Home Crystal chemistry of the high hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr and the role of water in the extra-framework cations ordering
Article Open Access

Crystal chemistry of the high hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr and the role of water in the extra-framework cations ordering

  • Natalia V. Zubkova EMAIL logo , Nikita V. Chukanov , Igor V. Pekov , Christof Schäfer , Dmitry A. Ksenofontov , Katarzyna Skrzyńska and Dmitry Yu. Pushcharovsky
Published/Copyright: March 12, 2025

Abstract

The crystal structure of the highly hydrous analogue of the K-rich gismondine-Sr from Bellerberg paleovolcano, Eifel Mountains, Germany, was studied by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Electron microprobe analyses (energy-dispersive spectroscopy analyses) provided the empirical formula Sr1.86Ca1.13Ba0.02K1.47Na0.48(Al7.79Fe0.13Si8.08O32.025)·14.97H2O. The mineral is orthorhombic, space group P21212, a = 14.1790(2), b = 10.6062(2), c = 13.8989(2) Å, V = 2090.19(6) Å3 and Z = 2. The crystal structure of the mineral (R = 0.0374 for 4963 unique reflections with I > 2σ(I)) is characterized by the gismondine-type (GIS) framework with ordered Al and Si atoms in tetrahedral sites. Partially ordered extra-framework cations and water molecules fill the cages of the framework. The higher hydration degree increases the ordering of extraframework cations in the structure. The higher hydration degree increases the ordering of extraframework cations in the structure. The phenomenon is discussed in ion-exchanged GIS zeolites as well as natural zeolites of PHI-type structures.

1 Introduction

Zeolites are the most common microporous framework minerals. Aluminosilicate framework of the recently discovered zeolite mineral gismondine-Sr, ideally Sr4(Al8Si8O32)·9H2O, 1 is topologically identical to the frameworks of other zeolites of the gismondine (GIS) family, namely gismondine-Ca, Ca4(Al8Si8O32)·18H2O, 2 , 3 garronite-Ca, NaCa2.5(Al6Si10O32)·14H2O, 4 garronite-Na, Na6(Al6Si10O32)·7–10H2O, 5 gobbinsite, Na5(Al5Si11O32)·12H2O, 6 and amicite, K4Na4(Al8Si8O32)·10H2O. 7 Six aforementioned zeolites reveal different extraframework cations and different Si/Al ratios. Gismondine-Ca, amicite and gismondine-Sr are distinguished from this group by the Si/Al ratio equal to one. 1

A GIS-type structure topology that characterizes these minerals contains double wave-shaped bent chains of alternating SiO4 and AlO4 tetrahedra (a crankshaft configuration) with 4-membered rings. These chains are linked in the framework with a system of channels confined by eight-membered rings. The listed zeolites differ in the order of framework cations and vary in content and distribution of extra-framework components, which may lead to symmetry lowering from tetragonal (garronite-Ca) to orthorhombic (gismondine-Sr, gobbinsite) and monoclinic (gismondine-Ca, amicite, garronite-Na). These zeolites, as well as their synthetic pure sodium analogue, are active ionites under mild conditions, i.e. at low temperatures and low concentrations of exchangeable cations (Ag, Cs, Ba, Li, Na, K, Rb, and Pb) in aqueous solutions. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12

Gismondine-Sr has been described as a new mineral species from the Halamish locality, Hatrurim Complex, Negev Desert, Israel. 1 The empirical formula of the holotype (below, Sample 1) is (Sr2.02Ca1.09Ba0.02K0.72Na0.62)(Al7.91Si8.09O31.85)·9H2O and structural investigation revealed orthorhombic symmetry (B2212). Subsequently, potassium-rich gismondine-Sr with the empirical formula (Sr1.74Ca1.05Ba0.09K1.56Na0.49)(Al7.98Si8.06O32)·9.62H2O and the same space group has been described as a component of a xenolith from the Bellerberg paleovolcano in Germany (below, Sample 2). 13 In the present work, the crystal structure of an unusually highly hydrous and partially cation-ordered, Sr-dominant and K-rich gismondine with the simplified formula Sr2CaK2⎕(Al8Si8O32)·15–16H2O from the Bellerberg paleovolcano (Sample 3) was studied. Our results point out the relationship between hydration degree and extra-framework cation ordering in a zeolite structure.

2 Experimental

2.1 Occurrence and general appearance of the mineral

A highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr studied in this work has been discovered in a calcic xenolith from the southern lava flow of the Bellerberg paleovolcano, East Eifel Mountains, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Earlier, low-hydrous gismondine-Sr from the same xenolith was described. 13 The main primary, high-temperature minerals of the xenolith are wollastonite, åkermanite, gehlenite, larnite, combeite, bredigite, nepheline and leucite. Crystals of low-temperature minerals formed at the hydrothermal stage (the zeolites gismondine-Sr and flörkeite, as well as afwillite, ettringite, members of the tobermorite group, etc.) occur in cavities of the xenolith. The crystals of gismondine-Sr have a pseudo-tetragonal bipyramidal habit (Figure 1a). Some of these crystals might be evidence of dehydration cracks (Figure 1b).

