Abstract
In this work, we consider the (1+1)-dimensional modified improved Boussinesq (IMBq) equation. As the considered equation is of evolution type, no recourse to a Lagrangian formulation is made. However, we showed that by utilising the partial Lagrangian method and multiplier method, one can construct a number of local and nonlocal conservation laws for the IMBq equation. In addition, by using a solitary wave ansatz method, we obtained exact bright soliton solutions for this equation. The parameters of the soliton envelope (amplitude, widths, velocity) were obtained as function of the dependent model coefficients. Note that, it is always useful and desirable to construct exact solutions especially soliton-type envelope for the understanding of most nonlinear physical phenomena.
1 Introduction
The notion of conservation laws plays an important role for the integrability, devoloping numerical methods, and behaviour of solutions for differential equations arising in nonlinear phonomena. A systematic way to determine the conservation laws of partial differential equations (PDEs) is the famous Noether’s theorem. This theorem is linked to the knowledge of a classical Lagrangian [1]. There are differential equations that do not admit of a Lagrangian, e.g. scalar evolution equations. Several methos have been devoloped in the literature, which do not admit of a Lagrangian such as multiplier method, direct method, partial Lagrangian method, and non-local conservation method [2–5].
On the other hand, there is plainly a tendency in the modern nonlinear science community to obtain exact solutions for nonlinear equations. In recent years, many methods were developed for finding exact solutions of nonlinear evolution equations (NEEs) as the tanh−sech method [6, 7], extended tanh method [8, 9], sine−cosine method [10], homogeneous balance method [11, 12], first integral method [13], Jacobi elliptic function method [14], (G′/G)-expansion method [15], exp-function method [16], and F-expansion method [17]. It is well known that wave phenomena of optical fibres and nonlinear dispersive media are modelled by dark-shaped tanhp solutions or by bright-shaped sechp solutions.
Soliton was first discovered in 1834 by John Scott Russell [18], who observed that a canal boat stopping suddenly gave rise to a solitary wave that travelled down the canal for several miles, without breaking up or losing strength. Russell named this phenomenon the “soliton”. A soliton is a special travelling wave that after a collision with another soliton eventually emerges unscathed. Solitons are solutions of PDEs that model phenomena like water waves or waves along a weakly anharmonic mass-spring chain. The soliton has exponential tails, which are the basic character of solitary waves. This property allows the exponential function to describe its solution. The soliton obeys a superposition-like principle: solitons passing through one another emerge unmodified. In addition, theories of dispersion-managed solitons, quasi-linear pulses have also been developed. It is known that dark solitons are more stable in the presence of noise and spreads more slowly in the presence of loss, in the optical communication systems, as compared to bright solitons [19–21].
We consider the following one-dimensional generalised IMBq equation (modified improved Boussinesq equation) [22]:

The generalised IMBq equation governs various physical models like nonlinear wave in weakly dispersive medium (in this case, f(u)=u2 [23–25]) and longitudinal variation wave in elastic rod (f(u)=u3 or f(u)=u5 [26]), etc. For the local or global existence of solution of IMBq equation, see Refs. [27–29], and for the small amplitude solution and scattering, see Refs. [28, 30]. Yang and Wang [31], example of (f(u)=u2) the blowup of solutions is obtained numerically. If we take f(u)=u3, (1) becomes

The article is organised as follows: in Section 2, we present the fundemental operators for the determination of conservation laws. In Section 3, we introduce the partial Lagrangian method and multiplier approach and apply both of them to IMBq equation. In Section 4, we investigate the bright soliton solutions. In last section, we briefly make a summary to the results that we have obtained.
2 Methods to Derive Conservation Laws of (2)
In this section, we implement two distinct methods for obtaining the conserved vectors of (2). The first one is the partial Lagrangian approach, which is developed by Kara and Mahomed [3]. If the standard Lagrangian does not exist or is difficult to find of the considered PDEs, then we write its partial Lagrangian and derive the conservation laws by the partial Noether approach. Omitting the straightforward calculations, we present only the conserved vectors such as

where F(t) and G(x) are arbitrary constants of t and x, respectively.
Secondly, we applied the multiplier approach to (2). For the theoretical aspects and applications of the multiplier approach, one can resort to Refs. [32–35]. Using this method, we find out the four multipliers and four conserved vectors as follows (with the help of [36]):


