A new phonological difference between Babylonian and (Neo-)Assyrian
Babylonian and Neo-Assyrian differ over how (i. e. plene vs. non-plene) they spell contracted u before ventive/allative -nim (and its allomorphs) in III-weak verbal forms. This difference is demonstrated quantitatively, using large assemblages of sources. It emerges that the principles governing the distribution of plene spellings in Neo-Assyrian are not simply ‘watered down’ (i. e. orthographically economical) equivalents of the corresponding principles in Babylonian. This situation argues for a phonological difference or differences between Babylonian and Neo-Assyrian over and above those currently recognised. Several possibilities arise for the nature of the difference(s). There are signs that the difference(s) also apply to earlier periods of Assyrian.
© Walter de Gruyter 2010
Articles in the same Issue
- Die marû-Basen der sumerischen Verben túm „hin-, wegführen“ und r̂e6/de6 „bringen, liefern“
- Enmerkar und Sulge als sumerische Muttersprachler nach literarischen Quellen
- Sumerian Literary Catalogues and the Scribal Curriculum
- The Expedition of Ebla against Ašdar(um) and the Queen of Ḫarran
- A new phonological difference between Babylonian and (Neo-)Assyrian
- Die Goldschale der Iabâ – eine levantinische Antiquität
- Buchbesprechungen
Articles in the same Issue
- Die marû-Basen der sumerischen Verben túm „hin-, wegführen“ und r̂e6/de6 „bringen, liefern“
- Enmerkar und Sulge als sumerische Muttersprachler nach literarischen Quellen
- Sumerian Literary Catalogues and the Scribal Curriculum
- The Expedition of Ebla against Ašdar(um) and the Queen of Ḫarran
- A new phonological difference between Babylonian and (Neo-)Assyrian
- Die Goldschale der Iabâ – eine levantinische Antiquität
- Buchbesprechungen