Figure 1: 
Gismondine-Sr (nearly dipyramidal) and flörkeite (tabular) crystals from the Bellerberg paleovolcano. Scanning electron microscopic images, back-scattered electron mode. The field of view widths are 350 μm (a) and 220 μm (b). Photo – Rafał Juroszek.
Figure 1:

Gismondine-Sr (nearly dipyramidal) and flörkeite (tabular) crystals from the Bellerberg paleovolcano. Scanning electron microscopic images, back-scattered electron mode. The field of view widths are 350 μm (a) and 220 μm (b). Photo – Rafał Juroszek.

2.2 Chemical composition

Chemical analyses were carried out using a digital scanning electron microscope Tescan VEGA-II XMU equipped with energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) INCA Energy 450 with semiconducting Si (Li) detector Link INCA Energy at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV, electron current of 190 pA and electron beam diameter of 160–180 nm. Attempts to use WDS mode, with a higher beam current, were unsuccessful because of the instability of the mineral under the electron beam due to partial dehydration. A good agreement was observed between compositional data obtained under these standard conditions and those obtained under more “mild” conditions (with a current lowered to 90–100 pA and electron beam defocused to an area of 30 × 30 μm).

The following standards were used: albite for Na, orthoclase for K, wollastonite for Ca, SrF2 for Sr, BaSO4 for Ba, metallic iron for Fe, and quartz for Si.

The chemical composition of the studied sample (mean of four analyses, wt%) is: Na2O 1.00, K2O 4.61, CaO 4.20, SrO 12.82, BaO 0.20, Al2O3 26.36, Fe2O3 0.69, SiO2 32.22, H2O (calculated by difference) 17.90, total 100. The empirical formula calculated based on 16 Si + Al + Fe atoms per formula unit is Sr1.86Ca1.13Ba0.02K1.47Na0.48(Al7.79Fe0.13Si8.08O32.025)·14.97H2O.

2.3 Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr was carried out at room temperature using an Xcalibur S diffractometer equipped with a CCD detector (MoKα-radiation). More than a hemisphere of three-dimensional data was collected. Data reduction was performed using CrysAlisPro Version 1.171.42.49. 14 The data were corrected for Lorentz factor and polarization effects. The crystal structure was solved by direct methods and refined using the SHELX software package, 15 to R = 0.0374 for 4963 unique reflections with I > 2σ(I) in the frames of orthorhombic space group P21212. The space group B2212 was excluded based on a large number of reflections with I > 3σ(I), which violate systematic absence. The crystal data and the experimental details are presented in Table 1, atom coordinates and displacement parameters in Table 2, and selected interatomic distances in Table 3.

Table 1:

Crystal data, data collection information, and structure refinement details for the highly hydrous analogue of the gismondine-Sr (Sample 3).

Formula Sr1.92Ca1.14K1.34Na0.54(Al8Si8O32)·15.7H2O
Formula weight 1,482.49
Temperature, K 293(2)
Radiation and wavelength, Å MoKα; 0.71073
Crystal system, space group, Z Orthorhombic, P21212, 2
Unit cell dimensions, Å a = 14.1790(2)
b = 10.6062(2)
c = 13.8989(2)
V, Å3 2090.19(6)
Absorption coefficient μ, mm−1 3.267
F 000 1,450
Crystal size, mm3 0.14 × 0.20 × 0.22
Diffractometer Xcalibur S CCD
θ range for data collection, °/Collection mode 2.811–28.282/hemisphere
Reflections collected 18,658
Unique reflections 5,138 (Rint = 0.0375)
Reflections with I > 2σ(I) 4963
Data reduction CrysAlisPro Version 1.171.42.49 14
Structure solution Direct methods
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Number of refined parameters 356
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)] R1 = 0.0374, wR2 = 0.0886
R Indices (all data) R1 = 0.0392, wR2 = 0.0895
GoF 1.134
Largest diff. peak and hole, e/Å3 0.83 and −0.69
Table 2:

Coordinates and equivalent displacement parameters (Ueq, in Å2) of atoms and site occupancy factors (s.o.f.) in the structure of the highly hydrous analogue of the gismondine-Sr (Sample 3).

