Home High-temperature phase transitions and domain structures of KLiSO4: studied by polarisation-optics, X-ray topography and liquid–crystal surface decoration
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

High-temperature phase transitions and domain structures of KLiSO4: studied by polarisation-optics, X-ray topography and liquid–crystal surface decoration

  • Christian Scherf , Nicolay R. Ivanov , Su Jin Chung , Theo Hahn and Helmut Klapper EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 29, 2017

Abstract

The transitions between the room temperature phase III (space group P63) and the two high-temperature phases II (Pcmn) and I (P63/mmc) of KLiSO4 and the domain structures generated by them were investigated by high-temperature polarisation optics (birefringence) and room-temperature X-ray topography, optical activity and nematic–liquid–crystal (NLC) surface decoration. The transition from the polar hexagonal phase III into the centrosymmetric orthorhombic phase II at 708 K leads, due to the loss of the trigonal axis and the radial temperature gradient of the optical heating chamber used, to a roughly hexagonal arrangement of three sets of thin orthorhombic {110} lamelleae with angles of 60° (120°) between them. The associated twin law “reflection m{110}orth” corresponds to the frequent growth twin m{101̅0}hex of phase III. The domains are easily ferroelastically switched. Upon further heating above 949 K into phase I (P63/mmc) all domains vanish. Upon cooling back into phase II the three domain states related by 60°(120°) reflections m{110}orth re-appear, however (due to the higher thermal agitation at 949 K) with a completely different domain structure consisting of many small, irregularly arranged {110}orth domains. Particular attention is paid to the domain structure of the hexagonal room temperature phase III generated during the re-transition from the orthorhombic phase II. Curiously, from the expected three twin laws inversion 1̅, rotation 2⊥[001]hex and reflection m{101̅0}hex only the latter, which corresponds to the frequent growth twinning, has been found. Finally a short treatise of the structural relations of the KLiSO4 high-temperature polymorphs is given.


Dedicated to: Prof. emerit. Hans Wondratschek, University of Karlsruhe, Germany († 26 Oct. 2014).


Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for financial support through the research grant Ha 401/27 and for the grant of a visiting fellowship to N.R.I. They also thank Jan M. Simons for his help in preparing the figures.

Appendix: Structural relations of the KLiSO4 high-temperature polymorphs

(1) Structure types of KLiSO4

For more than 100 years KLiSO4 has been one of the well-known and often investigated compounds, because of its rich collection of polymorphs (modifications) and the different types of phase transitions (cf. Tomaszewski [9]) between them. Beyond this wealth, however, KLiSO4 plays an even more special role among the group of related compounds MLiSO4 with M=K1+NH41+, Rb1+ and Cs1+ in that it exhibits among its five polymorphs two different structure types, hexagonal (stuffed) tridymite and orthorhombic Icmm [10], [11], [13], whereas the other compounds (although also exhibiting polymorphism) have only one of these structure types.[10]

In addition, the nature of the KLiSO4 phase transitions is quite diverse, ranging from fast, displacive group-subgroup transitions to slow reconstructive transitions without symmetry relations. In the present paper only the three “high-temperature” polymorphs III, II and I and their phase transitions and domains structures are discussed, whereas the “low-temperature” phases III, VI and V and their transitions are extensively treated in the first publication of this series [17].

The “prototype structures” of the tridymite and the Icmm type are presented in Figure 15 in an idealised fashion (equal tetrahedra, no disorder) and highest symmetry: space groups P63/mmc (194[11]) for the tridymite and Icmm (7411 ) for the Icmm type. If two (oppositely linked) different tetrahedra, SO4 and LiO4, are considered, the space group of the tridymite type is (polar) P63mc (186), index [2], if the tetrahedra are fully ordered, or P63 (173), index [4], if chiral order (enantiomorphism) is admitted. For the Icmm polymorphs the symmetry reduces for two types of tetrahedra to the (still centrosymmetric) space group Pcmn (62), index [2], with polar pairs of SO4- and LiO4-tetrahedra along [001]. These pairs, however, are ordered antiparallel due to the n-glide perpendicular to [001].

