the cubic field parameter Dq [23] and the orbital reduction factor k exhibit overall decreasing tendencies (Mg>Ca>Sr) with increasing alkaline earth ionic radius, consistent with those (Li>Na>K) for the same [CuO6]10− clusters in similar alkali lead tetraborate 90R2B4O7·9PbO·CuO (R=Li, Na, K) glasses [23], [24]. Physically, the overall decreasing Dq may be ascribed to the weakening electrostatic coulombic interactions with increasing alkali or alkaline earth ion radius [24], [25]. The lower Dq values for RPPZ glasses than those (≈1275.1–1302.0 cm−1) for alkali lead tetraborate glasses [25] are attributable to the lower stability of the network and hence weaker Cu2+–O2− bonding in the former. On the other hand, the overall decreasing tendency (Mg>Ca>Sr) of k may be illustrated by the increasing probability of productivity of nonbridge oxygen (NBO) and hence the enhancing Cu2+–O2− electron cloud admixtures with increasing alkali earth ionic radius under PbO addition in the network [7], [26]. Interestingly, the previously mentioned decreasing rule of k from Mg to Sr is in accordance with the whole decreasing rule of χ (=(α+β+β1)/3) of the molecular orbital coefficients and the increasing rule of the average Γ (=(Γπσ)/2) of the normalized covalency coefficients based on (6) and (7) of Ramadevudu et al. [45] (see Tab. 2). Further, both the orders of χ (Mg>Ba>Ca>Sr) and Γ (Mg<Ba<Ca<Sr) actually reveal the order of covalency (Mg<Ba<Ca<Sr) or k (Mg>Ba>Ca>Sr) of the systems. On the other hand, the rough relationship Γπ≤Γσ for Cu2+ in the RPPZ glasses is supported by the previous studies of Sreehari Sastry and Rupa Venkateswara Rao [22] and can be regarded as suitable. Thus, the systems may be treated as dominantly ionic, with the percentage of the covalency of approximately 9%–13%. In addition, the orbital reduction factors k for the present systems are higher than those (≈0.774, 0.762, and 0.756) for the similar 90R2B4O7·9PbO·CuO glasses [23], possibly because of the weaker covalency of in-plane π bonding in phosphate glasses than borate glasses [46].

  2. Despite the previously mentioned overall decreasing tendencies of Dq and k from Mg to Sr, the anomalies are found for R=Ba, i.e. both quantities show the abrupt increases related to SrPPZ, yielding the largest Dq (Ba>Mg>Ca>Sr) and the next highest k (Mg>Ba>Ca>Sr) among the systems. The anomalies can be attributed to the cross linkage of Ba2+ in the network because of its large ionic radius [22]. Ba2+ at 20 mol% may tend to coordinate with more oxygen ions and form dominantly ionic bonding owing to the high ionicity. Thus, the electron cloud admixture (or covalency) can considerably decrease and induce the increases of ionicity and effective charge Qeff of the oxygen ions bonding to both Ba2+ and impurity Cu2+. As a result, the covalency of [CuO6]10− clusters in BaPPZ exhibits a significant decrease and yields the next highest k among the systems, consistent with the next largest χ and the next smallest Γ (see Tab. 2). As for the cubic field parameter, the relationship Dq∝Qeffk based on the point charge model is approximately held for an octahedral cluster [19]. For R=Mg, Ca, and Sr, the effective charge Qeff of ligand oxygen may largely remain unchanged, and thus the decreasing k brings forward the decreasing order (Mg>Ca>Sr) of Dq for the three systems. As regards BaPPZ, however, the increases of both k and Qeff arising from the cross linkage can yield a remarkable increase of Dq and lead to the resultant order Ba>Mg>Ca>Sr of Dq. Finally, the overall increasing order (Mg≤Ba<Ca<Sr) of the relative tetragonal elongation ratio ρ suitably reflects the increasing Jahn-Teller tetragonal elongations via the vibration interactions because of the decreasing crystal-field strength Dq (or force constant of the Cu2+–O2− bonds).

