Home Effect of hydrophile–lipophile balance of F-alkylated cyclic polyethylene glycol succinates on their applications
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of hydrophile–lipophile balance of F-alkylated cyclic polyethylene glycol succinates on their applications

  • Ali Khalfallah

    Ali Khalfallah professor at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Gables. He obtained his University Habitation and his PhD in Chemistry from the University of Carthage in Tunisia. These research works are on Organic Materials, such as Surfactants, Liquid Crystals, Organic Semiconductors.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 11, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) of any surfactant determines its solubility. Selection of the ideal surfactant for a given application appears to be facilitated by a thorough understanding of the relationship between accurately measured or calculated HLB and physicochemical properties. In this study the HLB values of the mono-, bi- and bolaphilic derivatives of F-alkylated cyclic polyethylene glycol succinate were determined using the Griffin technique. It was investigated how the different applications of these surfactants can be distinguished by their HLB values.


Corresponding author: Ali Khalfallah, Faculty of Sciences of Gabes, City Riadh, Zerig, 6029 Gabes, Tunisia; and Laboratory of Molecular Organic Chemistry, National Higher Engineering, School of Tunis, 5 Avenue Taha Hussein, Montfleury, 1089, Tunis, Tunisia, E-mail:

About the author

Ali Khalfallah

Ali Khalfallah professor at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Gables. He obtained his University Habitation and his PhD in Chemistry from the University of Carthage in Tunisia. These research works are on Organic Materials, such as Surfactants, Liquid Crystals, Organic Semiconductors.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Griffin, W. C. Classification of Surface-Active Agents by “HLB”. J. Soc. Cosmetic Chem. 1949, 1, 311–326. http://journal.scconline.org/contents/cc1949/cc001n05.html.Search in Google Scholar

2. Miller, R. Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Emulsifiers: Types and Uses; Academic Press: Oxford, 2016; pp. 498–502.10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00249-XSearch in Google Scholar

3. Khattab, A. F.; Ismael, Y. A.; El-Habab, A. T. Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation of Ethoxylated Lauryl Myristyl Alcohol as Non-ionic Surfactants (Surfethoxymers). Tenside Surf. Det. 2023, 60 (6), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1515/tsd-2023-2530.Search in Google Scholar

4. Ali, I.; Khan, S.; Ahmed, S.; Khan, S.; Ali, H. S.; Shafiullah, R. U.; Raza, M.; Shah, Z. A. Synthesis of Non-ionic Surfactants Nano-Vesicles for Clarithromycin Oral Delivery. Tenside Surf. Det. 2023, 60 (4), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1515/tsd-2022-2476.Search in Google Scholar

5. Khalfallah, A.; Ayari, A.; Boughariaou, B.; Hedhli, A. Synthesis and Surface-Active Properties of Fluorinated Cyclic PEGyl Succinate Derivatives. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl Chem. 2010, 67, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-009-9659-x.Search in Google Scholar

6. Khalfalla, A.; Boughariaou, B.; Hedhli, A. Synthesis and Surface-Active Properties of F-Alkylated Polar Loops. J. Surfact. Deterg. 2013, 16, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-012-1387-3.Search in Google Scholar

7. Khalfallah, A.; Ayari, A.; Abdelkader, A.; Hedhli, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Some Nonionic Bolaamphiphiles. J. Surfact. Deterg. 2014, 17, 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-014-1602-5.Search in Google Scholar

8. Khalfallah, A.; Kriaa, A.; Hedhli, A. Influence of the Hydro/fluorocarbon Chain Length on CMC and HLB of Surface-Active Nonionic Surfactants Containing Polyethylene Glycol Groups. Tenside Surf. Det. 2018, 55 (3), 246–251; https://doi.org/10.3139/113.110560. https://doi.org/10.3139/113.110560.Search in Google Scholar

9. Nektarios, P. A.; Steenhuis, T. S.; Petrovic, A. M. Fingered Flow in Laboratory Golf Putting Greens. J. Turfgrass Sci. 1999, 3, 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1300/J099v03n01_05.Search in Google Scholar

