Abstract
We studied the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of VO2+ ions in ammonium hydrogen tartrate (AHT) single crystals at room temperature. We determined the spin Hamiltonian parameters and the molecular bonding coefficients of the complex both in theoretical and experimental ways. The results indicate that the vanadium ion forms a tetragonally compressed octahedron and has a double bond with one of the oxygens in the axial position. This is the reason why the paramagnetic centre in the host crystal is axially symmetric as in most of the vanadyl ion-containing complexes.
1 Introduction
The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic technique is a useful tool to study the magnetic behaviour, site symmetry, bonding nature, and dynamics of paramagnetic centres. There are many methods to have such centres in the host crystal lattices. One of the methods is doping transition metal ions to the crystal centres [1–4].
Vanadium has an electronic configuration [Ar]3d34s2 and is a stable cation existing in di-, tri-, and tetravalent states in complexes [5–7]. The tetravalent state of the vanadium ion has only one unpaired electron in the ground-state configuration. Usually, in solids or in solutions, vanadium coordinates to five or six oxygens [8]. One of the oxygens is bound to vanadium ion by a strong double covalent bond and forms vanadyl (VO2+) ion. Therefore, most of the complexes having VO2+ ions possess C4v symmetry and show axial symmetry in paramagnetic centres [9].
Some researchers have studied tartrate-containing complexes such as di-sodium tartrate [10] and diammonium d-tartrate [5] doped with VO2+ by EPR spectroscopy in recent years. The title complex in our study, ammonium hydrogen tartrate (AHT) or ammonium bitartrate, is used as baking powder [11]. Some other researchers have studied different physical properties of the AHT such as Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectra [12]; magnetic susceptibility [13]; electrical conductivity [14]; and thermal, optical, and dielectric properties [15]. However, there is no EPR spectroscopic report for the AHT complex in the literature.
One can study the bonding nature and magnetic behaviour of the complex by the EPR method after doping with VO2+ ions. In this study, we tried to identify the dynamics of the paramagnetic centre in AHT complex by using EPR technique. We calculated the spin Hamiltonian parameters and the molecular bonding coefficients of the complex both in theoretical and experimental ways.
2 Experimental
AHT single crystals were grown from a saturated solution of ammonia with tartaric acid in stoichiometric proportion. An aqueous solution of 1 wt% of vanadyl(IV) sulphate was added as dopant to the saturated solution of AHT. After about 3 weeks, colourless single crystals were obtained by using slow evaporation method. The crystal system of AHT is orthorhombic and belongs to the space group P212121 having four molecules per unit cell with the following parameters: a=7.648, b=11.066, and c=7.843 Å [16]. EPR spectra of the AHT:VO2+ single crystal were recorded on a Varian E109 Century series X-band EPR spectrometer. We used a diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (dpph) sample (g=2.0036) to make corrections to the g values.
3 Results and Discussion
We recorded the EPR spectra of the AHT:VO2+ single crystal at room temperature. The nuclear spin of the vanadium is 7/2, and vanadyl ion has a single electron of spin 1/2 in its d orbitals. The interaction between these spins results hyperfine splitting giving an octet in an EPR spectrum [17]. Since there are four molecules in the unit cell of the AHT:VO2+ complex, we can expect 32 peaks in the EPR spectrum. However, the positions of the sites in the complex depending on the crystal planes cause the complex to feel different external magnetic fields. If two of the sites feel the same magnetic field, there will be an octet instead of 16 peaks in the EPR spectrum as if there was a single site. But this time, the intensity of the lines increases twice. Both of the sites have the same g values and same hyperfine splitting constants (A). If two of the sites feel different magnetic fields, there will be 16 peaks having nearly the same g but different A values in the EPR spectrum. In this case, still some of the lines overlap and increase the intensity of the peaks [10].
As a general case, when there is more than one site in a paramagnetic centre, the number of lines in the EPR spectrum increases as well. The sites have nearly the same g values, while A values may change slightly. This is the case for some lines at some orientations overlapping in the spectrum for the AHT:VO2+ complex. Figure 1 shows one of such spectra at an orientation in the bc plane. To determine the principal g and A values of the single crystal, one must take the EPR spectra in all three mutually perpendicular axes. When taking the spectra in one axis, generally one rotates the crystal from 0° to 180° in the external applied magnetic field. It will be very difficult to follow the same line, say for the magnetic spin quantum number m=−7/2, in all spectra for a single axis in anisotropic cases. To handle the problem, we used a simple numerical technique explained in [18]. Figure 2 shows the line positions and fitted curves. One can easily find the g2 values for a specific line with respect to rotation angle in each plane after the fitting process [19].

