Abstract
In the post-Cold War international society, third-party intervention has become increasingly common across various spheres. What were previously assumed to be domestic or bilateral issues have become of great interest to foreign governments and international organizations. Disputes over history, whose intensification in many parts of the world is also a recent political phenomenon, are no exception. Regarding past atrocities by one country upon another, the “victim” side seeks recognition and redress from third parties, while the “perpetrator” side tries to prevent such interference. This paper investigates the causes of such intervention and the consequences of it for bilateral relations between the intervenor and the “perpetrator” country, using the conflict between Armenia and Turkey over the recognition of the 1915–1916 Armenian Massacre as genocide as a case study. The results reveal that countries with a Christian majority and a large Armenian population typically conduct such intervention, and that although third-party intervention affects bilateral relations negatively, the effect is only temporary.
References
Barkin, J. Samuel and Bruce Cronin (1994) “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization, 48(1):107–130.10.1017/S0020818300000837Search in Google Scholar
Ben Aharon, Eldad (2015) “A Unique Denial: Israel’s Foreign Policy and the Armenian Genocide,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(4):638–654.10.1080/13530194.2015.1043514Search in Google Scholar
Blacker, Uilleam, Aleksandr Ėtkind and Julie Fedor (eds.) (2013) Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.10.1057/9781137322067Search in Google Scholar
Dadrian, Vahakn N. (2003) The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. Providence, R.I.: Berghahn Books.Search in Google Scholar
Elbadawi, E. and Nicholas Sambanis (2000) “Why are There So Many Civil Wars in Africa? Understanding and Preventing Violent Conflict,” Journal of African Economics, 9(3):244–269.10.1093/jae/9.3.244Search in Google Scholar
Franklin, James C. (2008) “Shame on You: The Impact of Human Rights Criticism on Political Repression in Latin America,” International Studies Quarterly, 52(1):187–211.10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00496.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fuchs, Andreas and Nils-Hendrik Klann (2013) “Paying a Visit: The Dalai Lama Effect on International Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 91(1):164–177.10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.04.007Search in Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Kiichi (2011) Senso wo Kiokusuru: Hiroshima, Horokosuto to Genzai. Tokyo: Kodansha.Search in Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and James Mahoney (2012) A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691149707.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. (2008) “Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem,” International Organization, 62(4):689–716.10.1017/S0020818308080247Search in Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. and James Ron (2009) “Seeing Double: Human Rights Impact Through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes,” World Politics, 61(2):360–401.10.1017/S0043887109000136Search in Google Scholar
Halaçoğlu, Yusuf (2002) Facts on the relocation of Armenians (1914-1918). Ankara: Turkish Historical Society Printing House.Search in Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Tsuyoshi and Kazuhiko Tōgō (2008) East Asia’s Haunted Present: Historical Memories and the Resurgence of Nationalism. Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.Search in Google Scholar
Hovannisian, Richard G. (2009) The Armenian Genocide: Cultural and Ethical Legacies. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Ito, Masako (2013) Senso Kioku no Seijigaku: Kankoku Gun ni Yoru Betonamu Jin Senji Gyakusatsu Mondai to Wakai he no Michi. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Search in Google Scholar
Kan, Hideki (ed.) (2011) Higashi Ajia no Rekishi Masatsu to Wakai Kanousei: Reisengo no Kokusaichitsujo to Rekishi Ninshiki wo Meguru Shomondai. Tokyo: Gaifusha.Search in Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. and Beth A. Simmons (2015) “Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations,” American Journal of Political Science, 59(1):55–70.10.1111/ajps.12119Search in Google Scholar
Kimura, Kan (2014) Nikkan Rekishi Ninshiki Mondai Toha Nanika: Rekishi Kyokasho, “Ianhu,” Popyurizumu. Tokyo: Minerva Shobo.Search in Google Scholar
King, David and Miles Pomper (2004) “The US Congress and the Contingent Influence of Diaspora Lobbies: Lessons from US Policy Toward Armenia and Azerbaijan,” Journal of Armenian Studies, 8(1):72–98.Search in Google Scholar