Site x y z U eq s.o.f.
Sr 0.17746(4) 0.71795(5) −0.15353(4) 0.01565(17) Sr0.964(8)Ca0.036(8)
Ca −0.03945(18) 0.4576(3) 0.40050(17) 0.0159(8) Ca0.478(6)
K1 0.09879(17) −0.0185(3) 0.07214(19) 0.0377(9) K0.687(7)a
K2 −0.0917(4) 0.4755(6) 0.6218(5) 0.0447(19) K0.378(9)a
Si1 0.0 0.0 0.32125(14) 0.0094(4) Si1.00
Si2 0.74085(10) 0.26783(15) 0.08194(10) 0.0083(3) Si1.00
Si3 0.25787(10) −0.23103(14) 0.41203(10) 0.0070(3) Si1.00
Si4 0.0 0.0 0.65273(16) 0.0079(4) Si1.00
Si5 0.0 0.5 0.17347(14) 0.0092(4) Si1.00
Si6 0.0 0.5 −0.15593(15) 0.0064(4) Si1.00
Al1 0.15651(11) 0.01740(15) 0.48940(11) 0.0081(3) Al1.00
Al2 0.15952(11) 0.47709(15) 0.01044(11) 0.0076(3) Al1.00
Al3 0.41677(11) −0.24969(13) 0.24558(11) 0.0069(3) Al1.00
Al4 0.10075(11) −0.25113(15) 0.25082(11) 0.0114(4) Al1.00
O1 0.6433(3) 0.2928(4) 0.1398(3) 0.0131(8) O1.00
O2 0.7296(3) 0.1566(4) 0.0038(3) 0.0112(8) O1.00
O3 0.0912(3) 0.0383(4) 0.3844(3) 0.0179(9) O1.00
O4 0.7673(3) 0.3913(4) 0.0180(3) 0.0133(8) O1.00
O5 0.0902(3) −0.0333(5) 0.5869(3) 0.0225(10) O1.00
O6 0.0185(3) 0.1210(4) 0.7198(3) 0.0198(10) O1.00
O7 0.2409(3) −0.1009(4) 0.4719(3) 0.0126(8) O1.00
O8 0.7108(3) 0.3385(4) 0.4879(3) 0.0167(9) O1.00
O9 0.3391(3) 0.8002(4) 0.3338(3) 0.0179(9) O1.00
O10 −0.0862(3) 0.5500(4) 0.1076(3) 0.0171(9) O1.00
O11 0.0035(3) 0.3737(4) −0.2232(3) 0.0107(8) O1.00
O12 −0.1760(3) 0.2317(5) 0.1554(3) 0.0269(10) O1.00
O13 −0.1613(3) 0.2738(4) 0.3597(3) 0.0134(8) O1.00
O14 0.0952(3) 0.5109(4) −0.0932(3) 0.0124(8) O1.00
O15 −0.0321(3) 0.3875(4) 0.2445(3) 0.0188(9) O1.00
O16 0.0269(3) −0.1190(4) 0.2529(3) 0.0152(8) O1.00
Ow1 0.0122(5) 0.2906(10) 0.4717(5) 0.077(3) O1.00
Ow2 0.2501(3) 0.5226(4) −0.2441(3) 0.0239(10) O1.00
Ow3 −0.1679(4) 0.2586(5) 0.6548(4) 0.0447(15) O1.00
Ow4 0.6461(4) 0.2653(6) −0.1880(5) 0.062(2) O1.00
Ow5A −0.0269(10) 0.2384(13) −0.0216(10) 0.036(3) O0.50
Ow5B −0.0454(10) 0.1865(15) −0.0561(11) 0.044(4) O0.50
Ow6A −0.1168(14) 0.506(2) 0.4365(15) 0.0264(17) O0.25
Ow6B −0.1687(7) 0.5781(9) 0.3562(7) 0.0264(17) O0.50
Ow6C −0.1296(15) 0.544(2) 0.3969(16) 0.0264(17) O0.25
Ow7 −0.0767(9) 0.4678(12) 0.5702(10) 0.035(3) O0.50
Ow8A 0.2001(7) −0.0478(8) −0.1989(6) 0.0200(19) O0.50
Ow8B 0.1170(10) −0.0576(11) −0.1422(11) 0.056(4) O0.50
  1. aK1 and K2 sites are assumed to be partly filled according to the refined occupancy factors in the following way: K0.45Ca0.05(H2O)0.350.15 (K1) [eref 13.05, ecalc 13.05] and Na0.27K0.220.51 (K2) [eref 14.36, ecalc 14.3], where ⎕ is vacancy.

Table 3:

Selected interatomic distances (Å) in the structure of the highly hydrous analogue of the gismondine-Sr (Sample 3).