EPR spectrum of AHT:VO2+ single crystal. The magnetic field is in the bc plane making 10° from the b-axis.

Angular variation of g2 values of AHT:VO2+ single crystal.
Including only electronic Zeeman and hyperfine interactions, one can describe the EPR spectra of the single crystal in terms of the following spin Hamiltonian:

After calculations described in [18], we constructed g and A tensors and diagonalised them to find the principal g and A values. One can find both the results of our work and some other tartrate containing complexes in Table 1.
The principal values of g and A tensors of VO2+ ions observed in different single crystals (Δg = ±0.005 and ΔA = ±5 × 10−4 cm−1).
Complex | Site | g|| | g⊥ | giso | A|| (10−4 cm−1) | A⊥ (10−4 cm−1) | Aiso (10−4 cm−1) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHT | I | 1.941 | 1.992 | 1.975 | 198.0 | 93.58 | 128.4 | This work |
II | 1.946 | 1.990 | 1.975 | 173.2 | 94.34 | 120.6 | This work | |
III | 1.942 | 1.993 | 1.976 | 191.9 | 97.42 | 128.9 | This work | |
IV | 1.946 | 1.990 | 1.975 | 175.7 | 101.4 | 126.2 | This work | |
DADT | I | 1.940 | 1.990 | 1.973 | 197.0 | 79.00 | 118.3 | [5] |
DST | I | 1.894 | 1.984 | 1.954 | 180.2 | 78.00 | 112.2 | [10] |
DADT, diammonium d-tartrate; DST, disodium tartrate.
If we examine Figure 2 carefully, we can see four chemically identical but magnetically not identical sites in the complex. It means that the sites align in different directions in the unit cell of the complex. All sites in the single crystal show nearly axial symmetry as is the case for paramagnetic vanadyl ions in orthorhombic crystal systems. The single-crystal EPR spectra also show that the VO2+ group localises interstitially and make a defection in the host lattice. It coordinates with two bidentate tartrate dianions in the equatorial plane and an aqua molecule in the axial position opposite to the oxide. The proton vacancy in tartrate dianions provides the charge compensation in the complex [10]. The value of the ratio g||/g⊥ is greater than unity and hence indicates the tetragonal distortion of the vanadyl ions in AHT single crystals [20]. The distortion is along V=O direction and removes the degeneracy of the ground state of vanadyl ion with its dxy orbital lying lowest.
The gi (i=||, ⊥) values and the molecular bonding coefficients are related to each other [21]:


where ge (2.0023) is the free electron g factor, and λ is the spin-orbit coupling coefficient for the VO2+ ion. We take λ=170 cm−1 for VO2+ ion [22].
On the other hand, the relation between Ai (i=||, ⊥) values and the molecular bonding coefficients is as follows [21, 22]:


where κ is the Fermi contact term and indicates the 4s orbital mixing with 3dxy orbital of the vanadium. P is the dipolar interaction term between magnetic moments of the unpaired electron and the vanadium nucleus. One can calculate the dipolar interaction term by neglecting second-order effects and using the negative values for Ai [23, 24]:

Using (4) and (5) and eliminating v, we have an expression for

One can find the calculated molecular bonding coefficients in Table 2.
Theoretical and experimental molecular bonding coefficients and the principal values of g and A tensors of VO2+ ions observed in different powder complexes (A and P are in 10−4 cm−1, Δg = ±0.005 and ΔA = ±5 × 10−4 cm−1, κ is the Fermi contact parameter).
Powder complex | g|| | g⊥ | giso | |A||| | |A⊥| | |Aiso| | κ | |P| | γ2 | 1 − γ2 | Ref. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHTa | 1.941 | 1.986 | 1.971 | 189.2 | 76.86 | 114.3 | 0.84 | 131.1 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.48 | 0.30 | 0.52 | This work |
AHTb | 1.944 | 1.980 | 1.968 | 188.6 | 80.94 | 116.8 | 0.95 | 125.2 | 0.67 | 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.33 | 0.33 | This work |
DADT | 1.940 | 1.990 | 1.973 | 189.0 | 70.50 | 110.0 | 0.84 | 121.0 | 0.76 | 0.99 | 0.71 | 0.24 | 0.29 | [5] |
DST | 1.922 | 1.984 | 1.963 | 183.0 | 70.70 | 108.1 | 0.81 | – | – | 0.96 | – | – | – | [10] |
aExperimental, bTheoretical.
Figure 3 shows the powder EPR spectrum of the AHT:VO2+ single crystals and its computer simulation. We measured the g and A values of the powder spectrum. The results are as follows: g||=1.941, g⊥=1.986, A||=192.1×10−4 cm−1, and A⊥=72.86×10−4 cm−1. These results are reasonable and compatible with the single-crystal data.

