Home Study of a high efficient composite foam drainage surfactant for gas production
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Study of a high efficient composite foam drainage surfactant for gas production

  • Jie Dong

    Jie Dong is a graduated student of applied chemistry.

    , Rongde Tao

    Rongde Tao is an engineer of applied chemistry.

    , Jun Xu

    Jun Xu is an engineer of applied chemistry.

    , Yongfei Li

    Yongfei Li is professor of applied chemistry.

    , Sanbao Dong

    Sanbao Dong is a graduated student of applied chemistry.

    EMAIL logo
    and Gang Chen EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 19, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The foam drainage technique for gas production has the disadvantage of requiring a large amount of surfactant and having low resistance to salt and oil. In this study, a new surfactant mixture (composite surfactant) of lauramidopropyl betaine (LAB-35), α-olefin sulfonate (AOST), sodium alkyl sulfonate (SASE) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was tested and its foaming properties were investigated in detail. The foaming properties were determined using high-speed measurements and the Ross-Miles method. The results show that the foaming volume of the composite surfactant can reach 563 mL, indicating that the foaming behaviour of the composite surfactant is more effective than that of the individual surfactants used for the mixture. In addition, the results show that the composite surfactant has a resistance to salt, methanol and condensate oil that most foam drainage agents do not have. However, the stability of the composite surfactant gradually decreases with increasing temperature and concentration. The surface tension was measured and the critical micelle concentration of the composite surfactant is 0.023 g/L.


Corresponding author: Sanbao Dong and Gang Chen, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China; and Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Reservoir Protection Technology of Oilfields, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China, E-mail: (S. Dong), (G. Chen)

About the authors

Jie Dong

Jie Dong is a graduated student of applied chemistry.

Rongde Tao

Rongde Tao is an engineer of applied chemistry.

Jun Xu

Jun Xu is an engineer of applied chemistry.

Yongfei Li

Yongfei Li is professor of applied chemistry.

Sanbao Dong

Sanbao Dong is a graduated student of applied chemistry.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The work was supported financially by the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2020JQ-775), Scientific Research Program Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (21JP094) and The Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities. And we thank the work of the Modern Analysis and Testing Center of Xi’an Shiyou University.

  3. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1. Chowdiah, P., Misra, B. R., Kilbane, J. J., Srivastava, V. J., Hayes, T. D. Foam propagation through soils for enhanced in-situ remediation. J. Hazard Mater. 1998, 62, 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00191-5.Search in Google Scholar

2. Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Krastev, R., Hirasaki, G. J., Rossen, W. R. Foam-oil interaction in porous media: implications for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 183–184, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2118/154197-MS.Search in Google Scholar

3. Saleh, S., Al, J. Foam-assisted liquid lifting in low pressure gas wells. In SPE Production Operations Symposium; OnePetro: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 1997.10.2118/37425-MSSearch in Google Scholar

4. Yang, J., Jovancicevic, V., Ramachandran, S. Foam for gas well deliquification. Colloids Surf., A 2007, 309, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhang, T., Wang, S. Z., Dong, C. H. Experimental study on the emergency disposal agent for methanol leakage. Adv. Mater. Res. 2017, 1142, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1142.306.Search in Google Scholar

6. Gu, X. F., Gao, L., Li, Y. F., Dong, K., Zhang, J., Du, W. C., Qu, C. T., Chen, G. Performance and mechanism of span surfactants as clean flow improvers for crude oil. Petrol. Chem. 2020, 60, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544120010156.Search in Google Scholar

7. Zhang, H. R., Liang, Y. T., Zhou, X. Y., Yan, X. H., Qian, C., Liao, Q. Sensitivity analysis and optimal operation control for large-scale waterflooding pipeline network of oilfield. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2017, 154, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.019.Search in Google Scholar

8. Yan, J., Liu, Q. N., Du, W. C., Qu, C. T., Song, Z. F., Li, J. L., Zhang, J., Chen, G. Synthesis and properties of octadecyl trimethyl ammonium polyacrylic surfactants. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2020, 57, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.3139/113.110674.Search in Google Scholar

9. Bai, Y., Zhang, J., Dong, S. B., Li, J. L., Zhang, R. J., Pu, C. S., Chen, G. Effect of anion on the corrosion inhibition of cationic surfactants and a mechanism study. Desalination Water Treat. 2020, 188, 130–139. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2020.25431.Search in Google Scholar

10. Chen, G., Cheng, C., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Hu, Q., Qu, C. T., Dong, S. B. Synergistic effect of surfactant and alkali on the treatment of oil sludge. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2019, 183, 106420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106420.Search in Google Scholar

11. Zhang, H. R., Liang, Y. T., Zhou, X. Y., Yan, X. H., Qian, C., Liao, Q. Sensitivity analysis and optimal operation control for large-scale waterflooding pipeline network of oilfield. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2017, 154, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.019.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chen, G., Yan, J., Liu, Q. N., Zhang, J., Li, H., Li, J. L., Qu, C. T., Zhang, Y. M. Preparation and surface activity study of amino acid surfactants. Compt. Rendus Chem. 2019, 22, 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2018.11.009.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kurnia, I., Zhang, G., Han, X., Yu, J. Zwitterionic-anionic surfactant mixture for chemical enhanced oil recovery without alkali. Fuel 2020, 259, 116236.1–116236.9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116236.Search in Google Scholar