Sr – Ow5B 2.523(13) K2 – Ow7 2.564(13) Si6 – O14 1.611(4) × 2
  -Ow8B 2.535(12)    -Ow3 2.583(9)     -O11 1.635(4) × 2
  -Ow4 2.553(5)    -Ow6A 2.62(2) <Si6-O> 1.62
  -Ow8A 2.584(8)    -O9 2.647(8)
  -O14 2.624(4)    -O11 2.762(7) Al1 – O5 1.736(5)
  -Ow2 2.634(4)    -Ow2 2.918(8)     -O8 1.740(4)
  -Ow3 2.678(6)    -O11 2.960(8)     -O3 1.743(4)
  -O4 2.764(4)    -O7 3.017(7)     -O7 1.751(4)
  -Ow5A 2.852(14)    -Ow1 3.220(11) <Al1-O> 1.743
  -O2 2.879(4)    -Ow6C 3.25(2)
  -O11 2.910(4) <K2-O> 2.85 Al2 – O10 1.728(4)
<Sr-O> 2.69     -O4 1.742(4)
Si1 – O3 1.615(4) × 2     -O14 1.742(4)
Ca – Ow1 2.157(11)    -O16 1.625(4) × 2     -O2 1.743(4)
   -O15 2.295(5) <Si1-O> 1.620 <Al2-O> 1.739
   -Ow6A 2.30(2)
   -Ow6B 2.318(10) Si2 – O12 1.607(4) Al3 – O6 1.719(4)
   -Ow6C 2.40(2)    -O2 1.612(4)     -O9 1.730(4)
   -Ow7 2.420(14)    -O1 1.622(4)     -O11 1.756(4)
   -O13 2.666(5)    -O4 1.627(4)     -O1 1.760(4)
   -Ow1 2.875(11) <Si2-O> 1.617 <Al3-O> 1.741
  -O15 2.904(5)
<Ca-O> 2.48 Si3 – O8 1.615(4) Al4 – O12 1.714(4)
   -O13 1.615(4)     -O15 1.746(4)
K1 – Ow5B 2.631(15)    -O9 1.619(4)     -O16 1.750(4)
   -O12 2.766(6)    -O7 1.629(4)     -O13 1.756(4)
   -Ow5A 2.859(14) <Si3-O> 1.620 <Al4-O> 1.742
   -O16 2.914(5)
   -O2 2.994(5) Si4 – O6 1.608(4) × 2
   -O4 3.016(5)     -O5 1.611(4) × 2
   -Ow8B 3.019(15) <Si4-O> 1.610
   -Ow4 3.203(9)
   -Ow2 3.239(5) Si5 – O15 1.614(4) × 2
<K1-O> 2.96     -O10 1.617(4) × 2
<Si5-O> 1.616

3 Results

The crystal structure of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr is characterized by the GIS type framework, which is built by doubly connected chains of four-membered rings [1 and references therein]. It contains two secondary building units (SBU), namely four- and eight-membered rings of tetrahedra. 16 The four-membered rings are connected by sharing oxygen atoms, forming a double crankshaft chain. There are two systems of double crankshaft chains that create eight-membered rings forming channels. Cages hosting extra-framework cations and water molecules are formed at the intersections of the mutually perpendicular double crankshaft chains. A review of crystallographic features of the zeolites with GIS structure type is extensively reported in ref. 1]. In the structure of the studied mineral, Al and Si atoms are highly ordered at T sites, which is unambiguously proved by T–O distances (the averaged T(Si)–O distances vary from 1.610 to 1.623 Å and the T(Al)–O distances are in the range from 1.739 to 1.743 Å). Four extra-framework cation sites were found. The Sr1 site was refined as Sr versus Ca giving the composition Sr0.964Ca0.036. The Ca2 site is split over a two-fold axis and occupied by Ca in 48 %, whereas two K sites, K1 and K2, showed the site occupancy factors of 0.687(7) and 0.378(9) for the K scattering curve, respectively, and were assumed to be partly filled in the following way: K0.45Ca0.05(H2O)0.350.15 (K1) [eref 13.05, ecalc 13.05] and Na0.27K0.220.51 (K2) [eref 14.36, ecalc 14.3], where ⎕ is vacancy.

Minor Ba impurities may occur at the Sr, K1, and K2 sites. The remaining electron density on the difference Fourier synthesis was assigned to fully occupied (Ow1–Ow4) and partially occupied (Ow5a, Ow5b, Ow6a, Ow6b, Ow6c, Ow7, Ow8a, and Ow8b) sites of water molecules. The refinement resulted in the following formula obtained from the structure data: Sr1.92Ca1.14K1.34Na0.54(Al8Si8O32)·15.7H2O (Z = 2) that is in good agreement with chemical composition data. The crystal chemical formula is: (Sr0.96Ca0.04)2(Ca0.480.02)2(K0.45Ca0.05(H2O)0.350.15)2 (⎕0.51Na0.27K0.22)2(Al8Si8O32)·15H2O.