Thus, using the multiplier method, we obtained one trivial and three nontrivial conservation laws of IMBq equation.
It is well known that in order to obtain the physical meanings of the considered underlying equation, conservation laws are the key instruments. Some well known conservation laws in physics are the conservation of energy, mass (or matter), momentum (linear or angular) and Hamiltonian. For instance, the conservation of energy follows from the time invariance of physical systems. Therefore, in (5),
3 Exact Solutions
3.1 The Bright (Non-topological) Soliton Solution
Using the ansatz method for the bright (non-topological) 1-soliton, solution of (2) is taken to be given by the form [37, 38]

and

Here, λ is the soliton amplitude, v is the soliton velocity, and B is the inverse width of the soliton. The unknown p will be determined during the course of derivation of the solutions of (2). From the ansatz (6), it is possible to obtain necessary derivatives. Then, the obtained derivatives are substituted in (2), and we collect all terms with the same order of sechξ. Then, by equating each coefficient of the resulting polynomial to zero, we obtain a set of algebraic equations:


Finally, solving the system of equations, we can get


Equating the exponents of sechξ leads to

Thus, finally, the 1-soliton solution of (2) is given by

which exists provided that B≠ 0.
Figures 1 and 2 are the profile of a 1-soliton solution of IMBq equation for λ= 1/2, p= 1 and λ= 1, p= 1, respectively.

λ=1 and p=1.