10. Wang, Z.; Wu, L.; Wu, Q. J. Water-entry Value as an Alternative Indicator of Soil Water-Repellency and Wettability. J. Hydrol. 2000, 231, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00185-2.Search in Google Scholar

11. Müller, K.; Deurer, M. Review of the Remediation Strategies for Soil Water Repellency. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 144, 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

12. Carrillo, M. L. K.; Letey, J.; Yates, S. R. Unstable Water Flow in a Layered Soil I. Effects of a Stable Water-Repellent Layer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 450–455. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.642450x.Search in Google Scholar

13. Feng, G. L.; Letey, J.; Wu, L. Water Ponding Depths a Ect Temporal Infiltration Rates in a Water Repellent Sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2001, 65, 315–320. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.652315x.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ritsema, C. J.; Dekker, L. W.; Hendrickx, J. M. H.; Hamminga, W. Preferential Flow Mechanism in a Water Repellent Sandy Soil. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29, 2183–2193. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00394.Search in Google Scholar

15. Song, E.; Schneider, J. G.; Anderson, S. H.; Goyne, W. K.; Xiong, X. Wetting Agent Influence on Water Infiltration into Hydrophobic Sand: II. Physical Properties. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 1879–1885. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj14.0153.Search in Google Scholar

16. Schramm, L. L. Emulsions, Foams, and Suspensions: Fundamentals and Applications, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 1–13.10.1002/3527606750Search in Google Scholar

17. Kale, S. N.; Deore, S. L. Emulsion Micro, Emulsion and Nano Emulsion. A Review. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 2017, 8, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2017.1.8.Search in Google Scholar

18. Ito, M.; Uehara, M.; Wakui, R.; Shiota, M.; Kuroiwa, T. Preparation Characteristics of Water-In-Oil Emulsion Using Olive Oil as a Continuous Phase in Microchannel Emulsification. Jpn. J. Food Eng. 2017, 18, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.11301/jsfe.17489.Search in Google Scholar

19. Cheng, C. J.; Chu, L. Y.; Xie, R. Preparation of Highly Monodisperse W/O Emulsions with Hydrophobically Modified SPG Membranes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 300, 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.056.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kiefer, J.; Frank, K.; Zehentbauer, F. M.; Schuchmann, H. P. Infrared Spectroscopy of Bilberry Extract Water-In-Oil Emulsions: Sensing the Water-Oil Interface. Biosensors 2016, 6 (2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios6020013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Wu, H.; Ramachandran, C.; Weiner, N. D.; Roessler, B. J. Topical Transport of Hydrophilic Compounds Using Water-In-Oil Nanoemulsions. Int. J. Pharm. 2001, 220, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00671-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Le Révérend, B. J. D.; Taylor, M. S.; Norton, I. T. Design and Application of Water-In-Oil Emulsions for Use in Lipstick Formulations. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2011, 33 (3), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00624.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Kunstmann-Olsen, C.; Belić, D.; Bradley, D. F.; Danks, S. P.; Fernandez, Y. A. D.; Grzelczak, M. P.; Hill, A. P.; Qiao, X.; Raval, R.; Sorzabal-Bellido, I.; Brust, M. Ion Shuttling between Emulsion Droplets by Crown Ether Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3 (11), 3136–3144. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1na00009h.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Feng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, Z.; McClements, D. J.; Jafari, S. M. Application of Nanoemulsions in Formulation of Pesticides. Nanoemulsions 2018, 379–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811838-2.00012-6.Search in Google Scholar

25. Cambiella, A.; Benito, J. M.; Pazos, C.; Coca, J.; Ratoi, M.; Spikes, H. A. The Effect of Emulsifier Concentration on the Lubricating Properties of Oil-In-Water Emulsions. Tribol. Lett. 2006, 22 (1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-006-9072-1.Search in Google Scholar

26. Yue, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, T.; Yang, D.; Qiu, F. Design and Fabrication of Superwetting Fiber-Based Membranes for Oil/water Separation Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 364 (15), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.149.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/tsd-2024-2625).


Received: 2024-09-07
Accepted: 2024-11-25
Published Online: 2024-12-11
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tsd-2024-2625/html
Scroll to top button