4 Discussion

Chemically and structurally, the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr is close to the recently reported holotype gismondine-Sr from Hatrurim Complex, 1 and gismondine-Sr from the Bellerberg paleovolcano studied in ref. 13] (Table 4). A significant difference between these samples is in water content, which is considerably higher in the mineral studied in the present work. This results in the larger unit cell of the highly hydrous analogue of the gismondine-Sr in comparison with gismondine-Sr (V = 2090.19(6) Å3) for the highly hydrous analogue of the gismondine-Sr from Bellerberg paleovolcano (Sample 3), 2023.44(4) Å3 for gismondine-Sr from Israel (Sample 1) and 2013.73(5) Å3 for gismondine-Sr from Bellerberg paleovolcano (Sample 2). Structural differences between gismondine-Sr samples studied earlier and their highly hydrous analogue studied in this work are related to the tilting of the framework tetrahedra as well as the distribution and ordering of extra-framework cations. This leads to different space groups (B2212 for the former and P21212 for the latter). The comparison of tetrahedral frameworks of gismondine-Sr and its highly hydrous analogue is shown in Figure 2.

Table 4:

Comparative data for gismondine-Sr (Samples 1 and 2) and its highly hydrous analogue (Sample 3).

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3
Empirical formula (Sr2.02Ca1.09Ba0.02K0.72Na0.62) (Sr1.74Ca1.05Ba0.09K1.56Na0.49) (Sr1.86Ca1.13Ba0.02K1.47Na0.48)
(Al7.91Si8.09O31.85)·9H2O (Al7.98Si8.06O32)·9.62H2O (Al7.79Fe0.13Si8.08O32.025)·14.97H2O
Simplified formula (Sr,Ca,K,Na)4.5(Al8Si8O32)·9H2O (Sr,K,Ca,Na)5(Al8Si8O32)·10H2O Sr2CaK2⎕(Al8Si8O32)·15–16H2Oa
Locality Hatrurim complex, Israel Bellerberg paleovolcano, Germany Bellerberg paleovolcano, Germany
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, B2212 Orthorhombic, B2212 Orthorhombic, P21212
a, Å 14.0256(2) 13.9859(2) 14.1790(2)
b, Å 10.45900(10) 10.46830(10) 10.6062(2)
c, Å 13.79360(10) 13.7542(2) 13.8989(2)
V, Å3 2023.44(4) 2013.73(5) 2090.19(6)
R hkl 0.0353 0.0451 0.0374
Reference 1 13 This work
  1. aThe formula is written taking into account the partial ordering of extra-framework cations.

Figure 2: 
Tetrahedral framework (in two projections) in the structure of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr (Sample 3) (left part) and gismondine-Sr (Sample 2) (right part) drawn after ref. 13]. Si-centred tetrahedra are red, Al-centred tetrahedra are lilac. The unit cells are outlined.
Figure 2:

Tetrahedral framework (in two projections) in the structure of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr (Sample 3) (left part) and gismondine-Sr (Sample 2) (right part) drawn after ref. 13]. Si-centred tetrahedra are red, Al-centred tetrahedra are lilac. The unit cells are outlined.

In the structure of low-hydrous gismondine-Sr (Samples 1 and 2), two topologically identical cages are filled by cations and water molecules in a different way whereas in the mineral studied in this work (Sample 3) three types of topologically identical cages can be distinguished (Figure 3). One of the cages is filled by Sr2+ (with minor Ca2+) and water molecules. The next cage is occupied by K1 [K+ + Ca2+ + water molecules] and water molecules, whereas the last contains the Ca site, K2 site [K+ + Na+ + water molecules], and water molecules (Figure 4).

Figure 3: 
Cages filled by extra-framework cations and water molecules projected along [101] in the structures of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr studied in this work (Sample 3) (a) and gismondine-Sr (Sample 2) drawn after ref. 13] (b). Sr sites are purple spheres, K sites – yellow spheres, Ca sites – dark green spheres, water molecules – blue spheres, Na cations – green spheres.
Figure 3:

Cages filled by extra-framework cations and water molecules projected along [101] in the structures of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr studied in this work (Sample 3) (a) and gismondine-Sr (Sample 2) drawn after ref. 13] (b). Sr sites are purple spheres, K sites – yellow spheres, Ca sites – dark green spheres, water molecules – blue spheres, Na cations – green spheres.

Figure 4: 
Cages present in the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr (Sample 3); Sr sites are green spheres, K sites – purple spheres, Ca sites – dark blue spheres, water molecules – red spheres.
Figure 4:

Cages present in the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr (Sample 3); Sr sites are green spheres, K sites – purple spheres, Ca sites – dark blue spheres, water molecules – red spheres.