  3. In light of (1), the high k (≈0.9–1) and hence the large ζ as well as the moderate Dq (i.e. the denominator E1) may account for the relatively large magnitudes (averages) of g factors. The moderate local relative elongation ratios ρ (≈3%–5%) for Cu2+ in RPPZ glasses can be illustrated by the measured EPR spectra characterized by the moderate positive anisotropies Δg (≈0.34 [22]). In addition, the moderate ρ due to the Jahn-Teller effect can induce moderate negative Ds and Dt and hence the moderate denominator E2, leading to the relatively larger g (≈2.09 [22]) for the present RPPZ glasses than those (g≈2.04 [23]) with much larger relative elongation ratios (≈18%–30% [23]) for the alkali lead tetraborate glasses. Similar moderate relative tetragonal elongations (≈6.8% and 8.9% [47]) are found for Cu2+ in LiRbB4O7 and NaRbB4O7 glasses. On the other hand, normally merely absolute values were experimentally determined for hyperfine structure constants in EPR measurements [22]. The present calculations and various observed hyperfine structure constants [43] for Cu2+ in oxides reveal that the signs of A and A are negative and positive, respectively. This may be ascribed to the larger negative isotropic terms related to κ than the positive anisotropic ones related to the g-shifts and H [see (1)]. Further, the increasing orders (Mg<Ca<Sr<Ba) of κ and H are suitably responsible for those of the average (=|A+2A|/3) and anisotropy (=|A|−|A|) of the hyperfine structure constants and can be regarded as reasonable in physics.

4 Summary

The spin Hamiltonian parameters and local structures are theoretically investigated for Cu2+ in RPPZ glasses. The relative tetragonal elongation ratios ρ are found to be approximately 3.2%, 4.4%, 4.6%, and 3.3% for R=Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba, respectively, because of the Jahn-Teller effect. The whole decreasing crystal-field strength Dq and orbital reduction factor k from Mg to Sr can be ascribed to the weakening electrostatic coulombic interactions and the increasing probability of productivity of NBO (the enhancing Cu2+–O2− electron cloud admixtures), respectively, under PbO addition with increasing alkali earth ionic radius. The anomalies (i.e. the largest Dq and the next highest k among all the systems) for R=Ba with the abrupt increases related to R=Sr are attributed to the cross linkage of Ba2+ in the network because of its large ionic radius. The overall increasing order (Mg≤Ba<Ca<Sr) of ρ is illustrated by the decreasing crystal-field strength Dq (force constant of the Cu2+–O2− bonds). The present studies would be helpful to understand local structures and the relationships with properties of RPPZ glasses containing copper dopants.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by “the Sichuan Province Academic and Technical Leaders Support Fund” (grant no. Y02028023601032) and “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (grant no. ZYGX2014J136).

References

[1] B. Eraiah and S. G. Bhat, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 68, 581 (2007).10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.01.032Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Marino, S. Arrasmith, L. Gregg, S. Jacobs, G. Chen, et al., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 289, 37 (2001).10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00706-2Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. F. Ismail, M. R. Sahar, and S. K. Ghoshal, Mater. Charact. 111, 177 (2016).10.1016/j.matchar.2015.11.030Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. R. Dousti and R. J. Amjad, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 420, 21 (2015).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[5] X. Xu, Z. Wen, X. Yang, J. Zhang, and Z. Gu, Solid State Ionics 177, 2611 (2006).10.1016/j.ssi.2006.04.010Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Daiko, H. Yajima, T. Kasuga, Y. Daiko, H. Yajima, et al., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 267 (2008).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.05.016Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Cetinkaya Colak and E. Aral, J. Alloys Compd. 509, 4935 (2011).10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.172Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. V. Dorozhkin, Acta Biomater. 6, 4457 (2010).10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.031Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Uo, M. Mizuno, and Y. Kuboki, Biomaterials 19, 2277 (1999).10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00136-7Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. A. Chavez-Pirson, In: Workshop on Specialty Optical Fibers and Their Applications (WSOF-10), International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2010 78390K-1-4.10.1117/12.876525Search in Google Scholar

[11] D. M. Pickup, R. J. Newport, and J. C. Knowles, J. Biomater. Appl. 26, 613 (2012).10.1177/0885328210380761Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] S. Lanfredi, P. S. Saia, R. Lebullenger, and A. C. Hermandes, Solid State Ionics 146, 329 (2002).10.1016/S0167-2738(01)01030-XSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Y. M. Moustafa and A. El-Adawy, Phys. Status Solidi 179a, 83 (2000).10.1002/1521-396X(200005)179:1<83::AID-PSSA83>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. C. Sales and L. A. Boatner, Mater. Lett. 2, 301 (1984).10.1016/0167-577X(84)90038-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. Martínez-Martínez, A. Speghini, M. Bettinelli, C. Falcony, and U. Caldiño, J. Lumin. 129, 1276 (2009).10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.06.013Search in Google Scholar

[16] B. F. Luke, J. W. Jon, T. Neil, T. R. Signo, K. B. Richard, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 112, 023109 (2012).10.1063/1.4739288Search in Google Scholar

[17] Z. A. Talib, W. M. Daud, and E. Z. M. Tarmizi, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69, 1969 (2008).10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.02.005Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. M. Smedskjaer, R. E. Youngman, and J. C. Mauro, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 381, 58 (2013).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.09.019Search in Google Scholar

