Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Deskriptive statt präskriptiver Sprachwissenschaft!? [Descriptive instead of prescriptive linguistics!?]

Published/Copyright: December 9, 2005
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik
From the journal Volume 32 Issue 3

Abstract

It is one of the main aims of modern linguistics to describe rather than prescribe linguistic forms and their uses. Normally, descriptive and prescriptive ways of reflecting on language are seen as antagonistic; e.g. a grammarian is either a descriptivist or a prescriptivist. In contrast to this antagonistic conception, the paper argues that the designation of a grammar as descriptive or prescriptive is rather a matter of scale than of antagonism. To hold this thesis, four dimensions are investigated in detail. A grammar might be classified as descriptive or prescriptive by analyzing the intention of its author (Autordimension), its reception (Rezipientendimension), its formulation as a text (Textdimension) and the ways a grammar extracts and treats linguistic data (Datendimension). On the basis of this assumption prescriptive ways of thinking about language are seen as inevitable even for modern linguists. This might be less of a problem than modern linguists have always presumed.

:
Online erschienen: 2005-12-09
Erschienen im Druck: 2004-09-20

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Downloaded on 9.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.3.376/html
Scroll to top button