(2) Order and disorder of the KLiSO4 polymorphs

Starting from the polar and chiral ordered room-temperature phase III of space group P63 (173) [1], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [26] the disorder of the high-temperature phase I (space group P63/mmc (194), supergroup index [4], [13], [32]) can be described as follows:

  • due to the centrosymmetry the polarity of phase III is lost;

  • due to the mirror planes in z=¼ and ¾ of supergroup P63/mmc (194) the tetrahedral apices of both O4 and LiO4 tetrahedra are half up and half down along the c-axis, i.e. each tetrahedral site is now a superposition of two equal but oppositely oriented half tetrahedra, related by a mirror plane in xy¼ or xy ¾.

  • The vertical mirror planes in P63/mmc cause a further disorder of the structure of phase I: the tetrahedral bases are “split” into two, i.e. instead of a single triangular basis there is now a superposition of two triangles, rotated by about 30° around [001]. Considering both disorders in b) and c), each single SO4 and LiO4 tetrahedron in phase III is split in phase I into four disordered tetrahedra, each of “weight ¼”, thus resembling the supergroup index [4].

  • There is a small further disorder effect which occurs in all polymorphs of KLiSO4, including the ordered form III: the distance between the S- and the Li–atoms along c (≈3.33 Å) is shorter than the sum of the “standard” bond lengths S–O (≈1.47 Å) and Li–O (≈1.92 Å), which is ≈3.39 Å. As a result, the O atom, forming the joint apex of each pair of tetrahedra, is “pushed out” from its ideal position on the c-axis by about 0.27 Å, thus adding another, rather small three-fold disorder effect. This leads in phase III to an inclined S–O–Li bond with an (S–O–Li) angle of ≈155° instead of 180°.

  • For the intermediate (orthorhombic) phase II with space group Pcmn (62) [13], [26], [31] significantly less disorder is found, compared to phase I. Again, the polarity of III is lost because of the centrosymmetry of II and, again, the mirror plane m perpendicular to [010] and parallel to c causes a two-fold splitting of the tetrahedra as in phase I, i.e. a rotation of the basis planes of the tetrahedra around [001] by about 30°. Also the disorder of the O atoms (tetrahedral apices) occurs as in phases III and I. However, the major disorder effect of phase I, the reversal of half the tetrahedral orientations and the superposition of the disordered SO4/LiO4 pairs (due to the mirror planes in xy¼ and xy¾) [see (b) above] does not occur in II. Instead, the glide planes n in xy¼ and xy¾ still reverse the pairs of SO4- and LiO4-tetrahdedra, however not in the same site (as in phase I), but in sites related by the translation ½ ½ 0. This results in a well-ordered non-polar arrangement of tetrahedra. Hence, with respect to tetrahedral order/disorder, polymorph II is a well-defined intermediary between the ordered polar phase III and the strongly disordered phase I.[13]

It should be noted that the n-glide and its effect in phase II remain unchanged if instead of the centrosymmetric space group Pcmn (62) its non-centrosymmetric alternative Pc21n is chosen.

(3) Phase transitions between KLiSO4 polymorphs

  • We begin with a hypothetical, not realised case, the non-existence of phase II, i.e. the non-existence of the Icmm structure among the KLiSO4 polymorphs. Then the resulting phase transition of index [4] at 708 K

    Phase III (P63, 173)Phase I (P63/mmc, 194),

    has almost textbook character, with the following essential features:

    • both polymorphs are of the tridymite type;

    • the transition would be non-ferroelastic, i.e. group and subgroup belong to the same crystal family (here hexagonal); both modifications have the same lattice. The point group of the supergroup, 6/mmm, is the hexagonal holohedry, the point group of the subgroup, 6, is of index [4];

    • all twins of this phase transition would be strictly merohedral (Σ1);

    • the phase transitions (in both directions) would involve a reversal of the tetrahedral apices by one half of the SO4- as well as of the LiO4-tetraheda in order to achieve either complete disorder (III→I) or complete polar order (I→III).

    It should be noted that a reversal of the apex of a tetrahedron does not require a rotation of 180° of the tetrahedron (up→down orientation) but only of 70.5° (180°–109.5°), thus making the order-disorder transition much easier to achieve.

  • The discussion above of the (hypothetical) simple phase transition III←→I makes it easier to grasp which unusual complexities are introduced by the “insertion” of the Icmm phase II with orthorhombic space group Pcmn (62), leading to the sequence

    III (P63, 175) 708 K II (Pcmn, 62) 949 K I (P63/mmc, 194).