λ=−1 and p=1.
4 Conclusions
In this study, we studied the conservation laws and soliton-type exact solutions of (1+1)-dimensional IMBq equation. The infinitely many nonlocal conservation laws for the considered equation were computed via the partial Noether approach. In addition, the local conservation laws were constructed with the help of the multiplier method and maple GEM package [36]. The multiplier method, when applied to the IMBq equation, gave rise to four multipliers of the form Q(x, t, u), and thus, four local conserved vectors were obtained in each case. The conserved vectors obtained here can be used in reductions and solutions of the underlying equation.
Furthermore, we have derived the exact bright soliton solutions of the IMBq equation. This has been realised by using the solitary wave ansatz method. In view of the analysis, we see that the used method is an efficient method of integrability for constructing exact soliton solutions.
References
[1] E. Noether, Nachr. König. Gesell. Wiss. Göttingen Math.-Phys. Kl. Heft. 2, 235 (1918). [English translation in Transport Theor. Stat. 1, 186 (1971).].Search in Google Scholar
[2] T. Wolf, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 13, 129 (2002).Search in Google Scholar
[3] A. H. Kara and F. M. Mahomed, Nonlinear Dynam. 45, 367 (2006).Search in Google Scholar
[4] R. Naz, F. M. Mahomed, and D. P. Mason, Appl. Math. Comput. 205, 212 (2008).Search in Google Scholar
[5] N. H. Ibragimov, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 333, 311 (2007).Search in Google Scholar
[6] W. Malfliet and W. Hereman, Phys. Scripta 54, 563 (1996).10.1088/0031-8949/54/6/003Search in Google Scholar
[7] A. M. Wazwaz, Appl. Math. Comput. 154, 713 (2004).Search in Google Scholar
[8] S. A. El-Wakil and M. A. Abdou, Chaos, Solitons Fract. 31, 840 (2007).Search in Google Scholar
[9] E. Fan, Phys. Lett. A 277, 212 (2000).10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00725-8Search in Google Scholar
[10] A. Bekir, Phys. Scripta 77, 501 (2008).10.1088/0031-8949/77/04/045008Search in Google Scholar
[11] E. Fan and H. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 246, 403 (1998).10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00547-7Search in Google Scholar
[12] M. L. Wang, Phys. Lett. A 213, 279 (1996).10.1016/0375-9601(96)00103-XSearch in Google Scholar
[13] Z. S. Feng, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 35, 343 (2002).Search in Google Scholar
[14] E. Fan and J. Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 305, 383 (2002).10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01516-5Search in Google Scholar
[15] A. Bekir, Phys. Lett. A 372, 3400 (2008).10.1016/j.physleta.2008.01.057Search in Google Scholar
[16] H. Naher, F. A. Abdullah, and M. A. Akbar, J. Appl. Math. 2012, 575387 (2012).Search in Google Scholar
[17] M. A Abdou, Chaos Solitons Fract. 31, 95 (2007).Search in Google Scholar
[18] J. S. Russell, Report on Waves, Fourteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, York 1844.Search in Google Scholar
[19] S. L. Palacios and J. M. Fernandez-Diaz, Opt. Commun. 178, 457 (2000).Search in Google Scholar
[20] A. Biswas, H. Triki, and M. Labidi, Phys. Wave Phenom. 19, 24 (2011).Search in Google Scholar
[21] A. Bekir and O. Guner, Ocean Eng. 74, 276 (2013).Search in Google Scholar
[22] C. By Yonggeunr and O. Tohru, Proc. R. Soc. A 462, 1949 (2006).10.1098/rspa.2006.1675Search in Google Scholar
[23] V. G. Makhankov, Phys. Lett. C 35, 1 (1978).10.1016/0370-1573(78)90074-1Search in Google Scholar
[24] T. Kano and T. Nishida, Osaka J. Math. 23, 389 (1986).Search in Google Scholar
[25] N. Polat, Z. Naturforsch. 63a, 543 (2008).10.1515/zna-2008-0903Search in Google Scholar
[26] A. Clarkson, R. J. LeVeque, and R. Saxton, Stud. Appl. Math. 75, 95 (1986).Search in Google Scholar
[27] G. Chen, J. Xing, and Z. Yang, Nonlinear Anal. 26, 1255 (1986).Search in Google Scholar
[28] Y. Liu, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 45, 797 (1996).Search in Google Scholar
[29] S. Wang and G. Chen, Nonlinear Anal. 36, 961 (1999).Search in Google Scholar
[30] S. Wang and G. Chen, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 274, 846 (2002).Search in Google Scholar
[31] Z. Yang and X. Wang, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 278, 335 (2003).Search in Google Scholar
[32] P. J. Olver, Application of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York 1993.10.1007/978-1-4612-4350-2Search in Google Scholar
[33] H. Steudel, Zeit Naturforsch. 17A, 129 (1962).10.1515/zna-1962-0204Search in Google Scholar
[34] W.-H. Steeb and W. Strampp, Physica 114A, 95 (1982).10.1016/0378-4371(82)90266-7Search in Google Scholar
[35] S. Steinberg and K. B. Wolf, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 90, 36 (1981).Search in Google Scholar
[36] A. F. Cheviakov, Comput. Phys. Comm. 176, 48 (2007).Search in Google Scholar
[37] H. Triki and A. M. Wazwaz, Phys. Lett. A 373, 2162 (2009).10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.029Search in Google Scholar
[38] A. Bekir and O. Guner, Pramana J. Phys. 81, 203 (2013).Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Unsteady Chemically Reacting Casson Fluid Flow in an Irregular Channel with Convective Boundary
- Peristaltic Transport of Visco-Elasto-Plastic Fluids in a Planar Channel
- Eigenvalue Problem, Spin Systems, Lie Groups, and Parameter Dependence
- Structural, Electronic, Elastic and Thermal Properties of Li2AgSb: First-Principles Calculations
- Exact Solutions of the (2+1)-Dimensional Dirac Oscillator under a Magnetic Field in the Presence of a Minimal Length in the Non-commutative Phase Space
- Multi-soliton Collisions and Bäcklund Transformations for the (2+1)-dimensional Modified Nizhnik–Novikov–Vesselov Equations
- Theoretical and Experimental EPR Study of VO2+-Doped Ammonium Hydrogen Tartrate
- Dynamics of Line Preserving Field Line Motions
- Physical Mechanism for the Phase Invariance in Special Relativity
- Soliton Solutions of Nonlinear and Nonlocal Sine-Gordon Equation Involving Riesz Space Fractional Derivative
- Conservation Laws and Soliton Solutions of the (1+1)-Dimensional Modified Improved Boussinesq Equation
- A Meshless Method Based on Radial Basis and Spline Interpolation for 2-D and 3-D Inhomogeneous Biharmonic BVPs
- Rapid Communication
- Electrical Conductivity of Molten SnCl2 at Temperature as High as 1314 K
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Unsteady Chemically Reacting Casson Fluid Flow in an Irregular Channel with Convective Boundary
- Peristaltic Transport of Visco-Elasto-Plastic Fluids in a Planar Channel
- Eigenvalue Problem, Spin Systems, Lie Groups, and Parameter Dependence
- Structural, Electronic, Elastic and Thermal Properties of Li2AgSb: First-Principles Calculations
- Exact Solutions of the (2+1)-Dimensional Dirac Oscillator under a Magnetic Field in the Presence of a Minimal Length in the Non-commutative Phase Space
- Multi-soliton Collisions and Bäcklund Transformations for the (2+1)-dimensional Modified Nizhnik–Novikov–Vesselov Equations
- Theoretical and Experimental EPR Study of VO2+-Doped Ammonium Hydrogen Tartrate
- Dynamics of Line Preserving Field Line Motions
- Physical Mechanism for the Phase Invariance in Special Relativity
- Soliton Solutions of Nonlinear and Nonlocal Sine-Gordon Equation Involving Riesz Space Fractional Derivative
- Conservation Laws and Soliton Solutions of the (1+1)-Dimensional Modified Improved Boussinesq Equation
- A Meshless Method Based on Radial Basis and Spline Interpolation for 2-D and 3-D Inhomogeneous Biharmonic BVPs
- Rapid Communication
- Electrical Conductivity of Molten SnCl2 at Temperature as High as 1314 K