Abstract:
Based on the Hieroglyphic Luwian and Phoenician orthography and linguistics the first part of this paper demonstrates that, despite the communis opinio, Awa/ir(a/i)kus of the KARATEPE inscription and Wa/irikas of the ÇINEKÖY inscription cannot be identical. Accordingly, the second half of the paper discusses the chronology of these and other related inscriptions and proposes a new king list for Hiyawa.
Published Online: 2014-6-1
Published in Print: 2014-6-1
© De Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Une version sumérienne de la légende d’Adapa (Textes de Tell Haddad X)
- Waw sargonicum. On Parataxis in Sargonic Royal Inscriptions
- Rhythm and Expression in Akkadian Poetry
- Beutestücke aus Babylonien in Assyrien. Überlegungen zu einer neuen Weihinschrift Kurigalzus I. aus Assur
- Awarikus und Warikas: Zwei Könige von Hiyawa
- Buchbesprechungen
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Une version sumérienne de la légende d’Adapa (Textes de Tell Haddad X)
- Waw sargonicum. On Parataxis in Sargonic Royal Inscriptions
- Rhythm and Expression in Akkadian Poetry
- Beutestücke aus Babylonien in Assyrien. Überlegungen zu einer neuen Weihinschrift Kurigalzus I. aus Assur
- Awarikus und Warikas: Zwei Könige von Hiyawa
- Buchbesprechungen