    The following important aspects are emphasised:

    • there is practically no symmetry (and structure) relation between P63 and Pcmn, any group-subgroup tree would have to go up to P63/mmc (supergroup index [4]) and down to Pcmn (subgroup index [6], see below);

    • For the way down, from P63/mmc to Pcmn, there is a direct subgroup relation of index [6=3×2], as follows:

      P63/mmc (194) [3]Ccmm (63) [2]Pcmn (62)

      The index [6] is rather high, but there is another important aspect: The orthorhombic subgroup Ccmm occurs as three (120°) conjugate subgroups of the hexagonal supergroup P63/mmc, thus determining already the 120°-orientations of the of the three domain structures of Pcmn, which result from the above transition (cf. Figure 7);

    • Phase II with Pcmn is centrosymmetric with opposite, but well-ordered pairs of tetrahedral apices due to the n-glide, in contrast to the disordered phase I and the polar phase III, thus phase II is well suited as an intermediate form between III and I. In both transitions, from P63 on heating and from P63/mmc on cooling, 50% of both, SO4 and LiO4 tetrahedra must change their apex orientation;

    • The further geometric disorder of the structure of II is similar to that of phase I: splitting of the triangular bases due to m||[001] and small disorder of O in the S–O–Li bond chain along [001].

References

[1] H. Schulz, U. Zucker, R. Frech, Crystal structure of KLiSO4 as a function of temperature. Acta Cryst. 1985, B41, 21.10.1107/S0108768185001525Search in Google Scholar

[2] S. Bhakay-Tamhane, A. Sequeira, R. Chidambaram, Phase transitions in LiKSO4: low-temperature neutron diffraction results. Phase Transit.1991, 35, 75.10.1080/01411599108203424Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Zhang, E. K. H. Salje, A. Putnis, Phase transitions in LiKSO4 between 1.5 K and 850 K: an infrared spectroscopic study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter1998, 10, 11811.10.1088/0953-8984/10/50/019Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. L. Bansal, S. K. Deb, A. P. Roy, V. C. Sahni, New phase transition in LiKSO4. Solid State Commun.1980, 36, 1047.10.1016/0038-1098(80)90034-4Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. Bhakay-Tamhane, A. Sequeira, R. Chidambaran, Low-temperature phase transitions in LiKSO4: a neutron study. Solid State Commun.1985, 53, 197.10.1016/0038-1098(85)90125-5Search in Google Scholar

[6] P. E. Tomaszewski, K. Lukaszewicz, Orthorhombic low-temperature phase of LiKSO4. Phys. Status Solidi1982, 71, K53.10.1515/9783112494981-050Search in Google Scholar

[7] P. E. Tomaszewski, K. Lukaszewicz, X-ray study of the low-temperature phase transitions in LiKSO4. Phase Transit.1983, 4, 37.10.1080/01411598308218845Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. Bhakay-Tamhane, A. Sequeira, Kinetics and symmetry changes in low-temperature phase transitions in KLiSO4. Ferroelectrics1986, 69, 241.10.1080/00150198608008197Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. E. Tomaszewski, LiKSO4– chronological bibliography 1850–1987, Wroclaw, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[10] M. J. Buerger, The stuffed derivatives of the silica structures. Amer. Mineralogist1954, 39, 600.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Th. Hahn, G. Lohre, S. J. Chung, A new tetrahedral framework structure in sulfates and fluoberyllates. Die Naturwissenschaften1969, 56, 459.10.1007/BF00601063Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. J. Bradley, The crystal structure of lithium potassium sulphate. Philos. Mag. 1925, 49, 1225.10.1080/14786442508634703Search in Google Scholar

[13] S. J. Chung, Tetraedergerüste bei Fluoberyllaten und Sulfaten (Struktur, Polymorphie, Mischkristalle). Doctoral Thesis, RWTH Aachen, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Karppinen, J. O. Lundgren, R. Liminga, Structure of pyroelectric lithium potassium sulphate, LiKSO4. Acta Cryst. 1983, C39, 34.10.1107/S0108270183003509Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. A. Sandomirskii, S. S. Meshalkin, I. V. Rozhdestvenskaya, The crystal structure of the A phase of KLiSO4. Soviet Physics –Crystallogr.1983, 28, 33.Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. Bhakay-Tamhane, A. Sequeira, R. Chidambaram, Structure of lithium potassium sulphate, LiKSO4: a neutron diffraction study. Acta Cryst. 1984, C40, 1648.10.1107/S0108270184009045Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. Klapper, Th. Hahn, S. J. Chung, Optical, pyroelectric and X-ray topographic studies of twin domains and twin boundaries in KLiSO4. Acta Cryst. 1987, B43, 147, with Erratum on page 406 of the same volume.10.1107/S0108768187098148Search in Google Scholar