[19] C. P. Poole, Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques, 2nd ed., Interscience Publishers, New York 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. O. Graham and R. L. White, Phys. Rev. 10b, 4505 (1974).10.1103/PhysRevB.10.4505Search in Google Scholar

[21] Y. V. Yablokov and T. A. Ivanova, Coord. Chem. Rev. 190–192, 1255 (1999).10.1016/S0010-8545(99)00173-3Search in Google Scholar

[22] S. Sreehari Sastry and B. Rupa Venkateswara Rao, Physica 434b, 159 (2014).10.1016/j.physb.2013.11.017Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. Q. Kuang, S. Y. Wu, G. L. Li, and X. F. Hu, Mol. Phys. 113, 698 (2014).10.1080/00268976.2014.969344Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. L. Rao, G. Sivaramaiah, and N. O. Gopal, Physica 349b, 206 (2014).Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. K. Brow and D. R. Tallent, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 222, 396 (1997).10.1016/S0022-3093(97)90142-3Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. L. Pascual, L. Seijo, and Z. Barandiran, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4841 (1995).10.1063/1.470619Search in Google Scholar

[27] R. W. Reynolds, L. A. Boatner, M. M. Abraham, and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. 10b, 3802 (1974).10.1103/PhysRevB.10.3802Search in Google Scholar

[28] S. Y. Wu, H. M. Zhang, P. Xu, and S. X. Zhang, Spectrochim. Acta 75a, 230 (2010).10.1016/j.saa.2009.10.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] M. Q. Kuang, S. Y. Wu, X. F. Hu, and B. T. Song, Z. Naturforsch. 68a, 442 (2013).10.5560/zna.2013-0019Search in Google Scholar

[30] S. Y. Wu, J. S. Yao, H. M. Zhang, and G. D. Lu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 21b, 3250 (2007).10.1142/S0217979207044305Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. T. Barriuso, J. A. Aramburu, and M. Moreno, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 6521 (2002).10.1088/0953-8984/14/25/319Search in Google Scholar

[32] Y. Q. Xu, S. Y. Wu, M. Q. Kuang, X. F. Hu, and C. C. Ding, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 432, 535 (2016).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.11.018Search in Google Scholar

[33] D. J. Newman and B. Ng, Rep. Prog. Phys. 52, 699 (1989).10.1088/0034-4885/52/6/002Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Y. Wu, X. Y. Gao, and H. N. Dong, Mater. Lett. 60, 1319 (2006).10.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.020Search in Google Scholar

[35] J. Z. Lin, S. Y. Wu, Q. Fu, and H. M. Zhang, Mod. Phys. Lett. 21b, 737 (2007).10.1142/S0217984907013006Search in Google Scholar

[36] S. Y. Wu and H. N. Dong, J. Lumin. 119–120, 517 (2006).10.1016/j.jlumin.2006.01.046Search in Google Scholar

[37] Y. X. Hu, S. Y. Wu, and X. F. Wang, Philosoph. Mag. 90, 1391 (2010).10.1080/14786430903369585Search in Google Scholar

[38] H. M. Zhang, S. Y. Wu, M. Q. Kuang, and Z. H. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 73, 846 (2012).10.1016/j.jpcs.2012.02.021Search in Google Scholar

[39] J. Z. Lin, S. Y. Wu, Q. Fu, and G. D. Lu, Z. Naturforsch. 61a, 583 (2006).10.1515/zna-2006-10-1111Search in Google Scholar

[40] H. N. Dong and X. S. Liu, Mol. Phys. 113, 492 (2015).10.1080/00268976.2014.954018Search in Google Scholar

[41] A. S. Chakravarty, Introduction to the Magnetic Properties of Solids, Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York 1980.Search in Google Scholar

[42] J. S. Griffith, The Theory of Transition-Metal Ions, Cambridge University Press, London 1964.Search in Google Scholar

[43] B. R. McGarvey, J. Phys. Chem. 71, 51 (1967).10.1021/j100860a007Search in Google Scholar

[44] A. Abragam and M. H. I. Pryce, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 206a, 164 (1951).Search in Google Scholar

[45] G. Ramadevudu, M. Shareefuddin, N. S. Bai, M. L. Rao, and M. N. Chary, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 278, 205 (2000).10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00255-6Search in Google Scholar

[46] H. Hosono, H. Kawazoe, and T. Kanazawa, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 33, 103 (1979).10.1016/0022-3093(79)90099-1Search in Google Scholar

[47] H. M. Zhang and X. Wan, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 361, 43 (2013).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.10.019Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-5-1
Accepted: 2016-6-15
Published Online: 2016-7-9
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2016-0180/html
Scroll to top button