A comparison of crystal structures of Samples 1, 2, and 3 suggests that a high degree of hydration prevents the disordering of extra-framework cations over numerous sites with low populations, which may lead to differences in symmetry between the distinct crystals. Interestingly, an analogous observation has been made for flörkeite and minerals of the phillipsite series. These minerals have frameworks of the PHI-type topology, which is built up by wave-shaped bent chains (crankshaft configuration), similar to structures with GIS-type topology. The topological symmetry in PHI-type structures is orthorhombic, space group Cmcm. However, the symmetry is lowered to monoclinic and triclinic in minerals of the phillipsite series, (K,Na,Ca0.5,Ba0.5)(Al x Si16–xO32)·12H2O, and flörkeite, (K3Ca2Na)(Al8Si8O32)·12H2O, respectively. 17 In minerals of the phillipsite series, symmetry is reduced to P21/m due to the distortion induced by the presence of large cations such as K and Ba in the channels. 18 , 19 These minerals exhibit a disordered arrangement of Al and Si cations over tetrahedral sites and a disordered or partially ordered distribution of extra-framework cations. In flörkeite, the symmetry is firstly lowered to B2/b owing to the ordered framework cations. 18 , 20 The reduction of symmetry to a triclinic crystal system occurs due to the ordered distribution of extra-framework cations and water molecules, leading to the doubling of the unit-cell parameter a. 20 According to the ideal formulas, both flörkeite and minerals of the phillipsite series may host 12 H2O molecules per formula unit. 21 However, most data on phillipsite-type minerals indicate significantly lower hydration degree. 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 On the other hand, flörkeite with strictly ordered extra-framework cations accommodates 12 H2O molecules. 17 , 20 The higher degree of hydration seems to favor the partially ordered or ordered distribution of extra-framework cations in zeolites, leading to symmetry variation.

Moreover, extra-framework cation ordering may be triggered, not only by hydration but also by other causes that lower free volume in the pores. The ion exchange reaction of amicite with the empirical formula H20.20Na3.62K4.06(Al7.71Si8.29O32)O10.09 with Cs, Rb, Pb, and Ag 9 has shown that the sizes of ions are relevant to the degree of hydration and arrangement in the extra-framework space. The empirical formulae of the ion-exchanged samples are H16.45Na3.445Cs4.19(Al8.10Si7.90O32)O8.00, H8.64Na0.77K0.44Rb6.55(Al7.86Si8.14O32)O4.27, H30.95Pb3.98(Al7.89Si8.11O32)O15.51 and – H27.90Ag8.00(Al7.96Si8.04O32)O13.97, which corresponds to 8.2, 4.3, 15.5 and 14.0 H2O molecules per formula unit, respectively.

Products of that ion exchange are monoclinic, pseudo-orthorhombic, and the replacement of Na and K with Pb is accompanied by a threefold increase in the c parameter (from ∼10 Å in the original sample to ∼29 Å). Simultanious incorporation of large Pb2+ cations and 15.5 H2O molecules per formula unit into the GIS-type structure resulted in a mechanical stress and destruction of crystals of Pb-exchanged gismondine.

Incorporating the large Rb+ cation in the amicite structure is accompanied by significant dehydration, and extra-framework cations are ordered at three Rb-dominant sites and one K-dominant site. On the contrary, in Ag-exchanged amicite, small Ag+ ions are disordered over 11 sites with low occupancy factors. In the ion-exchange reaction of amicite with cesium, only K+ is substitured with Cs+ whereas the content of smal Na+ cations remains unchanged. As a result, the content of H2O molecules decreases insignificantly and is accompanied by the transformation of two sites of extra-framework cations to four sites, Na1, Na2, Cs1 and Cs2. 9

As a result of the ion exchange of gismondine-related zeolites with other cations, the volume of the unit cell decreases significantly (from 1,047.6 Å3 for the initial amicite to 962–1,015 Å3 in the ion exchange products), 9 , 10 which indicates a high degree of elasticity of the framework.

It was also found that on heating above 75°С, amicite partially dehydrates and degrades into K- and Na-dominant phases. 26 It is important to notice that hydration level, and consequently arrangement of extra-framework cations, might influence the ion-exchangeable capacity of zeolites. Therefore, insight into the microstructure of zeolites is indispensable for the development of zeolite-based ion exchangers. 27

Synthetic zeolites occurring in hydrothermal sodium-aluminosilicate systems with GIS topology are well-known family called P zeolites. 28 These compounds attract attention due to their ion-exchange, water-softening properties, they could be used for in environmental-friendly detergents, gas separation and removal of toxic and radioactive wastes [29] and references therein].

The GIS-type zeolite MAP, Na8(Al8Si8O32nH2O, exhibits a high framework flexibility and a high intrinsic thermodynamic selectivity for calcium over sodium. 11 The exchanges of Na by Li, K, Rb, Cs, Mg, Ca, Sr, and Ba in MAP have been examined. 12 Structural data showed that cation exchange often caused changes in symmetry.