[18] R. Cach, P. E. Tomaszewski, P. Bastie, J. Bornarel, Phase transitions in LiKSO4 at low temperatures. Ferroelectrics1984, 53, 337.10.1080/00150198408245082Search in Google Scholar

[19] R. Cach, P. E. Tomaszewski, J. Bornarel, Dielectric measurements and domain structure in LiKSO4 at low temperatures. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.1985, 18, 915.10.1088/0022-3719/18/23/520Search in Google Scholar

[20] R. C. de Sousa, J. A. C. de Paiva, J. Mendes Filho, A. Sergio Bezerra Sombra, Electrical properties of LiKSO4 crystals at low temperatures. Solid State Commun.1993, 87, 959.10.1016/0038-1098(93)90738-9Search in Google Scholar

[21] I. M. Iskornev, I. N. Flerov, M. V. Gorev, L. A. Kot, V. A. Grankina, Specific heat and phase transitions in KLiSO4 crystals. Sov. Phys. Solid State1984,26, 1926.Search in Google Scholar

[22] L. Abello, K. Chhor, C. Pommier, Thermodynamic studies on the successive phase transitions in LiKSO4 crystals at low temperatures. J. Chem. Thermodynamics1985, 17, 1023.10.1016/0021-9614(85)90087-4Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. J. Oliveira, F. A. Germano, J. Mendes Filho, F. E. A. Melo, J. E. Moreira, Phase transitions in LiKSO4 below room temperature. Physical ReviewB1988, 38, 12633.10.1103/PhysRevB.38.12633Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] H. Bill, Y. R. Sekhar, D. Lovy, An EPR study of a new low-temperature phase transition in KLiSO4:MoO43–. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1988, 21, 2795.10.1088/0022-3719/21/15/012Search in Google Scholar

[25] H. Klapper, H.-D. Jennissen, Chr. Scherf, Th. Hahn, X-ray topographic and polarisation-optical studies of the low-temperature phase transitions and domain structures of KLiSO4. Ferroelectrics2008, 376, 25.10.1080/00150190802440724Search in Google Scholar

[26] Chr. Scherf, Strukturelle Phasenübergänge und Zwillingsdomänen des Kaliumlithium-sulfats und verwandter Sulfate. Doctoral Thesis, RWTH Aachen, 2000. 286 pages, in German. Shaker Verlag Aachen 2000, ISBN 3-8265-8258-6. http://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/96444/files/Scherf_Christian.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[27] T. Krajewski, T. Breczewski, P. Iscunovicz, B. Mroz, High-temperature ferroelastic phase in LiKSO4. Ferroelectrics Lett.1, 85, 95.10.1080/07315178508202451Search in Google Scholar

[28] Chr. Scherf, Th. Hahn, G. Heger, R. A. Becker, W. Wunderlich, H. Klapper, Optical and Synchroton radiation white-beam topographic investigation during the high-temperature phase transitions of KLiSO4. Ferroelectrics1997, 191, 171.10.1080/00150199708015635Search in Google Scholar

[29] A. Pietraszko, The X-ray study of the high-temperature phase transitions of KLiSO4. Ferroelectrics1988, 79, 121.10.1080/00150198808229412Search in Google Scholar

[30] H. Sankaran, S. M. Sharma, S. K. Sikka, An orthorhombic structure for the high-temperature lock-in phase of LiKSO4. Solid State Commun.1988, 66, 7.10.1016/0038-1098(88)90481-4Search in Google Scholar

[31] Chr. Scherf, W. Paulus, G. Heger, Th. Hahn, Crystal structure analysis of the orthorhombic phase II of KLiSO4. Physica B (Condensed Matter)2000, 276, 247.10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01475-1Search in Google Scholar

[32] L. H. Lyoo, H. M. Park, S. J. Chung, High-temperature analysis of KLiSO4 by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B (Condensed Matter)2004, 348, 34.10.1016/j.physb.2003.10.017Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. A. Gridnev, A. A. Khodorov, Relaxation of metastable states near the ferroelastic phase transition in KLiSO4. Ferroelectrics1997, 199, 34.10.1080/00150199708213450Search in Google Scholar