Experimental and simulated EPR spectrum of AHT:VO2+ powder sample at room temperature.
One can calculate the octahedral field parameter (Dq) and the tetragonal field parameters (Ds and Dt) by fitting the theoretical results of optical absorption and EPR spectra to the experimental results [8]:



We used the theoretical formulas to calculate the tetragonal field parameters as described in [25, 26]. The calculated values for the parameters are Dq=1662, Ds=−1974.5, and Dt=977.6 cm−1. Hence, the theoretical optical absorption energies are Δ⊥=10 811, Δ||=16 620, and Δ=19 630 cm−1.
From perturbation theory, one can derive the equations for the theoretical values of the spin Hamiltonian parameters for 3d1 ions in tetragonal symmetry as [27, 28]:


where k is the orbital reduction factor, and ζ is the spin-orbital coupling parameter. We have ζ ≈ kζ0, where ζ0 ≈ 248 cm−1 for a free V4+ ion [1]. After calculating the g factors theoretically, one can use (4) and (5) to find theoretical A values. Here, again we have P ≈ kP0, where P0 ≈ 172×10−4 cm−1 for a free V4+ ion [29]. Taking
4 Conclusion
We studied the EPR spectra of the vanadyl ions in AHT single crystal. The angular variation in g2 values in the EPR spectra shows that VO2+ ions form four magnetically non-equivalent sites in the unit cell of AHT complex. The paramagnetic centre (VO2+) exhibits axial symmetry in the complex. An octahedral complex with a tetragonal compression shows the relation between the g and A values as follows [1]: g||<g⊥<ge and |A|||>|A⊥|. Since our results suit the case, we can conclude that the paramagnetic centre in AHT single crystal is tetragonally compressed.
Molecular orbital bonding coefficients indicate the bonding nature of the paramagnetic centre with its environment. One can infer from Table 2 that the in-plane σ-bonding of the vanadium ion with the equatorial ligands is 30 % covalent and out-of-plane π-bonding of the vanadium with the oxide is 52 % covalent in the powder sample.
References
[1] A. Abragam and B. Bleaney, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1970.Search in Google Scholar
[2] J. A. Weil, J. R. Bolton, and J. E. Wertz, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Applications, Wiley-Inter Science, New York 1994.Search in Google Scholar
[3] R. Kripal, I. Mishra, S. K. Gupta, and M. Arora, Chem. Phys. Lett. 484, 200 (2010).Search in Google Scholar
[4] E. Bozkurt, B. Karabulut, İ. Kartal, and Y. S. Bozkurt, Chem. Phys. Lett. 477, 65 (2009).Search in Google Scholar
[5] M. Fidan, R. Tapramaz, and Y. Şahin, J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 71, 818 (2010).Search in Google Scholar
[6] B. Natarajan, S. Mithira, S. Deepa, and P. Sambasiva Rao, J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 68, 1995 (2007).Search in Google Scholar
[7] P. A. Angeli Mary and S. Dhanuskodi, Spectrochim. Acta A 57, 2345 (2001).10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00428-0Search in Google Scholar
[8] C. J. Ballhausen and H. B. Gray, Inorg. Chem. 1, 111 (1962).Search in Google Scholar
[9] P. Dwivedi and R. Kripal, Phys. Scripta. 82, 045701 (2010).Search in Google Scholar
[10] B. Karabulut, R. Tapramaz, and F. Köksal, Z. Naturforsch. Pt. A 59, 669 (2004).10.1515/zna-2004-1008Search in Google Scholar
[11] R. J. Lewis, (Ed.), Hawley’s Condensed Chemical, Dictionary, (12th ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York 1993.Search in Google Scholar
[12] P. Kolandaivel and S. Selvasekarapandian, Cryst. Res. Technol. 28, 665 (1993).Search in Google Scholar
[13] M. M. Abdel-Kader, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11, 1007 (1992).Search in Google Scholar
[14] C. C. Desai and A. N. Hanchinal, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 4, 419 (1985).Search in Google Scholar
[15] R. Hanumantharao, S. Kalainathan, G. Bhagavannarayana, and U. Madhusoodanan, Spectrochim. Acta A 103, 388 (2013).10.1016/j.saa.2012.10.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] A. J. Van Bommel and J. M. Bijvoet, Acta Crystallogr. 11, 61 (1958).Search in Google Scholar
