Summary:
After thorough comparative examination of the Amduat limestone fragments from the tombs of king Thutmose I (KV38) and queen Hatshepsut (KV20), it is my conclusion that these limestone fragments of the oldest and earliest version of the Amduat Book together are forming an entity, that this is actually one single specimen. Therefore I assume that all fragments originate from only one tomb, namely from Thutmose I (KV 38), and neither from two different tombs nor from different reigns. It therefore seems problematic to state that any of these fragments might originate from tomb KV 20. Moreover, after having discovered the earliest ever mud-plaster fragments of the Amduat Book in the tomb of Thutmose I (KV 38) in the Valley of Kings, I could prove that the Amduat Book was already known during the reign of Thutmose I.
© 2016 by De Gruyter
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Walter-Friedrich Reineke
- Die königlichen Amduat-Fragmente vor der Regierungszeit Thutmosis’ III.
- Wege und Abwege. Zu den Metaphern in der ramessidischen Weisheitsliteratur
- Zu den memphitischen Grabreliefs in der Sammlung des Ägyptischen Museums – Georg Steindorff – der Universität Leipzig
- Quand Thot devient babouin
- The Funerary Ensemble of Nairis in the Hermitage Museum
- Reuniting Philology and Archaeology: The “Emic” and “Etic” in the Letter of the Dead Qau Bowl UC16163 and its Context
- Once More Unto the Breach
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Walter-Friedrich Reineke
- Die königlichen Amduat-Fragmente vor der Regierungszeit Thutmosis’ III.
- Wege und Abwege. Zu den Metaphern in der ramessidischen Weisheitsliteratur
- Zu den memphitischen Grabreliefs in der Sammlung des Ägyptischen Museums – Georg Steindorff – der Universität Leipzig
- Quand Thot devient babouin
- The Funerary Ensemble of Nairis in the Hermitage Museum
- Reuniting Philology and Archaeology: The “Emic” and “Etic” in the Letter of the Dead Qau Bowl UC16163 and its Context
- Once More Unto the Breach