5 Conclusions

Taking into account a partial ordering of extra-framework cations in the crystal structure of the highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr, its simplified formula can be written as Sr2CaK2⎕(Al8Si8O32)·15H2O. One can suppose that in low-hydrous varieties of gismondine-Sr, enhanced free volume of zeolite channels promotes the multiplication of the number of sites of extra-framework cations, which results in their disordering. On the other hand, the large extra-framework cations may prevent the disordering in extra-framework space, as has been shown in amicite. The high content of large K+ cations in flörkeite may be the main cause of the lowering of the free volume, which could promote the ordering of extra-framework cations and is favorable for the ordered arrangement of water molecules.


Corresponding author: Natalia V. Zubkova, Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, Vorobievy Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

We thank Rafał Juroszek for the photo of the crystals.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The author(s) have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author(s) state(s) no conflict of interest

  6. Research funding: This work in part of X-ray diffraction, structural and crystal chemical analysis was supported by the Russian Science Foundation [grant No. 22-17-00006] (for N.V.Z., N.V.C. and I.V.P.). Identification and chemical analysis of highly hydrous analogue of gismondine-Sr and, partly, discussion of the results were carried out in accordance with the state task, state registration No. 124013100858-3. The work of K.S was supported by National Science Center of Poland [grant number 2023/49/N/ST10/01501].

  7. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Skrzyńska, K.; Cametti, G.; Galuskina, I. O.; Vapnik, Y.; Galuskin, E. V. Gismondine-Sr, Sr4(Al8Si8O32)·9H2O, a New Strontium Dominant, Orthorhombic Zeolite of the Gismondine Series from the Hatrurim Complex, Israel. Am. Mineral. 2023, 108, 249–258; https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2022-8376.Search in Google Scholar

2. Fischer, K. The Crystal Structure Determination of the Zeolite Gismondite, CaAl2Si2O8·4H2O. Am. Mineral. 1963, 48, 664–672.Search in Google Scholar

3. Vezzalini, G.; Oberti, R. The Crystal Chemistry of Gismondines: the Non-existence of K-Rich Gismondines. Bull. Mineral. 1984, 107, 805–812; https://doi.org/10.3406/bulmi.1984.7822.Search in Google Scholar

4. Artioli, G. The Crystal Structure of Garronite. Am. Mineral. 1992, 77, 189–196.Search in Google Scholar

5. Grice, J. D.; Rowe, R.; Poirier, G. Garronite-Na, a New Zeolite Species from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Québec. Can. Mineral. 2016, 54, 1549–1562; https://doi.org/10.3749/canmin.1600018.Search in Google Scholar

6. McCusker, L. B.; Baerlocher, C.; Nawaz, R. Rietveld Refinement of the Crystal Structure of the New Zeolite Mineral Gobbinsite. Z. Kristallogr. 1985, 171, 281–289; https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1985.171.14.281.Search in Google Scholar

7. Alberti, A.; Vezzalini, G. The Crystal Structure of Amicite, a Zeolite. Acta Cryst. 1979, 35, 2866–2869; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0567740879010852.Search in Google Scholar

8. Bauer, T.; Baur, W. Structural Changes in the Natural Zeolite Gismondine (GIS) Induced by Cation Exchange with Ag, Cs, Ba, Li, Na, K and Rb. Eur. J. Mineral. 1998, 10, 133–147; https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/10/1/0133.Search in Google Scholar

9. Chukanov, N. V.; Kazheva, O. N.; Chervonnaya, N. A.; Varlamov, D. A.; Ermolaeva, V. N.; Pekov, I. V.; Shilov, G. V. Ion-exchange Properties of the Natural Zeolite Amicite. Maced. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2020, 39 (2), 207–216; https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2020.1984.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kazheva, O. N.; Chukanov, N. V.; Chervonnaya, N. A.; Varlamov, D. A.; Ermolaeva, V. N.; Shilov, G. V. Crystal Structures of Rb- and Ag-Substituted Forms of Natural Zeolite Amicite. Crystallogr. Rep. 2021, 66 (1), 86–94; https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063774521010089.Search in Google Scholar

11. Adams, C. J.; Araya, A.; Carr, S. W.; Chapple, A. P.; Graham, P.; Minihan, A. R.; Osinga, T. J. In Recent Progress and Discussions Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Karge, H. G.; Weitkamp, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, Vol. 98, 1995; p. 206.10.1016/S0167-2991(06)81156-0Search in Google Scholar

12. Allen, S.; Carr, S.; Chapple, A.; Dyer, A.; Heywood, B. Ion Exchange in the Synthetic Gismondine, Zeolite MAP. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 2409–2415; https://doi.org/10.1039/b111490p.Search in Google Scholar