[17] B. Karabulut and R. Tapramaz, Z. Naturforsch. Pt. A 54, 370 (1999).10.1515/zna-1999-6-704Search in Google Scholar
[18] B. Karabulut and R. Tapramaz, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 55, 331 (1999).Search in Google Scholar
[19] N. M. Atherton, Electron Spin Resonance: Theory and Applications, Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester, 1973.Search in Google Scholar
[20] B. Karabulut and A. Tufan, Spectrochim. Acta A 65, 285 (2006).10.1016/j.saa.2005.10.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] A. H. Maki and B. R. McGarvey, J. Chem. Phys. 29, 31 (1958).Search in Google Scholar
[22] D. Kivelson and S. K. Lee, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 1896 (1964).Search in Google Scholar
[23] İ. Kartal, B. Karabulut, and E. Bozkurt, Z. Naturforsch. Pt. A 65, 347 (2010).Search in Google Scholar
[24] R. Kripal and P. Singh, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 307, 308 (2006).Search in Google Scholar
[25] H.-M. Zhang, W.-B. Xiao, and X. Wan, Physica B 449, 225 (2014).10.1016/j.physb.2014.05.036Search in Google Scholar
[26] C.-Y. Li and X.-M. Zheng, Acta Phys. Pol. A 125, 73 (2014).10.12693/APhysPolA.125.73Search in Google Scholar
[27] F. Wang, W.-C. Zheng, and H. Lv, Spectrochim. Acta A 71, 513 (2008).10.1016/j.saa.2007.12.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] E. Kalfaoğlu and B. Karabulut, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 1593 (2012).Search in Google Scholar
[29] B. R. McGarvey, J. Phys. Chem. 71, 51 (1967).Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Unsteady Chemically Reacting Casson Fluid Flow in an Irregular Channel with Convective Boundary
- Peristaltic Transport of Visco-Elasto-Plastic Fluids in a Planar Channel
- Eigenvalue Problem, Spin Systems, Lie Groups, and Parameter Dependence
- Structural, Electronic, Elastic and Thermal Properties of Li2AgSb: First-Principles Calculations
- Exact Solutions of the (2+1)-Dimensional Dirac Oscillator under a Magnetic Field in the Presence of a Minimal Length in the Non-commutative Phase Space
- Multi-soliton Collisions and Bäcklund Transformations for the (2+1)-dimensional Modified Nizhnik–Novikov–Vesselov Equations
- Theoretical and Experimental EPR Study of VO2+-Doped Ammonium Hydrogen Tartrate
- Dynamics of Line Preserving Field Line Motions
- Physical Mechanism for the Phase Invariance in Special Relativity
- Soliton Solutions of Nonlinear and Nonlocal Sine-Gordon Equation Involving Riesz Space Fractional Derivative
- Conservation Laws and Soliton Solutions of the (1+1)-Dimensional Modified Improved Boussinesq Equation
- A Meshless Method Based on Radial Basis and Spline Interpolation for 2-D and 3-D Inhomogeneous Biharmonic BVPs
- Rapid Communication
- Electrical Conductivity of Molten SnCl2 at Temperature as High as 1314 K
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Unsteady Chemically Reacting Casson Fluid Flow in an Irregular Channel with Convective Boundary
- Peristaltic Transport of Visco-Elasto-Plastic Fluids in a Planar Channel
- Eigenvalue Problem, Spin Systems, Lie Groups, and Parameter Dependence
- Structural, Electronic, Elastic and Thermal Properties of Li2AgSb: First-Principles Calculations
- Exact Solutions of the (2+1)-Dimensional Dirac Oscillator under a Magnetic Field in the Presence of a Minimal Length in the Non-commutative Phase Space
- Multi-soliton Collisions and Bäcklund Transformations for the (2+1)-dimensional Modified Nizhnik–Novikov–Vesselov Equations
- Theoretical and Experimental EPR Study of VO2+-Doped Ammonium Hydrogen Tartrate
- Dynamics of Line Preserving Field Line Motions
- Physical Mechanism for the Phase Invariance in Special Relativity
- Soliton Solutions of Nonlinear and Nonlocal Sine-Gordon Equation Involving Riesz Space Fractional Derivative
- Conservation Laws and Soliton Solutions of the (1+1)-Dimensional Modified Improved Boussinesq Equation
- A Meshless Method Based on Radial Basis and Spline Interpolation for 2-D and 3-D Inhomogeneous Biharmonic BVPs
- Rapid Communication
- Electrical Conductivity of Molten SnCl2 at Temperature as High as 1314 K