14. Wen, Y. P., Lai, N. j., Li, W. H., Zhang, Y. Q., Du, Z. F., Han, L. J., Song, Z. L. Factors influencing the stability of natural gas foam prepared by alkyl polyglycosides and its decay rules. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2021, 196, 108039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108039.Search in Google Scholar

15. Koczo, K., Tselnik, O., Falk, B. Silicon-based foamants for foam assisted lift of aqueous-hydrocarbon mixtures. In SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry; OnePetro: The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2011.10.2118/141471-MSSearch in Google Scholar

16. Pan, F., Zhang, Z. X., Zhang, X. X., Davarpanah, A. Impact of anionic and cationic surfactants interfacial tension on the oil recovery enhancement. Powder Technol. 2020, 373, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.06.033.Search in Google Scholar

17. Chen, G., Lin, J., Liu, Q. N., Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Li, H., Ma, Y., Qu, C. T., Song, W. Q. Corrosion inhibition and the structure-efficiency relationship study of two cationic surfactants. Anti-corrosion Methods & Mater. 2019, 66, 388–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/ACMM-10-2017-1856.Search in Google Scholar

18. Pratiwi, R., Setiati, R., Andryan, R., Fadliah, F., Fajarwati, K. Initial screening of AOS, its performance in EOR to improve oil recovery. J. Phys. Conf. 2019, 1402, 055013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/5/055013.Search in Google Scholar

19. Chen, G., Yan, J., Bai, Y., Liu, D. W., Zhang, J., Li, J. L., Qu, C. T. Synthesis of two chiral surfactants by a simple method and the surface activity evaluation. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 316, 113892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113892.Search in Google Scholar

20. Liu, Q. N., Gao, M. L., Zhao, Y., Li, J. L., Qu, C. T., Zhang, J., Chen, G. Synthesis and interface activity of a new quaternary ammonium surfactant as an oil/gas field chemical. Tenside Surfactants Deterg. 2020, 57, 90–96. https://doi.org/10.3139/113.110665.Search in Google Scholar

21. Liu, Q. N., Gao, M. L., Qu, C. T., Zhang, R. J., Song, Z. F., Li, J. L., Chen, G. Synthesis and interface activity of cetyltrimethylammonium benzoate. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 14, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990793120010066.Search in Google Scholar

22. Liu, J. H., Liu, Z., Yuan, T. J., Wang, C. W., Gao, R. M., Hu, G. F., Xu, S. J., Zhao, J. S. Synthesis and properties of zwitterionic Gemini surfactants for enhancing oil recovery. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 311, 113179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113179.Search in Google Scholar

23. Roncoroni, M. A., Romero, P., Montes, J., Bascialla, G., Rodriguez, R., Pons-Esparver, R. R., Mazadiego, L. F., García-Mayoral, M. F. Enhancement of a foaming composite surfactanttion with a zwitterionic surfactant for gas mobility control in harsh reservoir conditions. Petrol. Sci. 2021, 18, 1409–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PETSCI.2021.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

24. Negm, N. A., El Farargy, A. F., Mohammed, D. E., Mohamad, H. N. Environmentally friendly nonionic surfactants derived from tannic acid: synthesis, characterization and surface activity. J. Surfactants Deterg. 2012, 15, 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-011-1326-8.Search in Google Scholar

25. Yekeen, N., Manan, M. A., Idris, A. K., Samin, A. M. Influence of surfactant and electrolyte concentrations on surfactant Adsorption and foaming characteristics. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2017, 149, 612–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.018.Search in Google Scholar

26. Lee, J. J., Nikolov, A., Wasan, D. Surfactant micelles containing solubilized oil decrease foam film thickness stability. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 415, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.10.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Behera, M. R., Varade, S. R., Ghosh, P., Paul, P., Negi, A. S. Foaming in micellar solutions: effects of surfactant, salt, and oil concentrations. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 18497–18507. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie503591v.Search in Google Scholar

28. Qu, C., Wang, J., Yin, H., Lu, G., Li, Z., Feng, Y. Condensate oil-tolerant foams stabilized by an anionic−sulfobetaine surfactant mixture. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 1738–1747. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02325.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Yoshimura, T., Ichinokawa, T., Kaji, M., Esumi, K. Synthesis and surface-active properties of sulfobetaine-type zwitterionic Gemini surfactants. Colloids Surf., A 2006, 273, 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.08.023.Search in Google Scholar

30. Stevenson, P. Foam Engineering, Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2012.10.1002/9781119954620Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-31
Accepted: 2022-08-23
Published Online: 2022-12-19
Published in Print: 2023-01-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tsd-2022-2462/html
Scroll to top button