Kosuge, Nobuko (2005) Sengo Wakai: Nihon ha Kako kara Tokihanatareru Noka. Chuo Koron Shinsha.Search in Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles (2010) How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of Stable Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400834419Search in Google Scholar
Kurosawa, Fumitaka and Ian Nish (eds.) (2011) Rekishi to Wakai. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lewy, Guenter (2005) The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey: A Disputed Genocide. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lind, Jennifer M. (2008) Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Gary Goertz (2004) “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research,” American Political Science Review, 98(4):653–669.10.1017/S0003055404041401Search in Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev and Errol A. Henderson (2013) “The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends,” International Interactions, 39(3):265–291.10.1080/03050629.2013.782306Search in Google Scholar
Mochizuki, Mike (2011) “Mikan no Kadai toshiteno Rekishi Wakai: Chiiki Anzenhosho to Beikoku no Senryaku heno Eikyo.” In: (Hideki Kan, ed.) Higashi Ajia no Rekishi Masatsu to Wakai Kanousei: Reisengo no Kokusaichitsujo to Rekishi Ninshiki wo Meguru Shomondai. Tokyo: Gaifusha, 439–455.Search in Google Scholar
Morrow, James D., Randolph M. Siverson and Tressa E. Tabares (1998) “The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990,” American Political Science Review, 92(3):649–661.10.2307/2585487Search in Google Scholar
Onuma, Yasuaki (1998) Jinken, Kokka, Bunmei: Huhenshugiteki Jinkenkan kara Bunsaiteki Jinkenkan he. Kuramae, Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Search in Google Scholar
Pollins, Brian M. (1989) “Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce: The Effect of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows,” American Journal of Political Science, 33(3):737–761.10.2307/2111070Search in Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. (1996) “Conditions of Successful Third-Party Intervention in Intrastate Conflicts,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(2):336–359.10.1177/0022002796040002006Search in Google Scholar
Regan, Patrick M. and Aysegul Aydin (2006) “Diplomacy and Other Forms of Intervention in Civil Wars,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5):736–756.10.1177/0022002706291579Search in Google Scholar
Rihoux, Benoît and Charles Ragin (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: SAGE Publications, Inc.10.4135/9781452226569Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Shiping (2011) “Reconciliation and the Remaking of Anarchy,” World Politics, 63(4):711–749.10.1017/S0043887111000219Search in Google Scholar
Yoshimura, Takayuki (2011) “‘Arumenia Jin Gyakusatsu’ wo Meguru Ichi Kousatsu.” In: (Yuji Ishida and Shinichi Takeuchi eds.) Jenosaido to Gendai Sekai. Tokyo: Bensei Shuppan, 165–194.Search in Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. (2010) After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921421Search in Google Scholar
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- The Colour of the Elected: Determinants of the Political Under-Representation of Blacks and Browns in Brazil
- The Halo Effect: Perceptions of Diffuse Threat and SVP Vote Share
- A Climate for Change? Norwegian Farmers’ Attitudes to Climate Change and Climate Policy
- Analyzing Electoral Behavior Using PTV’s: Benefits and Methodological Issues
- Causes and Consequences of Third-Party Intervention in Disputes over History: Recognition of the Armenian Massacre as Genocide and Relations with Turkey
- How to Win the Brussels Game? Explaining the European Parliament’s Success under the Co-Decision
- Modes of Public Governance: A Typology Toward a Conceptual Modeling
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- The Colour of the Elected: Determinants of the Political Under-Representation of Blacks and Browns in Brazil
- The Halo Effect: Perceptions of Diffuse Threat and SVP Vote Share
- A Climate for Change? Norwegian Farmers’ Attitudes to Climate Change and Climate Policy
- Analyzing Electoral Behavior Using PTV’s: Benefits and Methodological Issues
- Causes and Consequences of Third-Party Intervention in Disputes over History: Recognition of the Armenian Massacre as Genocide and Relations with Turkey
- How to Win the Brussels Game? Explaining the European Parliament’s Success under the Co-Decision
- Modes of Public Governance: A Typology Toward a Conceptual Modeling