[34] H.-D. Jennissen, Phasenumwandlungen und Defektstrukturen in Kristallen mit tetraedrischen Baugruppen. Doctoral Thesis. RWTH Aachen University, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[35] A. R. Lang, Study of individual dislocations in crystals by X-ray diffraction microradiography. J. Appl. Phys. 1959, 30, 1748.10.1063/1.1735048Search in Google Scholar

[36] H. Klapper, K. J. Roberts, D. Götz, N. Herres, X-ray topographic investigations of phase transitions in crystals. J. Crystal Growth1983, 65, 621.10.1016/0022-0248(83)90113-6Search in Google Scholar

[37] H. Klapper, X-ray topography of twinned crystals. In Progress in crystal growth andcharacterization, Vol. 14, (Ed. P. Krishna) Pergamon, Oxford, p. 367, 1987.10.1016/0146-3535(87)90023-2Search in Google Scholar

[38] H. L. Bhat, H. Klapper, K. J. Roberts, An X-ray topographic study of the paraelectric-to-ferroelectric phase transition in nearly perfect single crystals of ammonium sulphate. J. Appl. Cryst.1995, 28, 168.10.1107/S0021889894010083Search in Google Scholar

[39] N. Herres, H. Klapper. X-ray topographic study of the antiferroelectric phase transition and antiphase boundaries in copper formate tetrahydrate. Z. Kristallogr.2015, 230, 677.10.1515/zkri-2015-1853Search in Google Scholar

[40] J. Ortega, J. Etxebarria, T. Breczewski, Relation between the optical properties and structure of KLiSO4 in the room-temperature phase. J. Appl. Cryst.1993, 26, 549.10.1107/S002188989201286XSearch in Google Scholar

[41] N. R. Ivanov, N. A, Tikhomirova, A. V. Ginzberg, S. P. Chumakova, I. E. Eknadiosyants, V. Z. Borodin, A. N. Pinskaya, V. A. Babanskikh, V. A. D’yakov. Domain structure of KTiOPO4 crystals. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr.1994, 39, 539.Search in Google Scholar

[42] A. Kundt, Ueber eine einfache Methode zur Untersuchung der Thermo-, Actino- und Piëzoelectricität der Krystalle. Ann. Phys.1883, 20, 592.10.1002/andp.18832561205Search in Google Scholar

[43] L. I. Dontzova, N. A. Tikhomirova, L. A. Shuvalov, Investigation of domain structure and switching processes in ferroelectric domains by the liquid crystal method. Ferroelectrics1989, 97, 87.10.1080/00150198908018085Search in Google Scholar

[44] N. R. Ivanov, S. A. Pikin, D. Ganzke, T. Weyrauch, W. Haase. Decoration of solid-state ferroelectric domains by the help of ferroelectric liquid crystals. Ferroelectrics2000, 244, 362.10.1080/00150190008228448Search in Google Scholar

[45] M. Polomska, N. A. Tikhomirova, Domain structure of LiN[H,D]4SO4 revealed by liquid crystal decoration. Ferroelectrics1982, 44, 205.10.1080/07315178208202395Search in Google Scholar

[46] Chr. Scherf, Th. Hahn, G. Heger, N. R. Ivanov, H. Klapper, Imaging of inversion twin boundaries in potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) by liquid-crystal decoration and X-ray diffraction topography. Philosoph. Transact. Royal Soc.1999, A357, 2651.10.1098/rsta.1999.0454Search in Google Scholar

[47] J. Sapriel, Domain-wall orientation in ferroelastics. Phys. Rev. B, 1975,12, 5128.10.1103/PhysRevB.12.5128Search in Google Scholar

[48] Th. Hahn, H. Klapper, Twinning of crystals. Chapter 3.3, in International Tables for Crystallography, Vol. D. Physical Properties of crystals, (Ed. A. Authier) Second Edition, International Union of Crystallography. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014.10.1107/97809553602060000917Search in Google Scholar

[49] K. Aizu, Determination of the state parameters and formulation of spontaneous strain for ferroelastics. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.1970, 28, 706.10.1143/JPSJ.28.706Search in Google Scholar


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2016-2030).



Article note:

Co-author Theo Hahn passed away on Febr. 12, 2016. A few weeks before his decease he drafted a chapter on the structural relations of the high-temperature polymorphs of KLiSO4. In respectful commemoration of Theo Hahn we have included this chapter without changes as an Appendix.


Received: 2016-12-1
Accepted: 2017-1-31
Published Online: 2017-3-29
Published in Print: 2017-5-24

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zkri-2016-2030/html
Scroll to top button