13. Skrzyńska, K.; Cametti, G.; Juroszek, R.; Schӓfer, C.; Galuskina, I. New Data on Minerals with the GIS Framework-type Structure: Gismondine-Sr from the Bellerberg Volcano, Germany, and Amicite and Ba-Rich Gismondine from the Hatrurim Complex, Israel. Mineral. Mag. 2023, 87, 443–454; https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2023.27.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction CrysAlisPro Software System, V. 1.171.42.49; Rigaku Corporation: Oxford, UK, 2022.Search in Google Scholar

15. Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal Structure Refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. 2015, C71, 3–8; https://doi.org/10.1107/s2053229614024218.Search in Google Scholar

16. Baerlocher, C.; McCusker, L. B.; Olson, D. H. Atlas of Zeolite Framework Types, 6th revised edition; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2007; p. 398.Search in Google Scholar

17. Skrzyńska, K.; Cametti, G.; Galuskina, I. O.; Vapnik, Y.; Galuskin, E. Flörkeite, (K3Ca2Na)[Al8Si8O32]·12H2O: A Rare Zeolite from Pyrometamorphic Rocks of the Hatrurim Complex, Israel. Lithosphere 2022, 2022, 1343791; https://doi.org/10.2113/2022/1343791.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gottardi, G. Topologic Symmetry and Real Symmetry in Framework Silicates. Mineral. Petrol. 1979, 26, 39–50; https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01081289.Search in Google Scholar

19. Passaglia, E.; Sheppard, A. The Crystal Chemistry of Zeolites. In Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications; Mineralogical Society of America; Geochemical Society, 2001; Vol. 45, pp. 69–116.10.1515/9781501509117-004Search in Google Scholar

20. Lengauer, C. L.; Kolitsch, U.; Tillmanns, E. Florkeite, K3Ca2Na[Al8Si8O32]·12H2O, a New Phillipsite-type Zeolite from the Bellerberg, East Eifel Volcanic Area, Germany. Eur. J. Mineral. 2009, 21, 901–913.10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1952Search in Google Scholar

21. Coombs, D. S.; Alberti, A.; Armbruster, T.; Artioli, G.; Colella, C.; Galli, E.; Grice, J. D.; Liebau, F.; Mandarino, J. A.; Minato, H.; Nickel, E. H.; Passaglia, E.; Peacor, D. R.; Quartieri, S.; Rinaldi, R.; Ross, M. I.; Sheppard, R. A.; Tillmanns, E.; Vezzalini, G. Recommended Nomenclature for Zeolite Minerals: Report of the Subcommittee on Zeolites of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Name. Can. Mineral. 1997, 35, 1571–1606.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gatta, G. D.; Cappelletti, P.; Rotiroti, N.; Slebodnick, C.; Rinaldi, R. New Insights into the Crystal Structure and Crystal Chemistry of the Zeolite Phillipsite. Am. Mineral. 2009, 94, 190–199; https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2009.3032.Search in Google Scholar

23. Gatta, G. D.; Cappelletti, P.; Langella, A. Crystal-Chemistry of Phillipsites from the Neapolitan Yellow Tuff. Eur. J. Mineral. 2010, 22, 779–786; https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2010/0022-2027.Search in Google Scholar

24. Kónya, P.; Szakáll, S. Occurrence, Composition and Paragenesis of the Zeolites and Associated Minerals in the Alkaline Basalt of a Maar-type Volcano at Haláp Hill, Balaton Highland, Hungary. Mineral. Mag. 2011, 75, 2869–2885; https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2011.075.6.2869.Search in Google Scholar

25. Mattioli, M.; Cenni, M. Mineralogical Dataset of Natural Zeolites from Lessini Mounts, Northern Italy: Analcime, Natrolite, Phillipsite and Harmotome Chemical Composition. Data Brief 2020, 31, 105791; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105791.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Pakhomova, A. S.; Danisi, R. M.; Armbruster, T.; Lazic, B.; Krivovichev, S. V.; Yakovenchuk, V. N. High-temperature Induced Dehydration, Phase Transition and Exsolution in Amicite: A Single-Crystal X-Ray Study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 182, 207–219; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.08.036.Search in Google Scholar

27. Kwon, S.; Kim, C.; Han, E.; Lee, H.; Cho, H. S.; Choi, M. Relationship between Zeolite Structure and Capture Capability for Radioactive Cesium and Strontium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124419; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124419.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Håkansson, U.; Fälth, L.; Hansen, S. Structure of a High-Silica Variety of Zeolite Na-P. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, C46, 1363–1364; https://doi.org/10.1107/s0108270189013260.Search in Google Scholar

29. Novembre, D.; Gimeno, D.; Del Vecchio, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Na-P1 (GIS) Zeolite Using a Kaolinitic Rock. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4872; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84383-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2024-0108).


Received: 2024-08-17
Accepted: 2025-02-11
Published Online: 2025-03-12
Published in Print: 2025-03-26

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zkri-2024-0108/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button